Variation in outcome reporting and measurement tools in clinical trials of treatments for genitourinary symptoms in peri- and postmenopausal women: a systematic review

Recommended measurement instruments for genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause: the COMMA (Core outcomes in menopause) consortium

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to identify appropriate definitions and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for each of the eight core outcomes previously selected for genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause: pain with sex, vulvovaginal dryness, vulvovaginal discomfort or irritation, discomfort or pain when urinating, change in most bothersome symptom, distress, bother or interference of genitourinary symptoms, satisfaction with treatment, and side effects.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to identify possible definitions and PROMs, including their measurement properties. Identified definitions and relevant PROMs with acceptable measurement properties were entered into an international consensus process involving 28 participants from 10 countries to achieve final recommendations for each core outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 87 publications reporting on 34 PROMs were identified from 21,207 publications screened. Of these 34 PROMs, 29 were not considered to sufficiently map onto the core outcomes, and 26 of these also had insufficient measurement properties. Therefore, only five PROMs corresponding to two core outcomes were considered for recommendation. We recommend the PROMIS Scale v2.0 - Sexual Function and Satisfaction: Vaginal Discomfort with Sexual Activity to measure the outcome of "pain with sexual activity" and the Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) Questionnaire to measure "distress, bother or interference" from genitourinary symptoms. Six definitions of "side effects" were identified and considered. We recommend that all trials report adverse events in study participants, which is a requirement of Good Clinical Practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Suitable PROMs and definitions were identified to measure three of eight core outcomes. Because of the lack of existing measures, which align with the core outcomes and have evidence of high-quality measurement properties, future work will focus on developing or validating PROMs for the remaining five core outcomes.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Genitourinary Symptoms Associated With Menopause

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause encompasses the group of urogenital signs and symptoms resultant from hypoestrogenism, including genital dryness, burning or irritation, sexual discomfort, pain or dysfunction, and urinary urgency, dysuria, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause can have a profound impact on well-being, functioning, and quality of life in postmenopausal women. Treatment includes vaginal moisturizers and lubricants geared towards providing symptomatic relief; hormonal treatments which promote epithelial thickening and production of vaginal secretions; and pelvic floor physical therapy along with behavioral therapies that address pelvic floor hypertonicity and psychosocial factors.

Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: Does Everyone Have It?

In 2014, the North American Menopause Society and the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health recommended using the term genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) to cover a range of genital and urinary symptoms that might be experienced during and after menopause. The term as currently defined, however, includes symptoms that may not be menopausal symptoms. The term GSM also includes "objective" measures such as vaginal pH that do not relate to symptom severity and are not priorities for clinicians or patients. We question the validity of GSM as a new syndrome and recommend the definition of the syndrome be revised to ensure it more closely reflects the symptoms attributable to menopause and the experience, difficulties, and response to treatment of those affected.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Vaginal Hyaluronic Acid to Estrogen for the Treatment of Vaginal Atrophy in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review

Topical estrogen is effective for treating postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. However, there is a potential risk of estrogen-related adverse effects. There is a need for finding effective non-hormonal treatment for vaginal atrophy. The topical application of moisturising agents, such as hyaluronic acid (HA), represents a promising non-hormonal treatment for the relief of vaginal atrophy. This study aimed to summarize the evidence regarding the efficacy of topical HA compared to topical estrogen in postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy. The literature search covered English-published studies from database inception till February 2023. The search included the electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Scopus, using the terms "Hyaluronic Acid" AND "Postmenopause" AND "Vagina" AND "Atrophy". Due to the diversity in reporting outcomes, meta-analysis was not feasible. A narrative synthesis with a systematic approach was conducted by vote counting of studies that included a direct comparison between topical HA and topical estrogen. Six studies were included. Intra-group comparisons showed that both interventions were significantly effective in alleviating the symptoms of vaginal atrophy and dyspareunia as well as improving vaginal pH and cell maturation index. However, inter-group comparisons in most studies showed that estrogen was superior to HA in relieving vaginal symptoms and improving vaginal pH, dyspareunia, and the cell maturation index. There is no evidence to show the superiority of HA to estrogen in the treatment of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. However, the therapeutic efficacy of HA seems to be comparable to estrogen and considering its safety, HA can be used as an alternative to estrogen in patients who do not want to use estrogen. The available studies have several limitations, and the reporting of outcomes was considerably heterogeneous.

Impact of Topical Interventions on the Vaginal Microbiota and Metabolome in Postmenopausal Women: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Postmenopausal women with genitourinary symptoms of menopause are often prescribed vaginal estradiol or moisturizer for symptom improvement, but the impact of these treatments on the local microenvironment is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To compare changes in the vaginal microbiota, metabolome, and pH among women using low-dose vaginal estradiol tablet or low pH moisturizer gel for 12-weeks vs low pH placebo.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a post hoc prespecified secondary analysis of a 12-week multicenter randomized clinical trial among postmenopausal women with moderate to severe genitourinary symptoms. Women were enrolled between April 2016 and February 2017; final follow-up visits occurred in April 2017. Data were analyzed from November 2018 to July 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Ten-μg vaginal estradiol plus placebo gel vs placebo tablet plus vaginal moisturizer vs dual placebo.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome measures were changes in the diversity and composition of the vaginal microbiota, changes in the metabolome, and pH.

RESULTS

Of 302 postmenopausal women from the parent trial, 144 women (mean [SD] age, 61 [4] years) were included in this analysis. After 12 weeks, the microbiota was dominated with Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium communities among 36 women (80%) in the estradiol group, compared with 16 women (36%) using moisturizer and 13 women (26%) using placebo (P < .001). The composition of vaginal fluid metabolites also varied after 12-weeks among women in the estradiol group with significant changes in 90 of 171 metabolites measured (53%) (P < .001), including an increase in lactate. The 12-week pH among women in the estradiol group was lower vs placebo (median [IQR] pH, 5 [4.5-6.0] vs 6 [5.5-7.0]; P = .005) but not the moisturizer group vs placebo (median [IQR] pH, 6 [5.5-6.5]; P = .28). There was a decrease in pH from baseline to 12-weeks within the moisturizer (median [IQR] pH, 7 [6.0-7.5] vs 6 [5.5-6.5]; P < .001) and placebo (median [IQR] pH, 7 [7.0-7.5] vs 6 [5.5-7.0]; P < .001) groups. Women with high-diversity bacterial communities at baseline exhibited greater median change in pH compared with women with low-diversity communities (median [IQR] change, -1 [-2 to -0.5] vs -0.3 [-1.1 to 0], P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial found that use of vaginal estradiol tablets resulted in substantial changes in the vaginal microbiota and metabolome with a lowering in pH, particularly in women with high-diversity bacterial communities at baseline. Low pH moisturizer or placebo did not significantly impact the vaginal microbiota or metabolome despite lowering the vaginal pH. Estradiol use may offer additional genitourinary health benefits to postmenopausal women.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02516202.

A core outcome set for genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause: the COMMA (Core Outcomes in Menopause) global initiative

OBJECTIVE

Genitourinary symptoms, such as vaginal dryness and pain with sex, are commonly experienced by postmenopausal women. Comparing treatments for these genitourinary symptoms are restricted by the use of different outcome measures in clinical trials and the omission of outcomes, which may be relevant to women. The aim of this project was to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) to be reported in clinical trials of treatments for genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of treatments for genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause and extracted their outcomes. This list was refined and entered into a two-round modified Delphi survey, which was open to clinicians, researchers, and postmenopausal women from November 2019 to March 2020. Outcomes were scored on a nine-point scale from "not important" to "critically important." The final COS was determined following two international consensus meetings.

RESULTS

A total of 26 unique outcomes were included in the Delphi process, which was completed by 227 participants of whom 58% were postmenopausal women, 34% clinicians, and 8% researchers. Predefined thresholds were applied to the Delphi scores to categorize outcomes by importance, which informed the e consensus meetings, attended by 43 participants from 21 countries. The final COS includes eight outcomes: (1) pain with sex, (2) vulvovaginal dryness, (3) vulvovaginal discomfort or irritation, (4) discomfort or pain when urinating, (5) change in most bothersome symptom, (6) distress, bother or interference of genitourinary symptoms, (7) satisfaction with treatment, (8) side effects of treatment.

CONCLUSION

These eight core outcomes reflect the joint priorities of postmenopausal women, clinicians, and researchers internationally. Standardized collection and reporting of these outcomes in clinical trials will facilitate the comparison of different treatments for genitourinary symptoms, advance clinical practice, and ultimately improve outcomes for symptomatic women.

Automated Identification of Common Disease-Specific Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research Using ClinicalTrials.gov: Algorithm Development and Validation Study

Background

Common disease-specific outcomes are vital for ensuring comparability of clinical trial data and enabling meta analyses and interstudy comparisons. Traditionally, the process of deciding which outcomes should be recommended as common for a particular disease relied on assembling and surveying panels of subject-matter experts. This is usually a time-consuming and laborious process.

Objective

The objectives of this work were to develop and evaluate a generalized pipeline that can automatically identify common outcomes specific to any given disease by finding, downloading, and analyzing data of previous clinical trials relevant to that disease.

Methods

An automated pipeline to interface with ClinicalTrials.gov’s application programming interface and download the relevant trials for the input condition was designed. The primary and secondary outcomes of those trials were parsed and grouped based on text similarity and ranked based on frequency. The quality and usefulness of the pipeline’s output were assessed by comparing the top outcomes identified by it for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to a list of 80 outcomes manually abstracted from the most frequently cited and comprehensive reviews delineating clinical outcomes for COPD.

Results

The common disease-specific outcome pipeline successfully downloaded and processed 3876 studies related to COPD. Manual verification indicated that the pipeline was downloading and processing the same number of trials as were obtained from the self-service ClinicalTrials.gov portal. Evaluating the automatically identified outcomes against the manually abstracted ones showed that the pipeline achieved a recall of 92% and precision of 79%. The precision number indicated that the pipeline was identifying many outcomes that were not covered in the literature reviews. Assessment of those outcomes indicated that they are relevant to COPD and could be considered in future research.

Conclusions

An automated evidence-based pipeline can identify common clinical trial outcomes of comparable breadth and quality as the outcomes identified in comprehensive literature reviews. Moreover, such an approach can highlight relevant outcomes for further consideration.

Protocol for development of a core outcome set for menopausal symptoms (COMMA)

OBJECTIVE

Menopause is the natural cessation of menstruation and may be accompanied by troublesome symptoms including hot flushes and night sweats (vasomotor symptoms) and genitourinary symptoms. Randomized trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of interventions for these symptoms have reported a wide range of outcomes and used inconsistent measures. This variation precludes comparing and combining data from different trials. To overcome this limitation, we will develop a Core Outcome Set for Menopausal Symptoms.

METHODS

We will systematically review the literature to identify the outcomes reported in the interventional trials for vasomotor and genitourinary symptoms. This list will be entered into a two-round modified Delphi survey to be completed by clinicians, researchers, and consumers (women who have experienced menopause). Participants will score outcomes on a nine-point scale from "not important" to "critically important." Representatives from each stakeholder group will then meet to discuss the results and finalize the Core Outcome Set. Ethics approval was not required as this was considered service evaluation and development. The study is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative (http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/917).

RESULTS

An agreed upon set of minimum outcomes and outcome measures will facilitate combining and comparing findings from future trials of treatments for menopausal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This Core Outcome Set will better enable women and clinicians to select effective treatments, improve the quality of trial reporting, reduce research wastage, and improve care for women with troublesome menopausal symptoms. VIDEO SUMMARY:: http://links.lww.com/MENO/A633.