The Marriage of Sartorius and Tensor Fasciae Latae in Treating Vascular Prosthetic Graft Infections

Soft tissue reconstruction of complex infra-inguinal wounds following revisionary vascular surgery

INTRODUCTION

Large, full thickness infra-inguinal wounds following revision revascularization procedures of the lower extremity are a challenging complication for reconstructive surgery. Frequently, these patients present with various comorbidities and after several previous reconstructive attempts and therefore no straightforward soft tissue reconstruction is likely.

METHODS

Patients who presented with large, complex inguinal wounds for soft tissue reconstruction were analyzed retrospectively in terms of flap choice, outcome and complication rates. A focus was set on the reconstructive technique and a subgroup analysis was assessed.

RESULTS

19 patients (11 men, 8 women) who received 19 flaps (17 pedicled, two free flaps) were included in this retrospective study. Average patient age was 73.3 years (range: 53-88 years). 10 fascio-cutaneous flaps (ALT, 52.6%) and 9 muscle flaps (47.4%) were applied. Among muscle flaps, 3 pedicled gracilis flaps, 4 pedicled rectus abdominis flaps and two free latissimus dorsi flaps were used. No flap losses were observed except one case of limited distal flap necrosis (gracilis group). Body Mass Index (BMI) ranged from 19 to 37, mean 26.8. Mean surgery time in all patients was 165.9 minutes (range: 105-373 minutes). Revision surgery due to local wound healing problems averaged 1.6 in all patients. In all cases sufficient soft tissue reconstruction was achieved and bypasses were preserved. Lengths of stay averaged 27.2 (14 to 59 days). Mortality was considerably (10.5%) due to systemic complications (One patient died due to a heart attack 4 weeks postoperatively, another patient died due to an extensive pulmonary embolism two weeks postoperatively).

CONCLUSION

Soft tissue reconstruction of complex inguinal wounds after revision vascular surgery is challenging and wound-healing problems are expectable. In addition to the rectus abdominis flap the pedicled ALT flap is feasible in a broad variety of medium to large wounds. Free flap reconstruction is recommended for very large defects. A structured interdisciplinary approach is required for the management of complex wounds after vascular surgery to prevent and to deal with complications and perioperative morbidity.

[Thigh muscle flaps for postoperative inguinal wound complications in vascular surgery : Sartorius muscle versus rectus femoris muscle]

BACKGROUND

Inguinal wound complications often cause postoperative morbidity and also mortality following vascular surgical interventions. The aim of this study was to report experiences and a comparison of the outcomes using rectus femoris muscle flaps (RFF) and sartorius muscle flaps (SMF).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed at two locations of a cross-border vascular center and all muscle flap interventions performed at the two centers within the vascular surgery department were reviewed. Primary outcomes were muscle flap survival, graft salvage and major amputations.

RESULTS

A total of 44 RFFs were performed in 39 patients (mean age 67 years, 73% males) and 25 SMFs in 24 patients (mean age 64 years, 76% males). Wound infections were the most common indications for muscle flap reconstruction. At a mean follow-up of 24 months (±24) and 17 months (±20), respectively, comparable flap survival rates (91% vs. 84%), wound healing rates (72% vs. 83%), graft salvage (65% vs. 73%) and amputation rates (9% vs. 8%) were found.

CONCLUSION

Muscle flap reconstruction is an effective way to cover groin defects resulting from deep wound infections after vascular surgery, achieving good results in a high-risk group of patients. No differences were found between SMF and RFF regarding amputation and graft loss. Both techniques can be safely performed, depending on the preference and experience of the surgical team. The RFF technique should be preferentially used to cover large tissue defects, whereas the SMF procedure can be preferred to cover smaller defects in the groin.