Aromatase and estrogen receptor immunoreactivity in the coronary arteries of monkeys and human subjects

The effect of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate treatment on lipoprotein (a), atherogenic and anti-atherogenic apolipoproteins levels in postmenopausal women: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The administration of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate seems to confer women cardioprotection, however, its impact on lipoprotein (a) and apolipoproteins' concentrations remains unclear. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the effect of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate treatment on lipoprotein (a) and apolipoproteins' values in females.

METHODS

We systematically searched four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) to identify relevant publications published until March 9th, 2022. No language restrictions were applied. The random-effects model (the DerSimonian and Laird methods) was employed to calculate the weighted mean difference (WMD).

RESULTS

The administration of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate resulted in a significant decrease of lipoprotein (a) (WMD: -67.59 mg/L, 95 % CI: -106.39 to -28.80; P < 0.001) and apolipoprotein B concentrations (WMD: -3.71 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -6.68 to -0.75; P = 0.014), respectively. No effect of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate on apolipoprotein AI (WMD: 0.23 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -3.99 to 4.46; P = 0.91) or AII (WMD: 0.21 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -2.24 to 2.68; P = 0.86) concentrations was detected. In the stratified analysis, there was a notable reduction in lipoprotein (a) levels in the RCTs with a duration of ≥6 months (WMD: -73.34 mg/L), in postmenopausal women with a BMI ≥25 kg/m² (WMD: -69.85 mg/L) and in postmenopausal women aged ˂60 years (WMD: -61.93 mg/L).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrates that 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate treatment reduces lipoprotein (a) and apolipoprotein B levels in postmenopausal women.

Skeletal muscle wasting: the estrogen side of sexual dimorphism

The importance of defining sex differences across various biological and physiological mechanisms is more pervasive now than it has been over the past 15-20 years. As the muscle biology field pushes to identify small molecules and interventions to prevent, attenuate, or even reverse muscle wasting, we must consider the effect of sex as a biological variable. It should not be assumed that a therapeutic will affect males and females with equal efficacy or equivalent target affinities under conditions where muscle wasting is observed. With that said, it is not surprising to find that we have an unclear or even a poor understanding of the effects of sex or sex hormones on muscle wasting conditions. Although recent investigations are beginning to establish experimental approaches that will allow investigators to assess the impact of sex-specific hormones on muscle wasting, the field still needs rigorous scientific tools that will allow the community to address critical hypotheses centered around sex hormones. The focus of this review is on female sex hormones, specifically estrogens, and the roles that these hormones and their receptors play in skeletal muscle wasting conditions. With the overall review goal of assembling the current knowledge in the area of sexual dimorphism driven by estrogens with an effort to provide insights to interested physiologists on necessary considerations when trying to assess models for potential sex differences in cellular and molecular mechanisms of muscle wasting.

Sex Differences in the Inflammatory Response: Pharmacological Opportunities for Therapeutics for Coronary Artery Disease

Coordinated molecular responses are key to effective initiation and resolution of both acute and chronic inflammation. Vascular inflammation plays an important role in initiating and perpetuating atherosclerotic disease, specifically at the site of plaque and subsequent fibrous cap rupture. Both men and women succumb to this disease process, and although management strategies have focused on revascularization and pharmacological therapies in the acute situation to reverse vessel closure and prevent thrombogenesis, data now suggest that regulation of host inflammation may improve both morbidity and mortality, thus supporting the notion that prevention is better than cure. There is a clear sex difference in the incidence of vascular disease, and data confirm biological differences in inflammatory initiation and resolution between men and women. This article reviews contemporary opinions describing the sex difference in the initiation and resolution of inflammatory responses, with a view to explore potential targets for pharmacological intervention.