Slater K, Ajjikuttira AA. Is simultaneous panniculectomy an ideal approach to repair a ventral hernia: a general surgeon's experience.
Hernia 2021;
26:139-147. [PMID:
34392437 DOI:
10.1007/s10029-021-02483-9]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The number of Australian patients undergoing ventral hernia repair has seen a significant increase in the last twenty years. With the obesity epidemic, the general surgeon is frequently seeing patients with hernias and significant abdominal aprons and is being asked to address this at the time of the hernia repair. This can be performed utilising a general surgery and plastic surgery team, but there may be some advantages to general surgeon being able incorporate this into their practice. We present our approach to patients undergoing ventral hernia repair and simultaneous panniculectomy (VHR + PAN) by a single general surgeon.
METHODS
Data were analysed from a single surgeon's experience performing VHR + PAN at the same operation. Data were collected prospectively from 2009 to 2020. 146 cases of patients undergoing VHR + PAN were identified and included in this study.
RESULTS
The mean age of patients undergoing VHR + PAN was 58 years. The mean BMI was 35, with 59% of patients losing weight loss prior to surgery. 66% of patients had a hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh and 91% of patients had retro-rectus or pre-peritoneal mesh approach to the repair. 42% of patients had a post-operative complication with 80.6% of these being related to surgical-site occurrences. Other complications included gastrointestinal (14%), respiratory (13%) and venous thromboembolism, such as a deep vein thrombus or pulmonary embolism (6%). There were 2 deaths in the series (1.3%). The hernia recurrence rate was 6%.
CONCLUSION
Simultaneous PAN is possible in patients with an abdominal apron who are undergoing VHR, with an acceptable risk of SSOs and other complications. This technique provides excellent exposure and with appropriate training is well within the remit of the general surgeon. This may save further operative management in the future and can offer patients improved self-esteem, mobility, and independence. Patient optimisation is key, paying careful attention to pre-operative weight loss, diabetic control, smoking cessation and respiratory function. VHR + PAN is an important technique that should be in the repertoire of all abdominal wall reconstruction units.
Collapse