Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator Island Flap for Management of Recurrent Benign Rectovaginal Fistula

Modified Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator Flap Interposition for Rectovaginal Fistula

IMPORTANCE

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is a challenging condition associated with recurrences and significant functional impairment.

OBJECTIVES

The internal pudendal artery perforator (IPAP) flap has become a viable option for reconstructing the vagina and perineal regions. This study aims to introduce a modified technique of IPAP flap interposition and evaluate its postoperative outcomes in the treatment of low RVF.

STUDY DESIGN

Sixteen patients with RVF who underwent modified IPAP flap interposition between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Recurrence rate, the satisfaction of vulvar appearance (Visual Analog Scale), and quality of sexual life (Female Sexual Function Index score) were followed up and analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients presented with low fistula with a mean diameter of 8.3 mm. The mean width and length of the IPAP flaps were 3.8 and 6.2 cm, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 14.1 months. All patients achieved successful healing without recurrence. High satisfaction was reported for the cosmetic effect of the vulva with a mean Visual Analog Scale score of 8.4. The proportion of female sexual disorder exhibited a statistically significant reduction, decreasing from 100% preoperatively to 38% after surgery ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified IPAP flap interposition is a reliable and safe option for repairing low RVF, with high success rates and minimal donor site morbidity. Moreover, this procedure provides a suitable volume flap and preserves the vaginal physiological environment, which benefits postoperative sexual function.

Sacroperineal Reconstruction With Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps After Resection of Locally Advanced Primary and Recurrent Anorectal Malignancy

ABSTRACT

Modern interdisciplinary concepts with involvement of various surgical specialties can considerably reduce perioperative morbidity after sacroperineal resection of locally advanced primary or recurrent anorectal malignancies. Resultant defects can represent a major challenge for reconstruction particularly with chemoradiotherapy. The aim is to assess the long-term outcomes of sacroperineal reconstruction using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps.We performed a retrospective data analysis on 31 patients who were treated with inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps (n = 61) over the period 2009-2021. The demographic data, comorbidities, operative details, and outcomes with special focus on wound infection and dehiscence were recorded.The median age was 42 year (range, 25-82 years) with preponderance of males (n = 21). The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 80 months. Early minor complications included superficial wound dehiscence (3), which was managed conservatively, whereas the major (2) included deep wound collection and infection (1), which required surgical drainage, and perineal hernia, which required repair. All flaps survived completely.Inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps are safe, robust, and reliable with less donor side morbidity and positive impact on quality of life. It should be considered as a valuable tool in the reconstructive armamentarium of sacroperineal defects within a multidisciplinary setting.

Gender-specific Anatomical Distribution of Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator: A Radiographic Study for Perineal Reconstruction

Cancer, trauma, infection, or radiation can cause perineal defects. Fasciocutaneous flaps based on perforator vessels (PV) from the internal pudendal artery (IPA) provide an ideal reconstructive option for moderate defects. We hypothesized that, due to gender differences in the pelvic–perineal region, the anatomical distribution of PV differs between genders.

Treatment of deep cavities using a perforator-based island flap with partial de-epithelization

Background

The perforator-based island flap is a popular option for defect coverage. In cases with deep cavities, however, the classical island flap may not be a suitable option. By de-epithelization of the peripheral portion of a perforator-based island flap, the distal part of the flap can be used to fill deep spaces, as the flap can be folded and inserted into the spaces.

Methods

From June 2015 to April 2017, 21 cases of deep internal defects were reconstructed with perforator-based island flaps with peripheral de-epithelization. A fasciocutaneous flap was elevated and rotated with the pivot point on the perforator. After performing de-epithelization on the periphery of the flap, the de-epithelized portion of the flap was inserted and anchored into the internal defect. Demographic information about the patients, the size of the defects, the perforators that were used, and complications were recorded.

Results

During the follow-up period (mean, 14.2 months) of total 21 cases, no major complications such as flap loss occurred. In 2 cases, a minor complication was observed. Temporary flap congestion was seen in 1 case, and was treated with a short period of leech therapy, and the other case was partial necrosis on the flap margin, which was cured with minimal debridement and conservative treatment. No major problems have occurred, especially on the de-epithelized part of the flap and in the occupied space.

Conclusions

With performing careful procedure, a perforator-based island flap with partial de-epithelization can be a useful option for the surgical treatment of deep cavities.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered in the institutional review board on human subjects research and the ethics committee, Hanyang University Guri Hospital (Institutional Review Board File No. 2018–01–003-002 https://www.e-irb.com:3443/devlpg/nlpgS200.jsp).