Addressing Obesity in Clinical Gynecology Practice

vNOTES Hysterectomy: What about Obese Patients?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the surgical outcomes of hysterectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for patients with body mass index (BMI) <30 and BMI ≥30.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A French teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent a vNOTES hysterectomy from February 2020 to January 2022 were included (N = 200). The vNOTES approach was chosen for all patients requiring a hysterectomy, unless the procedure was for endometriosis or cancer (except grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on their BMI (<30 or ≥30 kg/m²). The population characteristics, surgical outcomes, and hospitalization outcomes were compared. The main outcome was the intraoperative conversion rate. Secondary end points were blood loss, operative time, perioperative and postoperative complications, and same-day surgery management.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 146 patients were included in the BMI <30 group, and 54 patients in the BMI ≥30 group. There was no statistical difference between obese and nonobese patients concerning intraoperative conversion (p = .150), with 4 cases occurring in the BMI <30 group (2.74%) and 4 occurring in the BMI ≥30 group (7.41%). Operative times were longer in obese patients (115.93 min [±55.28] vs 79.78 min [±40.38], p <.001). There was no significant difference in blood loss (p = .337) or perioperative and postoperative complications (p = .346 and p = .612, respectively). The ability to complete the surgery as a same-day procedure was no different between obese and nonobese patients (p = .150).

CONCLUSION

The results concerning intraoperative conversion and perioperative and postoperative complications show that vNOTES hysterectomies seem to be feasible for obese patients. When same-day surgery was decided before surgery, no more obese than nonobese patients were converted to conventional hospitalization. Further studies are needed to confirm these observations.

The Comparison of Surgical Outcomes following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and vNOTES Hysterectomy in Obese Patients

AIM

This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and vaginally assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy procedures in obese patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted with 83 obese women (BMI > 30 kg/m²) who underwent TLH (35 patients) or vNOTES hysterectomy (48 patients) for benign gynecological indications. The duration of surgery, intra/postoperative complications, intra- and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) levels, hospital stay, Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at the postoperative 6th and 24th hours of the patients were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between TLH and vNOTES groups regarding age (49 vs. 52 years, p = 0.35), parity (2 vs. 3, p = 0.17), and uterine weight (290 vs. 230 g., p = 0.13) The median BMI was 31.6 kg/m² (30-42.2 kg/m²) in the TLH group and 31.9 kg/m² (30-54.6 kg/m²) in the vNOTES group (p = 0.31). The vNOTES hysterectomy group had significantly shorter durations of surgery (67.5 vs. 136 min) and postoperative hospitalization than the TLH group (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Besides, the 6th-hour (6 vs. 7, p = 0.02) and 24th-hour (4 vs. 3, p < 0.001) VAS scores were significantly lower in the vNOTES hysterectomy group. The propensity-matched group analysis showed significantly lower 6th-hour and 24th-hour VAS scores and shorter duration of surgery (80 vs. 135 min, p < 0.001) in the vNOTES hysterectomy group than the TLH group.

CONCLUSION

vNOTES is a feasible technique in obese women who require a hysterectomy and provides favorable outcomes considering the shorter duration of surgery and postoperative hospitalization and lower pain scores.

A Review of Second- and Third-line Infertility Treatments and Supporting Evidence in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

In clomiphene-citrate-resistant anovulatory women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and no other infertility factors, either metformin combined with clomiphene citrate or gonadotrophins could be used as a second-line pharmacological therapy, although gonadotrophins are more effective. Gonadotrophins could also be used as a second-line pharmacological therapy in anovulatory women with PCOS and clomiphene-citrate-failure. Laparoscopic ovarian surgery can also be used as a second-line therapy for ovulation induction in anovulatory women with clomiphene-citrate-resistant PCOS and no other infertility factors. The usefulness of letrozole as a second-line pharmacological treatment for ovulation induction in clomiphene-citrate-resistant women with PCOS requires further research. In terms of improving fertility, both pharmacological anti-obesity agents and bariatric surgery should be considered an experimental therapy in anovulatory women with PCOS and no other infertility factors. Where first- or second-line ovulation induction therapies have failed, in vitro fertilization (IVF)/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) could be offered as a third-line therapy in women with PCOS in the absence of an absolute indication for IVF/ICSI. For women with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol is preferred and an elective frozen embryo transfer strategy could be considered. In assisted conception units with sufficient expertise, in-vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes could be offered to women with PCOS.