Not all Radiofrequency Devices Are Created Equal: A Thermal Assessment

A Retrospective Review Comparing Renuvion Helium Plasma Radiofrequency with BodyTite Bipolar Radiofrequency after Liposuction or Body Contouring

Background

Driven by demand for nonexcisional alternatives to address lax skin following liposuction, various energy-based technologies have become available. Helium plasma radiofrequency (RF) and bipolar RF have gained prominence. These technologies have distinctly different methods of action and indications, potentially influencing procedural safety and duration.

Methods

Conducted to collect and evaluate real-world procedure and safety data, this retrospective, single-center, contiguous series study included patients who underwent either helium plasma RF or bipolar RF following a liposuction or body contouring procedure.

Results

The helium plasma RF group (N = 229) averaged 4.9 concurrent procedures, whereas the bipolar RF group (N = 236) averaged 4.4 concurrent procedures. The total treatment time, including concurrent procedures, was 182 minutes for the helium plasma RF group and 196 minutes for the bipolar RF group. The findings from the subanalysis group (n = 9) indicated that the treatment time for the helium plasma RF side of the body was 50% shorter than the bipolar RF side. A statistically significant difference in adverse events by group was observed. There were 45 events in 34 patients for helium plasma RF and 93 events in 62 patients for bipolar RF. Notably, fewer occurrences of burns, hematoma, hypertrophic scar, and seroma were reported for helium plasma RF compared with bipolar RF.

Conclusions

The analysis reveals a notable difference in the occurrence of adverse events, with statistically significantly fewer incidents observed for helium plasma RF compared with bipolar RF. Data suggests that helium plasma RF exhibits shorter durations in the operating room compared with bipolar RF, suggesting increased procedural efficiency.

Radiofrequency and Electrical Muscle Stimulation: A Synergistic Treatment That Achieves Lipolysis and Circumferential Waist Reduction in Noninvasive Body Contouring

Background

Surgeons and providers in aesthetic medicine seek noninvasive devices that can be utilized for safe, efficient, and effective body contouring. Patient demand has propelled the development of novel devices that can simultaneously improve skin laxity, adipolysis along with stimulation of muscle hypertrophy.

Objectives

To determine the efficacy of body contouring after 3 treatments using the noninvasive Transform (InMode, Lake Forest, CA) device.

Methods

A prospective, multicenter study was performed. Outcomes evaluated include: standardized caliper and ultrasound measurements of abdominal skin/soft-tissue thickness, waist circumference, histologic evaluation, patient comfort, and satisfaction assessments.

Results

Forty-four patients were successfully enrolled in the study and completed the series of 3 treatments which involved combined electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) and noninvasive bipolar radiofrequency (RF). Abdominal ultrasound measurements reveal a decrease in soft-tissue thickness (average 3.1 mm; P = .001), there was a significant decrease in caliper measurements of periumbilical skin thickness (P < .003), and the average reduction of abdominal circumference was 1.9 cm (P < .0001) 3 months after the treatment series. Histology confirmed subcutaneous adipolysis without damaging the dermal layer. Patients reported a high degree of satisfaction with the overall result (P = .003) and that each of the 3 treatments were progressively more comfortable (P < .005).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that a series of simultaneous noninvasive RF with EMS treatments to the abdomen decreases subcutaneous soft-tissue thickness of the treated area. These comfortable treatments ultimately result in a high degree of patient satisfaction at 3 months.

Level of Evidence 4

From the SAFE to the SAFEST Liposuction: Combining PAL and RFAL Technology in Body Contouring Procedures

BACKGROUND

The SAFE liposuction technique is a worldwide extended method used to achieve great and reproducible results after the surgical aspiration of fat. We propose an evolution of the technique to address one of the major limitations of liposuction, loose skin. The SAFEST liposuction technique combines PAL and RFAL to achieve skin tightening and fat reduction with minimal added morbidity.

METHODS

Patients treated with the SAFEST liposuction technique between December 2019 and February 2022 were included in the study. Demographic and surgical data were collected retrospectively. Photographs and satisfaction interviews were conducted preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively in every case.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients (58 female and 7 male) were included in the cohort, and a total of 169 anatomical areas were treated with the SAFEST liposuction technique (abdomen, arms, back, flanks and thighs). Globally, satisfaction at 12 months follow-up was of 94.1% and complications only presented in 4.7% of the treated areas. 6 of the 38 treated abdomens (18.4%) presented a complication (4 seromas and 2 access point infections) and 2 of the 38 treated flanks (5.3%) presented one (2 seromas). The rest of the treated anatomical areas (arms, back and thighs) showed no complications and high satisfaction rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAFEST liposuction technique achieves outstanding and satisfying results with minimal complications by safely combining the advantages of two different technologies, PAL and RFAL. The main advantages of the presented technique are the skin tightening, the body ligament contraction, the coagulation and the reduction of the operative time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Safety and Efficacy of Renuvion Helium Plasma to Improve the Appearance of Loose Skin in the Neck and Submental Region

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive procedures that deliver thermal energy to subcutaneous tissue offer a solution when deciding between excisional and noninvasive options to address face and neck aging-related changes. A minimally invasive helium plasma device, Renuvion, was first utilized for subdermal tissue heating to reduce skin laxity under an FDA general clearance for cutting, coagulation, and ablation of soft tissue.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the helium plasma device for improving the appearance of loose skin in the neck and submental region.

METHODS

Patients undergoing the procedure with the helium plasma device in the neck and submentum were studied. They were seen for 6 months following the procedure. The primary effectiveness endpoint for improvement in lax skin in the treatment area was determined by 2 of 3 blinded photographic reviewers. The primary safety endpoint was the level of pain after treatment.

RESULTS

The primary effectiveness endpoint was met; 82.5% demonstrated improvement at Day 180. The primary safety endpoint was met; 96.9% of patients experienced no pain to moderate pain to Day 7. There were no serious adverse events reported related to the study device or procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The data demonstrate benefit to patients by improvement of the appearance of lax skin in the neck and submental region. Outcomes resulted in US Food and Drug Administration 510(k) clearance in July 2022, expanding indications for the device to include subcutaneous dermatological and aesthetic procedures to improve the appearance of loose skin in the neck and submental region.

The effect of combined hyaluronic acid filler injection and radiofrequency treatment: A clinic histological analysis

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injections have increased in popularity. They are usually performed in combination with other treatment modalities, including lasers and energy-based devices, to enhance cosmetic results. Theoretically, HA and other filler injections should be performed after laser- or energy-based device treatments. In some instances, however, practitioners are asked to administer laser- or energy-based device treatment after HA dermal filler injection. There is a concerning possibility of HA filler degradation as a result of bulk heating generated by lasers or energy-based devices, especially radiofrequency (RF).

AIM

To evaluate the effect of RF treatment at different time points on HA degradation in vivo, using clinicohistological analysis.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Fourteen volunteers were recruited and received intradermal HA filler injections in four sites on the abdomen. One site served as the control, and the other three sites were treated with monopolar RF on the same day after injection, at 14 and 28 days post-injection. Skin biopsies were performed at baseline and 56 days after HA injection. Histopathological sections were reviewed for residual filler in the tissue.

RESULTS

The results showed that HA grading scores decreased in five (35.71%), one (7.14%), and one (7.14%) participants when RF was performed immediately, 14 and 28 days after injection, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, RF treatment after HA filler injection may affect the integrity of the HA filler in the tissue, especially if RF treatment was performed on the same day after HA injection.

Radiofrequency and Radiofrequency Microneedling in Skin of Color: A Review of Usage, Safety, and Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency (RF) and radiofrequency microneedling (RFM) for rhytides, scarring, and skin rejuvenation are believed to have a lower risk of postprocedural dyspigmentation in darker skin types.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety and efficacy of RF and RFM in Fitzpatrick skin Types III to VI.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE databases from 2000 to 2021 using combinations of the terms radiofrequency, microneedling, skin of color, and Fitzpatrick was performed. Exclusion criteria included non-Fitzpatrick skin Types III-VI patient population, nonprimary articles, nonskin radiofrequency, and nonhuman studies.

RESULTS

Thirty-five articles addressing the use of RF or RFM in skin of color were identified-22 for skin rejuvenation, 7 for acne scars, 4 for nonacne scars, 1 for hyperpigmentation, and 1 for acne treatment. Seven studies noted transient postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, 1 observed mild prolonged hyperpigmentation, and only 1 study reported permanent scarring.

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency and RFM seem to have a low risk of scarring or hyperpigmentation in skin of color. This review demonstrates that these procedures have been successfully used primarily for rhytides, acne scarring, and skin rejuvenation. However, a large proportion of the studies lack strong quality evidence.

Noninvasive Vulvar and Intravaginal Treatments

Radiofrequency is an effective and safe method for both pelvic floor restoration and nonsurgical labiaplasty. Bipolar radiofrequency with temperature control is more effective than monopolar radiofrequency for volumetric heating of vulvovaginal tissue. Combination of electrical muscle stimulation and radiofrequency can provide combined nonsurgical restoration of the vulvovaginal tissues.