1
|
Sassarini J, Lumsden MA. Post cancer care in women with an increased risk of malignancy or previous malignancy: The use of hormone replacement therapy and alternative treatments. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024; 38:101854. [PMID: 38160182 DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2023.101854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jenifer Sassarini
- Consultant in Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Princess Royal Maternity Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow, Argyll and Clyde, UK
| | - Mary Ann Lumsden
- Hon Prof of Gynaecology and Medical Education, University of Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sorouri K, Lynce F, Feltmate CM, Davis MR, Muto MG, Konstantinopoulos PA, Stover EH, Kurian AW, Hill SJ, Partridge AH, Tolaney SM, Garber JE, Bychkovsky BL. Endometrial Cancer Risk Among Germline BRCA1/ 2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: Review of Our Current Understanding and Next Steps. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300290. [PMID: 38061009 PMCID: PMC10715772 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the literature exploring endometrial cancer (EC) risk among surgical candidates with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) to guide decisions around risk-reducing (rr) hysterectomy in this population. DESIGN A comprehensive review was conducted of the current literature that influences clinical practice and informs expert consensus. We present our understanding of EC risk among BRCA1/2 PV carriers, the risk-modifying factors specific to this patient population, and the available research technology that may guide clinical practice in the future. Limitations of the existing literature are outlined. RESULTS Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs, those with a personal history of tamoxifen use, those who desire long-term hormone replacement therapy, and/or have an elevated BMI are at higher risk of EC, primarily endometrioid EC and/or uterine papillary serous carcinoma, and may benefit from rr-hysterectomy. Although prescriptive clinical guidelines specific to BRCA1/2 PV carriers could inform decisions around rr-hysterectomy, limitations of the current literature prevent more definitive guidance at this time. A large population-based study of a contemporary cohort of BRCA1/2 PV carriers with lifetime follow-up compared with cancer-gene negative controls would advance this topic and facilitate care decisions. CONCLUSION This review validates a potential role for rr-hysterectomy to address EC risk among surgical candidates with BRCA1/2 PVs. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for rr-hysterectomy in BRCA1/2 PV carriers are essential to ensure equitable access to this preventive measure, supporting insurance coverage for patients with either BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs to pursue rr-hysterectomy. Overall, this review highlights the complexity of EC risk in BRCA1/2 PV carriers and offers a comprehensive framework to shared decision making to inform rr-hysterectomy for BRCA1/2 PV carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimia Sorouri
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Filipa Lynce
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Colleen M. Feltmate
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Michelle R. Davis
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Michael G. Muto
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth H. Stover
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Sarah J. Hill
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ann H. Partridge
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Sara M. Tolaney
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Judy E. Garber
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Brittany L. Bychkovsky
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lara LA, Cartagena-Ramos D, Figueiredo JB, Rosa-E-Silva ACJ, Ferriani RA, Martins WP, Fuentealba-Torres M. Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 8:CD009672. [PMID: 37619252 PMCID: PMC10449239 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009672.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The perimenopausal and postmenopausal periods are associated with many symptoms, including sexual complaints. This review is an update of a review first published in 2013. OBJECTIVES We aimed to assess the effect of hormone therapy on sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. SEARCH METHODS On 19 December 2022 we searched the Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, ISI Web of Science, two trials registries, and OpenGrey, together with reference checking and contact with experts in the field for any additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials that compared hormone therapy to either placebo or no intervention (control) using any validated assessment tool to evaluate sexual function. We considered hormone therapy: estrogen alone; estrogen in combination with progestogens; synthetic steroids, for example, tibolone; selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), for example, raloxifene, bazedoxifene; and SERMs in combination with estrogen. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. We analyzed data using mean differences (MDs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs). The primary outcome was the sexual function score. Secondary outcomes were the domains of sexual response: desire; arousal; lubrication; orgasm; satisfaction; and pain. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 36 studies (23,299 women; 12,225 intervention group; 11,074 control group), of which 35 evaluated postmenopausal women; only one study evaluated perimenopausal women. The 'symptomatic or early postmenopausal women' subgroup included 10 studies, which included women experiencing menopausal symptoms (symptoms such as hot flushes, night sweats, sleep disturbance, vaginal atrophy, and dyspareunia) or early postmenopausal women (within five years after menopause). The 'unselected postmenopausal women' subgroup included 26 studies, which included women regardless of menopausal symptoms and women whose last menstrual period was more than five years earlier. No study included only women with sexual dysfunction and only seven studies evaluated sexual function as a primary outcome. We deemed 20 studies at high risk of bias, two studies at low risk, and the other 14 studies at unclear risk of bias. Nineteen studies received commercial funding. Estrogen alone versus control probably slightly improves the sexual function composite score in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women (SMD 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.04 to 0.96; I² = 88%; 3 studies, 699 women; moderate-quality evidence), and probably makes little or no difference to the sexual function composite score in unselected postmenopausal women (SMD 0.64, 95% CI -0.12 to 1.41; I² = 94%; 6 studies, 608 women; moderate-quality evidence). The pooled result suggests that estrogen alone versus placebo or no intervention probably slightly improves sexual function composite score (SMD 0.60, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.04; I² = 92%; 9 studies, 1307 women, moderate-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of estrogen combined with progestogens versus placebo or no intervention on the sexual function composite score in unselected postmenopausal women (MD 0.08 95% CI -1.52 to 1.68; 1 study, 104 women; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of synthetic steroids versus control on the sexual function composite score in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women (SMD 1.32, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.47; 1 study, 883 women; very low-quality evidence) and of their effect in unselected postmenopausal women (SMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.85; 1 study, 105 women; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of SERMs versus control on the sexual function composite score in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women (MD -1.00, 95% CI -2.00 to -0.00; 1 study, 215 women; very low-quality evidence) and of their effect in unselected postmenopausal women (MD 2.24, 95% 1.37 to 3.11 2 studies, 1525 women, I² = 1%, low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of SERMs combined with estrogen versus control on the sexual function composite score in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women (SMD 0.22, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.43; 1 study, 542 women; very low-quality evidence) and of their effect in unselected postmenopausal women (SMD 2.79, 95% CI 2.41 to 3.18; 1 study, 272 women; very low-quality evidence). The observed heterogeneity in many analyses may be caused by variations in the interventions and doses used, and by different tools used for assessment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Hormone therapy treatment with estrogen alone probably slightly improves the sexual function composite score in women with menopausal symptoms or in early postmenopause (within five years of amenorrhoea), and in unselected postmenopausal women, especially in the lubrication, pain, and satisfaction domains. We are uncertain whether estrogen combined with progestogens improves the sexual function composite score in unselected postmenopausal women. Evidence regarding other hormone therapies (synthetic steroids and SERMs) is of very low quality and we are uncertain of their effect on sexual function. The current evidence does not suggest the beneficial effects of synthetic steroids (for example tibolone) or SERMs alone or combined with estrogen on sexual function. More studies that evaluate the effect of estrogen combined with progestogens, synthetic steroids, SERMs, and SERMs combined with estrogen would improve the quality of the evidence for the effect of these treatments on sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia A Lara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | | | - Jaqueline Bp Figueiredo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
- Ultrasonography and Retraining Medical School of Ribeirao Preto (EURP), Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Ana Carolina Js Rosa-E-Silva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Rui A Ferriani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sellers TA, Peres LC, Hathaway CA, Tworoger SS. Prevention of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2023; 13:a038216. [PMID: 37137500 PMCID: PMC10411689 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Given the challenges with achieving effective and durable treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer, primary prevention is highly desirable. Fortunately, decades of research have provided evidence for several strategies that can be deployed to optimize risk reduction. These include surgery, chemoprevention, and lifestyle factor modifications. These broad categories vary in terms of the magnitude of risk reduction possible, the possible short-term and long-term side effects, the degree of difficulty, and acceptability. Thus, the concept of a risk-based model to personalize preventive interventions is advocated to guide discussion between care providers and women at risk. For women with inherited major gene mutations that greatly increase risk of ovarian cancer, surgical approaches have favorable risk to benefit ratios. Chemoprevention and lifestyle factor modifications portend a lower degree of risk reduction but confer lower risk of undesirable side effects. Since complete prevention is not currently possible, better methods for early detection remain a high priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Sellers
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA
| | - Lauren C Peres
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA
| | - Cassandra A Hathaway
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moss KM, Mishra GD, Krejany EO, Hickey M. What happens after menopause? (WHAM): A prospective controlled study of symptom profiles up to 12 months after pre-menopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:58-64. [PMID: 35933227 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Understanding how symptoms cluster after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) can inform patient expectations but information is lacking. We aimed to identify symptom profiles after RRSO, changes over time, and the effect of hormone therapy (HT). METHOD Participants were premenopausal women from a longitudinal controlled study (What Happens After Menopause? (WHAM)). Menopausal symptoms were prospectively measured in three groups: pre-menopausal comparisons who retained their ovaries (n = 99), RRSO HT users (n = 57) and RRSO non-HT users (n = 38). Symptoms (hot flashes, night sweats, low desire, vaginal dryness, poor sleep, anxiety/depression) were measured at baseline (pre-surgery) and at 3, 6 and 12 months using standardised questionnaires. Latent transition analysis was used to identify symptom profiles post-RRSO, and the probability of changing profiles over time. RESULTS Three symptom profiles were identified: Most Symptoms (81-87% non-HT; 36-41% HT; 7-9% comparisons), Few Symptoms (7-13% non-HT; 36-42% HT; 77-80% comparisons), and Sexual Symptoms (0-10% non-HT; 17-27% HT; 14-15% comparisons). Most of the non-HT group reported Most Symptoms at 3 months with only a 2% chance of improvement by 12 months. The HT group were split between profiles at 3 months with a 5-13% chance of improvement by 6 months (14% chance of worsening), and a 12-32% chance of improvement by 12 months (4-25% chance of worsening). CONCLUSIONS Symptoms cluster into distinct profiles after premenopausal RRSO. Most non-HT users are highly symptomatic with little chance of improvement by 12 months. In contrast, two-thirds of HT users have fewer symptoms and a much higher chance of improvement. These findings can inform patient decision-making and expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina M Moss
- Australian Women and Girls' Health Research Centre, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gita D Mishra
- Australian Women and Girls' Health Research Centre, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Efrosinia O Krejany
- Gynaecology Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martha Hickey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zarbo C, Brugnera A, Frigerio L, Celi C, Compare A, Dessì V, Giordano R, Malandrino C, Sina FP, Strepparava MG, Tessitore IV, Ventura M, Fruscio R. Cancer Anxiety Mediates the Association Between Satisfaction With Medical Communication and Psychological Quality of Life After Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy. Front Psychol 2022; 13:840931. [PMID: 35356354 PMCID: PMC8959915 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy (PBSO) reduces the risk of developing ovarian cancer. However, the psychological mechanisms that may affect post-surgery Quality of Life (QoL) among patients who underwent PBSO are still largely unknown. Thus, this study aimed at exploring the direct and indirect associations of satisfaction with medical communication and cancer anxiety on post-surgery QoL among women at high risk of developing ovarian cancer. Method Fifty-nine women (mean age: 50.64 ± 6.7 years) who underwent PBSO took part in this cross-sectional study, filling out a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire, a battery of validated psychological measures and an ad hoc developed scale for the assessment of cancer anxiety. We first examined the correlations among all variables of interest, and then tested if cancer anxiety mediated the association between satisfaction with medical communication and post-surgery psychological QoL, controlling both for time from surgery and education. Results Post-surgery psychological QoL was unrelated from any sociodemographic or clinical variable. Cancer anxiety had a significant direct negative effect on psychological QoL, while satisfaction with medical communication had a significant positive direct effect on it. Finally, cancer anxiety significantly mediated the association between satisfaction with medical communication and post-surgery psychological QoL. Discussion Results suggest that post-surgery psychological QoL of patients who underwent PBSO may be increased with interventions, delivered in a genetic counselling setting, targeting quality of medical communication and cancer anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Zarbo
- Unit of Epidemiological and Evaluation Psychiatry, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Agostino Brugnera
- Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luigi Frigerio
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Chiara Celi
- Clinical Psychology Unit, ASST-Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Angelo Compare
- Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Valentina Dessì
- Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Rosalba Giordano
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Chiara Malandrino
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Maria Grazia Strepparava
- Clinical Psychology Unit, ASST-Monza, Monza, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Gynaecologic Surgery Unit, ASST-Monza, Monza, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|