Comparative effects of oral conjugated equine estrogens and micronized 17β-estradiol on breast proliferation: a retrospective analysis

Estrogen-alone therapy and invasive breast cancer incidence by dose, formulation, and route of delivery: findings from the WHI observational study

OBJECTIVE

Research on the relationships between different hormone therapy doses, formulation and routes of delivery, and subsequent breast cancer incidence has been limited. This study directly compared different estrogen doses, formulations, and route of delivery of estrogen alone among women with a hysterectomy in relation to invasive breast cancer incidence.

METHODS

The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study is a large multicenter prospective cohort study conducted at 40 US sites. Analyses included 26,525 postmenopausal women with a hysterectomy, aged 50 to 79 years, at study entry, recruited between September, 1993 and December, 1998, with annual follow-up through September 12, 2005.

RESULTS

Average follow-up was 8.2 years. For conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) users, no difference was observed between low-dose CEE (<0.625 mg) compared with conventional-dose CEE (0.625 mg) for breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65, 1.48)]. Compared with conventional-dose CEE, transdermal estrogen was associated with a nonsignificant lower risk of invasive breast cancer (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.47, 1.19). The low prevalence of transdermal use likely limited power for this comparison, and for a comparison of oral estradiol to conventional-dose CEE (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.84, 1.39).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that invasive breast cancer risk did not differ appreciably in women with a hysterectomy using estrogen-alone when directly comparing different doses, formulations, and routes of delivery to the conventional oral CEE. These findings suggest that the lower breast cancer risk found in the WHI estrogen-alone trial may extend to lower doses of CEE. Additional research is needed to confirm these hypotheses.

Human versus non-human sex steroid use in hormone replacement therapies part 1: Preclinical data

Prior to 2002, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was considered to be an important component of postmenopausal healthcare. This was based on a plethora of basic, epidemiological and clinical studies demonstrating the health benefits of supplementation with human sex steroids. However, adverse findings from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) studies that examined the 2 major forms of HRT in use in the US at that time - Premarin (conjugated equine estrogens; CEE) and Prempro (CEE + medroxyprogesterone acetate; MPA), cast a shadow over the use of any form of HRT. Here we review the biochemical and physiological differences between the non-human WHI study hormones - CEE and MPA, and their respective human counterparts 17β-estradiol (E₂) and progesterone (P₄). Preclinical data from the last 30 years demonstrate clear differences between human and non-human sex steroids on numerous molecular, physiological and functional parameters in brain, heart and reproductive tissue. In contrast to CEE supplementation, which is not always detrimental although certainly not as optimal as E₂ supplementation, MPA is clearly not equivalent to P₄, having detrimental effects on cognitive, cardiac and reproductive function. Moreover, unlike P₄, MPA is clearly antagonistic of the positive effects of E₂ and CEE on tissue function. These data indicate that minor chemical changes to human sex steroids result in physiologically distinct actions that are not optimal for tissue health and functioning.

Effect of a tissue selective estrogen complex on breast cancer: Role of unique properties of conjugated equine estrogen

The Women's Health Initiative studies reported that the menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) regimen containing conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) and medroxyprogesterone acetate increased, whereas CEE alone reduced breast cancer incidence. These observations suggest the possibility that CEE might exert unique actions on breast and also suggest the need to eliminate the progestogen from MHT regimens. A MHT regimen called a tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC), containing CEE plus bazedoxifene (BZA), to avoid the need for a progestogen, was developed and FDA approved. Our study addressed two questions regarding this TSEC: (i) whether CEE exert effects on breast cancer which differ from those of estradiol (E₂ ) and (ii) whether BZA antagonize the effects of E₂ and CEE on breast cancer? Two rodent models (NMU and ACI) were used to compare the effect of CEE with E₂ on mammary tumor formation, proliferation and apoptosis. In both the NMU and ACI models, E₂ significantly increased tumor incidence and multiplicity whereas in striking contrast CEE did not, even though the estrogenic effects of CEE and E₂ on uterine weight were identical. Mechanistically E₂ blocked whereas CEE stimulated apoptosis (cleaved caspase-3) in ACI animals and only E₂ stimulated proliferation (Ki67). BZA exerted highly potent anti-estrogenic effects on tumors by completely blocking palpable tumor formation. These data suggest that the CEE/BZA TSEC may be a safer, breast-antagonistic, MHT agent for women and might have potential to prevent breast cancer while relieving menopausal symptoms.

State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment

BACKGROUND

In this review, we examine the continually expanding and increasingly compelling data linking radiation and various chemicals in our environment to the current high incidence of breast cancer. Singly and in combination, these toxicants may have contributed significantly to the increasing rates of breast cancer observed over the past several decades. Exposures early in development from gestation through adolescence and early adulthood are particularly of concern as they re-shape the program of genetic, epigenetic and physiological processes in the developing mammary system, leading to an increased risk for developing breast cancer. In the 8 years since we last published a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, hundreds of new papers have appeared supporting this link, and in this update, the evidence on this topic is more extensive and of better quality than that previously available.

CONCLUSION

Increasing evidence from epidemiological studies, as well as a better understanding of mechanisms linking toxicants with development of breast cancer, all reinforce the conclusion that exposures to these substances - many of which are found in common, everyday products and byproducts - may lead to increased risk of developing breast cancer. Moving forward, attention to methodological limitations, especially in relevant epidemiological and animal models, will need to be addressed to allow clearer and more direct connections to be evaluated.

Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer

Observational and randomized controlled trial data have extensively examined the relationship between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and risk of developing breast cancer. A highly influential study from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) in 2002 reported that a MHT regimen of conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate increased the risk of breast cancer by 26%. Later reports from the WHI indicated that a MHT regimen with conjugated equine estrogens alone decreased the risk of breast cancer by 23%. Critical re-examination of the WHI study noted that the average participant age was 63, that few women had symptoms, and that the WHI results might not apply to younger, symptomatic women shortly after menopause. Since the original publications, several post hoc analyses and observational studies have stimulated reconsideration of the WHI findings. Emphasis has been directed toward risks in younger women just entering the menopause, the subgroup who are most likely to be considering MHT use. The goal of this treatise is to integrate available mechanistic and clinical information related to the use of estrogen alone or estrogen plus a progestogen for five years or less. These data suggest that estrogen alone neither decreases nor increases risk in younger women initiating therapy close to the time of menopause but decreases risk in older women. Both younger and older women experience an excess risk with estrogen plus a progestogen. The attributable risk in younger women is less in those with a low underlying Gail Model risk score. Effects of MHT on risk largely reflect actions on pre-existing, occult, undiagnosed breast cancers. Tumor kinetic models suggest that the pro-proliferative effects of estrogen plus a progestogen on occult tumors provide a mechanistic explanation for the increased risk with this therapy. Pro-apoptotic effects of estrogen alone may explain the reduction of breast cancer in women starting this therapy at an average age of 63 as reported in the WHI study. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Menopause'.

Effects of menopausal hormonal therapy on occult breast tumors

An estimated 7% of 40-80 year old women dying of unrelated causes harbor occult breast tumors at autopsy. These lesions are too small to be detected by mammography, a method which requires tumors to be approximately 1cm in diameter to be diagnosed. Tumor growth rates, as assessed by "effective doubling times" on serial mammography range from 10 to >700 days with a median of approximately 200 days. We previously reported two models, based on iterative analysis of these parameters, to describe the biologic behavior of undiagnosed, occult breast tumors. One of our models is biologically based and includes parameters of a 200 day effective doubling time, 7% prevalence of occult tumors in the 40-80 aged female population and a detection threshold of 1.16 cm and the other involves computer based projections based on age related breast cancer incidence. Our models facilitate interpretation of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and anti-estrogen prevention studies. The biologically based model suggests that menopausal hormone therapy with conjugated equine estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in the WHI trial primarily promoted the growth of pre-existing, occult lesions and minimally initiated de novo tumors. The paradoxical reduction of breast cancer incidence in women receiving estrogen alone is consistent with a model that this hormone causes apoptosis in women deprived of estrogen long term as a result of the cessation of estrogen production after the menopause. Understanding of the kinetics of occult tumors suggests that breast cancer "prevention" with anti-estrogens or aromatase inhibitors represents early treatment rather than a reduction in de novo tumor formation. Our in vivo data suggest that the combination of a SERM, bazedoxifene (BZA), with conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) acts to block maturation of the mammary gland in oophorectomized, immature mice. This hormonal combination is defined by the generic term, tissue selective estrogen complex or TSEC. Xenograft studies with the BZA/CEE combination show that it blocks the growth of occult, hormone dependent tumors in nude mice. These pre-clinical data suggest that the BZA/CEE TSEC combination may prevent the growth of occult breast tumors in women. Based on the beneficial effects of this TSEC combination on symptoms and fracture prevention in menopausal women, the combination of BZA/CEE might be used as a means both to treat menopausal symptoms and to prevent breast cancer. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'CSR 2013'.

Conjugated estrogens for the treatment of menopausal symptoms: a review of safety data

INTRODUCTION

Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) are widely used for the treatment of menopausal symptoms, such as vasomotor symptoms and vulvovaginal atrophy, and for the prevention of bone loss, in postmenopausal women. The safety profile of CEE has been extensively published over the past 20 years.

AREAS COVERED

Data from randomized controlled trials and from observational studies on the effects of CEE on the risk of breast cancer, endometrial cancer or hyperplasia, other cancers, cardiovascular outcomes, and cognitive function are reviewed. When used alone, CEE are not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and may be associated with reduced mortality. The risk of cardiovascular events with CEE may be reduced in women who are more recently postmenopausal.

EXPERT OPINION

Numerous clinical studies have evaluated the safety of CEE. The data reviewed in this article describe the breast, endometrial, and cardiovascular safety of unopposed CEE. International recommendations describe CEE as the menopausal symptom treatment of choice, particularly in young or recently postmenopausal hysterectomized women.

Effects of bazedoxifene acetate with and without conjugated equine estrogens on the breast of postmenopausal monkeys

OBJECTIVE

Concerns about increased breast cancer risk with estrogen and progestin therapy have led to an increased interest in progestin alternatives. The main objective of this study was to determine if bazedoxifene acetate (BZA), a new selective estrogen receptor modulator, will antagonize the proliferative and transcriptional effects of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) in the breast.

METHODS

As part of a 20-month preclinical trial, 95 ovariectomized cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) were randomized to receive no treatment or treatment with BZA (20 mg/d), CEE (0.45 mg/d), or BZA and CEE in combination (women's daily equivalent doses). The data presented here include breast effects after 6 months of treatment. Endpoints included histomorphometry, histopathological evaluations, gene microarray assays, polymerase chain reaction quantification of specific estrogen receptor α (ER-α) activity markers, and immunohistochemical detection of sex steroid receptors, and the proliferation marker Ki67.

RESULTS

BZA + CEE and BZA resulted in significantly less total epithelial density, lobular enlargement, and Ki67 immunolabeling in the terminal ducts compared with CEE alone (P < 0.05 for all). The addition of BZA to CEE antagonized the expression of ER-α-regulated genes such as GREB1 and TFF1 (P < 0.01 for both), whereas BZA alone had minimal effects on ER-α-mediated transcriptional activity. BZA and BZA + CEE did not significantly up-regulate genes related to cell cycle progression and proliferation. BZA with and without CEE also resulted in less lobular and terminal duct ER-α immunolabeling compared with control and CEE (P < 0.0001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that BZA given at a clinically relevant dose is an estrogen antagonist in the breast, supporting the idea that CEE + BZA may provide a lower breast cancer risk profile compared with traditional estrogen + progestin therapies.

Effects of the conjugated equine estrogen/bazedoxifene tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC) on mammary gland and breast cancer in mice

A tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC), combining a selective estrogen receptor modulator, bazedoxifene (BZA), with conjugated equine estrogen (CEE), represents a novel strategy of menopausal hormone therapy without involving a progestin. We hypothesized that the antiestrogenic properties of BZA can also block the estrogenic effects of CEE on breast tissue and thereby prevent breast cancer in women. To test our hypothesis, the effects of estradiol (E(2)), CEE, and BZA on mammary gland and breast cancer xenografts were assessed in mouse models. In immature castrate mice, BZA completely blocked CEE- or E(2)-stimulated ductal and terminal end bud growth of mammary gland as well as estrogen-responsive gene expression. As a positive control, E(2) stimulated tumor growth in nude mice bearing MCF-7 xenografts. This effect was completely blocked by BZA as were E(2)-stimulated expression of PR, pS2 (trefoil factor 1), cMyc, and AREG; the enhancement of Ki67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA); and the antiapoptotic effect. CEE was much less potent than E(2) in stimulating Ki67, reducing apoptosis, and stimulating gene expression, but all effects were blocked by BZA. Unexpectedly, CEE alone, even at high doses, did not stimulate tumor growth. As confirmation of its absorption and deconjugation, CEE caused a 6-fold increase in uterine weight and stimulation of gene expression. These data support our hypothesis that the net effect of the CEE/BZA TSEC is to block estrogen action in benign and malignant breast tissue. These findings provide a rationale for a clinical study to determine whether this TSEC prevents breast cancer in women.

The Mammary Glands of Macaques

This review describes the normal biology and physiology of the mammary gland in macaques, including the typical histologic appearance across the life span (development, reproductive maturity, lactation, and senescence). The molecular events regulating breast morphogenesis are described, as well as systemic and local hormonal regulators of mammary gland proliferation, differentiation, and function. Similarities and differences to the human breast are described. Regulatory events are illuminated by discussion of genetically modified mouse models. Tissue response markers, including immunohistochemical markers of proliferation and other hormonally induced changes and studies to date, regarding the effects of exogenous hormones, are briefly summarized. In general, estrogens stimulate progesterone receptor expression and proliferation in the mammary gland, and combinations of estrogens and progestogens cause greater proliferation than estrogens alone. Evaluation of novel chemical agents in macaques requires careful evaluation of age and hormonal context to avoid the confounding effects of mammary gland development, past reproductive history, and other influences on mammary gland morphology. The expression of proliferation markers and progesterone receptors may be used as biomarkers to measure chemically induced hormonal effects.