Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings

A Cost-Utility Analysis of the Use of -125 mm Hg Closed-incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery

Background

Closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) decreases the rate of wound complications in oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) but at a fiscal cost. Our aim was to examine the cost-utility of ciNPT in OBS.

Methods

A literature review was performed to obtain the probabilities and outcomes for the treatment of unilateral breast cancer with OBS with ciNPT versus without. Reported utility scores in the literature were used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each health state. A decision analysis tree was constructed with rollback analysis to determine the more cost-effective strategy. An incremental cost-utility ratio was calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results

OBS with ciNPT is associated with a higher clinical effectiveness (QALY) of 33.43 compared to without (33.42), and relative cost increase of $667.89. The resulting incremental cost-utility ratio of $57432.93/QALY favored ciNPT. In one-way sensitivity analysis, ciNPT was the more cost-effective strategy if the cost of ciNPT was less than $1347.02 or if the probability of wound dehiscence without was greater than 8.2%. Monte Carlo analysis showed a confidence of 75.39% that surgery with ciNPT is more cost effective.

Conclusion

Despite the added cost, surgery with ciNPT is cost-effective. This finding is a direct result of decreased overall wound complications with ciNPT.

Efficacy of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Postoperative Complications in Breast Reconstruction After Radiotherapy: A Propensity Score Analysis

Background

Implant-based breast reconstruction following radiotherapy can lead to significant postoperative complications. Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has emerged as a potential intervention to reduce these complications.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of ciNPWT in reducing postoperative complications in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted, including patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy and radiotherapy between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022. We utilized a procedure-level analysis model with patients contributing distinct observations for multiple procedures. Our primary outcome measures included fluid collection, infection, and wound complications. Propensity score analysis was employed to adjust for potential confounders, such as BMI, smoking history, and diabetes history, creating a balanced comparison between the ciNPWT-treated and untreated groups.

Results

In our study of 301 breast reconstructions postradiotherapy from 2015 to 2022, encompassing 218 unique patients, we found significant benefits of ciNPWT. During an average of 2.2-year follow-up, the ciNPWT group demonstrated no infections, contrasting with a 10.4% rate in the non-ciNPWT group (P < .0001). Wound complications were also significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (1.9% vs 11.2%; P = .00848). Demographic differences were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weights. The findings suggest ciNPWT's promising role in enhancing postoperative outcomes in breast reconstruction postradiotherapy.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the use of ciNPWT in implant-based breast reconstruction postradiotherapy can potentially reduce postoperative complications. This intervention can improve patient outcomes and may offer cost-saving benefits in the long run.

Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic

Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes of Two Different Closed Incision Negative Pressure Systems in Breast Surgery and Implications to Cost of Care

Background

Surgical site complication (SSC) rates in breast surgery have been reported between 2.25% and 53%. Use of incision management may help reduce the risk of SSCs. The potential of 2 closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) systems to mitigate surgical site complications (SSC) and surgical site infections (SSI) in breast surgery were assessed.

Methods

A systematic literature review for breast surgery studies was conducted comparing ciNPT use against standard of care (SOC). SSC, SSI, and dehiscence rates were examined. SSCs were defined as all surgical site complications including SSI, dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, and necrosis. Risk ratios and random effects models were used to assess the effect of ciNPT with multilayer absorbent dressing (ciNPT-MLA) and ciNPT with foam dressing (ciNPT-F) compared with SOC.

Results

Eight articles were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences in SSC rates (P = .307) or SSI rates (P = .453) between ciNPT-MLA and SOC were observed. ciNPT-MLA use was associated with a reduction in dehiscence compared with SOC (RR = 0.499, 95% CI = 0.303, 0.822; P = .006). A significant reduction in SSC rates (RR = 0.498, 95% CI = 0.271, 0.917; P = .025) was observed with ciNPT-F use. Similarly, dehiscence rate reduction was associated with ciNPT-F use (RR = 0.349, 95% CI= 0.168, 0.725; P = .005). A trend towards reduction of SSI rates with ciNPT-F use compared with SOC was also noted (P = .053).

Conclusions

Compared with SOC, ciNPT-MLA significantly reduced rates of dehiscence, while ciNPT-F use resulted in significantly reduced SSC and dehiscence rates with a trend toward reducing SSI.

Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy with Wide-Coverage Dressings in Simple Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

Objective: A new configuration of closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) dressings now covers the incision and a broader area of peri-incisional tissues. We have implemented these ciNPT dressings following simple mastectomy (SM) or skin-sparing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction (IBR). This study assesses patient-reported outcomes of this new protocol. Approach: Patients underwent SM or IBR for breast cancer. ciNPT with wide-coverage dressings were placed over the entire breast, and -125 mmHg was applied for 14 days. Upon dressing removal, patients rated their experience using the Wound-Q™ Suction Device Scale and recorded their satisfaction on a Likert scale ranging 1-5. Results: Thirteen SM patients and 12 IBR patients were included in the study. The median age was 62 years, and SM patients were significantly older (p < 0.01). Patients rated the ciNPT device highest on items relating to its function and appearance, and lowest on noise and interference with sleep and physical activity. The overall mean score for the combined cohort was 64.8/100. The mean score for SM patients (74.8 ± 19.9) was significantly greater than for IBR patients (53.9 ± 9.6, p < 0.01). The mean overall patient satisfaction rating was 3.92 on a 5-point scale; 4.0 in the SM group and 3.8 in the IBR group. Innovation: This study is the first to report on the patient experience with these newly available wide-coverage ciNPT dressings. Conclusion: Overall, the dressing was well-tolerated by patients, and satisfaction was high. The positive reception of ciNPT with wide-coverage dressings supports continued use at our hospital.

Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus Standard-of-care Dressings in Breast Surgery: A Pilot Study

Background

Standard breast reduction dressings such as Prineo are used to cover surgical wounds, in combination with a binder or support bra. The Prevena Restor BellaForm is a negative pressure wound therapy dressing that covers the entirety of the breast mound and is purported to provide further support and reduce swelling. The aim of this study was to compare the Restor to standard-of-care dressings.

Methods

The study was a randomized control trial of women undergoing bilateral breast reduction with one breast being dressed with the Prevena Restor BellaForm dressing and the other having standard of care (Prineo). Outcomes measured were drain outputs, postoperative length of stay, quality of scarring, patient preference for dressings, and adverse events. Follow-up was at 1, 2-6, and 26 weeks.

Results

The results show a reduction in postoperative days 1 and 2 average drain output on the Restor side compared with standard dressings. Patient-reported outcome measures showed less bruising. There was no difference in postoperative length of stay and no difference in appearance of scars at the 26-week follow-up period. One patient required removal of the dressing due to irritation and one patient required assistance with resealing of the vacuum.

Conclusions

We have shown benefits to drain output and comfort using close incisional negative pressure therapy in breast reduction mammaplasty. We plan to continue to investigate close incisional negative pressure therapy in larger comparative trials for other breast procedures including implant-based reconstruction, where a reduction in drain output could be of great benefit to both healing and reduction of infection risk.

Outcomes of Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction Managed with Closed-incision Negative Pressure Therapy Applied Over the Whole Breast

Background

Incision healing after mastectomy and immediate reconstruction can be supported with closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT). Studies have reported patients receiving postoperative care with ciNPT after breast surgery exhibited lower rates of dehiscence, infection, necrosis, and seroma, compared with standard dressings. A recent approach to ciNPT involves the application of negative pressure to the incision and a wider area of surrounding tissue. In this retrospective review, we investigated the outcomes of ciNPT using full-coverage dressings over the entire breast after mastectomy and reconstruction.

Methods

Patients underwent mastectomies and immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction with an implant or tissue expander. After surgery, patients received oral antibiotics and ciNPT with full-coverage foam dressings at -125 mm Hg.

Results

All 54 patients (N = 105 incisions) were women, with a mean age of 53.5 years and 29.1 kg per m2 body mass index. Common comorbidities included prior chemotherapy (31.3%) or radiation (21.6%), hypertension (14.8%), and diabetes (5.6%). Procedures included skin-reducing (34.3%), skin-sparing (7.6%), and nipple-sparing (58.1%) mastectomies. Lymph nodes were removed in 38 (36.2%) incisions. All patients were discharged home with ciNPT on postoperative day (POD) 1, and ciNPT was discontinued on POD 5-7. At POD 30, three patients developed seromas, requiring revision. Of these, one required removal of the left tissue expander. The remaining 102 incisions (97.1%) healed without complication.

Conclusions

Among this cohort, the use of ciNPT with full-dressing coverage of the breast incisions and surrounding soft tissue was effective in supporting incisional healing after mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

Evolution of breast conserving surgery-current implementation of oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery: a literature review

Background and Objective

De-escalation in breast cancer surgery has been a natural evolution since breast conserving surgery (BCS) was introduced in the early 1980s. From Halsted mastectomies to wide local excisions, we are facing nowadays the next trend in form of oncoplastic breast surgery. Oncoplastic breast surgery combines oncological principles with plastic surgery techniques to preserve the breast shape and appearance. The aim of this work is to review recent oncological and quality of live outcomes derived from oncoplastic techniques as well as offer a perspective about its implementation in breast cancer units.

Methods

A literature review was conducted to explore the landscape of oncoplastic breast surgery. Key terms related to oncoplastic techniques and breast cancer were used in searches across databases such as PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria focused on recent articles discussing oncological and quality of life (QoL) outcomes, as well as perspectives on the role of oncoplastic surgery.

Key Content and Findings

The research aims to contribute valuable insights into the efficacy and impact of oncoplastic surgery in the context of breast cancer treatment. In this new era of precision medicine, it is more than just healing patients; it is about improving their well-being. We ought to consider specific oncoplasty role in leading this paradigm shift. It is also relevant to define whether these new technical-demanding surgical options can be applied to all patients and if professional training performs adequately to current demands of personalized treatments.

Conclusions

The global adoption of oncoplastic BCS is recommended due to its oncological safety and improvement in QoL compared to standard procedures. Emphasizing the need for skilled surgeons in complex cases, collaboration between breast surgeons and scientific societies is urged to certify ongoing educational training in oncoplastic techniques.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncoplastic Surgery Prevents Delays to Adjuvant Therapy

Breast reductions, including oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS), have high postoperative wound healing complication (WHC) rates, ranging from 17% to 63%, thus posing a potential delay in the onset of adjuvant therapy. Incision management with closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) effectively reduces postoperative complications in other indications. This retrospective analysis compares postoperative outcomes and delays in adjuvant therapy in patients who received ciNPT on the cancer breast versus standard of care (SOC) after oncoplastic breast reduction and mastopexy post lumpectomy.

Methods

Patient demographics, ciNPT use, postoperative complication rates, and time to adjuvant therapy were analyzed from the records of 150 patients (ciNPT = 29, SOC = 121). Propensity score matching was used to match patients based on age, body mass index, diabetes, tobacco use, and prior breast surgery.

Results

In the matched cohort, the overall complication rate of ciNPT-treated cancerous breasts was 10.3% (3/29) compared with 31% (9/29) in SOC-treated cancerous breasts (P = 0.096). Compared with the SOC-treated cancerous breasts, the ciNPT breasts had lower skin necrosis rates [1/29 (3.4%) versus 6/29 (20.7%); P = 0.091] and dehiscence rates [0/29 (0%) versus 8/29 (27.6%); P = 0.004]. In the unmatched cohort, the total number of ciNPT patients who had a delay in adjuvant therapy was lower compared to the SOC group (0% versus 22.5%, respectively; P = 0.007).

Conclusion

Use of ciNPT following oncoplastic breast reduction effectively lowered postoperative wound healing complication rates and, most importantly, decreased delays to adjuvant therapy.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Comparison of Outcomes

We aim to discern the impact of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) on wound healing in the oncoplastic breast surgery population.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent oncoplastic breast surgery with and without ciNPT in a single health system over 6 years. Oncoplastic breast surgery was defined as breast conservation surgery involving partial mastectomy with immediate volume displacement or replacement techniques. Primary outcomes were rates of clinically significant complications requiring either medical or operative intervention, including seroma, hematoma, fat necrosis, wound dehiscence, and infection. Secondary outcomes were rates of minor complications.

Results

ciNPT was used in 75 patients; standard postsurgical dressing was used in 142 patients. Mean age (P = 0.73) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.11) were similar between the groups. The ciNPT cohort had higher baseline BMIs (28.23 ± 4.94 versus 30.55 ± 6.53; P = 0.004), ASA levels (2.35 ± 0.59 versus 2.62 ± 0.52; P = 0.002), and preoperative macromastia symptoms (18.3% versus 45.9%; P ≤ 0.001). The ciNPT cohort had statistically significant lower rates of clinically relevant complications (16.9% versus 5.3%; P = 0.016), the number of complications (14.1% versus 5.3% with one complication, 2.8% versus 0% with >2; P = 0.044), and wound dehiscence (5.6% versus 0%; P = 0.036).

Conclusions

The use of ciNPT reduces the overall rate of clinically relevant postoperative complications, including wound dehiscence. The ciNPT cohort had higher rates of macromastia symptoms, BMI, and ASA, all of which put them at increased risk for complications. Therefore, ciNPT should be considered in the oncoplastic population, especially in those patients with increased risk for postoperative complications.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Standard of Care Over Closed Plastic Surgery Incisions in the Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Background

Surgical site complications (SSCs) are not uncommon in plastic surgery procedures due to characteristics of the incisions and the patients undergoing such procedures. Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been used to manage surgical incisions across surgical specialties. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of ciNPT on risk of SSCs following plastic surgery.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted to identify studies published between January 2005 and July 2021 comparing ciNPT versus traditional standard of care (SOC) dressings for patients undergoing plastic surgery. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model. A cost analysis was conducted using inputs from the meta-analysis and cost estimates from a national hospital database.

Results

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. In the 11 studies that evaluated the effect of ciNPT on of SSCs, ciNPT use was associated with a significant reduction in risk of SSC (P < .001). ciNPT use was also associated with reduced risk of dehiscence (P = .001) and skin necrosis (P =.002) and improved scar quality (P = .014). Hospital length of stay was decreased by an average of 0.61 days for patients receiving ciNPT (P < .001). There were no differences in observed risk of SSIs (P = .113) and seromas (P = .143). While not statistically significant, a decrease in rate of reoperations (P = .074), fluid volume removed from the drains (P = .069) and drain days (-1.97 days, P = .093) was observed with ciNPT use. The estimated cost savings attributed to ciNPT use was $904 (USD) per patient.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that ciNPT may reduce the incidence of SSCs and related health care utilization and costs in plastic surgery procedures.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy versus Standard of Care in Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been utilized to help manage closed incisions across many surgical specialties. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of ciNPT on postsurgical and health economic outcomes.

Methods

A systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed for publications written in English, comparing ciNPT to standard-of-care dressings between January 2005 and August 2021. Study participant characteristics, surgical procedure, dressings used, treatment duration, postsurgical outcomes, and follow-up data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Risk ratios summarized dichotomous outcomes. Difference in means or standardized difference in means was used to assess continuous variables reported on the same scale or outcomes reported on different scales/measurement instruments.

Results

The literature search identified 84 studies for analysis. Significant reductions in surgical site complication (SSC), surgical site infection (SSI), superficial SSI, deep SSI, seroma, dehiscence, skin necrosis, and prolonged incisional drainage were associated with ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Reduced readmissions and reoperations were significant in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05). Patients receiving ciNPT had a 0.9-day shorter hospital stay (P < 0.0001). Differences in postoperative pain scores and reported amounts of opioid usage were significant in favor of ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Scar evaluations demonstrated improved scarring in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05).

Discussion

For these meta-analyses, ciNPT use was associated with statistically significant reduction in SSCs, SSIs, seroma, dehiscence, and skin necrosis incidence. Reduced readmissions, reoperation, length of hospital stay, decreased pain scores and opioid use, and improved scarring were also observed in ciNPT patients.

Non-operative adjuncts for the prevention of mastectomy skin flap necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Native skin flap necrosis is a potentially devastating complication following skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with a reported incidence of as high as 30%. Treatment depends on the depth and extent of tissue necrosis and can range from dressings to surgical debridement and further reconstruction. This can have implications on patient physical and psychological wellbeing as well as cost of treatment. This study aims to identify and appraise cost-effective non-surgical adjuncts for the prevention of native skin flap necrosis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and structured around existing recommended guidelines. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed with the medical subject headings 'mastectomy' and 'flap necrosis'. After exclusion, 12 articles were selected for review and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 8439 mastectomies were performed on 7895 patients. Preventative non-surgical adjuncts that demonstrated statistically significant reduction in mastectomy flap necrosis included topical nitroglycerin ointment (P = 0.000), closed-Incision negative pressure wound therapy (P = 0.000), topical dimethylsulfoxide ointment (P = 0.03), oral cilostazol (P = 0.032), and local heat pre-conditioning (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies multiple adjuncts that may aid in preventing mastectomy skin flap necrosis, especially in high-risk patients. Further studies could aim to define standardized protocols and compare the various adjuncts in different circumstances.

Closed-Incision and Surrounding Soft Tissue Negative Pressure Dressings in Post-Mastectomy Pre-Pectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Pilot Study

Background: Closed-incision and surrounding soft tissue negative pressure therapy (cistNPT) is theorized to decrease infection, reduce tissue edema, and promote healing of the mastectomy skin flap. We report our early experience with this dressing in pre-pectoral direct-to-implant (pDTI) breast reconstruction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent post-mastectomy pDTI breast reconstruction with cistNPT between July 2019 and February 2020. All reconstructions utilized smooth round silicone gel implants and human acellular dermal matrix. Results: Thirty-five female patients underwent 58 mastectomies. Mean age and body mass index were 49.9 years and 28.9 kg/m2, respectively. Eleven (31.4%) patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The mean sternal notch-to-nipple distance was 27.0 cm. The median specimen weight was 483 g, while the median implant volume was 495 cc. The mean implant-to-specimen ratio was 1.4 for nipple-sparing, 1.1 for skin-sparing, and 0.7 for skin-reducing mastectomy. Total drain volume was 483.1 cc from each breast. Post-operative complications included seroma (5.2%), peri-incisional necrosis (8.6%), and superficial skin epidermolysis (13.8%). There were no cases of surgical site infection, dehiscence, or hematoma. Rate of return to the operative room was 3.4%. Mean follow-up was 90 days. Conclusions: In our series of pDTI breast reconstructions with cistNPT, no patients experienced hematoma, dehiscence, or infection complications. Rates of seroma, skin necrosis requiring operative debridement, and total drain volumes were lower than those reported in literature.

Effectiveness of prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy in stopping surgical site wound problems for closed incisions in breast cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy in stopping surgical site wound problems for closed incisions in breast cancer surgery. A systematic literature search up to April 2022 was performed and 2223 women with closed incisions in breast cancer surgery at the baseline of the studies; 964 of them were using the prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy, and 1259 were using standard dressings. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy in stopping surgical site wound problems for closed incisions in breast cancer surgery using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. The prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy women had a significantly lower total wound problems (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.90, P = .01), lower surgical site wound infection (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96, P = .03), lower wound dehiscence (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.75, P < .001) and lower wound necrosis (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71, P < .001), in women with closed incisions in breast cancer surgery compared with standard dressings. However, prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy did not show any significant difference in wound seroma (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.32-1.65, P = .45), and hematoma (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.33-1.59, P = .001) compared with standard dressings in women with closed incisions in breast cancer surgery. The prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy women had a significantly lower total wound problems, surgical site wound infection, wound dehiscence, and wound necrosis and no significant difference in wound seroma, and hematoma compared with standard dressings in women with closed incisions in breast cancer surgery. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of 5 out of 12 studies in the meta-analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons.

The Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy on the Medial Thigh Donor Site in Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis Flap Breast Reconstruction

The objective of this study was to examine the impact of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) on donor site complications and patient perceptions in transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap breast reconstruction. Our institution conducted a retrospective cohort study, including all patients with TMG flap breast reconstruction from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021. Patients were grouped according to conventional wound management or CINPT. Outcomes were surgical site complications, fluid drainage, time to drain removal, and in-hospital stay length. A patient survey was created. A total of 56 patients with 83 TMG flaps were included (control group: 35 patients with 53 TMG flaps; CINPT group: 21 patients with 30 TMG flaps). Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. The flap width was significantly larger in the CINPT group (8.0 cm vs. 7.0 cm, p = 0.013). Surgical site complications were reduced in the CINPT group without statistical difference (30.0% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.064). Fluid drainage and time to drain removal were similar in both groups. The average in-hospital stay was significantly shortened in the CINPT group (10.0 days vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.030). The survey excluded pain, skin irritations, and discomfort during sleep and movement in the CINPT group and showed that the patients felt well protected. This study fails to provide compelling evidence for CINPT to enhance incision healing on the donor site in TMG flap breast reconstruction. There was a trend toward reduced surgical site complications on the donor thigh and the in-hospital stay was shortened. Prophylactic CINPT increases patient comfort and provides a feeling of additional wound protection.

Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy after Resection of Soft-Tissue Tumors Reduces Wound Complications: Results of a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Wound healing after resection of large soft-tissue tumors is often impaired by large dead space and fluid collection. Recently, the authors were able to show an association of wound complications with worse oncologic outcome in soft-tissue sarcomas. The aim of the study was to examine the value of closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy on postoperative wound drainage and wound complications after soft-tissue tumor resection.

METHODS

Patients for whom resection is planned of a soft-tissue tumor larger than 10 cm in diameter of the extremities or the trunk were allocated randomly to one of two groups. After wound closure, patients in the study group received closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy for a duration of 5 days, whereas those in the control group received regular dressings. The amount of drainage fluid, course of wound healing, length of hospital stay, and wound edge perfusion at postoperative day 5 measured by white-light infrared spectroscopy were compared.

RESULTS

Sixty patients could be included in the study with even distribution to both study arms, meeting the goal. The postoperative course of wound drainage volume was significantly lower in the study group, and hospital stay was significantly shorter, with 9.1 ± 3.8 days versus 13.9 ± 11.8 days. The occurrence of wound complications was significantly lower in the study group on time-to-event analysis (one versus six). Tissue spectroscopy revealed a significantly higher oxygen saturation increase in the wound edge for the study group versus the control group.

CONCLUSION

Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy should be considered for patients undergoing resection of large soft-tissue tumors.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Dressing in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review

The implementation of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CINPT) is widely seen in many surgical subspecialties including orthopaedics, vascular surgery, and abdominal surgery. However, research on its use in breast surgery is still in its infancy. We conducted a systematic review on the use of CINPT vs standard of care dressings (SOC) in wound management of post-operative breast surgery. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, MedLine, and Google Scholar for studies that compared CINPT against SOC. Seven studies were included in this systematic review. The results of our systematic review have shown that CINPT has a positive outcome in reducing post-operative wound complication rates as compared to SOC dressings (commonly Steri-Strips and waterproof dressings), which was 1-8% vs 1-30% in CINPT and SOC, respectively. Furthermore, CINPT has the potential to confer additional cost-savings of up to USD218 per patient for a health institution with regards to reduced complications rates that might have required extended management. The use of CINPT in breast surgery remains highly promising. It has many advantages over SOC, including better wound outcomes and added cost savings. Further studies are required to delineate the potential benefits in different sub-sets of patients.

The Impact of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound on Scar Quality and Patient Reported Outcomes: a Within-Patient Controlled, Randomized Trial

Literature provides a moderate level of evidence for the beneficial effects of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) on scar quality. The purpose of this study was to establish if iNPWT results in improved scar outcomes in comparison to the standard of care. Therefore, a within‐patient randomised controlled, open‐label trial was conducted in transgender men undergoing gender‐affirming mastectomies. A unilateral side was randomised to receive iNPWT (PICO™, Smith&Nephew) without suction drains and contrastingly the standard dressing (Steri‐Strips™) with suction drain. Scar quality and questionnaires were bilaterally measured by means of objective assessments and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROM) at 1, 3 and 12 months. Objective scar outcomes were scar pliability (Cutometer®), colouration (DSM‐II) and scar width (3‐D imaging). PROM outcomes were related to scars (POSAS and SCAR‐Q) and body satisfaction (BODY‐Q). From 85 included patients, 80 were included for analyses. No significant difference between treatments was seen in the quantitative outcomes of scar pliability, colour, and width. For qualitative scar outcomes, several significant findings for iNPWT were found for several subscales of the POSAS, SCAR‐Q, and BODY‐Q. These effects could not be substantiated with linear mixed‐model regression, signifying no statically more favourable outcome for either treatment option. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that some PROM outcomes were more favourable for the iNPWT compared to standard treatment. In contrast, the quantitative outcomes showed no beneficial effects of iNPWT on scar outcomes. This suggests that iNPWT is of little benefit as a scar‐improving therapy.

Simple and Efficient Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction via Primary Closure Combined with Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (CiNPWT)—Experience of a Single Surgeon

Background: In this study, we aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (CiNPWT) when combined with primary closure (PC) in a patient with pressure ulcers, based on one single surgeon’s experience at our medical center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with stage III or IV pressure ulcers who underwent reconstruction surgery. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, cause and location of defect, comorbidities, lesion size, wound reconstruction methods, operation time, debridement times, application of CiNPWT to reconstructed wounds, duration of hospital stay, and wound complications were analyzed. Results: Operation time (38.16 ± 14.02 vs. 84.73 ± 48.55 min) and duration of hospitalization (36.78 ± 26.92 vs. 56.70 ± 58.43 days) were shorter in the PC + CiNPWT group than in the traditional group. The frequency of debridement (2.13 ± 0.98 vs. 2.76 ± 2.20 times) was also lower in the PC + CiNPWT group than in the traditional group. The average reconstructed wound size did not significantly differ between the groups (63.47 ± 42.70 vs. 62.85 ± 49.94 cm²), and there were no significant differences in wound healing (81.25% vs. 75.38%), minor complications (18.75% vs. 21.54%), major complications (0% vs. 3.85%), or mortality (6.25% vs. 10.00%) between the groups. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that PC combined with CiNPWT represents an alternative reconstruction option for patients with pressure ulcers, especially in those for whom prolonged anesthesia is unsuitable.

An Advanced Surgical Dressing for High-risk Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: a Case-control Study

Oncological breast surgeries, classified as breast conserving surgery, oncoplastic surgery, and mastectomies (standard or with tissue sparing and reconstruction), are burdened with an overall complication rate up to 33%. Aquacel Ag Surgical is a combined hydrofiber-hydrocolloids dressing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of surgical site complications in patients presenting with three or more risk factors (or two, of which at least one classified as "high risk"), undergoing breast cancer surgery with/without reconstruction, comparing advanced (Aquacel Ag Surgical) with traditional dressing.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, monocentric, case-control study based at the breast unit of the Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital of Turin, Italy. Forty-two patients who underwent breast surgeries and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, from February 1 to July 31, 2018. The primary endpoint was comparing the incidence of surgical site complications (skin alterations, infection, and wound dehiscence) in the two groups. The secondary endpoints were evaluating patient's quality of life, aesthetic outcomes, and compliance to the dressings.

RESULTS

The distribution of risk factors at the baseline between the two groups was balanced, without statistically significant differences. Wound complications' incidence at 1 week was lower in the advanced dressing group (P = 0.015). On the bivariate descriptive analysis, advanced dressing proved to be easier to remove for the operator (P = 0.026). The aesthetic outcomes vouched for better scores in the advanced dressing group.

CONCLUSION

In the presented study Aquacel Ag Surgical dressing reduces surgical site complications in the first week after surgery in patients affected by three or more risk factors (or two with at least one classified as "high risk").

The use of closed incision negative pressure therapy for incision and surrounding soft tissue management: Expert panel consensus recommendations

As the use of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) becomes more widespread, dressing designs have evolved to address implementation challenges and meet surgeon demand. While traditional application of ciNPT was limited to the immediate suture line, a novel dressing that covers the incision and additional surrounding tissues has become available. To expand upon previous ciNPT recommendations and provide guidance on this new dressing, an expert panel of plastic surgeons convened to review the current literature, identify challenges to the implementation and sustainability of ciNPT, and use a modified Delphi technique to form a consensus on the appropriate use of ciNPT with full‐coverage dressings. After three rounds of collecting expert opinion via the Delphi method, consensus was reached if 80% of the panel agreed upon a statement. This manuscript establishes 10 consensus statements regarding when ciNPT with full‐coverage foam dressings should be considered or recommended in the presence of patient or incision risk factors, effective therapeutic settings and duration, precautions for use, and tools and techniques to support application. The panel also discussed areas of interest for future study of ciNPT with full‐coverage dressings. High‐quality, controlled studies are needed to expand the understanding of the benefits of ciNPT over the incision and surrounding tissues.

Within-patient randomized clinical trial comparing incisional negative-pressure wound therapy with suction drains in gender-affirming mastectomies

BACKGROUND

Incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is widely adopted by different disciplines for multiple indications. Questions about the most appropriate uses and value of iNPWT have been raised.

METHODS

An open-label within-patient RCT was conducted in transgender men undergoing gender-affirming mastectomies. The objective was to determine the effect of iNPWT as a substitute for standard dressing and suction drains on wound healing complications. One chest side was randomized to receive the iNPWT intervention, and the other to standard dressing with suction drain. The primary endpoints were wound healing complications (haematoma, seroma, infection, and dehiscence) after three months. Additional outcomes were pain according to a numerical rating scale and patient satisfaction one week after surgery.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were included, of whom 81 received both the iNPWT and standard treatment. Drain removal criteria were met within 24 h in 95 per cent of the patients. No significant decrease in wound healing complications was registered on the iNPWT side, but the seroma rate was significantly increased. In contrast, patients experienced both significantly less pain and increased comfort on the iNPWT side. No medical device-related adverse events were registered.

CONCLUSION

Substituting short-term suction drains with iNPWT in gender-affirming mastectomies increased the seroma rates and did not decrease the amount of wound healing complications. Registration number: NTR7412 (Netherlands Trial Register).

Oncoplastic breast surgery: the role of negative pressure wound therapy

Wound-related problems following breast surgery are common. Delayed wound healing can lead to poor cosmesis and, among breast cancer patients, can result in delays in receiving adjuvant treatment. The aim of our review was to look at the literature in relation to the role of negative pressure wound therapy in oncoplastic breast surgery, as at the time of writing, there is no consensus on the use of prophylactic negative pressure dressings in closed wounds following breast surgery.

Negative pressure wound therapy does not decrease postoperative wound complications in patients undergoing mastectomy and flap fixation

Patients and breast cancer surgeons are frequently confronted with wound complications after mastectomy. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a promising technique for preventing wound complications after skin closure in elective surgery. However, a clinical study evaluating postoperative complications following the use of NPWT, focusing solely on closed incisions in patients undergoing mastectomy, has yet to be performed. Between June 2019 and February 2020, 50 consecutive patients underwent mastectomy with NPWT during the first seven postoperative days. This group was compared to a cohort of patients taking part in a randomized controlled trial between June 2014 and July 2018. Primary outcome was the rate of postoperative wound complications, i.e. surgical site infections, wound necrosis or wound dehiscence during the first three postoperative months. Secondary outcomes were the number of patients requiring unplanned visits to the hospital and developing clinically significant seroma (CSS). In total, 161 patients were analyzed, of whom 111 patients in the control group (CON) and 50 patients in the NPWT group (NPWT). Twenty-eight percent of the patients in the NPWT group developed postoperative wound complications, compared to 18.9% in the control group (OR = 1.67 (95% CI 0.77–3.63), p = 0.199). The number of patients requiring unplanned visits or developing CSS was not statistically significant between the groups. This study suggests that Avelle negative pressure wound therapy in mastectomy wounds does not lead to fewer postoperative wound complications. Additionally, it does not lead to fewer patients requiring unplanned visits or fewer patients developing clinically significant seromas.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03942575. Date of registration: 08/05/2019.

Implant-based Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: The Importance of Oncoplastic Plane, its Blood Supply and Assessment Methods

With the recent rise in prepectoral breast reconstruction, partly due to the improvement in implants and the aesthetic results but, more so, due to the perseveration of the pectoralis major, it is of great importance to have an appreciation of the clinical anatomy with regards to the breast and its blood supply for the practice of prepectoral breast reconstruction. The preservation of the mastectomy flap vasculature together with meticulous surgical technique minimizes complications, notoriously of skin flap necrosis. We aimed to describe the anatomy of the oncoplastic plane (for the prepectoral technique), its vasculature, and relevant assessment methods.

Influence of closed incision negative-pressure therapy on abdominal donor-site morbidity in microsurgical breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Closed incision negative-pressure therapy (CINPT) has been shown to shorten the time to heal in post-bariatric abdominoplasty and to lower seroma rates in cosmetic abdominoplasty. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of CINPT on donor-site morbidity following abdominal-based free-flap breast reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed medical records from 225 women who had undergone 300 microsurgical free-flap breast reconstructions from the abdomen from November 1, 2007 to March 31, 2019. Patients were grouped according to wound therapy, including 127 patients in the standard of care group and 98 patients in the CINPT group. Primary outcomes were minor (non-operative) and major (operative) surgical site complications. Secondary outcomes were time to drain removal, in-hospital length, and scar quality.

RESULTS

Analysis of patient demographics showed an equal distribution with regard to the age, smoking status, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative chemotherapy, and previous abdominal surgery in both groups. Significantly more patients with obesity (29.6 vs. 15.8%; p = .01) and bilateral breast reconstruction (40.8 vs. 27.6%; p = .04) were included in the CINPT group. Compared to standard of care, the CINPT group had a lower incidence of major surgical site complications (26.0 vs. 11.2%; p = .001). There was no difference in minor surgical site complications and secondary outcomes between groups.

CONCLUSION

The CINPT represents a reliable tool to reduce surgical site complications on the abdominal donor-site in abdominal-based free-flap breast reconstruction.

Negative-pressure wound therapy - does it lower the risk of complications with closed wounds following breast surgery?

Introduction: Breast surgery complications are important not only due to their morbidity and psychological impact, but also the delays that can occur for adjuvant treatment or the loss of implants in severe cases. There is growing evidence that negative pressure dressing on closed wounds can reduce the complications following surgery. Methods: This study aimed to assess whether negative-pressure dressings reduced complications in patients undergoing bilateral reduction mammoplasty with randomization of a side to negative pressure and standard care, fixation strips, on the contralateral side. This allowed patients to act as their own controls. Results: This study found a significant reduction in the rate of wound complications but used a wide definition for what constituted a wound complication. Discussion: This finding is mirrored in existing work with studies showing that negative-pressure therapy is a cost-effective intervention. Further work is required to validate this finding and targeting those at highest risk may be preferential.

Closed-incision negative-pressure wound management in surgery—literature review and recommendations

Background

Wound healing deficits and subsequent surgical site infections are potential complications after surgical procedures, resulting in increased morbidity and treatment costs. Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) systems seem to reduce postoperative wound complications by sealing the wound and reducing tensile forces.

Materials and methods

We conducted a collaborative English literature review in the PubMed database including publications from 2009 to 2020 on ciNPWT use in five surgical subspecialities (orthopaedics and trauma, general surgery, plastic surgery, cardiac surgery and vascular surgery). With literature reviews, case reports and expert opinions excluded, the remaining 59 studies were critically summarized and evaluated with regard to their level of evidence.

Results

Of nine studies analysed in orthopaedics and trauma, positive results of ciNPWT were reported in 55.6%. In 11 of 13 (84.6%), 13 of 15 (86.7%) and 10 of 10 (100%) of studies analysed in plastic, vascular and general surgery, respectively, a positive effect of ciNPWT was observed. On the contrary, only 4 of 12 studies from cardiac surgery discovered positive effects of ciNPWT (33.3%).

Conclusion

ciNPWT is a promising treatment modality to improve postoperative wound healing, notably when facing increased tensile forces. To optimise ciNPWT benefits, indications for its use should be based on patient- and procedure-related risk factors.

A systematic review evaluating the influence of incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on scarring

Pathological scars can result in functional impairment, disfigurement, a psychological burden, itch, and even chronic pain. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the influence of incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (iNPWT) on scarring. PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for preclinical and clinical comparative studies that investigated the influence of iNPWT on scarring‐related outcomes. Individual studies were assessed using the OHAT Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human and Animal studies. The body of evidence was rated using OHAT methodology. Six preclinical studies and nine clinical studies (377 patients) were identified. Preclinical studies suggested that iNPWT reduced lateral tension on incisions, increased wound strength, and reduced scar width upon histological assessment. Two clinical studies reported improved patient‐reported scar satisfaction as measured with the PSAS (1 year after surgery), POSAS, and a VAS (both 42, 90, and 180 days after surgery). Five clinical studies reported improved observer‐reported scar satisfaction as measured with the VSS, SBSES, OSAS, MSS, VAS, and POSAS (7, 15, 30, 42, 90, 180, and 365 days after surgery). Three clinical studies did not detect significant differences at any point in time (POSAS, VAS, and NRS). Because of imprecision concerns, a moderate level of evidence was identified using OHAT methodology. Preclinical as well as clinical evidence indicates a beneficial influence of iNPWT on scarring. Moderate level evidence indicates that iNPWT decreases scar width and improves patient and observer‐reported scar satisfaction.

Four Curious Cases of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT)

Post-operative wound complications after infrainguinal vascular surgery can lead to a significant decrease in a patient’s quality of life. The main complications are surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, delayed healing and/or poor scarring. Closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) in particular has recently been suggested as a method of prophylaxis against these surgical site complications when applied over a closed wound. In our unit, it has generally been used for long groin and abdominal surgical wounds.

We describe here four relatively unusual cases of our experience using ciNPT. In our series, ciNPT has been used to good effect on small eccentrically shaped wounds and non-resolving groin hematomas. We have also used it in tandem with intra-cavity Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) (KCI, Acelity, San Antonio, TX) dressings for the management of partially closed wounds to reduce risk of infection and dehiscence. Additionally, it has shown good analgesic effects in our patient post-operatively.

Hence, we suggest that the paradigm of ciNPT can be expanded to include these circumstances to improve wound healing and decrease risk of post-operative complications. Further research into the overall clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness will also be helpful.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Wound Breakdown and Implant Loss in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Background:

Single-use negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to encourage wound healing. It is often used when patient factors impair wound healing, or in more complex wounds, such as in implant-based breast reconstruction. We report the findings of a prospective cohort study comparing the use of NPWT with standard dressings in prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Methods:

A prospective database of implant-based reconstruction from a single institution was mined to identify patients who underwent prepectoral reconstruction. Patient demographics, operative data, surgical complications, and 90-day outcomes were compared between patients who had NPWT and those who had standard dressings.

Results:

Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction was performed on 307 breasts. NPWT dressings were used in 126 cases, with standard dressings used in 181 cases. Wound breakdown occurred in 10 cases after standard dressings versus 1 where NPWT was utilized. Of the standard dressing cases, only 3 implants were salvaged, while 7 cases led to implant loss. The 1 case of wound breakdown in the NPWT cohort settled with conservative measures. The cost of a reconstructive failure was £14,902, and the use of NPWT resulted in a cost savings of £426 per patient.

Conclusions:

The utilization of single-use NPWT reduces the rate of wound breakdown and implant loss in prepectoral implant-based reconstruction. In addition to the significant clinical benefits, this approach is cost-saving compared with standard dressings. These data suggest that prepectoral implant reconstruction should be considered as an indication for the use of NPWT.

Closed incision negative pressure therapy following abdominoplasty after breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

Autologous breast reconstructions using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps create a large incision, presenting an opportunity for surgical site complications. In this pilot study, we aimed to examine outcomes in DIEP donor site incisions managed with standard dressings (control; n = 5) or closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT; n = 5). We observed no significant differences between group age, body mass index, and past medical history. Both treatment groups had a similar duration of hospital stay, the number of blood transfusions, and pain scores on postoperative day 2 (P > .05). There was a trend of higher drainage (P = .251) and shorter time to incision healing (P = .067) in the ciNPT group than the control though the difference was not statistically significant. We did observe a significant improvement in scar pigmentation, vascularity, and pliability at 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery in the ciNPT group compared with control (P < .05). No surgical site complications were reported in the ciNPT group within the follow-up period. In the control group, one patient developed wound edge fat necrosis requiring reoperation. In conclusion, we report that ciNPT is a useful incision management system for DIEP flap donor site incisions and it facilitated improved scar quality over standard dressings in this small pilot study. Further clinical studies are required to assess the full advantages provided by ciNPT.

Alternative Therapies to Fat Grafting in the Craniofacial Region

Autologous fat grafting is a technique with various applications in the craniofacial region ranging from the treatment of wounds, scars, keloids, and soft tissue deformities. In this review, alternative therapies to fat grafting are discussed. These are composed of established therapies like silicone gel or sheeting, corticosteroids, cryotherapy, and laser therapy. Novel applications of negative pressure wound therapy, botulinum toxin A injection, and biologic agents are also reviewed.

Is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery?

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used to treat many different types of wounds, but there is still a lack of large studies describing its effectiveness in breast surgery. Enhanced recovery, reduction of complications, and good scar quality might be improved by the application of NPWT. Existing data show that vacuumassisted closure (VAC) application after expander-based breast reconstruction may be beneficial because of decreasing overall complications in comparison with standard wound treatment. There are few cases in which the use of negative pressure resulted in healing of complicated breast wounds after implant insertion - most breasts achieved healing, wherein duration of NPWT ranged from seven to 21 days. The use of NPWT leads to a decrease of seroma formation (from 70% to 15%), the mean percutaneous aspirated volume (from 193 ml to 26 ml) and the numbers of percutaneous aspirations (from three to one) in latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction. Furthermore, a prospective, within-patient, randomised study with 200 participants showed that treating closed incisional wounds after reduction mammoplasty with a VAC system resulted in a decrease of overall complications and protected against wound dehiscence. In the literature, there are cases showing that NPWT may be useful for the successful treatment of chronic and non-healing wounds, included non-puerperal mastitis and surgical sites affected by radiation therapy due to breast cancer. There is still a need for evidence confirming the effectiveness of NPWT in breast surgery because of the deficiency of large prospective studies that compare NPWT with standard treatment.

Use of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Aesthetic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Recently published studies have demonstrated clinical effectiveness of closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) in many fields of surgery including vascular, cardiac, colorectal, orthopedic, and reconstructive surgery. A review of current literature was conducted to determine whether the application of negative-pressure therapy to closed incisions post aesthetic procedures was beneficial.

METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE databases were searched for preclinical and clinical studies published through June 2018. Higher quality publications that met the following criteria were included: adult patients undergoing aesthetic or body contouring procedures, comparison of ciNPT with conventional dressings, and documentation of wound complications and/or incision quality.

RESULTS

One animal and multiple small, retrospective comparison articles are discussed. Scientific mechanism of action and economic analysis are also discussed. There are no level 1 randomized prospective controlled trials that directly evaluate the effects of ciNPT dressings in cosmetic patients.

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing certain cosmetic procedures, preliminary data support the idea that ciNPT dressings provide aesthetic benefit, but more research is clearly needed.