Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Two Different Negative Pressure Therapy Systems in Closed Incision Management

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Two Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Devices to Manage Cesarean Section Incisions

This paper aims to evaluate whether there is a device-dependent effect on the reduction of surgical site complications in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) undergoing cesarean section (C-section). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for the period, January 2011 to September 2021. English language articles describing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared either a -80 or -125 mm Hg single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) device to standard dressings in obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) patients undergoing C-section were included. Conference abstracts and "terminated" RCTs with published results were deemed eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome of interest was surgical site infection (SSI), classified as composite, superficial, or deep. Secondary outcomes assessed included seroma, dehiscence, hematoma, bleeding, reoperation, readmission, blistering, and (composite) wound complications. A total of 223 titles were identified, of which 129 were screened by full-text review. Eleven RCTs encompassing 5,847 patients met the inclusion criteria and were considered eligible for further analysis (-80 mm Hg: six studies; -125 mm Hg: five studies). A statistically significant improvement in the composite SSI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.89) and superficial SSI (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.50-0.86) outcomes was observed with the -80 mm Hg device, compared with standard dressings. The same effect on SSI outcomes was not observed with the -125 mm Hg device (composite SSI-OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.64-1.28; superficial SSI-OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.70-1.78). There were no statistically significant differences in any of the other assessed outcomes. sNPWT devices may differ in their ability to reduce composite or superficial SSI after C-section. KEY POINTS: · Negative pressure benefits obese patients undergoing C-section.. · Negative pressure devices may differ in performance.. · A head-to-head clinical trial is needed..

Surgical site infection outcomes of two different closed incision negative pressure therapy systems in cardiac surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) system use compared with standard of care dressings (SOC) on surgical site infection (SSI) in cardiac surgery was assessed. A systematic literature review was conducted. Risk ratios (RR) and random effects models were used to assess ciNPT with foam dressing (ciNPT-F) or multilayer absorbent dressing (ciNPT-MLA) versus SOC. Health economic models were developed to assess potential per patient cost savings. Eight studies were included in the ciNPT-F analysis and four studies were included in the ciNPT-MLA analysis. For ciNPT-F, a significant reduction in SSI incidence was observed (RR: 0.507, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.362, 0.709; p < 0.001). High-risk study analysis reported significant SSI reduction with ciNPT-F use (RR: 0.390, 95% CI: 0.205, 0.741; p = 0.004). For ciNPT-MLA, no significant difference in SSI rates were reported (RR: 0.672, 95% CI: 0.276, 1.635; p = 0.381). Health economic modelling estimated a per patient cost savings of $554 for all patients and $3242 for the high-risk population with ciNPT-F use. Health economic modelling suggests ciNPT-F may provide a cost-effective solution for sternotomy incision management. However, limited high-quality literature exists. More high-quality evidence is needed to fully assess the impact of ciNPT use following cardiac surgery.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care Over Closed Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Incisions in the Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are common surgical procedures but carry a risk of harmful and costly surgical site complications (SSCs). This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) on the risk of SSCs following THA and TKA.

Methods

A systematic literature review identified studies published between January 2005 and July 2021 comparing ciNPT (Prevena Incision Management System) to traditional standard-of-care dressings for patients undergoing THA and TKA. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model. A cost analysis was conducted using inputs from the meta-analysis and cost estimates from a national database.

Results

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies evaluated SSCs, where a significant difference was seen in favor of ciNPT (relative risk [RR]: 0.332, P < .001). Significant benefits in favor of ciNPT were also observed for surgical site infection (RR: 0.401, P = .016), seroma (RR: 0.473, P = .008), dehiscence (RR: 0.380, P = .014), prolonged incisional drainage (RR: 0.399, P = .003), and rate of return to the operating room (RR: 0.418, P = .001). The estimated cost savings attributed to ciNPT use was $932 per patient.

Conclusions

The use of ciNPT after TKA and THA was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of SSCs, including surgical site infections, seroma, dehiscence, and prolonged incisional drainage. The risk of reoperation was reduced as were the costs of care in the modeled cost analysis, suggesting a potential for both economic and clinical advantages for ciNPT over standard-of-care dressings, particularly in high-risk patients.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Comparison of Outcomes

We aim to discern the impact of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) on wound healing in the oncoplastic breast surgery population.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent oncoplastic breast surgery with and without ciNPT in a single health system over 6 years. Oncoplastic breast surgery was defined as breast conservation surgery involving partial mastectomy with immediate volume displacement or replacement techniques. Primary outcomes were rates of clinically significant complications requiring either medical or operative intervention, including seroma, hematoma, fat necrosis, wound dehiscence, and infection. Secondary outcomes were rates of minor complications.

Results

ciNPT was used in 75 patients; standard postsurgical dressing was used in 142 patients. Mean age (P = 0.73) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.11) were similar between the groups. The ciNPT cohort had higher baseline BMIs (28.23 ± 4.94 versus 30.55 ± 6.53; P = 0.004), ASA levels (2.35 ± 0.59 versus 2.62 ± 0.52; P = 0.002), and preoperative macromastia symptoms (18.3% versus 45.9%; P ≤ 0.001). The ciNPT cohort had statistically significant lower rates of clinically relevant complications (16.9% versus 5.3%; P = 0.016), the number of complications (14.1% versus 5.3% with one complication, 2.8% versus 0% with >2; P = 0.044), and wound dehiscence (5.6% versus 0%; P = 0.036).

Conclusions

The use of ciNPT reduces the overall rate of clinically relevant postoperative complications, including wound dehiscence. The ciNPT cohort had higher rates of macromastia symptoms, BMI, and ASA, all of which put them at increased risk for complications. Therefore, ciNPT should be considered in the oncoplastic population, especially in those patients with increased risk for postoperative complications.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Standard of Care Over Closed Plastic Surgery Incisions in the Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Background

Surgical site complications (SSCs) are not uncommon in plastic surgery procedures due to characteristics of the incisions and the patients undergoing such procedures. Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been used to manage surgical incisions across surgical specialties. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of ciNPT on risk of SSCs following plastic surgery.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted to identify studies published between January 2005 and July 2021 comparing ciNPT versus traditional standard of care (SOC) dressings for patients undergoing plastic surgery. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model. A cost analysis was conducted using inputs from the meta-analysis and cost estimates from a national hospital database.

Results

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. In the 11 studies that evaluated the effect of ciNPT on of SSCs, ciNPT use was associated with a significant reduction in risk of SSC (P < .001). ciNPT use was also associated with reduced risk of dehiscence (P = .001) and skin necrosis (P =.002) and improved scar quality (P = .014). Hospital length of stay was decreased by an average of 0.61 days for patients receiving ciNPT (P < .001). There were no differences in observed risk of SSIs (P = .113) and seromas (P = .143). While not statistically significant, a decrease in rate of reoperations (P = .074), fluid volume removed from the drains (P = .069) and drain days (-1.97 days, P = .093) was observed with ciNPT use. The estimated cost savings attributed to ciNPT use was $904 (USD) per patient.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that ciNPT may reduce the incidence of SSCs and related health care utilization and costs in plastic surgery procedures.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy versus Standard of Care in Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been utilized to help manage closed incisions across many surgical specialties. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of ciNPT on postsurgical and health economic outcomes.

Methods

A systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed for publications written in English, comparing ciNPT to standard-of-care dressings between January 2005 and August 2021. Study participant characteristics, surgical procedure, dressings used, treatment duration, postsurgical outcomes, and follow-up data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Risk ratios summarized dichotomous outcomes. Difference in means or standardized difference in means was used to assess continuous variables reported on the same scale or outcomes reported on different scales/measurement instruments.

Results

The literature search identified 84 studies for analysis. Significant reductions in surgical site complication (SSC), surgical site infection (SSI), superficial SSI, deep SSI, seroma, dehiscence, skin necrosis, and prolonged incisional drainage were associated with ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Reduced readmissions and reoperations were significant in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05). Patients receiving ciNPT had a 0.9-day shorter hospital stay (P < 0.0001). Differences in postoperative pain scores and reported amounts of opioid usage were significant in favor of ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Scar evaluations demonstrated improved scarring in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05).

Discussion

For these meta-analyses, ciNPT use was associated with statistically significant reduction in SSCs, SSIs, seroma, dehiscence, and skin necrosis incidence. Reduced readmissions, reoperation, length of hospital stay, decreased pain scores and opioid use, and improved scarring were also observed in ciNPT patients.

Closed-Incision and Surrounding Soft Tissue Negative Pressure Dressings in Post-Mastectomy Pre-Pectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Pilot Study

Background: Closed-incision and surrounding soft tissue negative pressure therapy (cistNPT) is theorized to decrease infection, reduce tissue edema, and promote healing of the mastectomy skin flap. We report our early experience with this dressing in pre-pectoral direct-to-implant (pDTI) breast reconstruction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent post-mastectomy pDTI breast reconstruction with cistNPT between July 2019 and February 2020. All reconstructions utilized smooth round silicone gel implants and human acellular dermal matrix. Results: Thirty-five female patients underwent 58 mastectomies. Mean age and body mass index were 49.9 years and 28.9 kg/m2, respectively. Eleven (31.4%) patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The mean sternal notch-to-nipple distance was 27.0 cm. The median specimen weight was 483 g, while the median implant volume was 495 cc. The mean implant-to-specimen ratio was 1.4 for nipple-sparing, 1.1 for skin-sparing, and 0.7 for skin-reducing mastectomy. Total drain volume was 483.1 cc from each breast. Post-operative complications included seroma (5.2%), peri-incisional necrosis (8.6%), and superficial skin epidermolysis (13.8%). There were no cases of surgical site infection, dehiscence, or hematoma. Rate of return to the operative room was 3.4%. Mean follow-up was 90 days. Conclusions: In our series of pDTI breast reconstructions with cistNPT, no patients experienced hematoma, dehiscence, or infection complications. Rates of seroma, skin necrosis requiring operative debridement, and total drain volumes were lower than those reported in literature.

Closed‐incision negative pressure therapy at −125 mmHg significantly reduces surgical site complications following total hip and knee arthroplasties: A stratified meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Closed‐incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPT) has shown promising effects for managing infected wounds. This meta‐analysis explores the current state of knowledge on ciNPT in orthopedics and addresses whether ciNPT at −125 mmHg or −80 mmHg or conventional dressing reduces the incidence of surgical site complications in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Methods

This meta‐analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and Cochrane Handbook. Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ciNPT use compared to conventional dressings following hip and knee surgeries were considered for inclusion. Non‐stratified and stratified meta‐analyses of six RCTs were conducted to test for confounding and biases. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The included six RCTs have 611 patients. Total hip and knee arthroplasties were performed for 51.7% and 48.2% of the included population, respectively. Of 611 patients, conventional dressings were applied in 315 patients and 296 patients received ciNPT. Two ciNPT systems have been used across the six RCTs; PREVENA Incision Management System (−125 mmHg) (63.1%) and PICO dressing (−80 mmHg) (36.8%). The non‐stratified analysis showed that the ciNPT system had a statistically significant, lower risk of persistent wound drainage as compared to conventional dressing following total hip and knee arthroplasties (OR = 0.28; P = .002). There was no difference between ciNPT and conventional dressings in terms of wound hematoma, blistering, seroma, and dehiscence. The stratified meta‐analysis indicated that patients undergoing treatment with high‐pressure ciNPT (120 mmHg) displayed significantly fewer overall complications and persistent wound drainage (P = .00001 and P = .002, respectively) when compared to low‐pressure ciNPT (80 mmHg) and conventional dressings. In addition, ciNPT is associated with shorter hospital stays. (P = .005).

Conclusion

When compared to conventional wound dressing and −80 mmHg ciNPT, the use of −125 mmHg ciNPT is recommended in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.

Effect of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy on incidence rate of surgical site infection after stoma reversal: a pilot study

Introduction

The stoma reversal (SR) procedure is associated with a relatively high risk of perioperative complications with surgical site infection (SSI) as the most common. Recently closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) was applied widely to prevent SSI.

Aim

To investigate the efficiency of ciNPWT in terms of the incidence rate of SSI after SR surgery.

Material and methods

As an exploratory observational cohort study patients were treated either with ciNPWT (n = 15) or standard sterile dressing (SSD) (n = 15). CiNPWT was applied every 3 days whereas SSD was changed every day. Clinical evaluation for SSI signs, C-reactive protein level and pain assessment using the visual analogue scale (VAS) were analyzed.

Results

The incidence rate of SSI was in 13% (2/15) in the ciNPWT group and 26% (4/15) in the SSD group (p = 0.651, OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.03–3.73). All patients in the SSD group who developed SSI presented both local and generalized signs of infection. Pain-VAS levels assessed on the 1^st (MdnciNPWT = 4, MdnSSD = 5, p = 0.027, W = 51.5) and 3^rd postoperative day (MdnciNPWT = 2, MdnSSD = 4, p = 0.014, W = 45.5) were significantly lower in the ciNPWT group than in the SSD group.

Conclusions

CiNPWT seems not to have a benefit to reduce SSI after the SR procedure. Further investigation is needed to establish firmly the benefit of using ciNPWT in this group of patients.

A Modified Technique for Applying Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Dressing Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

Postoperative incisional management subsequent to total joint replacement arthroplasty is of importance to the orthopedic surgical team. The application of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) to surgical incisions following replacement arthroplasty has demonstrated positive outcomes in orthopedics. This paper describes a technique involving the postoperative application of ciNPT over closed incisions originating from joint arthroplasty to facilitate a reduction in the incidence of surgical site complications (SSCs). To address any potential challenges that may be associated with ciNPT application and removal, the ciNPT dressing was applied to the knee incision with approximately 15 degrees of flexion utilizing the total knee bump to allow the knee to rest with flexion at that angle. For posterior hip replacements or revisions, the readily adjustable ciNPT dressing was enlisted for use to cover curvilinear incisions. The adhesive drape over the foam ciNPT dressing would be blocked to ensure that drain placement, if used, would not be incorporated with the hydrocolloid portion of the dressing. In order to properly apply the dressing, it was imperative that the hydrocolloid portion was not subject to any buckling. The dressing was walked over the foam ciNPT dressing to ensure that there was an absence of tension on the dressing. The manufacturer's instructions support dressing use for a maximum of seven days with continuous subatmospheric pressure (-125 mmHg) applied to the closed incision. Applying the adhesive ciNPT drape over the ciNPT foam dressing with a minimal amount of tension is integral to attaining positive outcomes using ciNPT. Employing ciNPT may reduce the risk of delayed incisional healing and SSCs, which may alleviate providers from extra postoperative global visits.

Surgical Wound Complications after Colorectal Surgery with Single-Use Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Surgical Dressing over Closed Incisions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Global studies indicate that surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major healthcare challenge within hospitals and can have a profound impact on patient quality of life and healthcare costs. Closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been reported to provide positive clinical benefits for patients with various incisions, including those following colorectal surgeries.

METHODS

Investigators performed a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial to evaluate complications of surgical incisions in patients who received a ciNPT dressing versus a conventional surgical dressing (control) over their closed incision following colorectal surgery. The incidence of SSI was determined at 7, 15, and 30 days postsurgery.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients participated in the study. Results showed that the SSI rate on day 7 was lower in the ciNPT group versus the control group (10/75 [13.3%] vs 17/73 [23.3%]), but this difference was not statistically significant. On day 15, the SSI rate was 12/75 (16.0%) in the ciNPT group versus 21/73 (28.8%) in the control group; however, this difference was only marginally statistically significant (P = .0621). At 1 month, the SSI rate remained lower in the ciNPT group (13/75 [17.3%] vs 21/73 [28.8%], P = .0983) compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies with larger population sizes are necessary to determine the impact of ciNPT on patients' incisions after colorectal surgery.

Does Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Prevent Sternal Wound Infections?

BACKGROUND

 Incisional negative pressure wound therapy has been described as an effective method to prevent wound infections after open heart surgery in several publications. However, most studies have examined relatively small patient groups, only a few were randomized, and some have manufacturer-sponsorship. Most of the studies have utilized Prevena; there are only a few reports describing the PICO incisional negative pressure wound therapy system.

METHODS

 We conducted a prospective cohort study involving a propensity score-matched analysis to evaluate the effect of PICO incisional negative pressure wound therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting. A total of 180 high-risk patients with obesity or diabetes were included in the study group. The control group included 772 high-risk patients operated before the initiation of the study protocol.

RESULTS

 The rates of deep sternal wound infections in the PICO group and in the control group were 3.9 and 3.1%, respectively. The rates of superficial wound infections needing operative treatment were 3.1 and 0.8%, respectively. After propensity score matching with two groups of 174 patients, the incidence of both deep and superficial infections remained slightly elevated in the PICO group. None of the infections were due to technical difficulties or early interruption of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

 It seems that incisional negative pressure wound therapy with PICO is not effective in preventing wound infections after coronary artery bypass grafting. The main difference in this study compared with previous reports is the relatively low incidence of infections in our control group.

Decreasing complications of pectoralis major muscle flap reconstruction with two modalities of negative pressure wound therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Deep sternal wound infection is a feared complication of open-heart surgery. Negative pressure wound therapy has gained an important role in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy has been introduced as a method to prevent wound complications after sternotomy, and lately, after flap reconstructions in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection. We aimed to study if incisional negative pressure wound therapy with PICO™ had similar beneficial effect described earlier with competing commercial devices.

METHODS

This study included 82 patients treated with pectoralis major muscle flap for deep sternal wound infection during the years 2006-2020. PICO group consisted of 24 patients treated with preoperative negative pressure wound therapy and postoperative incisional negative pressure wound therapy (PICO™). Two control groups included 48 patients with conventional treatment and 10 patients with preoperative negative pressure wound therapy only.

RESULTS

In the PICO group, the complication rate declined from 50.0% to 33.30%, major complication rate from 29.2% to 12.5%, and need for an additional flap from 14.6.% to 4.2% when compared to conventional treatment. The length of hospital stay decreased as well. Preoperative negative pressure wound therapy alone was associated with moderate decline in the complication rates. In addition, we described the use of split pectoralis major muscle flap reconstruction in 57 patients. To our knowledge, this is the largest published patient series describing this method in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Incisional negative pressure wound therapy with PICO™ seems beneficial after flap reconstruction. Split pectoralis major muscle flap is a versatile reconstruction option suitable to be used as a workhorse in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection.

The use of closed incision negative pressure therapy for incision and surrounding soft tissue management: Expert panel consensus recommendations

As the use of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) becomes more widespread, dressing designs have evolved to address implementation challenges and meet surgeon demand. While traditional application of ciNPT was limited to the immediate suture line, a novel dressing that covers the incision and additional surrounding tissues has become available. To expand upon previous ciNPT recommendations and provide guidance on this new dressing, an expert panel of plastic surgeons convened to review the current literature, identify challenges to the implementation and sustainability of ciNPT, and use a modified Delphi technique to form a consensus on the appropriate use of ciNPT with full‐coverage dressings. After three rounds of collecting expert opinion via the Delphi method, consensus was reached if 80% of the panel agreed upon a statement. This manuscript establishes 10 consensus statements regarding when ciNPT with full‐coverage foam dressings should be considered or recommended in the presence of patient or incision risk factors, effective therapeutic settings and duration, precautions for use, and tools and techniques to support application. The panel also discussed areas of interest for future study of ciNPT with full‐coverage dressings. High‐quality, controlled studies are needed to expand the understanding of the benefits of ciNPT over the incision and surrounding tissues.

Closed-incision negative-pressure wound management in surgery—literature review and recommendations

Background

Wound healing deficits and subsequent surgical site infections are potential complications after surgical procedures, resulting in increased morbidity and treatment costs. Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) systems seem to reduce postoperative wound complications by sealing the wound and reducing tensile forces.

Materials and methods

We conducted a collaborative English literature review in the PubMed database including publications from 2009 to 2020 on ciNPWT use in five surgical subspecialities (orthopaedics and trauma, general surgery, plastic surgery, cardiac surgery and vascular surgery). With literature reviews, case reports and expert opinions excluded, the remaining 59 studies were critically summarized and evaluated with regard to their level of evidence.

Results

Of nine studies analysed in orthopaedics and trauma, positive results of ciNPWT were reported in 55.6%. In 11 of 13 (84.6%), 13 of 15 (86.7%) and 10 of 10 (100%) of studies analysed in plastic, vascular and general surgery, respectively, a positive effect of ciNPWT was observed. On the contrary, only 4 of 12 studies from cardiac surgery discovered positive effects of ciNPWT (33.3%).

Conclusion

ciNPWT is a promising treatment modality to improve postoperative wound healing, notably when facing increased tensile forces. To optimise ciNPWT benefits, indications for its use should be based on patient- and procedure-related risk factors.

Reducing the Risk of Postoperative Problems With Panniculectomies Using the Prevena Plus™ 125 Incisional Management Dressing

Abdominal wall reconstruction procedures have become increasingly popular in recent years as technology and surgical techniques have improved. The downside to these procedures has been the high rate of postoperative complications. Surgical site infections have been reported as high as 33.7% of the $9.8 billion spent annually on these complications. I present the case of a 62-year-old morbidly obese woman who underwent a combined procedure of abdominal wall reconstruction and panniculectomy. A total of 45 lbs of pannus was removed through a transverse incision that extended from hip to hip, measuring 90 cm in length. Following panniculectomy, abdominal wall reconstruction was performed by mobilizing the abdominal skin flap from the lower abdominal panniculectomy incision (avoiding a T-shaped incision with a traditionally high risk of dehiscence), and placement of biologic mesh as an underlay followed by fascial closure. Prevena Plus™ 125 (3M + KCI, San Antonio, TX) was applied for postoperative closed incisional negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) and continued for 10 days. No postoperative complications occurred. The incision healed without incident with no hernia recurrence at one year. ciNPT in high-risk patients can help minimize the risk of postoperative wound healing complications and should be considered in high-risk patients. Those patients undergoing combined procedures and especially morbidly obese patients undergoing combined abdominal wall reconstruction and panniculectomy are at particularly high risk for wound healing complications. ciNPT should be considered as a postoperative dressing of choice in this challenging patient population.

Deep Learning-Based Risk Model for Best Management of Closed Groin Incisions After Vascular Surgery

BACKGROUND

Reduced surgical site infection (SSI) rates have been reported with use of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) in high-risk patients.

METHODS

A deep learning-based, risk-based prediction model was developed from a large national database of 72,435 patients who received infrainguinal vascular surgeries involving upper thigh/groin incisions. Patient demographics, histories, laboratory values, and other variables were inputs to the multilayered, adaptive model. The model was then retrospectively applied to a prospectively tracked single hospital data set of 370 similar patients undergoing vascular surgery, with ciNPT or control dressings applied over the closed incision at the surgeon's discretion. Objective predictive risk scores were generated for each patient and used to categorize patients as "high" or "low" predicted risk for SSI.

RESULTS

Actual institutional cohort SSI rates were 10/148 (6.8%) and 28/134 (20.9%) for high-risk ciNPT versus control, respectively (P < 0.001), and 3/31 (9.7%) and 5/57 (8.8%) for low-risk ciNPT versus control, respectively (P = 0.99). Application of the model to the institutional cohort suggested that 205/370 (55.4%) patients were matched with their appropriate intervention over closed surgical incision (high risk with ciNPT or low risk with control), and 165/370 (44.6%) were inappropriately matched. With the model applied to the cohort, the predicted SSI rate with perfect utilization would be 27/370 (7.3%), versus 12.4% actual rate, with estimated cost savings of $231-$458 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with a subjective practice strategy, an objective risk-based strategy using prediction software may be associated with superior results in optimizing SSI rates and costs after vascular surgery.