An Aesthetic Factor Priority List of the Female Breast in Scandinavian Subjects

Definitions of Abnormal Breast Size and Asymmetry: A Cohort Study of 400 Women

BACKGROUND

Macromastia, micromastia and breast asymmetry have an impact on health and quality of life. However, there is scarce information addressing breast size and asymmetry frequency distribution in reference populations.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aims to identify factors that influence breast size and symmetry and classifies abnormal breast sizes and breast asymmetries in an adult German population.

METHODS

Breast base dimensions, breast volume, symmetry, and other breast anthropometric parameters of 400 German female patients were determined in a retrospective review of the MRI archives at our institution. Professional medical MRI-segmentation software was used for volume measurement.

RESULTS

A total of 400 Patients were retrospectively enrolled. The patients had a mean age of 50 ± 12 years (min: 24; max: 82), mean BMI of 25.0 ± 5.0 (min: 14.7, max: 45.6), and a mean total breast volume of 976 ml (right: 973 ml, min: 64, max: 4777; left: 979 ml, min: 55, max: 4670). The strongest correlation of breast volume was observed with BMI (r = 0.834, p < 0.001), followed by breast base width (r = 0.799, p < 0.001). Smaller breasts have higher breast volume asymmetry ratios (r = - 0.124, p < 0.014). For a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2, micromastia is defined by breast volumes below 250 ml (5th percentile) and macromastia by volumes above 1250 ml (95th percentile). Abnormal breast volume asymmetry (< 5th and > 95th percentile) is equivalent to an absolute difference of approximately 25% relative to the smallest side (bidirectional asymmetry ratio 5th percentile - 19%; 95th percentile 26%).

CONCLUSION

This study provides normative data of German women, as well as selected size-for-BMI percentiles and asymmetry ratio percentiles. The normative data may help to establish transparent and objective coverage criteria for health insurances.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Cosmetic Surgery and the Diversity of Cultural and Ethnic Perceptions of Facial, Breast, and Gluteal Aesthetics in Women: A Comprehensive Review

An increasing number of people are opting for cosmetic surgeries. For many years, the physical and aesthetic appearance of Caucasians has been considered to be ideal. However, it is now commonly acknowledged that attractiveness and aesthetic standards vary among cultural backgrounds and ethnic groups and that Western attractiveness criteria no longer apply to all. Herein, we conducted a comprehensive review of studies that examined cultural and ethnic variations in preferences for facial, breast, and gluteal aesthetics, as well as reviewed studies that investigated ethnic disparities in attitudes and motivations for cosmetic surgery. A total of 4532 references were identified, 66 of which met the inclusion criteria. Several studies have reported that facial golden ratios are invalid for representing perceived attractiveness standards among different ethnicities. The majority of studies also indicated that facial aesthetic interventions should not aim to Westernize but to optimize ethnic traits. Significant ethnic differences in preferences for upper- and lower-pole breast proportions have been reported. The size of the buttocks and waist-to-hip ratio were identified as the main factors of buttock aesthetics, with buttock size preferences having a high ethnic diversity. Interest in cosmetic surgical procedures while maintaining ethnic identity continues to grow among young women worldwide. This comprehensive review strongly suggests that accommodating cultural and ethnic differences in aesthetic standards in cosmetic surgery planning can lead to more acceptable cosmetic outcomes.

Brassiere Cup Size Agreement between Patients and Plastic Surgeons: Do Surgeons and Patients Speak the Same Size Language?

Patients undergoing plastic surgery of the breasts often communicate their size expectations as a brassiere cup size. However, multiple factors may cause a miscommunication between the surgeon and patient when brassiere cup size is used as a measure of results. The aim of this study was to determine the degree of agreement between disclosed and estimated brassiere cup size and also interrater agreement.

Methods

Three-dimensional (3D) scans of 32 subjects were evaluated by 10 plastic surgeons estimating cup size using the American brassiere system. The surgeons were blinded to all parameters, including the 3D surface software-derived volume measures of the Vectra scan. The 3D scans of the anterior torsos were viewed. The plastic surgeons' estimations were compared with the cup sizes stated by the subjects (disclosed cup size), using simple and weighted Kappa statistics.

Results

Agreement between the estimated and disclosed brassiere sizes was only slight (0.1479 ± 0.0605) using a simple Kappa analysis. Even when a Fleiss-Cohen-weighted comparison was used, only moderate agreement (0.6231 ± 0.0589) was found. The interrater agreement intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.705. Rater accuracy varied. The percentage of time spent in cosmetic practice and gender were not significantly correlated with accuracy.

Conclusions

Agreement between cup size disclosed by subjects and estimates by plastic surgeons was low. A miscommunication between the surgeon and patient may occur when using brassiere sizes to communicate wishes and estimates in procedures that involve changes in breast volume.

Patient Perceptions of Cancer and Reconstructive Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: The Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic profoundly impacted care for breast cancer patients. Oncologic and reconstructive surgeries were delayed as hospitals attempted to preserve personal protective equipment and bed capacity. Little is known about how this unprecedented time has affected breast cancer patients’ mental health and perceptions regarding their care. Methods: A survey was sent to surgical oncology and plastic surgery patients who received breast cancer care between March and May 2020, during which our institution suspended elective surgery. The survey questions included patient demographics, as well as questions focused on worries related to COVID-19, individualized cancer and reconstructive care, and patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Descriptive statistics were used to assess patient responses. Results: 56 breast cancer patients completed the survey, which reflected a 25% response rate. A majority of patients expressed moderate concern about contracting COVID-19, accessing high-quality cancer care (78%), and receiving timely surgical care (68%). Only 43% of patients reported delays in their surgical cancer and reconstructive care, when in actuality 57% of patients experienced surgical delays. Overall, patients were satisfied with telemedicine and did not feel it negatively impacted their care (69%). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to disruptions of routine oncologic and reconstructive care for breast cancer patients. Patients were concerned about receiving high-quality cancer and reconstructive care, and the results of this study uncovered gaps in patient–physician communication. The implementation of telemedicine was received positively. These data can be used to improve future health system practices as the medical community faces new potential shutdowns of surgical services.

Beyond the 21-cm Notch-to-nipple Myth: Golden Proportions in Breast Aesthetics

Background

The 21-cm notch-to-nipple distance has been accepted without academic scrutiny as a key measure in breast aesthetics. The Fibonacci sequence and phi ratio occur frequently in nature. They have previously been used to assess aesthetics of the face, but not the breast. This study aims to assess if the static 21-cm measure or the proportional phi ratio is associated with ideal breast aesthetics.

Method

Subclavicular-breast height and breast width were used to calculate the aesthetic ratio. Subjects were subsequently aesthetically rated. A one-sample t-test was used to determine if the ratio for each breast differed from phi. Breast scores with one, both, or no breasts were compared with an optimal phi ratio. Analysis of variance was performed. Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons was used when pairwise comparisons were conducted.

Results

Five subjects (14%) had bilateral optimal phi ratio breasts. Four subjects (11%) had one breast with an optimal phi ratio. Subjects with bilateral optimal phi ratios had significantly higher overall breast scores than those with only one optimal breast (Δ = 0.86, P = 0.025) or no optimal breast (Δ = 0.73, P = 0.008). Distance from optimal Fibonacci nipple position was moderately to strongly correlated with aesthetic score (-0.630, P = 0.016). No correlation was found between 21-cm notch-to-nipple distance and aesthetic score.

Conclusion

The bilateral optimal phi ratio is correlated with high overall aesthetic scores, as is the optimal Fibonacci nipple position. No correlation was found between 21-cm notch-to-nipple distance and overall aesthetic score.