1
|
Johns NE, Blumenberg C, Kirkby K, Allorant A, Costa FDS, Danovaro-Holliday MC, Lyons C, Yusuf N, Barros AJD, Hosseinpoor AR. Comparison of Wealth-Related Inequality in Tetanus Vaccination Coverage before and during Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 72 Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:431. [PMID: 38675813 PMCID: PMC11054082 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12040431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Immunization of pregnant women against tetanus is a key strategy for reducing tetanus morbidity and mortality while also achieving the goal of maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination. Despite substantial progress in improving newborn protection from tetanus at birth through maternal immunization, umbilical cord practices and sterilized and safe deliveries, inequitable gaps in protection remain. Notably, an infant's tetanus protection at birth is comprised of immunization received by the mother during and before the pregnancy (e.g., through childhood vaccination, booster doses, mass vaccination campaigns, or during prior pregnancies). In this work, we examine wealth-related inequalities in maternal tetanus toxoid containing vaccination coverage before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and at birth for 72 low- and middle-income countries with a recent Demographic and Health Survey or Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (between 2013 and 2022). We summarize coverage levels and absolute and relative inequalities at each time point; compare the relative contributions of inequalities before and during pregnancy to inequalities at birth; and examine associations between inequalities and coverage levels. We present the findings for countries individually and on aggregate, by World Bank country income grouping, as well as by maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination status, finding that most of the inequality in tetanus immunization coverage at birth is introduced during pregnancy. Inequalities in coverage during pregnancy are most pronounced in low- and lower-middle-income countries, and even more so in countries which have not achieved maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination. These findings suggest that pregnancy is a key time of opportunity for equity-oriented interventions to improve maternal tetanus immunization coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole E. Johns
- Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (N.E.J.)
| | - Cauane Blumenberg
- International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Rua Mal Deodoro 1160, Pelotas 96020-220, Brazil
- Causale Consulting, Avenida Adolfo Fetter 4331, Pelotas 96090-840, Brazil
| | - Katherine Kirkby
- Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (N.E.J.)
| | - Adrien Allorant
- Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (N.E.J.)
| | - Francine Dos Santos Costa
- International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Rua Mal Deodoro 1160, Pelotas 96020-220, Brazil
| | - M. Carolina Danovaro-Holliday
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Carrie Lyons
- Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (N.E.J.)
| | - Nasir Yusuf
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aluísio J. D. Barros
- International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Rua Mal Deodoro 1160, Pelotas 96020-220, Brazil
| | - Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor
- Department of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; (N.E.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chinese Herbal Medicine for induced abortion in early pregnancy (before 14 weeks’ gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 2022:CD014609. [PMCID: PMC9574624 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine for induced abortion in early pregnancy (before 14 weeks' gestation).
Collapse
|
3
|
Klu D, Yeboah I, Kayi EA, Okyere J, Essiaw MN. Utilization of abortion services from an unsafe provider and associated factors among women with history of induced abortion in Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:705. [PMID: 36100858 PMCID: PMC9469529 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05034-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), numerous studies have examined women's choice of abortion methods and services using hospital-based data, community-based surveys and nationally representative data. Little research focuses on the factors influencing a woman's choice of abortion provider. This study sought to identify factors that are associated with why a woman seeks abortion care services from an unsafe provider in Ghana. METHODS We used nationally representative data of women from the 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Survey (GMHS). Data analysis was restricted to women aged 15-49 with a recent history of induced abortion. Analyses focused on a weighted sample of 1,880. Descriptive analysis and the chi-square test were used to examine the proportion of women utilizing abortion services from unsafe providers. Factors hypothesized to affect the utilization of abortion services from unsafe providers were examined using both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS The proportion of survey respondents who reported that they utilize abortion service from unsafe providers were 57.5%. After adjusting for confounders, those who have knowledge of abortion legality [aOR: 0.381 (0.271-0.541)] and those who have attained secondary or higher education [aOR: 0.613 (0.411-0.914)] were less likely to use abortion services from unsafe providers. On the other hand, women belonging to the Ewe ethnic group [aOR: 0.696 (0.508-0.953)], those residing in the middle belt zone [aOR: 1.743 (1.113-2.728)], younger women aged 15-29 years [aOR: 2.037 (1.234-3.362)] were more likely to use abortion services from unsafe abortion providers. CONCLUSIONS This research suggests that increasing the knowledge of women on the legal status of abortion through public education and encouraging more women to pursue secondary or higher education can contribute to reducing the use of abortion services from unsafe providers. These interventions should be targeted among younger women and those who reside in the middle belt zones of Ghana.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desmond Klu
- Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, PMB 31, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana
| | - Isaac Yeboah
- Institute of Work, Employment and Society, University of Professional Studies, P.O. Box LG 149, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
| | - Esinam Afi Kayi
- Department of Adult Education and Human Resource Studies, School of Continuing and Distance Education, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 25, Accra, Legon, Ghana
| | - Joshua Okyere
- Department of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, PMB 40, Cape Coast, Ghana
| | - Mary Naana Essiaw
- Institute of Work, Employment and Society, University of Professional Studies, P.O. Box LG 149, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foreword: Global Gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 64:411-414. [PMID: 34224429 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|