Use of the Propeller Lumbar Perforator Flap: A Series of 32 Cases

Soft tissue reconstruction of the trunk with pedicled perforator and musculocutaneous flaps: A single-center comparative retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue trunk reconstruction is often challenging. Although free microvascular flaps are a feasible option in case of extensive defects involving deep structures, pedicled flaps represent a good alternative, especially if harvested and dissected with a "microsurgical" approach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of trunk reconstruction with the use of pedicled flaps, according to the application of our reconstructive algorithm, and to compare it to other reconstructive methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2021, we retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent soft tissue reconstruction of the trunk with pedicled flaps at the authors' institution. Patient's demographic, clinical and surgical characteristics and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed by descriptive statistics. A comparative analysis was made between the study group and two other groups who underwent reconstruction of trunk defects with free flaps and skin grafts, respectively, at the authors' institution.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were included in the study. Patients' age ranged between 36 and 82 years (mean: 57.8 years). Twenty-eight patients were male, while 19 patients were female. In 76.6% of patients (36 out of 47), reconstructive procedures were performed to repair defects resulting from cancer resection. Reconstruction of superficial defects was always achieved with perforator flaps (n = 25). In case of full-thickness defects, reconstruction was carried out with musculocutaneous flaps (n = 22); latissimus dorsi and vastus lateralis were the most used flaps for chest and abdominal wall reconstruction, respectively. In our series, we observed only one case of total flap loss requiring re-operation under general anesthesia. Minor complications occurred in 8.5% of cases (4 out of 47 patients). We observed two cases of partial flap necrosis and two cases of wound dehiscence. In the skin grafts group (n = 53), the mean age was 54.5 years (range 39-85) and 56% of patients were male (n = 30). In 66% of cases (n = 30) the defect resulted from oncological resection. The overall complication rate was 18.8% (n = 10). In the free flaps group (n = 10), the mean age was 49.0 years (range 29-77) and 60% of patients (n = 6) were male. In 70% of cases (n = 7) the defect was caused by oncological resection. Complications occurred in two patients (20%). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of overall complication rate between the study group and the two comparative groups (p = .48). A significant correlation was found between the reconstructive method and the type and size of the defect, with reconstruction through free flaps being associated with larger (344.0 vs. 220.4 cm2 ) (p = .04) and full-thickness defects (80.0% vs. 46.8%) (p < .01) if compared to pedicled flaps.

CONCLUSIONS

In the new era of microsurgery, pedicled flaps represent a valid alternative to free flaps for the majority of soft tissue defects of the trunk. In our series, no statistically significant differences in terms of complications were found between reconstructions of similar defects achieved with pedicled and free flaps, and free flap use was limited to extensive full-thickness defects. In addition, the rate of postoperative complications with pedicled flaps found in our cohort was lower than the rate reported in the literature.

Near-total gluteal defect reconstruction with bilateral delayed giant lumbar artery perforator flaps: A case report

The reconstruction of the near-total or total gluteal defects is challenging. Reconstructive options were restricted when the gluteal flaps were sacrificed. The lumbar artery perforator flap (LAPF) has been recently popularized as an alternative option for sacral and gluteal pressure ulcers. Extension of flap size may be needed in extensive defects. We aim to use the delay phenomenon to increase lumbar artery perforator flap territory to reconstruct near total gluteal defect. A 36-year-old woman was referred to our clinic with defect sizes of 23 × 23 cm and 25 × 17 cm for the right and left gluteal regions. She had a history of multiple surgeries for her paraplegia-related sacrogluteal pressure sores. The reconstruction was started on the left side with delaying incisions to the flap borders. Seven days later, the left gluteal defect was reconstructed with 27 × 19 cm LAPF based on a second lumbar artery perforator. At the same session, the delaying incision was performed to the borders of the right LAPF. On day 14, the right gluteal defect was closed with a 25 × 25 cm-sized right LAPF. No flap loss and early complications were seen. The patient was discharged without complication after 10 days after the last operation. The patient was followed up for 1 year. A right ischial pressure ulcer due to wheelchair use was encountered, which was managed with conservative wound care in the 8th month. Giant-sized lumbar artery perforator flaps may be obtained by delay phenomenon to reconstruct near-total or total gluteal pressure sores.

A Comparison of Handheld Doppler and Indocyanine Green Angiography for Perforator Localization

BACKGROUND

The preoperative identification of perforators is critical to the success of perforator flaps. Several technologies, including handheld Doppler (HHD) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), facilitate this process; however, each technology comes with unique downsides. This study directly compares the performance of HHD and ICGA in preoperative perforator identification and measures the effects of flap thickness and body mass index (BMI) on perforator localization.

METHOD

Data from preoperative HHD and ICGA assessments were compared with the criterion standard of intraoperative perforator localization. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive values were calculated for both and correlated with flap thickness and BMI.

RESULTS

Thirty flaps were transferred in 30 patients across 15 different donor sites. Indocyanine green angiography had higher sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (79.2%, 74.2%, and 87.5%, respectively) than HHD (55.6%, 46.6%, and 69.4%, respectively). Perforators detected by ICGA were used as flap pedicles in 21 cases compared with 13 with HHD. There were no correlations between HHD or ICGA performance and patient BMI (both P > 0.05). Increasing flap thickness was negatively correlated with the accuracy of ICGA ( P = 0.001) but not HHD ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Indocyanine green angiography was more sensitive, specific, and accurate than HHD in identifying perforators across various donor sites; however, its performance suffered in thicker flaps, whereas HHD did not. Patient BMI was not correlated with the performance of either technology. Additional research can further delineate the interrelationships of flap thickness and technologies for perforator localization.

Analysis of risk factors for complications of perforator propeller flaps used for soft tissue reconstruction after malignant tumor resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perforator propeller flaps (PPFs) have been widely used due to their numerous advantages; however, they were also associated with various complications. Herein, we analyzed the risk factors for complications of PPFs used for soft tissue reconstruction after malignant tumor resection.

METHODS

We searched databases for articles on soft tissue reconstruction using PPFs after malignant tumor resection published between January 1991 and April 2021. Studies were selected according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Fixed effects models and relative risks were used for data analysis. Funnel plots and Begg's test were used to evaluate publication bias.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Complications were found in 24.7% of all patients. The four significant risk factors were age equal or older than 60 years (pooled relative risk, 1.83; p = .04), smoking (pooled relative risk, 2.32; p = .03), diabetes (pooled relative risk, 2.59; p = .01) and radiotherapy (pooled relative risk, 2.09; p = .01). Hypertension, defects located in the extremities, flap size equal or greater than 100 cm² , and pedicle rotation equal or greater than 120 degrees were not significant risk factors for complications. No publication bias was found in the included articles.

CONCLUSION

Age equal or older than 60 years, smoking, diabetes and radiotherapy are four risk factors for complications when PPFs are used to reconstruct soft tissue defects resulting from malignant tumor resection.

Combined versus Single Perforator Propeller Flaps for Reconstruction of Large Soft Tissue Defects: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Sufficient wound closure of large soft tissue defects remains a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. We aimed to investigate whether combined perforator propeller flaps (PPFs) are suitable to expand reconstructive options. Patients undergoing PPF reconstruction surgery between 2008 and 2021 were screened and evaluated retrospectively. Of 86 identified patients, 69 patients received one perforator propeller flap, while 17 patients underwent combined PPF reconstruction with multiple flaps. We chose major complications as our primary outcome and defined those as complications that required additional surgery. Postoperatively, 27 patients (31.4%) suffered major complications. The propeller flap size, the type of intervention as well as the operation time were not associated with a higher risk of major complications. A defect size larger than 100 cm², however, was identified as a significant risk factor for major complications among single PPFs but not among combined PPFs (OR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.01−8.36; p = 0.05 vs. OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.02−3.37; p = 0.32). In conclusion, combined PPFs proved to be a reliable technique and should be preferred over single PPFs in the reconstruction of large soft tissue defects at the trunk and proximal lower extremity.