Estimation of placebo effect in randomized placebo-controlled trials for moderate or severe vasomotor symptoms: a meta-analysis

Hot flashes and sleep disruption in a randomized trial in menopausal women

BACKGROUND

Hot flashes, common during menopause, affect up to 80% of the Western menopausal women and are reported to contribute to sleep disturbances in midlife. Few prospective data are available to confirm the specific role of hot flashes in disrupting sleep in midlife women, however, or confirm whether changes in hot flashes in response to clinical therapies result in improvement in sleep.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of continuous nitroglycerin therapy on sleep quality in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with frequent hot flashes (pre-specified secondary trial endpoint) and to examine prospective associations between hot flashes and sleep disruption in this population.

STUDY DESIGN

Sleep data were analyzed from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of continuous transdermal nitroglycerin (NTG) therapy to suppress nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in perimenopausal or postmenopausal women with hot flashes. Participants were randomized to uninterrupted use of transdermal NTG (0.2-0.6 mg/hour) or placebo for 12 weeks. Nocturnal hot flashes awakening participants from sleep were evaluated using 7-day symptom diaries at baseline, 5 weeks, and 12 weeks. Sleep disruption (wakefulness after sleep onset, WASO) was assessed using validated sleep diaries, and global sleep quality was assessed by the validated Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI: range 0 [best] 21 [worst]) questionnaire. Mixed linear models examined changes in sleep quality and disruption, as well as the strength of associations between nocturnal hot flash frequency and sleep outcomes, over 5 and 12 weeks, adjusting for baseline values, age, race, and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Among the 141 participants (70 to NTG and 71 to placebo, mean age 54.6 [±3.9] years), the mean baseline hot flash frequency was 10.8 (±3.5) per day, including 2.6 (±1.7) nocturnal hot flashes awakening participants. At baseline, hot flashes were the most commonly reported reason for nocturnal awakening, with 62.6% of participants reporting waking due to hot flashes at least twice nightly. Over 5 and 12 weeks, mean frequency of nocturnal hot flashes causing awakenings decreased in both groups (NTG: -0.9 episodes/night, placebo: -1.0 episodes/night). Sleep disruption as measured by average nightly WASO also decreased (NTG: -10.1 minutes, placebo: -7.3 minutes), and mean PSQI score improved (NTG: -1.3 points, placebo: -1.2 points). No significant between-group differences in change in sleep outcomes were detected from baseline to 5 and 12 weeks, including PSQI sleep quality score as a prespecified secondary trial endpoint (P≥.05 for all). Greater improvement in nocturnal hot flash frequency over 5 and 12 weeks was associated with greater improvement in PSQI sleep quality score (β= -0.30, P=.01) and sleep disruption reflected by WASO (β= -1.88, P=.02) in the combined sample.

CONCLUSION

Among menopausal women in a randomized trial of continuous NTG therapy for hot flashes, hot flashes were the most frequently reported cause of nocturnal awakenings. Compared to placebo, continuous NTG therapy did not result in greater improvements in sleep quality from baseline to 5 and 12 weeks. Based on night-by-night symptom diaries and questionnaires, however, greater improvement in nocturnal hot flash frequency in both groups was associated with greater improvement in sleep quality and disruption.

Elinzanetant for the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause: OASIS 1 and 2 Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

Safe and effective nonhormonal treatments for menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are needed.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant, a selective neurokinin-1,3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of moderate to severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Two randomized double-blind phase 3 trials (OASIS 1 and 2) included postmenopausal participants aged 40 to 65 years experiencing moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (OASIS 1: 77 sites in the US, Europe, and Israel from August 27, 2021, to November 27, 2023, and OASIS 2: 77 sites in the US, Canada, and Europe from October 29, 2021, to October 10, 2023).

Intervention

Once daily oral elinzanetant, 120 mg, for 26 weeks or matching placebo for 12 weeks followed by elinzanetant, 120 mg, for 14 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end points included mean change in frequency and severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from baseline to weeks 4 and 12, measured by the electronic hot flash daily diary. Secondary end points included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b total T score and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire total score from baseline to week 12.

Results

Eligible participants (mean [SD] age, OASIS 1: 54.6 [4.9] years; OASIS 2: 54.6 [4.8] years) were randomized to elinzanetant (OASIS 1: n = 199; OASIS 2: n = 200) or placebo (OASIS 1: n = 197; OASIS 2: n = 200). A total of 309 (78.0%) and 324 (81.0%) completed OASIS 1 and 2, respectively. For the elinzanetant and placebo groups, the baseline mean (SD) VMS per 24 hours were 13.4 (6.6) vs 14.3 (13.9) (OASIS 1) and 14.7 (11.1) v 16.2 (11.2) (OASIS 2). Baseline VMS severity was 2.6 (0.2) vs 2.5 (0.2) (OASIS 1) and 2.5 (0.2) vs 2.5 (0.2) (OASIS 2). Elinzanetant significantly reduced VMS frequency at week 4 (OASIS 1: -3.3 [95% CI, -4.5 to -2.1], P < .001; OASIS 2: -3.0 [95% CI, -4.4 to -1.7], P < .001) and at week 12 (OASIS 1: -3.2 [95% CI, -4.8 to -1.6], P < .001; OASIS 2: -3.2 [95% CI, -4.6 to -1.9], P < .001). Elinzanetant also improved VMS severity at week 4 (OASIS 1: -0.3 [95% CI, -0.4 to -0.2], P < .001; OASIS 2: -0.2 [95 CI, -0.3 to -0.1], P < .001) and week 12 (OASIS 1: -0.4 [95% CI, -0.5 to -0.3], P < .001; OASIS 2: -0.3 [95% CI, -0.4 to -0.1], P < .001). Elinzanetant improved sleep disturbances and menopause-related quality of life at week 12, and the safety profile was favorable.

Conclusions and Relevance

Elinzanetant was well tolerated and efficacious for moderate to severe menopausal VMS.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: OASIS 1: NCT05042362, OASIS 2: NCT05099159.

Treating moderate-to-severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms with fezolinetant: analysis of responders using pooled data from two phase 3 studies (SKYLIGHT 1 and 2)

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to further characterize the efficacy of fezolinetant for the treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause using responder analysis and to investigate whether efficacy, not adjusted for placebo, resulted in clinically meaningful within-patient change.

METHODS

This prespecified analysis used pooled data from two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (SKYLIGHT 1 and 2). Responders were those experiencing ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100% reduction in VMS frequency from baseline to weeks 4 and 12. Responder analysis was performed for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to evaluate participants achieving a clinically meaningful within-patient change (not placebo adjusted) at week 4 and 12 versus baseline. Single responders were based on outcomes of VMS frequency, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance-Short Form 8b Total Score, Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) Total Score, and MENQoL VMS Domain Score. Double and triple responder analyses combined VMS frequency plus one or more of the PRO. Patient Global Impression of Change VMS was deemed a suitable anchor measure for meaningful within-patient change in VMS frequency.

RESULTS

A greater proportion of fezolinetant-treated versus placebo-treated participants had ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100% reduction in VMS frequency from baseline to weeks 4 and 12. A greater proportion of responders were observed in the fezolinetant groups versus placebo at week 12 in all four single responder analyses. In the double and triple responder analyses, odds ratios were supportive of a beneficial effect for both doses of fezolinetant versus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Fezolinetant was associated with significantly higher within-patient clinically meaningful improvement in important PRO, including VMS frequency, PROMIS SD SF 8b Total Score, MENQoL Total Score, and MENQoL VMS Domain Score.

The efficacy of purified pollen extract for reducing vasomotor symptoms in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Menopause impacts the quality of life for women, with symptoms varying from hot flashes to night disturbances. When menopausal hormonal therapy is contraindicated or women refuse menopausal hormonal therapy, many consider alternatives such as pollen extract for treating vasomotor symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis focuses on the impact of using purified pollen extract as a treatment option to reduce vasomotor symptoms in women, specifically focusing on symptoms such as hot flashes, night disturbances, myalgias, and depression.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the following Boolean search string "women OR females" AND "purified pollen OR pollen extract OR cytoplasmic pollen OR Bonafide OR Femal OR Estroven OR Serelys" AND "menopausal symptoms OR vasomotor symptoms OR hot flashes OR night sweats OR sleep disturbance." Publications in English from 2003 to the present were included. To assess the risk of bias, authors used the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 for a randomized controlled trial and Risk-of-Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for observational studies. Using ReviewManager, a Der Simonian-Laird random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted to determine the standardized mean differences (SMDs) in the outcomes for each study.

FINDINGS

Five articles were retained: one randomized controlled trial and four observational studies ( N = 420). An overall decrease in scores from the baseline of studies compared with a 3-month follow-up after purified cytoplasm of pollen (PCP) treatment was recognized when compiling the data. Overall, there was significant improvement across all outcomes at 3 months: hot flashes demonstrated an overall improvement in SMD of -1.66 ( P < 0.00001), night disturbance scores were improved with an SMD of -1.10 ( P < 0.0001), depression scores were improved with an SMD of -1.31 ( P < 0.0001), and myalgia had an improvement in SMD of -0.40 ( P < 0.00001). When controlled studies were pooled for meta-analysis, outcomes, however, were no longer statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Evaluating the risk-to-benefit ratio of alternative therapies, such as PCP extract, is important to care for women who cannot take traditional vasomotor symptom therapies. Pooled data from controlled studies evaluating PCP extract suggest that vasomotor symptom improvements seen in noncontrolled studies may have been due to the placebo effect; however, its use was not associated with significant adverse effects.

Comparative estrogen exposure from compounded transdermal estradiol creams and Food and Drug Administration-approved transdermal estradiol gels and patches

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of estrogen exposure associated with the use of compounded transdermal estradiol (E2) creams and compare it with estrogen exposure associated with the use of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved transdermal E2 patches and gels.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study that used clinical laboratory data collected from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Participants were first divided into three groups: postmenopausal women on no menopausal hormone therapy (n = 8,720); postmenopausal women using either a transdermal E2 patch, gel, or cream (n = 1,062); and premenopausal women on no hormonal therapy (n = 16,308). The postmenopausal menopausal hormone therapy group was further subdivided by formulation (patch [n = 777], gel [n = 132], or cream [n = 153]) and dose range (low, mid, or high). The Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test was used to determine if there was a dose-dependent trend in urinary E2 with increasing dose of compounded E2 cream (dose categories for E2 cream subanalysis, <0.5 mg [n = 49], ≥0.5-≤1.0 mg [n = 50], ≥1.0-≤1.5 mg [n = 58], and >1.5-≤3.0 mg [n = 46]). Urinary E2 and other characteristics were compared across formulations (within each dose range) using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

A dose-dependent, ordered trend existed for urinary E2 with increasing doses of compounded E2 cream (urinary E2 medians [ng/mg-Cr], 0.80 for <0.5 mg, 0.73 for ≥0.5-≤1.0 mg, 1.39 for ≥1.0-≤1.5 mg, and 1.74 for >1.5-≤3.0 mg; Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test, P < 0.001). Significant differences in urinary E2 concentrations were observed in all three dose ranges (Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance, P = 0.013 for low dose, P < 0.001 for mid dose, P = 0.009 for high dose). Comparison of E2 concentrations of compounded creams to E2 concentrations obtained with similar doses of FDA-approved patches and gels showed that the creams had significantly lower values than the patches and gels.

CONCLUSIONS

Estrogen exposure from compounded transdermal E2 creams increases in a dose-dependent manner; however, the amount of estrogen exposure associated with compounded creams is significantly lower than estrogen exposure associated with FDA-approved transdermal E2 patches and gels. Clinicians should be aware of the direction and magnitude of these potential differences in estrogen exposure when encountering women who have either previously used or are currently using compounded E2 creams.

Efficacy of Continuous Transdermal Nitroglycerin for Treating Hot Flashes by Inducing Nitrate Cross-tolerance in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Due to the potential risks of long-term systemic estrogen therapy, many menopausal women are interested in nonhormonal treatments for vasomotor symptoms. Physiologic studies indicate that nitric oxide plays a key role in mediating hot flash-related vasodilation, suggesting that nonhormonal medications that induce nitrate tolerance in the vasculature may offer therapeutic benefit for vasomotor symptoms.

Objective

To determine whether uninterrupted administration of transdermal nitroglycerin (NTG) to induce nitrate cross-tolerance decreased the frequency or severity of menopause-related hot flashes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial included perimenopausal or postmenopausal women reporting 7 or more hot flashes per day who were recruited from northern California by study personnel at a single academic center. Patients were randomized between July 2017 and December 2021, and the trial ended in April 2022 when the last randomized participant completed follow-up.

Interventions

Uninterrupted daily use of transdermal NTG (participant-directed dose titration from 0.2-0.6 mg/h) or identical placebo patches.

Main Outcome Measures

Validated symptom diaries assessing changes in any hot flash frequency (primary outcome) and moderate-to-severe hot flash frequency over 5 and 12 weeks.

Results

Among the 141 randomized participants (70 NTG [49.6%], 71 placebo [50.4%]; 12 [85.8%] Asian, 16 [11.3%] Black or African American, 15 [10.6%] Hispanic or Latina, 3 [2.1%] multiracial, 1 [0.7%] Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and 100 [70.9%] White or Caucasian individuals), a mean (SD) of 10.8 (3.5) hot flashes and 8.4 (3.6) moderate-to-severe hot flashes daily was reported at baseline. Sixty-five participants assigned to NTG (92.9%) and 69 assigned to placebo (97.2%) completed 12-week follow-up (P = .27). Over 5 weeks, the estimated change in any hot flash frequency associated with NTG vs placebo was -0.9 (95% CI, -2.1 to 0.3) episodes per day (P = .10), and change in moderate-to-severe hot flash frequency with NTG vs placebo was -1.1 (95% CI, -2.2 to 0) episodes per day (P = .05). At 12 weeks, treatment with NTG did not significantly decrease the frequency of any hot flashes (-0.1 episodes per day; 95% CI, -1.2 to 0.4) or moderate-to-severe hot flashes (-0.5 episodes per day; 95% CI, -1.6 to 0.7) relative to placebo. In analyses combining 5-week and 12-week data, no significant differences in change in the frequency of any hot flashes (-0.5 episodes per day; 95% CI, -1.6 to 0.6; P = .25) or moderate-to-severe hot flashes (-0.8 episodes per day; 95% CI, -1.9 to 0.2; P = .12) were detected with NTG vs placebo. At 1 week, 47 NTG (67.1%) and 4 placebo participants (5.6%) reported headache (P < .001), but only 1 participant in each group reported headache at 12 weeks.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial found that continuous use of NTG did not result in sustained improvements in hot flash frequency or severity relative to placebo and was associated with more early but not persistent headache.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02714205.