Managing Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women at Risk of Thrombosis

Abnormal uterine bleeding in anticoagulated patients by drug class: outcomes and management

BACKGROUND

Although abnormal uterine bleeding is a known adverse effect of anticoagulant drugs, true rates have not been widely studied. Society-backed recommendations and guidelines do not yet exist for prevention and management of abnormal uterine bleeding among anticoagulated patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the incidence of new-onset abnormal uterine bleeding among patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation by anticoagulant class, and to evaluate gynecologic treatment patterns.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted an institutional review board-waived retrospective chart review of female patients aged 18 to 55 years and prescribed therapeutic anticoagulants, including vitamin-K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparins, and direct oral anticoagulants, in an urban hospital network from January 2015 through January 2020. We excluded patients with antecedent abnormal uterine bleeding and menopause. Associations between abnormal uterine bleeding, anticoagulant class, and other covariates were evaluated with Pearson chi-square and analysis-of-variance tests. The primary outcome, abnormal uterine bleeding odds by anticoagulant class, was modeled with logistic regression. Age, antiplatelet therapy, body mass index, and race were included in our multivariable model. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits and treatment patterns.

RESULTS

Of the 2479 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 645 were diagnosed with abnormal uterine bleeding after initiating therapeutic anticoagulation. After adjusting for age, race, body mass index, and concurrent use of antiplatelet therapy, those receiving all 3 classes of anticoagulants had higher odds of experiencing abnormal uterine bleeding (adjusted odds ratio, 2.63; confidence interval, 1.70-4.08; P<.001), whereas those taking only direct oral anticoagulants had the lowest odds (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; confidence interval, 0.51-0.97; P=.032), with vitamin-K antagonists as the reference group. Race other than White was associated with higher odds of abnormal uterine bleeding, as was lower age. The most common hormone therapies used among patients with abnormal uterine bleeding were levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (7.6%; 49/645) and oral progestins (7.6%; 49/645). Sixty-eight patients (10.5%; 68/645) had an emergency department visit for abnormal uterine bleeding; 29.5% (190/645) of patients received a blood transfusion; 12.2% (79/645) began any pharmacologic therapy for bleeding; and 18.8% (121/645) underwent any gynecologic procedure.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal uterine bleeding occurs frequently among patients on therapeutic anticoagulation. Incidence in this sample varied considerably by anticoagulant class and race; use of single-agent direct oral anticoagulation carried the lowest risk. Important sequelae such as bleeding-related emergency department visits, blood transfusions, and gynecologic procedures were common. Balancing bleeding and clotting risk in patients on therapeutic anticoagulation requires a nuanced approach and should involve collaborative management between hematologists and gynecologists.

Bleeding Complications Associated With Intrauterine Contraception in Women Receiving Anticoagulation Therapy

Objective

Patients and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Reproductive issues in women on direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are replacing warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists for a wide range of indications. Advantages of DOAC therapy are fewer food and drug interactions and fixed dosing without routine laboratory monitoring, making DOACs the perfect choice especially for younger patients, in whom the main indication for anticoagulation is prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although DOACs are safer and much more convenient than other anticoagulant alternatives, their profile may have drawbacks, especially for younger female patients in whom reproductive issues need special considerations. These may include the issue of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) during anticoagulant therapy, the embryotoxicity risk from inadvertent DOAC exposure during pregnancy, and the prevention or planning of pregnancies during DOAC therapy. This review summarizes the most relevant evidence in this increasingly important field of women's health.

Management of anticoagulation associated reproductive tract bleeding in adolescent and young adult females - Results of a multinational survey

INTRODUCTION

Reproductive tract bleeding (RTB) is an important outcome in menstruating females on anticoagulant therapy (AC). The diagnosis and management of AC-RTB in adolescent and young adult (AYA) females is unknown.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to survey the contemporary patterns of diagnosis and management of AC-RTB in AYA females.

METHODS

SurveyMonkey® questions were sent to members of 1) Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis Hemostasis Subcommittee and Women's Health Subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and 2) Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society. Results are reported using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Response rate was 33% (251 out of 753). AC-RTB was infrequently reported. Menstrual history was not routinely reviewed prior to initiation of AC. Respondents indicated a differential risk of AC-RTB, most frequently with Rivaroxaban. Respondents continued hormonal therapy (HT) if an AYA female was on it at the start of AC. When AC-RTB occurred, management strategies were variable with initiation of HT or antifibrinolytic therapy being the most frequent. The timing of AC-RTB after the thrombotic event influenced the respondents' choice of therapy. Differences were seen in the management strategies between US and non-US participants, with more US respondents initiating HT while more non-US respondents modifying the AC regimen. Respondents uniformly reported complications with AC-RTB and with its treatment.

CONCLUSION

This survey highlights the need to review menstrual history at the start of and during AC and for future research into choosing the optimal AC in AYA females. The results can inform the design of future studies.