Silicone Migration and Late Hematoma following Silicone Implant Rupture: Case Report and Literature Review

Vulvar migration of injected polyacrylamide hydrogel following breast augmentation: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Vulvar migration is a rare complication of filler injection for breast augmentation, generally presenting as repeated pain and fever. We will report a case of woman with polyacrylamide hydrogel breast injection develops vulvar abscess.

CASE PRESENTATION

A woman with a history of polyacrylamide hydrogel breast injection was noted to have vulvar abscess due to migration of filler materials. Filler removal surgery and vacuum sealing drainage was performed for this patient. The patient was discharged from the hospital with no further complications. After a review of pertinent literature, only four previous case reports are found. Local inflammatory response, infection, large volume injections, inframammary fold destruction, hematogenous or lymphatic migrate, trauma, gravity and external pressure could play essential parts in the migration of injected filler.

CONCLUSION

Polyacrylamide hydrogel migration poses a worldwide challenge, necessitating personalized solutions. Our case study underscores the importance of comprehensive examinations for individuals with a history of filler breast injection when suspecting vulvar filler migration.

Leakage of ruptured silicone breast implants through abdominal laparoscopic port sites: A rare complication following transabdominoplasty breast augmentation

Background

Abdominoplasty and breast augmentation are two of the most commonly performed aesthetic procedures in the UK. When performed as a combined procedure, separate inframammary and abdominoplasty incisions are most frequently used. Transabdominoplasty breast augmentation, performed via a single abdominoplasty incision is also described.

Case

A 69-year-old female, having undergone a transabdominoplasty breast augmentation 20 years previously, was diagnosed with ascending colon cancer and admitted for a laparoscopic-assisted, right hemi-colectomy. Despite all the port sites being abdominal and below the inframammary fold, on their removal, silicone from ruptured breast implants was leaking through the port sites.

Outcome

The patient subsequently underwent an uneventful explantation of bilateral, ruptured, subglandular implants and recovered well.

Learning points

We recommend that breast implant explantation should be considered when patients indicated for elective intra-abdominal surgery are noted to have ruptured breast implants on staging CT imaging, especially when inserted via an abdominoplasty approach.

Iatrogenic intrathoracic encapsulated siliconoma from a ruptured breast implant

Our patient was a 57-year-old woman with a history of bilateral retropectoral silicone breast augmentation and axillary hyperhidrosis who underwent a bilateral thoracic sympathectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery by a surgeon at an outside hospital approximately 20 years ago. The left side required an open thoracotomy. Shortly after the surgery, she developed a left-sided Baker 4 capsular contracture and the left implant was noted to be ruptured. Both implants were exchanged. Several years later the patient began to experience progressive fatigue. Work-up revealed a left lung nodule and she underwent a biopsy that confirmed silicone granulomas. It was hypothesised that at the time of her initial thoracotomy the implant was violated resulting in silicone spillage into the thoracic cavity. The patient was referred to our institution for advanced management of her intrathoracic silicosis. The patient underwent bilateral removal of her silicone implants, total capsulectomy and needle-localised removal of her left thoracic silicone masses. She had an uneventful postoperative course with resolution of her fatigue.

The Value of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of the Integrity of Silicone Breast Implants

Background and Objective: Breast implant surgery for cosmetic purposes is the most popular plastic surgery and it has been performed for over 100 years. Rupture of silicone gel-filled breast implants usually is asymptomatic and is one of the more dangerous complications due to free silicone migration. The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US) in the evaluation of the integrity of silicone breast implants and identify the main sign of intact and ruptured breast implants. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study, the medical documentation of women who underwent breast implant surgery and US checkups at Tautrimas Aštrauskas Clinic in Kaunas, Lithuania, during 2015–2020 was analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: patients with intact and ruptured breast implants. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) as well as the signs of implant integrity of US examination were evaluated. Results: In this study, 76 women with bilateral breast implants (n = 152) were reviewed. On a US examination, ruptured implants were found in 41.1% (n = 61) of the cases; of them, 78.7% (n = 48) of the cases had ≥2 US signs of a ruptured implant, and in all these cases, implant rupture was confirmed at surgery. Overall, one US sign of a ruptured implant was found in 21.3% (n = 13) of the cases. Of them, inhomogeneous content in all cases (n = 3) was found in the intact implant group, and an abnormal implant shell was documented more often in the ruptured implant group, not intact one (n = 9, 90% vs. n = 1, 10%). US had a diagnostic accuracy of 94.7%, sensitivity of 98.3%, specificity of 89.2%, PPV of 93.4%, and NPV of 97.1% in the evaluation of implant integrity. Conclusions: Our results show that US is a very reliable alternative in evaluating breast implant integrity and could be the investigation of choice for implant rupture, while MRI could be advocated only in inconclusive cases. Uneven implant shell was found to be the most important US sign of breast implant rupture. Based on the findings, we recommend performing US examination after breast augmentation surgery with silicone gel-filled implants annually.

Delayed unilateral hematoma after reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery with implants in Asian patients: two case reports

Hematomas represent one of the postoperative complications in patients undergoing reconstructive or aesthetic breast surgery with a silicone implant. Although there are few reports of intracapsular hematoma, those presenting late hematoma after reconstructive and aesthetic augmentation surgeries are rarer. This study reported two Asian patients with late hematoma after reconstruction and aesthetic breast surgery. A 54-year-old female patient underwent bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction using anatomically shaped textured implant for intraductal carcinoma in August 2019. Contralateral nipple-sparing mastectomy was performed for the BRCA gene mutation on the left breast, which was immediately reconstructed with an anatomically shaped textured implant. In a 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation, an extracapsular hematoma was found on the right side, which was removed following the removal of both implants. Another case was a 63-year-old female patient who underwent augmentation of both breasts with smooth round implants and experienced right unilateral swelling and painless firmness about 30 years postoperatively. A preoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation showed both intracapsular and extracapsular ruptures on the right breast and a bulging implant herniation on the left breast. During the operation, hematoma, implants, and capsule were all removed. The excised capsule was sent for histological evaluation. Slightly dark colored blood was emptied before removing the semisolid-state intracapsular hematoma. In both cases, the patients responded well postoperatively and were discharged to their homes with no postsurgical complications, including seroma, or additional hematoma on the breasts. The etiology of late hematoma following breast augmentation or reconstruction has been poorly characterized. Further reports are needed to clearly establish the reasons for this increase in late hematoma formation.

An unusual case of late hematoma after implant-based breast reconstruction mimicking an anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a case report and literature review

Late hematoma associated with breast implants used in esthetic and reconstructive breast surgery represents a rare entity. These hematomas do not have a clear etiology, but triggering events like trauma, anticoagulant use, capsule contracture, or chronic inflammation are reported in literature. We describe an 82-year-old patient who developed a unilateral intra-capsular hematoma 19 years after mastectomy and breast reconstruction with McGhan 445 g implant. Differential diagnosis with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) was considered and potential causes of hematoma were evaluated. Constant pressure forces on chest wall were defined as pathophysiological cause. A systematic literature review concerning late hematoma cases was carried out, focusing on late hematoma etiology and various surgical treatments.

Level of evidence: Level V, diagnostic study.