The Conjoined TUGPAP Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Illustrative Anatomy

Volumetric Analysis of a Novel Chimeric Gracilis and Profunda Artery Perforator Flap

BACKGROUND

 The presence of a chimeric gracilis and profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap with a common arterial pedicle has been demonstrated on computed tomography angiography in up to 59% of patients and confirmed in a cadaveric model. Already utilized for head and neck reconstruction by Heredero et al, this novel flap could provide more volume than either flap alone which is advantageous, particularly in patients with sizable defects. The purpose of this study was to determine the average tissue volume that can be utilized from this chimeric flap.

METHODS

 CT Angiogram imaging studies exhibiting chimeric flap anatomy were reviewed over a 7-year period at a single institution utilizing Visage Version 7.1, a radiology picture archiving and communication system. This software was used to trace the flap pedicles and to capture estimated soft tissue volumes of each respective flap.

RESULTS

 A total of 31 patients, consisting of 52 lower extremity gracilis and PAP chimeric flaps, underwent tissue volume analysis. The average total volume of soft tissue supplied by the gracilis flap was found to be 70.21 cm3 (standard deviation [SD] = 26.99). The average volume of the PAP flap was 31.73 cm3 (SD = 26.12). The average total volume captured by the chimeric gracilis and PAP flap was 101.94 cm3 (SD = 62.40).

CONCLUSION

 The potential soft tissue volume that can be harvested from a chimeric gracilis and PAP flap is significantly greater than solitary gracilis or PAP flaps. This chimeric flap may serve as a viable and advantageous reconstructive option for patients requiring large volume soft tissue coverage, particularly if other sizable options are not available.

The PUG Flap: Conjoined Profunda Artery Perforator and Upper Gracilis Flap for Breast Reconstruction

Abdominal-based free flaps are the mainstay of autologous breast reconstruction; however, the region may not be ideal for patients with inadequate soft tissue or history of abdominal surgery. This case describes the use of a novel conjoined flap based on the profunda artery perforator and upper gracilis pedicles, named the perforator and upper gracilis (PUG) flap. This flap design aims to maximize medial thigh flap volume while ensuring robust tissue perforation. Here, we present our experience with the PUG flap in a breast cancer patient undergoing autologous reconstruction. The patient was a 41-year-old woman seeking nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction with the PUG flap due to limited abdominal tissue availability. The gracilis and profunda artery perforator flaps were elevated using one boomerang-style skin paddle. Once harvested, the flaps were inset with antegrade and retrograde flow off the internal mammary arteries and both respective internal mammary veins. The donor site was closed in a V-Y pattern resulting in a thigh lift-type lift and concealed scar. In conclusion, the boomerang-style PUG flap maximizes medial thigh free tissue transfer volume, offers internal blood flow redundancy, and maintains good cosmesis of the donor site.

Modern Approaches to Alternative Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction: Transverse Upper Gracilis Flap

The transverse upper/myocutaneous gracilis is a medial thigh-based flap primarily reserved as a secondary choice for autologous reconstruction of small to moderate-sized breasts in women without a suitable abdominal donor site. Its consistent and reliable anatomy based on the medial circumflex femoral artery permits expedient flap harvest with relatively low donor site morbidity. The primary disadvantage is the limited achievable volume, often necessitating augmentation such as extended flap modifications, autologous fat grafting, flap stacking, or even implant placement.

Bilateral Transverse Upper Gracilis Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A 4-Year Retrospective Study of the "2-in-1" Technique and a Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap is a reliable alternative to abdominally based breast reconstruction because of its advantageous anatomy. However, the limited tissue volume prevents reconstruction of large breasts. The bilateral TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction can overcome this problem.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed regarding unilateral breast reconstruction with bilateral TUGs at the Queen Victoria Hospital from 2015 to 2019. Associations between categorical variables were examined with Fisher exact test, and any differences in continuous variables by complication status were evaluated with Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for independent samples. A relevant systematic review was conducted with a meta-analysis of proportions using the Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation for the estimation of the overall survival rates.

RESULTS

Ten cases were identified with 6 having a delayed reconstruction. Median age and body mass index were 50.8 years and 23.9 kg/m2, respectively, and average flap weight was 268.3 g. One flap was placed superiorly with its pedicle anastomosed to the retrograde internal mammary vessels, except of half of the cases where a second anterograde vein was used. The mean follow-up was 21.4 months, and all flaps survived. Two patients returned to theater, and 4 experienced donor-site problems. The presence of complications was not associated with age, ever smoking, body mass index, TUG weight, or anastomosis to retrograde internal mammary vein. The systematic review resulted in 8 eligible articles with a total sample of 156 flaps. The overall survival rate was 96.8%. In 6 cases, the indication was Poland syndrome (7.7%), and in 48.7%, axillary vessels were also used as recipient vessels. The estimated overall flap survival rate was 100% (95% confidence interval, 99%-100%), and no significant heterogeneity was noted (I2 = 0%, P = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The "2-in-1" technique can lead to symmetrical aesthetically pleasant results for both recipient and donor sites. Our case series and the conducted systematic review reiterate the reliability of this approach.

Breast Reconstruction: Necessity for Further Standardization of the Current Surgical Techniques Attempting to Facilitate Scientific Evaluation and Select Tailored Individualized Procedures Optimizing Patient Satisfaction

Background

Various breast cancer reconstruction methods and novel surgical techniques include autologous or allogenic procedures, which can increase patient's quality of life and provide options when dealing with patients seen as challenging clinical scenarios.

Summary

Our aim was to review the current literature and present published evidence on innovative standards in whole breast reconstruction. Advances in flap monitoring or newly published data regarding neurotization in breast reconstruction, arm lymphedema management, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma reconstruction treatment, and robotic surgery with regard to radiotherapy define innovative standards in the breast reconstruction setting. The role of meshes/acellular dermal matrix and fat grafting as well as optimal sequencing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction appear highly debatable also in expert panel meetings rendering further clinical research including RCTs imperative.

Key Messages

There is an abundance of novel available techniques, which mandate further standardization, facilitating scientific evaluation in an attempt to help surgeons select tailored procedures for each patient with the goal to promote informed decision-making in breast reconstruction.