Treatment for vaginal atrophy using microablative fractional CO2 laser: a randomized double-blinded sham-controlled trial

European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) position statement on the use of laser vaginal devices for treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vaginal laxity, pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence

One in three women will experience pelvic floor disorders in her lifetime and nearly 60 percent of postmenopausal women are affected by vaginal dryness. Conservative management is recommended as first line treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Also, vaginal estrogens are often prescribed for symptomatic vaginal atrophy. Lasers have been used in cosmetic industry for connective tissue remodeling and repair of skin. Their use in the last decade for treating genitourinary symptoms of menopause, pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence has gained popularity but there is lack of robust evidence to support its use in routine practice. The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology calls for high quality evidence with patient related outcome measures before adopting to routine clinical practice.

Vaginal dryness: a review of current understanding and management strategies

The issue of vaginal dryness in genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) and its pervasive impact on women's quality of life is often overlooked. Extensive surveys conducted worldwide reveal limited understanding of vaginal dryness among public and health-care providers. Physician knowledge on menopause medicine varies globally, highlighting the need for standardized training. Effective communication between physicians and patients plays a crucial role in diagnosing and treating GSM symptoms. There are multiple treatment options to improve vaginal lubrication, including hormonal and non-hormonal therapies, along with lifestyle modifications. Tailoring treatments to individual patient preferences is crucial for compliance. Overall, GSM is multifaceted, from the prevalence of vaginal dryness to the nuances of treatment preferences. The urgency of widespread education and awareness of this matter must be underscored to meet the aim of enhancing the well-being and quality of life for women.

Laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

Objective

This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to update evidence on the effectiveness and safety of laser therapy for treating genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).

Data sources

Manuscripts published until May 2023 were systematically searched in PubMed; Embase; Scopus; Web of Science; CENTRAL; CINAHL; and clinical trial databases (www.trialscentral.org, www.controlled-trials.com, and clinicaltrials.gov), with no language and year of publication restriction.

Studies selection

RCTs with women diagnosed with GSM, and the intervention was vaginal laser therapy (CO2-laser or Er: YAG-laser) comparing with placebo (sham therapy), no treatment or vaginal estrogen therapy.

Data collection

Two authors evaluated the publications for inclusion based on the title and abstract, followed by reviewing the relevant full-text articles. Disagreements during the review process were addressed by consensus, with the involvement of a third author.

Data synthesis

Twelve RCTs, representing a total of 5147 participants, were included in this review. Vaginal health index (VHI) significantly improved in the carbon dioxide laser (CO2-laser) therapy group (MD=2.21; 95% CI=1.25 to 3.16), while dyspareunia (MD=-0.85; 95% CI=-1.59 to -0.10), dryness (MD=-0.62; 95% CI=-1.12 to -0.12) and burning (MD= -0.64; 95% CI=-1.28 to -0.01) decreased. No serious adverse effects were reported.

Conclusion

CO2-laser increases VHI score and decreases dyspareunia, dryness and burning, especially when compared to sham-laser. However, the certainty of the evidence is low, thus preventing the recommendation of laser therapy for GSM management.

Fractional CO2 laser for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: evaluating the evidence

The fractionated CO2 laser has been marketed to women for a variety of gynecologic symptoms and conditions, including the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). The evidence has been limited, precluding conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of the therapy. However, data from randomized, controlled trials evaluating this technology for GSM are now available. This Practice Pearl addresses the latest data concerning the use of the fractionated CO2 laser for the treatment of GSM.

Carbon dioxide laser therapy for the management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: A meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials

Genitourinary symptoms of menopause (GSM) affect ~50% of women after menopause. Recently, CO2 laser therapy has been used for managing GSM but without high quality evidence. The present review assessed the effectiveness of CO2 laser therapy in the management of GSM. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL and Scopus databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published up to June 30, 2023, comparing CO2 laser and sham laser treatments for GSM management. The outcomes of interest included Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Vaginal Health Index (VHI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for dyspareunia, dryness, burning, itching and dysuria. A total of seven RCTs were included in the review and meta-analysis, with 6/7 studies using three sessions of laser therapy, 4-8 weeks apart. Meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in FSFI [mean difference (MD), -1.48; 95% CI, -5.85, 2.89; I2=45%] and VHI scores (MD, -0.18; 95% CI, -1.66, 1.31; I2 =72%) between laser and control groups. Meta-analysis also demonstrated no statistically significant difference in VAS scores for dyspareunia (MD, -1.63; 95% CI; -4.06, 0.80; I2=91%), dryness (MD, -1.30; 95% CI, -3.14, 0.53; I2=75%), burning (MD, -0.76; 95% CI, -2.03; 0.51 I2=56%), itching (MD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.95, 0.38; I2=0%) and dysuria (MD, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.37, 0.67; I2=23%) between the groups. The included RCTs had low risk of bias. In conclusion, meta-analyses of high-quality sham-controlled RCTs indicated that CO2 may not have any beneficial effect on GSM. Limited data and high heterogeneity in meta-analyses in this area of research are important limitations that need to be addressed by future RCTs.

CO2 Laser versus Sham Control for the Management of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

In the context of the menopausal transition, genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) refers to a range of genitourinary symptoms, from vaginal dryness to dysuria and urinary urgency. While hormonal treatments are standard, their associated side effects have driven the exploration of alternatives like vaginal CO2 laser. We aimed to evaluate the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vaginal CO2 laser treatment for GSM to sham controls. This systematic review sourced four electronic databases until June 2023. The analysis incorporated seven RCTs with 407 women. The CO2 laser and sham control were comparable for most parameters, including the female sexual function index (FSFI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for dyspareunia, vaginal health index, pH, and patient satisfaction. However, the CO2 laser group showed significant improvement in the vaginal assessment scale for GSM symptoms. Sensitivity analyses revealed that parameters like FSFI showed significant differences in favor of CO2 laser group upon the exclusion of specific studies. In conclusion, vaginal CO2 laser therapy emerges as a promising alternative for GSM management, especially for most bothersome GSM symptoms; however, the need for further well-designed RCTs remains to validate its broad safety and efficacy.

Laser Therapy for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus, a Systematic Review

Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that mainly affects the anogenital area, with a higher incidence in post-menopausal women. In the long term, it can lead to loss of vulvar architecture or progress to squamous cell carcinoma. The evidence-based treatment involves high-potency topical corticosteroids in long regimens. However, second-line treatments are not well-established, including laser therapy. This current study aims to assess the level of evidence supporting this therapy. We conducted a search for primary-level studies published before April 2023 through MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL, with no restrictions on the publication language or date. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies were evaluated using the updated Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias (RoB-2). Six studies (177 patients) met our eligibility criteria. Laser therapy was compared to topical corticosteroid treatment in five out of six studies. No significant histological differences were found, except for an increase in collagen production in the laser group. A greater reduction in itching, pain, and dyspareunia at 1 and 3 months of treatment in the laser group, as well as in the Skindex-29 at 6 months, was reported. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher among those who received laser therapy. Tolerability was excellent. No significant differences were observed in any of the previous aspects in the study compared to the placebo. In conclusion, there is not enough evidence to recommend laser therapy as a standalone treatment.

Vaginal Laser Treatment for the Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Narrative Review

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic condition resulting from reduced estrogen levels during menopause. The North American Menopause Society and the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health suggested the term "genitourinary syndrome of menopause" (GSM) to indicate the broader aspects of VVA. Breast cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, can induce early and abrupt menopausal symptoms, including GSM, which negatively affects sexual function and the quality of life of the survivors. Vaginal laser therapy has emerged as a safe and effective option for the management of GSM in breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Two main types of lasers, the non-ablative erbium:YAG laser and fractional microablative CO2 vaginal laser, have been evaluated for GSM treatment. While there are few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the subject of BCSs, a wealth of prospective and retrospective studies have highlighted the beneficial effects of vaginal laser therapy on the symptoms of VVA, vaginal health, sexual function, and overall quality of life. More comprehensive research is essential to confirm its enduring effectiveness and safety, with a focus on conducting standardized and meticulously controlled investigations. This study is a narrative review that summarizes clinical trials ranging from the earliest to the most recent ones on laser treatment for GSM in BCSs.

Efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide laser therapy compared with sham for genitourinary syndrome of menopause management: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

IMPORTANCE

Data on whether the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) laser is useful for treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) are inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis evaluated the benefits and safety of CO 2 laser compared with sham treatment of GSM.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A relevant literature search of Europe PMC, MEDLINE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases using specific keywords was conducted. The results of continuous variables were pooled into the standardized mean difference (SMD), whereas dichotomous variables were pooled into odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using random-effects models. A funnel plot was used to assess for the presence of publication bias.

FINDINGS

A total of six randomized clinical trials were included. Pooled analysis revealed that CO 2 laser therapy was associated with a higher reduction in the Vaginal Assessment Scale (SMD, -0.81 [95% CI, -1.59 to -0.04]; P = 0.04; I2 = 88%) and Urinary Distress Inventory short form (SMD, -0.45 [95% CI, -0.84 to -0.06]; P = 0.02; I2 = 0%), and greater patient satisfaction rate (odds ratio, 5.46 [95% CI, 2.23 to 13.37]; P = 0.0002; I2 = 0%) when compared with sham-only treatment. Meanwhile, the Female Sexual Function Index, Vaginal Health Index, and Patient Global Impression Improvement did not differ significantly between groups. Adverse events were only mild with no serious adverse events reported.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

CO 2 laser therapy may improve the overall treatment of GSM with a relatively good safety profile. However, further randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are still needed to confirm the results of this study.

Nonestrogen Therapies for Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature and provide clinical practice guidelines regarding various nonestrogen therapies for treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to July 2021. We included comparative and noncomparative studies. Interventions and comparators were limited to seven products that are commercially available and currently in use (vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA], ospemifene, laser or energy-based therapies, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, Tibolone, vaginal hyaluronic acid, testosterone). Topical estrogen, placebo, other nonestrogen products, as well as no treatment were considered as comparators.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We double-screened 9,131 abstracts and identified 136 studies that met our criteria. Studies were assessed for quality and strength of evidence by the systematic review group.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Information regarding the participants, details on the intervention and comparator and outcomes were extracted from the eligible studies. Alternative therapies were similar or superior to estrogen or placebo with minimal increase in adverse events. Dose response was noted with vaginal DHEA and testosterone. Vaginal DHEA, ospemifene, erbium and fractional carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) laser, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, tibolone, hyaluronic acid, and testosterone all improved subjective and objective signs of atrophy. Vaginal DHEA, ospemifene, tibolone, fractional CO 2 laser, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, and testosterone improved sexual function.

CONCLUSION

Most nonestrogen therapies are effective treatments for the various symptoms of GSM. There are insufficient data to compare nonestrogen options to each other.

Vaginal laser therapy for GSM/VVA: where we stand now - a review by the EUGA Working Group on Laser

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic progressive condition that involves the genital and lower urinary tracts, related to the decrease of serum estrogenic levels when menopause occurs. The definition of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a medically more accurate, all-encompassing and publicly acceptable term than VVA. Due to the chronic progressive trend of GSM, symptoms tend to reappear after the cessation of therapy, and frequently long-term treatment is required. First-line therapies include vulvar and vaginal lubricant or moisturizers, and, in the case of failure, low-dose vaginal estrogens are the preferred pharmacological therapy. Populations of patients, such as breast cancer (BC) survivors, are affected by iatrogenic GSM symptoms with concerns about the use of hormonal therapies. The non-ablative erbium:YAG laser and the fractional microablative CO2 vaginal laser are the two main lasers evaluated for GSM treatment. The aim of this comprehensive review is to report the efficacy and safety of Er:YAG and CO2 vaginal lasers for GSM treatment. Vaginal laser therapy has been demonstrated to be effective in restoring vaginal health, improving VVA symptoms and sexual function. The data suggest that both Er:YAG and CO2 vaginal lasers are safe energy-based therapeutic options for management of VVA and/or GSM symptoms in postmenopausal women and BC survivors.

The efficacy of CO2 laser in the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

CO₂ laser has been proposed as a treatment strategy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). In order to assess its efficacy for treating GSM, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. To identify the current state of randomized controlled trials on CO₂ laser therapy for GSM, a literature review was conducted. We systematically searched the following databases: PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. In addition, a review of the references in the retrieved studies was carried out. Of 562 identified studies, 9 were eligible and were included in our analysis, involving 523 patients in total. Based on our analysis, CO₂ laser has no statistical difference compared with estrogen in VHI (p = 0.87), FSFI total score (p = 0.19), FSFI-Arousal (p = 0.11), FSFI-Desire (p = 0.72), FSFI-Orgasm (p = 0.45) and FSFI-Satisfaction (p = 0.08). The meta-analysis also showed that CO₂ laser significantly improved FSFI-Lubrication scores compared with estrogen therapy (p = 0.0004). Furthermore, compared with the sham group, CO₂ laser group had statistically improved VHI scores (p = 0.003) and FSFI scores (p < 0.00001). CO₂ laser therapy may be an effective alternative to estrogen therapy for GSM both in cases where estrogen is not applicable because of comorbidities and in cases in which women do not desire to take estrogen.

Diagnosis, causes, and treatment of dyspareunia in postmenopausal women

IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVES

Evaluation and treatment of dyspareunia remains a significant unmet need despite the availability of safe and effective treatments. The objectives of this review are to consider evaluation techniques, the medical causes, and treatment options for dyspareunia in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

This narrative review used PubMed to search for English-language articles related to postmenopausal dyspareunia. Search terms included, but were not limited to, dyspareunia, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, sexual dysfunction, postmenopausal dyspareunia, posthysterectomy dyspareunia, and postcancer dyspareunia.

FINDINGS

Many postmenopausal women with dyspareunia do not discuss their symptoms with their physicians. Healthcare clinicians should broach the topic of dyspareunia with their patients using oral or written questionnaires. In addition to a thorough medical history and physical examination, various tools can be used as further assessments, including vaginal pH, vaginal dilators, imaging, vulvar biopsy, vulvoscopy and photography, the cotton swab test, sexually transmitted infection screening, and vaginitis testing. Although dyspareunia in postmenopausal women is often due to the genitourinary syndrome of menopause, other conditions can also cause dyspareunia, including hypertonic pelvic floor, hysterectomy, cancer treatment, lichen conditions, vulvar cancer, vestibulodynia, and pelvic organ prolapse. Some of the treatments discussed include lubricants, moisturizers, vaginal estrogen, ospemifene, dehydroepiandrosterone, local testosterone therapy, cannabidiol, and fractional CO2 laser treatments. In some cases, dyspareunia may need to be specifically addressed by pelvic floor physical or sex therapists.

CONCLUSIONS

Dyspareunia is a common issue in postmenopausal women, which remains largely untreated. Women with dyspareunia require a thorough history, targeted physical examination, and coordination of multiple disciplines including medical clinicians, pelvic floor physical therapists, and sex therapists.

Safety and efficacy of fractional CO2 laser treatment to the vestibule: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, prospective 3-site clinical study in women with vestibular pain

BACKGROUND

Data are limited regarding fractional CO2 laser as a nonhormonal treatment for vestibular pain.

AIM

We sought to perform what is, to our knowledge, the first multisite prospective randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of fractional CO2 laser treatment to the vestibule in women with vestibular pain.

METHODS

Subjects (n = 70) meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria at each of 3 sites were randomized 2:1 to active or sham (zero energy) fractional CO2 laser treatment using the vestibular probe (SmartXide2 V2LR - MonaLisa Touch, DEKA, Florence, Italy). Subjects in each treatment arm received 3 treatments 4 weeks apart. At the initial follow-up (week 12), subjects were unblinded and those initially assigned to sham started active treatment.

OUTCOMES

Outcome measures included changes from baseline in sexual activity diaries and scores for the Vulvoscopic Genital Tissue Appearance Scale (VGTA), vestibular cotton-tipped swab testing, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), and the O'Leary-Sant voiding and pain indices, the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) and Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI).

RESULTS

After active treatment, VGTA scores significantly improved in 5 parameters. Pain associated with cotton-tipped swab testing was significantly reduced at weeks 4 through 16 (mean change from baseline -0.64 [95% CI, -0.79 to -0.50] and -1.31 [95% CI, -1.46 to -1.16], respectively). FSFI pain domain scores improved significantly at weeks 12 and 16 (mean change from baseline 0.925 [95% CI, 0.10-1.75] and 1.22 [95% CI, 0.40-2.05], respectively). FSFI total scores increased significantly at weeks 12 and 16 (mean change from baseline 6.24 [95% CI, 2.64-9.85] and 4.96 [95% CI, 1.36-8.57], respectively). FSDS-R scores decreased significantly at weeks 12 and 16 (mean change from baseline -5.84 [95% CI, -8.80 to -2.87] and -9.15 [95% CI, -12.11 to -6.18], respectively). ICSI scores decreased significantly at weeks 12 and 16 (mean change from baseline -0.91 [95% CI, -1.65 to -0.18] and -0.754 [95% CI, -1.49 to -0.02], respectively). ICPI scores decreased significantly at week 16 (mean change from baseline -0.99 [95% CI, -1.63 to -0.34]). In contrast, there were no significant changes in outcomes in the sham arm. No serious adverse events occurred.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Fractional CO2 laser treatment in women with vestibular pain resulted in improvement from baseline in multiple key outcome measures of vestibular health.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Strengths of the study were that it was a multisite prospective randomized double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial that included multiple measures related to vestibular pain and sexual function. Limitations were the nonvalidated primary outcome measure and limited study cohort.

CONCLUSION

Fractional CO2 laser therapy is a safe and effective nonhormonal treatment for vestibular pain.

Laser versus sham for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether CO2 laser treatment is more effective than sham application in relieving the most bothersome symptom (MBS) in women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).

DESIGN

Single-centre, sham-controlled, double-blind, randomised trial.

SETTING

A tertiary centre in Belgium.

POPULATION

Sixty women with moderate to severe GSM symptoms.

METHODS

All participants eventually received three consecutive laser and three consecutive sham applications, either first laser followed by sham, or conversely.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the participant-reported change in severity of the MBS at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included subjective (patient satisfaction, sexual function, urinary function) and objective (pH, Vaginal Health Index Score, in vivo microscopy) measurements assessing the short-term effect and the longevity of treatment effects at 18 months after start of the therapy. Adverse events were reported at every visit.

RESULTS

The MBS severity score decreased from 2.86 ± 0.35 to 2.17 ± 0.93 (-23.60%; 95% CI -36.10% to -11.10%) in women treated with laser compared with 2.90 ± 0.31 to 2.52 ± 0.78 (-13.20%; 95% CI -22.70% to -3.73%) in those receiving sham applications (p = 0.13). There were no serious adverse events reported up to 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with GSM, the treatment response 12 weeks after laser application was comparable to that of sham applications. There were no obvious differences for secondary outcomes and no serious adverse events were reported.

Clinical Consensus Statement: Vaginal Energy-Based Devices

ABSTRACT

This clinical consensus statement on vaginal energy-based devices (EBDs) reflects an update by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society's EBD writing group. In 2019, the American Urogynecologic Society's EBD writing group used a modified Delphi process to assess statements that were evaluated for consensus after a structured literature search. A total of 40 statements were assessed and divided into 5 categories: (1) patient criteria, (2) health care provider criteria, (3) efficacy, (4) safety, and (5) treatment considerations. Of the 40 statements that were assessed, 28 reached consensus and the remaining 12 did not. Lack of evidence was among the main reasons that vulvovaginal EBD treatment statements did not reach consensus. In March 2022, these statements were reassessed using the interim literature.

Vaginal laser therapy for gynecologic conditions: re-examining the controversy and where do we go from here

Despite significant controversy, vaginal laser therapy continues to be used for treatment of many gynecologic and pelvic conditions including vaginal atrophy, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, urinary incontinence and pelvic pain. This commentary reviews the controversy surrounding vaginal laser therapy and summarizes the important distinction between ablative and non-ablative vaginal lasers. While much research is still needed, the article describes what is important for healthcare professionals to know before making the decision to integrate this technology into their clinical practice.

Management of postmenopausal women: Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) and Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement (GEMVi) Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The aim of these recommendations is to set forth an individualized approach to the management of early postmenopausal women (i.e., within the first 10 years after natural menopause) covering all aspects of lifestyle and therapeutic management, with or without menopause hormone therapy (MHT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of French expert opinion. Recommendations were graded according to the HAS methodology and levels of evidence derived from the international literature, except when there was no good-quality evidence.

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

The beginning of menopause is an ideal time for each woman to evaluate her health status by assessing her bone, cardiovascular, and cancer-related risk factors that may be amplified by postmenopausal estrogen deficiency and by reviewing her lifestyle habits. Improving lifestyle, including nutrition and physical activity, and avoiding risk factors (notably smoking), should be recommended to all women. MHT remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms but it could be also recommended as first-line treatment for the prevention of osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women at low to moderate risk for fracture. The risks of MHT differ depending on its type, dose, duration of use, route of administration, timing of initiation, and whether a progestogen is used. There is reasonable evidence that using transdermal estradiol in association with micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone may limit both the venous thromboembolic risk associated with oral estrogens and the risk of breast cancer associated with synthetic progestins. Treatment should be individualized to each woman, by using the best available evidence to maximize benefits and minimize risks, with periodic reevaluation of its benefit-risk balance. For bothersome genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) symptoms, vaginal treatment with lubricants and moisturizers is recommended as first-line treatment together with low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy, depending on the clinical course. No recommendation of an optimal duration of MHT can be made, but it must take into consideration the initial indication for MHT as well as each woman's benefit-risk balance. Management of gynecological side-effects of MHT is also examined. These recommendations are endorsed by the Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement hormonal (GEMVI) and the Collège National des Gynécologues-Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF).

The evidence behind the use of LASER for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vulvovaginal atrophy, urinary incontinence and lichen sclerosus: A state-of-the-art review

In recent years, LASER has been introduced as a minimally invasive treatment for a broad range of vaginal and vulvar symptoms and diseases. However, the efficacy and safety of vaginal and vulvar LASER has continuously been questioned. The aim of this study is to create an overview of the current literature and discuss the controversies within the use of LASER for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vulvovaginal atrophy, urinary incontinence and lichen sclerosus. A search string was built in PubMed. The search was commenced on August 25, 2021 and closed on October 27, 2021. Two authors screened the studies in Covidence for inclusion according to the eligibility criteria in the protocol. The data were extracted from the studies and are reported in both text and tables. This review included 114 papers, of which 15 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The effect of LASER as a vaginal treatment was investigated for genitourinary syndrome of menopause in 36 studies (six RCTs), vulvovaginal atrophy in 34 studies (four RCTs) and urinary incontinence in 30 studies (two RCTs). Ten studies (three RCTs) investigated the effect of vulvar treatment for lichen sclerosus. Half of the included RCTs, irrespective of indication, did not find a significant difference in improvement in women treated with vaginal CO₂ or Er:YAG LASER compared with their respective controls. However, most non-comparative studies reported significant improvement after exposure to vaginal or vulvar LASER across all indications. Included studies generally had a short follow-up period and only a single RCT followed their participants for more than 6 months post treatment. Adverse events were reported as mild and transient and 99 studies including 51 094 patients provided information of no serious adverse events. In conclusion, this review found that the effect of vaginal and vulvar LASER decreases with higher study quality where potential biases have been eliminated. We therefore stress that all patients who are treated with vaginal or vulvar LASER should be carefully monitored and that LASER for those indications as a treatment should be kept on a research level until further high-quality evidence is available.

Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Non-Ablative Laser Treatment Alone or with Estriol or Moisturizers in Postmenopausal Women with Vulvovaginal Atrophy

BACKGROUND

Among treatments for vulvo-vaginal atrophy (VVA), there is a new kind of energy-based device, the non-ablative CO2 laser.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the non-ablative CO2 laser in menopausal women with VVA as a monotherapy or in association with vaginal estriol or moisturizer.

METHODS

Seventy-five women with VVA received laser treatment (Laser group), laser plus estriol gel (Laser+E) or laser plus moisturizers (Laser+M). The study protocol consisted of 3 monthly laser sessions (t0, t1, t2) and a gynecological examination at baseline and 1 month after last laser treatment (t3). Objective measures included VHI (Vaginal Health Index) and VuHI (Vulvar Health Index); subjective symptoms of VVA (Dryness, Burning, Itching, Dysuria) evaluated via visual analog scales, sexual function evaluated by FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index), FSDS (Female Sexual Distress Score) and MENQOL (Mopause-specific Quality Of Life). Adverse events and discomfort encountered during the procedure were also assessed.

OUTCOMES

Primary outcomes were the evaluation of VHI and VuHI and secondary outcomes were changes in VVA symptoms (VAS), sexual function (MENQOL, FSFI, FSDS) and discomfort during the procedure.

RESULTS

Seventy-five women (25 in Laser, 25 in Laser+E and 25 in Laser+M group) completed the study. At t3, mean VHI, VuHI, dryness, burning and itching VAS scores improved significantly with no differences between the groups. The lubrication domain of FSFI improved significantly only in the Laser+M group, while the pain domain improved significantly in all women with no differences between the groups. FSFI and FSDS overall scores and MENQOL sexual domain improved in all women with no significant difference between the groups. The mean score of the pain during the procedure was low at t0 and did not change throughout the study.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This study extends knowledge concerning the effectiveness of a new non-ablative CO2 laser in post-menopausal women with VVA.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

This is one of the first studies on this kind of laser and is the first to compare the effectiveness of laser treatment alone or in combination with vaginal estriol or moisturizers. Parameters of VVA and sexual function were evaluated using validated tools. Study limitations include short follow-up time, the limited number of participants and the absence of a sham-controlled group.

CONCLUSION

Non-ablative CO2 laser seems to be an effective treatment for VVA in menopausal women. Our preliminary data shows that it can be effective as monotherapy or with adjuvant treatments. Alvisi S, Lami A, Baldassarre M, et al. Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Non-Ablative Laser Treatment Alone or with Estriol or Moisturizers in Postmenopausal Women with Vulvovaginal Atrophy. J Sex Med 2022;19:761-770.

Vulvovaginal atrophy management with a laser: the placebo effect or the conditioning Pavlov reflex

Postmenopausal vulvovaginal pain and atrophy require appropriate and sensitive outcomes that correlate with the genital discomfort, symptoms and expected changes. In some studies, hormone and laser treatments do not detect benefits due to the fact that appropriate measuring tools were not used. While some studies have demonstrated placebo effects for both therapeutic approaches, others support that sham-intervention could be a therapeutic by creating a conditioning reflex. However, obtained results are directly related with the quality of outcomes: you get what you measure. It is imperative to follow the Core Outcomes in Menopause global initiative.

CO2-Laser therapy and Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a widespread condition with a great impact on quality of life and self-image.

AIM

We aimed to systematically review the current literature on CO2-Laser therapy efficacy for the treatment of GSM.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase databases were systematically queried in December 2020 Studies included women with a diagnosis of Vulvo-Vaginal Atrophy (VVA) or GSM without an history of gynaecological and/or breast cancer, pelvic organ prolapse staged higher than 2, pelvic radiotherapy or Sjogren's Syndrome. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42021238121.

OUTCOMES

Effects of CO2-Laser therapy on GSM symptoms assessed through subjective or objective efficacy measurement methods.

RESULTS

A total of 803 articles were identified. Of these, 25 studies were included in this review for a total of 1,152 patients. All studies showed a significant reduction in VVA and/or GSM symptoms (dryness, dyspareunia, itching, burning, dysuria). The pooled mean differences for the symptoms were: dryness -5.15 (95% CI:-5.72,-4.58; P < .001; I2:62%; n = 296), dyspareunia -5.27 (95% CI:-5.93,-4.62; P < .001; I2:68%; n = 296), itching -2.75 (95% CI:-4.0,-1.51; P < .001; I2:93%; n = 281), burning -2.66 (95% CI:-3.75, -1.57; P < .001; I2:86%; n = 296) and dysuria -2.14 (95% CI:-3.41,-0.87; P < .001; I2:95%; n = 281). FSFI, WHIS and VMV scores also improved significantly. The pooled mean differences for these scores were: FSFI 10.8 (95% CI:8.41,13.37; P < .001; I2:84%; n = 273), WHIS 8.29 (95% CI:6.16,10.42; P < .001; I2:95%; n = 262) and VMV 30.4 (95% CI:22.38,38.55; P < .001; I2:24%; n = 68). CO2-Laser application showed a beneficial safety profile and no major adverse events were reported.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Vaginal laser treatment resulted in both a statistically and clinically significant improvement in GSM symptoms. FSFI improved significantly in all 8 included studies but it reached a clinically relevant level only in 2 of them.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

The strength of the current meta-analysis is the comprehensive literature search. We reported data from a high number of patients (1,152) and high number of laser applications (more than 3,800). The main limitations are related to the high heterogeneity of the included studies investigating laser effects. Moreover, most of them are single center and nonrandomized studies.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that CO2-Laser is a safe energy-based therapeutic option for the management of VVA and/or GSM symptoms in postmenopausal women; however, the quality of the body of evidence is "very low" or "low". Filippini M, Porcari I, Ruffolo AF, et al., CO2-Laser therapy and Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Sex Med 2022;19:452-470.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Fractional CO2 Laser Therapy for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Breast Cancer Survivors

(1) Background: The objective of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy of fractional CO₂ laser therapy in breast cancer survivors. (2) Methods: This was a single-arm study of breast cancer survivors. Participants received three treatments of fractional CO₂ laser therapy and returned for a 4 week follow-up. Participants were contacted for follow-up at annual intervals. The Vaginal Assessment Scale (VAS), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Female Sexual Distress Scare Revised (FSDS-R), the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI), and adverse events were collected and reported for the two-year follow-up. The changes in scores were compared between the four-week and two-year and the one-year and two-year follow-ups using paired t-tests. (3) Results: In total, 67 BC survivors were enrolled, 59 completed treatments and the four week follow-up, 39 participated in the one-year follow-up, and 33 participated in the two-year follow-up. After initial improvement in the VAS from baseline to the four week follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the VAS score (mean Δ 0.23; 95% CI [−0.05, 0.51], p = 0.150) between the four week follow-up and the two-year follow-up. At the two-year follow-up, the FSFI and FSDS-R scores remained improved from baseline and there was no statistically significant change in the FSFI score (mean Δ −0.83; 95% CI [−3.07, 2.38] p = 0.794) or the FSDS-R score (mean Δ −2.85; 95% CI [−1.88, 7.59] p = 0.227) from the one to two-year follow-up. The UDI scores approached baseline at the two-year follow-up; however, the change between the one- and two-year follow-ups was not statistically significant (mean Δ 4.76; 95% CI [−1.89, 11.41], p = 0.15). (4) Conclusions: Breast cancer survivors treated with fractional CO₂ laser therapy have sustained improvement in sexual function two years after treatment completion, suggesting potential long-term benefit.

Pharmaceutical and Energy-Based Management of Sexual Problems in Women

This article summarizes and critiques the evidence for use of available pharmacotherapies (vasoactive, psychoactive, and hormonal medications) and energy-based therapies (laser, radiofrequency, shockwave, and neurostimulation) for treatment of female sexual dysfunction. The enthusiasm with which energy-based treatments for sexual dysfunction have been adopted is disproportionate to the amount of data currently available to support their clinical use. Pharmacotherapy for female sexual dysfunction has considerably more research evidence to justify its use. Patients must be empowered to make an informed, autonomous determination as to whether the risk/reward ratio favors the use of pharmacotherapy, energy-based therapy, or some other treatment intervention.

Pixel-CO2 laser for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive pixel-CO₂ laser procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This was a prospective, open-label study with a cohort of 59 women. Patients were treated intravaginally with a fractional/pixel CO₂ laser every 4–6 weeks for a total of three treatments and assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Evaluation tools included a Sandvik severity score based on a validated questionnaire, 1-h pad test, vaginal health index score (VHIS), validated female sexual function index (FSFI), patient’s impression of disease severity (PGI-S), global impression of improvement (PGI-I), and the short-term pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ-7) to assess improvements in quality of life. Reduction in SUI severity was noticed throughout the duration of the study, as compared to the baseline in which 2% of the patients were defined as “slight,” 73% “moderate,” and 25% “severe.” Gradual improvement of symptoms resulted in redistribution of severity score and the best outcome observed between 3 and 6 months. Sanitary pad weight declined from an average of 35.45 g per day at baseline to 12.47 g at the 3rd treatment, and increased to 23.06 g at 12 months. Vaginal acidity changes showed a similar pattern. No serious adverse events were reported. Pixel-CO₂ laser is safe and effective for treating SUI. Additional maintenance treatments should be considered during the 6–12-month post-treatment period in order to maintain the beneficial effects.

Brief summary

Pixel-CO₂ laser is a safe and effective treatment for SUI. Maintenance treatments should be considered at 6–12 months.

Vaginal CO2 laser therapy versus sham for genitourinary syndrome of menopause management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IMPORTANCE

The research of new therapeutic modalities, especially with energy-based devices, has been increasing nowadays for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) management. Microablative fractional CO2 laser has been used for pelvic floor dysfunction management.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare fractional CO2 laser therapy versus sham therapy for GSM management.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We searched for the available randomized clinical trials in Cochrane Library, PubMed, ISI web of science, and Scopus during March 2021. We included randomized clinical trials that compared CO2 laser to sham among postmenopausal women with GSM diagnosis. We extracted the available data from included studies and pooled them in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. Our main outcomes were total vaginal score assessment using the Vaginal Assessment Scale, sexual function using the Female Sexual Function Index, urinary symptoms using the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6, and satisfaction.

FINDINGS

Three studies met our inclusion criteria with a total number of 164 women. The CO2 laser was linked to a significant reduction in Vaginal Assessment Scale score when compared with the sham group (mean difference [MD] = -0.49, 95% CI [-0.75 to -0.22], P = 0.004). The CO2 laser was associated with a significant improvement in Female Sexual Function Index score in comparison with sham group (MD = 9.37, 95% CI [6.59-12.14], P < 0.001). In addition, a significant reduction in Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 score was reported among the CO2 laser group (MD = -6.95, 95% CI [-13.24 to -0.67], P = 0.03). More women were significantly satisfied among the CO2 laser group (risk ratio  = 1.98, 95% CI [1.36-2.89], P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

CO2 laser therapy is a promising alternative for GSM management. Further randomized trials with larger sample sizes are required to confirm our findings.

Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser for the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Fractionated carbon dioxide is not an effective monotherapy treatment for vulvar lichen sclerosus.

OBJECTIVE:

To estimate the efficacy of fractionated carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser therapy for vulvar lichen sclerosus.

METHODS:

We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, trial conducted in a clinic specializing in vulvar disorders. The study participants were 40 women with active vulvar lichen sclerosus confirmed with biopsy who were abstaining from topical and systemic treatments for at least 4 weeks before enrollment. Women were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either five sham laser treatments or five fractionated CO₂ treatments in a 24-week period. Study participants, treating clinicians, and the evaluating pathologist were blinded. The primary endpoint was the change in the histopathology scale score between pretreatment and posttreatment biopsies. We estimated 20 per group for 80% power to detect a 40% reduction in the histopathology scale score with up to 10% attrition. A secondary endpoint was the change in the validated CSS (Clinical Scoring System for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus).

RESULTS:

From November 2018 to June 2020, 40 women were randomized to participate in the trial, and 37 women (19 fractionated CO₂, 18 sham) were included in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Three women were excluded from the ITT analysis because they did not have posttreatment biopsies and, therefore, a posttreatment histopathology scale score could not be obtained. There was a 0.20 reduction (improvement) in histopathology scale score from baseline in the active treatment group (95% CI −1.1, 0.80, P=.74) and a 0.1 increase from baseline in the sham treatment group (95% CI −0.90, 1.0, P=.91). The change in histopathology scale score between the active and sham arm was not statistically significant (95% CI −1.14, 1.06, P=.76).

CONCLUSION:

Fractionated CO₂ is not an effective monotherapy treatment for vulvar lichen sclerosus.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03665584.

FUNDING SOURCE:

Additional funding for this study was supplied by El.En Group, Florence, Italy, the manufacturer of the laser used in this study. In addition, El.En Group supplied the laser used in the study.

Carbon Dioxide Laser Vulvovaginal Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) causes significant symptomatic aggravation that affects the quality of life (QoL). Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), the hallmark of GSM, is managed with topical non-hormonal therapy, including moisturizers and lubricants, and topical estrogen application. Patients not responding/being unsatisfied with previous local estrogen therapies are candidates for a noninvasive modality. Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy, especially the fractionated type (FrCO2), has drawn considerable attention over the past two decades as a non-invasive treatment for GSM. This systematic review describes the accumulated evidence from 40 FrCO2 laser studies (3466 participants) in GSM/VVA. MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched through April 2021. We analyze the effects of FrCO2 laser therapy on symptoms, sexual function, and QoL of patients with GSM/VVA. As shown in this review, FrCO2 laser therapy for GSM shows good efficacy and safety. This modality has the potential to advance female sexual wellness. Patient satisfaction was high in the studies included in this systematic review. However, there is a lack of level I evidence, and more randomized sham-controlled trials are required. Furthermore, several clinical questions, such as the number of sessions required that determine cost-effectiveness, should be addressed. Also, whether FrCO2 laser therapy may exert a synergistic effect with systemic and/or local hormonal/non-hormonal treatments, energy-based devices, and other modalities to treat GMS requires further investigation. Lastly, studies are required to compare FrCO2 laser therapy with other energy-based devices such as erbium:YAG laser and radiofrequency.

Vaginal laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause - systematic review

BACKGROUND

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) can have a great impact on the quality of life (QOL), and affects between 53.8% and 90% of postmenopausal women. The literature suggests that vaginal laser therapy could be an effective treatment for GSM symptoms, but its efficacy and safety have not been established and international societies do not endorse its use. Despite that, there has been an increase in the use of vaginal laser therapy globally over the last decade.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to evaluate the literature which assesses the efficacy and safety of the vaginal laser therapy in the treatment of GSM.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted electronically using Embase and PubMed to retrieve studies assessing evidence for the efficacy and safety of vaginal laser therapy for GSM or vulvovaginal atrophy up to June 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 64 studies were finally included in the review. There were 10 controlled intervention studies, 7 observational cohort and cross-sectional studies and 47 before-after studies without a control group.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal laser seems to improve scores on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Vaginal Health Index (VHI) in GSM over the short term. Safety outcomes are underreported and short-term. Further well-designed clinical trials with sham-laser control groups and evaluating objective variables are needed to provide the best evidence on efficacy.

[Management of vulvovaginal atrophy: Physical therapies. Postmenopausal women management: CNGOF and GEMVi clinical practice guidelines]

INTRODUCTION

For some patients, local hormonal or non-hormonal treatments for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (SGUM) are contraindicated or insufficiently effective. Different physical therapies such as vaginal laser therapy, radiofrequency therapy, photobiomodulation therapy and local injection of hyaluronic acid, autologous fat (lipofilling) and platelet rich plasma (PRP) have been proposed as alternatives.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to elaborate guidelines for clinical practice regarding the physical therapies proposed for management of vulvovaginal atrophy (AVV).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on AVV management with physical therapies was conducted on Medline between January 2014 and December 2020.

RESULTS

Regarding vaginal laser therapy, there are few randomized controlled trials and no formal conclusions can be drawn. The fractional CO2 laser did not demonstrate its superiority over local estrogen therapy. The ERBIUM:YAG laser has not been studied in randomized controlled trials. The lack of follow-up on the vaginal laser and the series of cases reporting risks of vaginal stenosis or chronic pain do not encourage recommending it as a first-line treatment. The literature concerning other physical treatments of AVV is weak concerning the genital area.

CONCLUSION

CO2 or ERBIUM:YAG vaginal lasers are not the first-line treatment for AVV (grade C). In patients with a contraindication to local hormonal treatments, treatment with vaginal CO2 laser or ERBIUM:YAG may be considered after information about the risks (burn, stenosis, pain) (expert opinion). The other physical treatments of SGUM have to be evaluated.

Effects of local laser treatment on vulvovaginal atrophy among women with breast cancer: a prospective study with long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

Women with breast cancer (BC) often suffer from severe vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) which ultimately leads to poor sexual and urinary quality of life. We conducted a prospective study among women with BC and VVA, in order to evaluate the long-term effect of laser therapy on VVA.

METHODS

Women with BC and VVA were proposed to have fractional microablative CO₂ laser therapy (MonaLisaTouch®, DEKA) once per month for 3 months. Efficacy of laser therapy was assessed at baseline, 6 months and 18 months after treatment, using Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score, Ditrovie score and vaginal pH. A pap smear was also performed and the epithelial maturation pattern was noted. Paired statistical tests were used to compare results between baseline, 6 months and 18 months.

RESULTS

46 women with BC (median age [interquartile range] 56.5 years [47.0 - 59.4]) were included between May and October 2018. PH level slightly decreased over time (mean Δ at 18 months -0.3, SD = 0.7, p = 0.02) whereas maturation pattern on pap smear did not change. Sexual quality of life was significantly improved at 6 months and 18 months (mean Δ at 6 months 8.3, SD = 6.2 (p < 0.0001) and mean Δ at 18 months 4.3, SD = 8.4 (p = 0.01)). Ditrovie total score improved at 6 months (mean Δ -1.2, SD = 2.7, p = 0.01) but returned to baseline afterwards. Side effects were very mild. Three women developed low (2)- and high (1)-grade HPV-linked cervical lesions during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Among women with BC, fractional microablative CO₂ laser is effective on the long term on VVA symptoms and gynaecological quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ID-RCB 2018-A01500-55.

A Double-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Therapy on Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause

BACKGROUND

Despite some prospective case series showing effectiveness of vaginal laser to treat genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), there is a paucity of placebo-controlled level one evidence.

AIM

To assess the effect of fractional carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser therapy to treat GSM against a sham comparator.

METHODS

We conducted a parallel, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to compare menopausal women treated with fractional CO₂ laser against sham treatment for improvement in GSM-related dyspareunia. Three treatments were given 6 weeks apart, and participants attended a 6-month visit from study start for primary (proportion improved) and secondary (vaginal health index, VHI; visual analogue scale, VAS; modified global assessment, PGI-I; Female Sexual Function Index, FSFI; Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging, DIVA; Urinary Distress Inventory short-form, UDI-6) assessments.

OUTCOMES

The primary endpoint was a 2-stage improvement in GSM-related dyspareunia from baseline to 6 months determined by a severity scale, and the proportion of subjects who achieved this were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Thirty participants were randomized to laser (n = 14) or sham (n = 16). In the treatment arm, 13 attended all treatments, and 1 attended at least 2 while in the sham arm, 14 attended all treatments, and 2 attended at least 2 treatments. Twelve (86%) in the treatment arm and 16 (100%) in the sham arm attended the 6-month visit. There were no differences in the proportion improved between treatments and controls (64% vs. 67%, respectively, P = 1.000). Both arms showed significant within-group improvements based on VHI and VAS, but not between groups. Similar findings were observed on sexual impact questionnaires with improvements within both groups from baseline to 6 months but not by median differences between the groups at 6 months. There were no adverse events in either of the arms.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Further well-powered research is needed to determine efficacy of fractional CO₂ laser for the treatment of GSM, especially in light of a potential placebo effect.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

We present a sham-controlled double-blinded randomized trial using validated tools; the main limitation included an underpowered proportion of sexually active participants for the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

This study was underpowered to draw conclusions regarding the efficacy of fractional CO₂ laser therapy in the treatment of GSM. We did observe improvements in the sham-arm to suggest a possible placebo contribution. Further well-powered level one research is needed to demonstrate the therapeutic effect of this novel modality. Cruff J, Khandwala S, A Double-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Therapy on Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause. J Sex Med 2021;18:761-769.

Energy-Based Devices for Functional Vaginal Problems: Issues and Answers

Abstract

Vaginal rejuvenation is a marketing term that encompasses surgical and medical treatments for functional vaginal/vulvar problems including but not limited to genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), sexual dysfunction, vaginal laxity, and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and for esthetic concerns including dissatisfaction with vulvovaginal appearance. Multiple treatment options have become available for indications of functional vaginal problems. Noninvasive management options including the use of more novel treatments such as energy-based devices have gained interest. Previously, studies regarding the efficacy and safety of the energy-based devices for functional vaginal problems were mostly limited to cohort studies without sham treatment, control groups, randomization, or double blinding. As a result of this insufficient data in 2018, the FDA released a statement of warning against the use of energy-based devices in the treatment of functional vaginal problems or vaginal cosmetic procedures (Https://Www.Fda.Gov/Medical-Devices/Safety-Communications/Fda-Warns-Against-Use-Energy-Based-Devices-Perform-Vaginal-Rejuvenation-or-Vaginal-Cosmetic. 1–4, 2018).

Purpose of Review

This article reviews the most current treatment modalities in the realm of vaginal rejuvenation therapy with an emphasis on the efficacy and safety of the energy-based devices.

Recent Findings

In the most recent literature, there have been studies with improvements in study design that support the efficacy and the short-term safety of the energy-based devices.

Summary

More recent studies with improved study design evidence that the use of energy-based devices results in improvements in functional vaginal problems and that serious adverse events appear to be rare. The availability of these devices as treatment options for functional vaginal problems has the potential to impact patient by improving their symptoms and quality of life. Caution still remains however regarding their safety following a longer period of time after their use.