Non-Neuraxial Labor Analgesia: Options

Nitrous Oxide Use for Pain in Labor, Conversion to Neuraxial Anesthesia and Birth Outcome

INTRODUCTION

A variety of labor pain management options is essential to patients and their care providers. Inhaled, patient controlled nitrous oxide (N2O) is a valuable addition to these options. The purpose of this study was to examine laboring patient, newborn, and provider characteristics associated with N2O use for pain relief in labor and to examine the association between N2O, conversion to neuraxial analgesia, and cesarean birth.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study of the first year of N2O use in one large academic medical center. Patients at least 37 weeks' gestation who were admitted for labor with intended vaginal birth from August 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, were included (N = 2605). Laboring patient and newborn factors and their relationship to N2O use were calculated as unadjusted and adjusted relative risks (RRs). Poisson regression was used to model the association between N2O use and subsequent use of neuraxial analgesia and type of birth for both nulliparous and multiparous patients.

RESULTS

Overall, 20.2% of patients used N2O during labor. Multiparous patients were 24% less likely to use N2O than nulliparous patients (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84). Use of N2O did not differ significantly between patients cared for by midwives compared with patients cared for by physicians (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00). In multivariable modeling, N2O use in multiparous patients was associated with a 17% decrease in use of neuraxial analgesia (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94). There was no association between N2O use and use of neuraxial analgesia in nulliparous patients (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.06). N2O use was not associated with cesarean birth in either group.

DISCUSSION

N2O is an important pain management option for laboring patients and those who care for them. Study results may assist midwives, physicians, and nurses in counseling patients about analgesia options.

Involving a Dedicated Epidural-Caring Nurse in Labor Ward Practice Improves Maternal Satisfaction towards Childbirth: A Retrospective Study

The quality of healthcare is crucially linked to patient satisfaction, particularly in the provision of neuraxial analgesia for labor pain. Neuraxial analgesia for labor pain control should ideally be readily available when requested. However, in real-world practice, anesthesiologists may not always respond immediately to maternal demands, which can compromise the quality of care. To address this issue, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of involving a dedicated nurse in epidural care to improve maternal satisfaction. This study was conducted in a single tertiary center. Medical records of women with singleton pregnancies above 36 gestational weeks who received neuraxial analgesia for labor pain control were reviewed (N = 354). Among them, 104 women (29%) received care from a dedicated nurse. The results showed that involving a dedicated nurse led to higher maternal satisfaction scores before (4.7 ± 0.5 versus 4.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.001), during (4.7 ± 0.6 versus 4.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.002), and at 24 h postpartum (4.7 ± 0.5 versus 4.5 ± 0.5, p = 0.001), without any adverse impact on maternal, neonatal, or epidural-related complications. These findings suggest that allocating a dedicated nurse to epidural care can effectively enhance maternal satisfaction and potentially improve overall care quality.

Beyond the epidural: Alternatives to neuraxial labor analgesia

Labor creates an intense pain experienced by women across the world. Although neuraxial analgesia is the most effective treatment of labor pain, in many cases, it may not be undesired, not available, or have contraindications. In addition, satisfaction with labor analgesia is not only determined by the efficacy of analgesia but a woman's sense of agency and involvement in the childbirth experience are also key contributors. Providing safe choices for labor analgesia and support is central to creating a tailored, safe, and effective analgesic treatment plan with high maternal satisfaction. Healthcare provider knowledge of various nonneuraxial analgesic options, including efficacy, contraindications, safe clinical implementation, and side effects of various techniques is needed for optimal patient care and satisfaction. Future rigorous scientific studies addressing all of these labor analgesia options are needed to improve our understanding. This review summarizes the current published literature for commonly available non-neuraxial labor analgesic options.

Comfort and Satisfaction Among Women Who Used Different Options for Analgesia During Labor and Birth

OBJECTIVE

To determine if comfort and satisfaction with the birth experience differed among women who used nitrous oxide (N₂O), epidural analgesia, or no analgesia during labor and birth.

DESIGN

Nonexperimental, cross-sectional, between-subjects.

SETTING

Maternity care units in three U.S. Midwest hospitals from June to October 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 84 women with spontaneous vaginal birth at term gestation (≥37 weeks).

METHODS

Women were grouped according to self-selected pain management method: N₂O and oxygen (50%/50% mixture) only (n = 28), epidural analgesia (may have been in combination with other analgesia options; n = 28), or no analgesia (n = 28). We collected data within 6 hours after childbirth using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised and the researcher-modified Childbirth Comfort Questionnaire. We analyzed data for differences in comfort and satisfaction scores among the three groups of women using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant differences related to comfort during labor and birth among women who used N₂O only, epidural analgesia, or no analgesia during labor and birth, F(2, 81) = 1.11, p = .34. We also found no statistically significant differences related to satisfaction with the birth experience among women who used N₂O only, epidural analgesia, or no analgesia during labor and birth, F(2, 81) = .084, p = .92.

CONCLUSION

Our finding of no statistically significant differences in comfort and satisfaction with the birth experience across groups highlights the need to present comprehensive pain management options to women for labor and birth, such as N₂O.

The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation during the first stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Labor pain during childbirth can have devastating effects on the progress of labor, mother, and fetus. Consequently, the management of labor pain is crucial for the well-being of the mother and fetus. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non -pharmacological analgesic technique. It uses a low-voltage electrical current to activate descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system to relieve pain. This study aimed to determine the effects of TENS therapy in the first stage of labor.

METHODS

In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, we screened low-risk pregnant women who anticipated spontaneous vaginal delivery. Women were assigned (1:1) to either the experimental group (received TENS therapy in the first stage of labor) or the control group (received routine obstetric care). The women, midwives, and researchers working in the gynecology and obstetric department were aware of the treatment group, but statisticians analysis the data were blinded. The primary outcome was labor pain intensity, assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after the randomization, at 30, 60, and 120 min after TENS therapy, and 2-24 h post-delivery. We used SPSS 21.0 software in data analysis. An independent sample t-test compared the mean VAS scores and labor duration between groups. A Chi-square test was employed to compare categorical variables between the groups. A significant level of ≤0.05 was statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 326 pregnant women were eligible: experimental group (n = 161) and control group (n = 165). The experimental group had statistically significantly lower mean VAS scores at a different time (30, 60, and 120 min post-intervention and 2-24 h post-delivery) than the control group (p < 0.001). The experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant shorter duration of the active labor phase than the control group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that TENS can be used as a non-pharmacological therapy to reduce pain and shorten the active labor phase.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN23857995 . Registered on 11/12/2020, 'retrospectively registered.

Association of Self-Administered Nitrous Oxide for Labor Analgesia With Maternal and Neonatal Process and Outcome Measures

OBJECTIVE

To describe patterns of use of self-administered nitrous oxide (N₂O) during labor and to determine if maternal and neonatal process and outcome measures differ for women who use N₂O compared to women who do not use N₂O.

DESIGN

Retrospective, full-census, observational cohort.

SETTING

An upper midwestern U.S., urban, 75-bed quaternary perinatal center with more than 5,000 annual births.

PARTICIPANTS

The participants included two groups of women: 400 who used N₂O during labor and a comparison group of 6,733 who met N₂O eligibility but did not use N₂O.

METHODS

We used descriptive statistics to examine patterns of use of N₂O during labor between January 2015 and March 2017. We examined associations of N₂O with process (length of first and second stages of labor, time from hospital admission to birth, time from birth to hospital discharge, and total length of stay) and outcome measures (shoulder dystocia, instrumentation, vaginal lacerations, Apgar scores at 5 minutes, nursery disposition) using multivariate linear, logistic, and ordinal regression models.

RESULTS

Three percent (12/400) of women who used N₂O discontinued because of side effects. Among participants with vaginal births who used N₂O, 17.6% (62/352) used N₂O as the only form of pain medication during labor. We found no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcome measures between the two groups. Among the process measures examined, we found a mean 2-hour-longer time from admission to birth and total length of stay in the N₂O group (p < .05) compared to the non-N₂O group.

CONCLUSION

Most participants who used N₂O (290/352, 82.3%) transitioned to other pain modalities during labor. Maternal and neonatal process and outcome measures were comparable relative to other pain management modalities, with the exception of longer time durations for two measures.

Reviewing pain management options for patients in active labor

Pain perception and preferences for pain management are unique to each woman in labor. This article provides an overview of the physiology of labor pain, discusses available nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic approaches to managing pain during active labor, and discusses potential benefits and risks for each option.

Oxycodone for pain management in the latent phase of labour - A pragmatic trial

BACKGROUND

Parenteral opioids are used for pain relief in labour but there are little data for oxycodone in this context. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, foetal exposure and safety of subcutaneous oxycodone in the latent phase of labour.

METHODS

This pragmatic trial included 76 parturients, who received subcutaneous oxycodone for pain relief in the latent phase of labour according to the hospital protocol: an initial dose 0.1 mg/kg, and a second dose, 0.05 mg/kg, could be administered four hours later. Pain intensity and pain relief were assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10. After delivery, blood samples from the maternal and umbilical veins were collected, and plasma concentrations of oxycodone and its main metabolites were quantified using UPLC-MS/MS. The Apgar scores and maternal and neonatal adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

The foetal exposure at birth was low, the median oxycodone and oxymorphone umbilical vein plasma concentrations were 1.2 ng/mL (range 0.21-7.8) and 0.14 ng/mL (0-0.26), respectively. Pain scores decreased substantially, from a median pain score of 7/10 before oxycodone to median scores of 5/10 at 30 minutes after administration, 5/10 at 60 minutes and 6/10 at 120 minutes. The median Apgar score was 9 (range 2-10) at 1 minute and 9 (6-10) at 5 minutes. Maternal adverse effects were mild, and there were no oxycodone-related neonatal adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous oxycodone provided effective analgesia during the latent phase of labour. Newborn exposure at birth was low, and oxycodone was well-tolerated.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Opioid-free Anesthesia versus Opioid Anesthesia for General Cesarean Section

Introduction While uncommon for cesarean delivery, general anesthesia may be patient requested or necessary due to maternal contraindication. Traditionally, opioids are used as a part of the general anesthetic. Because of their associated complications, it is standard to limit opioid use and fetal narcotic exposure during cesarean delivery. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the feasibility of multi-modal opioid-free general anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Methods Electronic medical records were obtained for patients receiving general anesthesia for cesarean delivery of live pregnancies through 2017 at our tertiary care facility. Post-operative pain was estimated using a 10-cm visual analogue scale and by calculating postoperative narcotic requirements in milligram morphine equivalents (MME) over three-time periods: during post-anesthesia recovery in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), the first 24 hrs after PACU discharge, and 24-48 hrs after PACU discharge. Apgar scores were also obtained to quantify neonatal effects of the general anesthetic. Results Eight of 17 patients (47.06%) received opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), and nine of 17 patients (52.94%) received anesthesia with opioids (OA). No significant difference was found between groups in terms of postoperative mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score over each time period. Similarly, no significant difference was found between groups in terms of postoperative narcotics requirement at all study points. Apgar scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OFA group displayed equivalent analgesia to the OA group in terms of self-reported VAS pain scores and postoperative MME. A larger prospective study is recommended to fully evaluate OFA for cesarean delivery.

A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Obstetric anesthesia has evolved over the course of its history to encompass comprehensive aspects of maternal care, ranging from cesarean delivery anesthesia and labor analgesia to maternal resuscitation and patient safety. Anesthesiologists are concerned with maternal and neonatal outcomes, and with preventing and managing complications that may present during childbirth. The current review will focus on recent advances in obstetric anesthesia, including labor anesthesia and analgesia, cesarean delivery anesthesia and analgesia, the effects of maternal anesthesia on breastfeeding and fever, and maternal safety. The impact of these advances on maternal and neonatal outcomes is discussed. Past and future progress in this field will continue to have significant implications on the health of women and children.