Calculated Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirements in Primary Open Repair of Craniosynostosis

Long-term outcomes after surgical correction of anterior plagiocephaly secondary to isolated frontosphenoidal synostosis: a systematic review and two illustrative cases

PURPOSE

Anterior plagiocephaly ( AP), secondary to isolated frontosphenoidal synostosis (IFS), represents one of the rarest forms of craniosynostosis documented in medical literature. Therefore, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the long-term (> 2 years) postoperative outcomes of this minor suture synostosis.

METHODS

This study presents the long-term outcomes of two patients previously treated for IFS, detailing their clinical, imaging, and postoperative characteristics. Additionally, a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA criteria to summarize existing literature on the topic. The review specifically focuses on long-term aesthetic outcomes, reoperation rates, and complications following surgical intervention for IFS.

RESULTS

Four articles encompassing 12 patients were included in the systematic review. The review highlights clinical features, postoperative complications, reoperation rates, and long-term aesthetic outcomes. The mean age at surgery was 17.5 months (range 9.5-24 months), with an average age at diagnosis of 9.3 months (range 6-10 months). Fronto-orbital advancement was the predominant surgical approach described across all cases. The reoperation rate among patients was 16.6%, with only two cases reporting postoperative complications. In one of our cases, an intraoperative CT scan was utilized to illustrate real-time improvement in frontal bone alignment according to the surgical plan, which significantly contributed to positive long-term clinical outcomes observed during a follow-up period exceeding 24 months.

CONCLUSION

IFS, is a rare minor suture synostosis, significantly affects the aesthetic appearance of the forehead and necessitates consideration in the management of AP cases. Surgical intervention has shown minimal reoperation rates and excellent long-term prognosis. These findings are reinforced by recent institutional data and a comprehensive systematic review of the current literature.

Sagittal Synostectomy With Tension Band Sutures for Correction of Sagittal Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Premature fusion of the sagittal suture is the most common form of craniosynostosis and can be treated using a variety of open or endoscopic approaches. Existing approaches have varying degrees of effectiveness. Open approaches, whether performed early or late, can be associated with significant blood loss and the need for transfusion. Endoscope-assisted approaches are minimally invasive but require months of postoperative helmet therapy to help remodel the skull. Implantation of springs or distractors requires a second operation for removal of the devices. Here, we present an alternative technique for early correction of sagittal craniosynostosis combining sagittal synostectomy with tension band sutures to remodel the skull without need for transfusion or helmet therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients treated for sagittal craniosynostosis using a synostectomy with tension band sutures at a single tertiary care institution. Data on patient demographics, operative factors, and postoperative course were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients underwent the novel procedure. The median preoperative cephalic index was 68 and improved to 76 immediately postoperatively. The median blood loss was 10 mL while the operative duration was 112 minutes. No blood transfusions were needed. One small dural laceration was encountered that was promptly repaired. There were no postoperative complications. Patients presenting for follow-up visits showed continued improvement in head shape and cephalic index.

CONCLUSION

A modified sagittal craniectomy with tension band sutures to remodel the skull is effective in achieving immediate correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. The correction remains durable over long-term follow-up. Importantly, the technique can be performed with minimal blood loss and reduces transfusion risk, operative time, and overall morbidity compared with traditional open approaches while avoiding the need for helmet therapy necessitated by endoscopic approaches.

Postoperative coagulopathy among otherwise healthy pediatric patients undergoing open craniosynostosis repair: a retrospective study

Significant blood loss and resultant transfusion may lead to coagulopathy. The need for routine transfusion of non-RBC blood products in healthy pediatric patients suffering significant, yet controlled, intra-operative blood loss is controversial. Open craniosynostosis surgery is often associated with significant intra-operative blood loss and transfusion, and routinely preformed on otherwise healthy pediatric patients. Therefore, we found it as a useful model for our study, which aimed to assess the need for routine transfusion of non-RBC blood products in healthy pediatric patients suffering significant intra-operative blood loss. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of otherwise healthy pediatric patients, undergoing open craniosynostosis surgery and transfused solely with packed red blood cells (pRBCs) in a single large-volume tertiary surgical center, between January 2010 and December 2021. Among 457 eligible patients, 34 (7.4%) developed significant postoperative coagulopathy. Median [IQR] intra-operative pRBC transfusion volume was 17.4 ml kg^-1 [13.3, 23.1]. Patients who developed coagulopathy did not have higher postoperative pRBC transfusion rate (8.8% vs 3.8%, P = 0.16) or volume (median [IQR], 0 [0, 0] vs 0 [0, 0] ml, P = 0.15), nor higher hospital LOS (5 [4, 5] vs 5 [4, 5] days, P = 0.66). ICU LOS was 0.8 [0.7, 1] vs 0.7 [0.6, 0.8] days (P = 0.02), a difference of no clinical significance.  Conclusions: The incidence of significant coagulopathy after craniosynostosis surgery was low, and not associated with clinically important complications. In otherwise healthy pediatric patients, even significant intra-operative blood loss can be safely managed solely with intravenous fluids and pRBC transfusion. What is Known: • Significant intra-operative blood loss and resultant transfusion may lead to postoperative coagulopathy. • There are potential deleterious effects from both coagulopathy and administration of blood products. What is New: • Open craniosynostosis corrective surgery is a useful model for studying coagulopathy after significant intra-operative blood loss and transfusion in otherwise healthy children. • Under certain conditions, in otherwise healthy pediatric patients, even significant intra-operative blood loss can be safely treated with intravenous fluids and pRBC transfusion alone, with no clinically significant postoperative coagulopathy or its complications.

Evaluation of Complications and Outcomes in Craniosynostosis by Age of Operation: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric

Considerable controversy exists around the optimal age on which to operate for craniosynostosis. This study aims to use data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric to assess the impact of operative age on hospital stay and outcomes. After excluding patients who underwent endoscopic cranial vault remodeling, a total of 3292 patients met inclusion criteria in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric between 2012 and 2019. Median age at surgery was 300 days (interquartile range: 204-494). Patients between 0 and 6 months underwent the highest proportion of complex cranial vault remodeling, Current Procedural Terminology 61,558 ( n =44, 7.7%) and Current Procedural Terminology 61,559 ( n =317, 55.1%). White blood cell counts peaked in the 12 to 18 months group, and were lowest in the 24± months group. Hematocrit was lowest in the 0 to 6 months group and rose steadily to the 24± months group; the inverse pattern was found in platelet concentration, which was highest in the youngest patients and lowest in the oldest. Prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and partial thromboplastin time were relatively consistent across all age groups. Younger patients had significantly shorter operating room times, which increased with patient age ( P <0.001). Younger patients also had significantly shorter length of stay ( P =0.009), though length of stay peaked between 12 and 18 months. There was a significantly lower rate of surgical site infection in younger patients, which occurred in 0.7% of patients 0 to 12 months and 1.0 to 3.0% in patients over 12 to 24± months. There was no significant difference in the average number of transfusions required in any age group ( P =0.961).

Complications in craniosynostosis surgery in patients with rickets: illustrative case and systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis (CSS) is the premature fusion of calvarial sutures associated with identified genetic mutations or secondary to alterations in intracranial pressure, brain, or bone growth patterns. Of the metabolic etiologies implicated in CSS, X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (XLHR) is the most common, with dysfunctional bone mineralization leading to progressive hyperostosis and delayed synostosis. There is a paucity of literature discussing the unique surgical considerations for XLHR-related CSS.

OBSERVATIONS

A 26-month-old male with XLHR-related sagittal CSS underwent cranial vault remodeling (CVR). Surgery was complicated by the presence of diploic hypertrophy with significant intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL). EBL greatly exceeded reference ranges for CVR in all-cause CSS. As a result, the surgical goals were modified and the complete planned procedure aborted. Subsequent review of preoperative imaging revealed multiple fine vascular lacunae within the bone. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify reported complications relating to surgical intervention for rickets-associated CSS.

LESSONS

Future considerations for patients with XLHR-related CSS should emphasize awareness of metabolic risk factors with associated complications, and the need for selection of approach and operative management techniques to avoid EBL. Further research is required to elucidate underlying mechanisms and determine whether the encountered phenomenon is characteristic across this patient population and potentially minimized by preoperative medical therapy.

The use of a single-piece bone flap for cranial reshaping in anterior craniosynostosis patients: clinical experience and a description of a novel technique

Background

Craniosynostosis is known as premature closure of one or more of the cranial sutures. Anterior craniosynostosis involves anterior plagiocephaly and trigonocephaly. One of the issues in anterior craniosynostosis skull reshaping is maintaining an aesthetically pleasing forehead curve. Therefore, in this article, we demonstrate our novel technique to use a single-piece bone flap for cranial reshaping of the anterior mold in patients diagnosed with anterior craniosynostosis. A retrospective record review of patients who underwent single piece bone flap cranial reshaping for correction of unicoronal synostosis (UCS) and metopic synostosis (MS) at an Academic Institute in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2018 and 2020, was conducted.

Results

Six non-syndromic consecutive patients were included. Three of the patients had MS. The mean age at surgery was 11.16 months (range, 6–19 months). The average OR time was 315 min (range, 263–368 min). The average intraoperative blood loss was 225 ml (range, 100–400 ml). All patients had achieved acceptable functional and aesthetic results.

Conclusion

Our novel technique is an innovative and efficient reconstructive technique to simultaneously address MS and UCS and minimize intraoperative bleeding and surgery time. However, more studies with more cases are required.

Antifibrinolytics Are Not Associated With Reduced Blood Loss in Minimally-Invasive Endoscopic-Assisted Craniectomy for Repair of Single-Suture Craniosynostosis

ABSTRACT

Minimally-invasive endoscopic-assisted craniectomy (EAC) achieves similar functional and cosmetic outcomes, whereas reducing morbidity risk that is often associated with complex cranial vault reconstruction. Antifibrinolytics (AF) usage to limit blood loss and transfusion requirements during complex cranial vault reconstruction has been studied extensively; however, studies are limited for AF therapy in EAC. The aim of this single-center retrospective observational cohort pilot study was to evaluate whether the use of AF was associated with reduced blood loss in infants undergoing EAC. The authors hypothesized that there would be no difference in blood loss between patients who received AF and those that did not receive AF during EAC. Non-syndromic patients who underwent single-suture EAC were retrospectively evaluated. Primary outcome measure was intraoperative calculated blood loss (mL/kg). Secondary outcome measures included perioperative red blood cells transfusion volumes, number of blood donor exposures, and pediatric intensive care unit and total hospital length of stay. Study cohort demographic and outcome data were analyzed; Fisher exact test was used for categorical data, Student t test was used for continuous data. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Forty-nine EAC patients were included in the study with 34 patients in the AF cohort and 15 patients in the non-AF cohort. There were no significant differences in demographics between the 2 groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in intraoperative calculated blood loss or any secondary outcome measure. In our single-suture EAC study cohorts, AF administration was not associated with a decrease in blood loss when compared to those that did not receive AF therapy.

Open Repair Versus Closed Repair: A Cost-Analysis of the Two Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Craniosynostoses

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to quantify the hospitalization charges of the 2 general surgical approaches in the treatment of craniosynostosis and determine if there was a significant difference between the 2. Several studies compared them side-by-side according to specific variables, such as success rates, postoperative complications, blood loss, and length of stay, but were limited by small sample sizes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study that was conducted using the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). All patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis (Q75.0) were identified. The procedures were grouped according to the approach taken, whether it was a traditional, open approach, or a closed, minimally invasive approach. The primary predictor variable was the surgical approach (open vs closed). The outcome variables were the hospital charges (US dollars) and length of stay (days). Statistical analyses were based on the univariate and multivariate linear regression models, and P value less than .05 marked the significance level.

RESULTS

Among a sample of 2,585 cases, an open approach was employed in 2,353 cases and a closed approach in 232 cases. Race, payer information, hospital region, admission status (elective vs not elective), patient location, and surgical approach (open vs closed) were all significant predictors (P < .15) of increased hospitalization charges. Relative to white patients, being in the 'other' racial class added $10,987 in hospital charges (P < .05). Relative to the Northeast, being a patient in the West added $33,459 in hospital charges (P < .01). Not being admitted electively added $72,572 (P < .01) relative to elective admissions. Finally, open repair added $59,539 (P < .01) in charges relative to closed repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The traditional open approach added nearly $60,000 to the cost of the procedure when compared with the closed, endoscopic approach. The scope and invasiveness of the open approach demand greater surgical services, hospital services, supplies, and equipment, ultimately contributing to this increased cost.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Parental Satisfaction Outcomes of Strip Craniectomy with Postoperative Helmet versus Spring-Mediated Remodeling in Sagittal Craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

We sought to compare outcomes and parental satisfaction between 2 approaches for sagittal craniosynostosis: strip craniectomy with spring-mediated skull remodeling (SMSR) and strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet (SCH).

METHODS

Perioperative and outcome data for SMSR or SCH patients between September 2010 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A telephone survey was administered to parents of children who underwent both procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 62 children were treated for sagittal craniosynostosis by either SMSR (n = 45) or SCH (n = 17). The SCH group had a lower estimated blood loss (27 vs. 47.06 mL, p = 0.021) and age at surgery (13.0 vs. 19.8 weeks) than the SMSR group. Three patients underwent early springs removal due to trauma or dislodgement, all of whom converted to helmeting. Of the 62 children initially identified, 59 were determined to have an adequate follow-up time to assess long-term outcomes. The mean follow-up time was 30.1 months (n = 16) in the SCH group and 32.0 months in the SMSR group (n = 43, p = 0.39). Two patients in the SCH group and one in the SMSR group converted to open cranial vault reconstruction. Thirty parents agreed to respond to the satisfaction survey (8 SCH, 22 SMSR) based on a Likert scale of responses (0 being most dissatisfied possible, 4 most satisfied possible). Average satisfaction was 3.86/4.0 in the SCH group and 3.45/4.0 in the SMSR group. No parents in the SCH group would change to SMSR, while 3 of the 22 SMSR survey responders would have changed to SCH.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative outcomes and average parental satisfaction were similar in both groups. Importance of helmet wear compliance and risk of spring dislodgement should be discussed with parents.