Successful Use of Negative-pressure Wound Therapy and Dermal Substitute in the Treatment of Gluteal Ecthyma Gangrenosum in a 2-year-old Girl

Ecthyma Gangrenosum in Children With Cancer: Diagnosis at a Glance: A Retrospective Study From the Infection Working Group of Italian Pediatric Hematology Oncology Association

BACKGROUND

To depict ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) clinical presentation and evolution in a large multicenter pediatric retrospective collection of children with malignancies or bone marrow failure syndromes, to facilitate early diagnosis.

METHODS

EG episodes diagnosed in the period 2009-2019 were identified by a retrospective review of clinical charts at centers belonging to the Italian Pediatric Hematology Oncology Association.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight cases of EG occurring in children (male/female 16/22; median age 5.2 years) with hematologic malignancy (29), allogeneic stem cell transplantation (2) or relapsed/refractory solid tumor (3) were collected. The involved sites were: perineal region (19), limbs (10), trunk (6), head and the iliac crest (3). Bacteremia was present in 22 patients. Overall, the germs isolated were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (3) and Escherichia coli (1); 31% of them were multidrug-resistant. All patients received antibacterial treatment, while surgery was performed in 24 patients (63.1%). Predisposing underlying conditions for EG were severe neutropenia (97.3%), corticosteroid treatment (71%) and iatrogenic diabetes (23.7%). All patients recovered, but EG recurred in 5 patients. Nine patients (24%) showed sequelae (deep scars, with muscle atrophy in 2). Four patients (10.5%) died, 1 due to relapse of EG with Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae co-infection and 3 due to the progression of the underlying disease.

CONCLUSIONS

EG requires early recognition and a proper and timely treatment to obtain the recovery and to avoid larger necrotic lesions, eventually evolving in scarring sequelae.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in children: A 25 cases series

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy is a device applied to a wound that causes local depression. There are a few series showing the effectiveness of this treatment in Pediatric. The objective of this work is to try to clarify the indications in children. This is a retrospective series of 25 children between 2004 and 2019. The inclusion criteria were all children with a wound treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. The characteristics retained were their age, the context of occurrence, the treatment time, the depression applied, the technique of skin covering wound and the average healing time. We included 25 patients. The average age was 8.8 years. The context of the wound occurrence was mainly a road (44%) or a domestic (36%) accident. Substance losses were mainly located in the lower limb (84%). The depression applied was -90mmHg. The healing time was 18.4 days. Thin skin grafting was the main method chosen (88%). No complications related to Negative Pressure Wound Therapy equipment have been identified. Despite the weakness of the literature and the lack of consensus regarding its use, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy is an essential therapy in pediatric. It is a simple and effective technique in children. It can reduce the need for flaps coverage, even in the event of exposure of noble elements. The flaps should not, however, be excluded from the decision-making algorithm, on pain of complications or sequelae.

Traditional and advanced therapeutic modalities for wounds in the paediatric population: an evidence-based review

OBJECTIVE

Children can have non-healing wounds due to a wide range of pathologies, including epidermolysis bullosa (EB), pilonidal disease and Stevens-Johnson syndrome, with some causes being iatrogenic, including extravasation injuries and medical device-related hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Furthermore, paediatric wounds are vastly different from adult wounds and therefore require a different treatment approach. While there are numerous types of dressings, topical remedies, and matrices with high-tier evidence to support their use in adults, evidence is scarce in the neonatal and paediatric age groups. The purpose of this review is to discuss the basic principles in paediatric wound management, as well as to present new treatment findings published in the literature to date. The benefits and risks of using different types of debridement are discussed in this review. Various topical formulations are also described, including the need to use antibiotics judiciously.

METHOD

Databases were searched for relevant sources including Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and DynaMed. Search terms used included 'wound care', 'wound management', 'paediatrics', 'children', 'skin substitutes', and 'grafts'. Additionally, each treatment and disease entity was searched for relevant sources, including, for example: 'Apligraf', 'dermagraft', 'Manuka honey', 'antibiotic', 'timolol', and 'negative pressure wound therapy' (NPWT).

RESULTS

Amniotic membrane living skin equivalent is a cellular matrix that has been reportedly successful in treating paediatrics wounds and is currently under investigation in randomised clinical trials. Helicoll is an acellular matrix, which shows promise in children with recessive dystrophic EB. NPWT may be used as a tool to accelerate wound closure in children; however, caution must be taken due to limited evidence to support its safety and efficacy in the paediatric patient population. Integra has been reported as a useful adjunctive treatment to NPWT as both may act synergistically. Hospitalised children and neonates frequently have pressure ulcers, which is why prevention in this type of wound is paramount.

CONCLUSION

Advancements in wound care are rapidly expanding. Various treatments for non-healing wounds in paediatric and neonatal patients have been reported, but high tier evidence in these populations is scarce. We hope to shed light on existing evidence regarding the different therapeutic modalities, from debridement techniques and dressing types to tissue substitutes and topical remedies. There have been promising results in many studies to date, but RCTs involving larger sample sizes are necessary, in order to determine the specific role these innovative agents play in paediatric wounds and to identify true safety and efficacy.