The Impact of Temporal Artery Biopsy at a UK Tertiary Plastic Surgery Unit

Questioning the Utility of Temporal Artery Biopsy in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Negative Biopsy May Facilitate Decision-making

Plastic surgeons are frequently consulted to perform temporal artery biopsy (TAB), even though patients meet the American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria for giant cell arteritis (GCA) and are already treated. This study aimed to analyze the impact of TAB on steroid duration in patients undergoing TAB.

Methods

We undertook a prospective study of adult patients undergoing TAB for GCA in Calgary. Consecutive, multicenter recruitment was performed over 2 years. Primary outcomes included initiation or discontinuation and duration of corticosteroids.

Results

Twenty-one TABs were performed in 20 patients. Nineteen percent of TABs were positive, and 71.4%, negative. In 9.5% of patients, accidental sampling of a vessel other than the superficial temporal artery occurred. Fifty-two percent of patients received steroids before TAB, of which the mean duration was 8.0 days for TAB+ (postive temporal artery biopsy result) patients and 8.4 days for TAB- (negative temporal artery biopsy result; P = 0.22) patients. Before TAB, the American College of Rheumatology score was 2.5 for TAB+ patients and 2.4 for TAB- (P = 0.74). Postbiopsy, the American College of Rheumatology score was 3.5 for TAB+ patients (therefore reaching diagnostic threshold of 3) but remained 2.4 for TAB- (P = 0.02). TAB+ patients were treated for 352.3 days, whereas TAB- patients for 16.7 days (P = 0.29). Complications were more likely with long-term (>6 weeks) steroids (P = 0.17).

Conclusion

In patients with a low suspicion of GCA, a negative TAB helps bolster physician confidence and leads to a shorter steroid duration.

Vascular ultrasound in rheumatology practice

Rheumatologists are increasingly using vascular ultrasound. Several guidelines now recommend ultrasound as the first diagnostic modality in giant cell arteritis (GCA). The German curriculum for rheumatology training has recently included ultrasound for the acute diagnosis of vasculitis. Recent studies have shown that ultrasound of temporal, axillary, subclavian, and vertebral arteries has sensitivities and specificities of >90%. Vascular ultrasound detects subclinical GCA in approximately 20% of patients with "pure" polymyalgia rheumatica. GCA fast-track clinics might regularly include these patients. A new score based on the intima-media thickness of the temporal and axillary arteries allows the monitoring of structural changes with treatment. The score decreases faster for the temporal arteries than it does for the axillary arteries. Measuring the diameter of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch might become a fast and cost-effective tool for the long-term monitoring of aortic aneurysms in extracranial GCA. Vascular ultrasound also has a role for Takayasu arteritis, thrombosis, Behçet's syndrome, and Raynaud's phenomenon.

Optimizing the use of temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Giant cell arteritis is an inflammatory disease of the large- and medium-sized vessels. It is the most common primary vasculitis, with lifetime incidences of 0.5% and 1% in men and women, respectively. Its diagnosis is based upon clinical criteria, which may include temporal artery biopsy. Expected positivity rates of temporal artery biopsies and patient selection remain controversial topics in the literature.

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective study of 127 patients referred for temporal artery biopsy with a diagnosis of suspected giant cell arteritis between January 2014 and December 2018 was performed. The primary outcome was the positivity rate. The relationships between positivity rates, symptoms, clinical suspicion, biopsy delay, biopsy length and corticosteroid treatment were also studied.

RESULTS

A positivity rate of 23.7% (16.6-32.6%) was shown, along with a significant association between jaw claudication and specimen positivity (odds ratio 8.1, p < 0.05). Moreover, there were significant associations between a high initial clinical suspicion of disease and specimen positivity (p < 0.05), as well as a high initial clinical suspicion of disease and pursuit of corticosteroid treatment following biopsy results, regardless of positivity (p < 0.05). The duration of corticosteroid treatment prior to biopsy was not associated with a change in positivity rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The positivity rate of temporal artery biopsy was 23.7%. Treatment of patients with negative temporal artery biopsy was associated with maintenance of corticosteroid treatment when the initial clinical suspicion of arteritis was high. Therefore, temporal artery biopsy may not be necessary for patients with a high initial clinical suspicion of giant cell arteritis.

Temporal Artery Biopsy Debate: Positive TAB Result Prolongs Steroid Use in Giant Cell Arteritis

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in diagnosing giant cell arteritis has been criticized due to surgical risks, a high false negative rate, and redundant information when patients already met American College of Rheumatology criteria. The objective of this study was to investigate TAB's impact on steroid treatment duration.

Methods

A retrospective chart review garnered patient demographics, symptoms, comorbidities, and steroid treatment duration in patients undergoing TAB at a single center. Steroid treatment was compared between TAB+ and TAB - patients.

Results

One hundred seven patients undergoing TAB were included. Patients were predominantly women (70.1%) with a median age of 74 years (46 -91). Of 107 TAB results, 74 (69.2%) were negative, 23 (21.5%) were positive, and 10 (9.3%) were found to be indeterminate. In TAB+ patients, the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate was not significantly different than TAB - patients (60.2 versus 43.7, P = 0.45), nor was the median C-reactive protein (38.8 versus 18.1, P = 0.17). Regarding steroid use, both TAB+ and TAB - patients had a similarly high rate of prebiopsy steroid initiation (82.6% versus 70.3%, P = 0.32). More TAB+ patients remained on steroids at 6 weeks (95.0% versus 57.4%, P = 0.004), 6 months (95% versus 37.7%, P < 0.001), 1 year (65.0% versus 31.1%, P = 0.024), and 18 months (50.0% versus 19.7%, P = 0.045). By 2 years, the difference no longer met significance (35.0% versus 14.8%, P = 0.12). P = 0.12).

Conclusion

TAB positivity does seem to influence maintenance of steroids up to 18 months after biopsy.

Necessity of Temporal Artery Biopsy for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Systematic Review

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is currently the gold standard procedure to diagnose giant cell arteritis. Despite low sensitivity, TAB is routinely performed even if a clinical diagnosis has already been made. The objective of this study was to determine the usefulness of TAB for giant cell arteritis management.

Methods

We performed a systematic review to identify studies that compared steroid treatment between TAB+ and TAB- patients. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception until April 4, 2020. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed by two independent reviewers and conflicts resolved by consensus. Studies reporting TAB result and steroid treatment were included. Information pertaining to steroid treatment was compared between TAB+ and TAB- groups. Steroid duration was compared by grouping patients in a less than 6 month group, a 6-24 month group, and a more than 24 month group.

Results

An estimated 5288 abstracts were screened and 13 studies involving 1355 patients were included. Rate of prebiopsy steroid treatment was higher in TAB+ patients compared with TAB- patients [93% versus 63% (P < 0.001)]. The TAB+ group was more likely to be started on steroids prebiopsy [28% versus 8% (P < 0.001)]. TAB+ and TAB- patients had similar steroid duration for all groups [<6-month group 17% versus 19% (P-0.596), the 6-24-month group 16% versus 19% (P-0.596), and the >24-month group 66% versus 63% (P-0.642)].

Conclusion

TAB results have minimal impact on treatment, and the utility should be reconsidered when a clinical diagnosis of giant cell arteritis is possible.

Clinical pathways for patients with giant cell arteritis during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international perspective

Giant cell arteritis, a common primary systemic vasculitis affecting older people, presents acutely as a medical emergency and requires rapid specialist assessment and treatment to prevent irreversible vision loss. Disruption of the health-care system caused by the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weak points in clinical pathways for diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis, but has also permitted innovative solutions. The essential roles played by all professionals, including general practitioners and surgeons, in treating these patients have become evident. Patients must also be involved in the reshaping of clinical services. As an international group of authors involved in the care of patients with giant cell arteritis, we reflect in this Viewpoint on rapid service adaptations during the first peak of COVID-19, evaluate challenges, and consider implications for the future.