Use and outcome of TIPS in hospitalized patients in Germany: A Nationwide study (2007-2018)

Acute Variceal Hemorrhage in Germany-A Nationwide Study of 65,357 Hospitalized Cases: Variceal Hemorrhage in Germany

Background: Acute variceal hemorrhage (AVH) is a frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in liver cirrhosis. Most cases require urgent endoscopic intervention due to potentially life-threatening courses. Different endoscopic hemostasis techniques can be used, in particular endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST), depending on the bleeding side (esophageal, fundal, and gastric) as well as radiological interventions (e.g., embolization and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [TIPS]). This study aimed to investigate trends in incidence, treatment modalities, and outcome parameters, such as in-hospital mortality and adverse events in Germany. Methods: We evaluated the current epidemiological trends, therapeutic strategies, and in-hospital mortality of AVH in Germany based on the standardized hospital discharge data provided by the German Federal Statistical Office from 2010 to 2019. Results: A total of 65,357 AVH cases, predominately males (68.3%), were included in the analysis. The annual incidence rate (hospitalization cases per 100,000 persons) was 8.9. The in-hospital mortality was 18.6%. The most common underlying disease was alcohol-related liver cirrhosis (60.6%). The most common clinical complication was bleeding anemia (60.1%), whereas hypovolemic shock (12.8%) was the less frequent. In esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH), EVL was the most frequently performed endoscopic therapy, while in gastric variceal hemorrhage (GVH), EST and fibrin glue injection were the most commonly performed therapies. EVL showed the lowest in-hospital mortality (12.3%) in EVH, while EST showed favorable results (14% in-hospital mortality) in GVH. Combination therapies overall showed a higher in-hospital mortality and were more frequent in GVH. The presence of hypovolemic shock, AKI, sepsis, artificial ventilation, ARDS, bleeding anemia, hepatic encephalopathy, and male sex was associated with a significantly worse outcome. Conclusion: Our study provides detailed insight into the incidence, patient-related risk factors, endoscopic treatment, and in-hospital mortality in a sizeable AVH collective in Germany. These data might help improve risk stratification and treatment strategies for AVH patients in the future.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outcomes After the Development of Ascites: A National Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Ascites, a severe complication of cirrhosis, significantly impacts patient morbidity and mortality especially in Black patients. Access to disease optimizing care has been proposed as a potential driver of this disparity. In this study, we evaluate TIPS utilization across racial and ethnic groups.

METHODS

We examined data from a 20% random sample of US Medicare enrollees with continuous Part D coverage. We required 180 days of continuous outpatient enrollment prior to cirrhosis diagnosis and all patients had ≥1 paracentesis within 180 days of their cirrhosis diagnosis. Time zero was the date of the first paracentesis. We assessed the likelihood of TIPS placement. Analyses were conducted to determine the independent associations between each outcome and race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

5915 patients (average age 68.2, 64.4% male) were included in the analysis. 439 (7.4%) patients were identified as Black, 223 (3.8%) as Hispanic, and 4942 (83.6%) as white. When compared to white patients in a multivariable analysis, Black patients were less likely to receive a TIPS procedure (hazard ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.8) and had less days alive outside of the hospital (-100.5; 95% CI -189.4 - -11.6). There were no significant differences in transplant-free survival or number of paracenteses per year between ethnic and racial groups.

CONCLUSION

Black patients are less likely to receive a TIPS procedure when controlling for common patient- and disease-specific variables. Access to optimal specialized services may be a significant driver for disparities in outcomes of patients with cirrhosis between racial and ethnic groups.

Attitudes towards transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in Australia: a national survey of TIPS centres

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a minimally invasive therapeutic option to treat the sequelae of portal hypertension. It is unclear whether current international recommendations are reflected in current clinical practice across Australia and the extent of variations in care. This study aimed to address this gap in knowledge and benchmark the current landscape of TIPS services in Australia against international guidelines.

METHODS

We designed a 42-item questionnaire according to practice-based recommendations and standards of international guidelines to investigate current landscape of TIPS service across four key domains: (1) service provision, (2) patient selection and indications, (3) best procedure practice, and (4) postoperative care.

RESULTS

Gastroenterologist/hepatologists from 23 major liver centres (67.6%) across Australia currently performing TIPS completed the questionnaire. Between 2017 and 2020, there were 456 elective TIPS insertions. Units offering TIPS service had a low median number of TIPS insertions (n=7 per annum). More than half of respondents (56.5%) did not have institutional clinical practice protocols. There was marked variation in practices across institutions in terms of TIPS indications and patient selection. Despite variations, the success rate of elective TIPS was high at 91.7% (79-100%), with 86.6% (29-100%) for rescue TIPS. There was significant variation in postoperative follow-up and care.

CONCLUSION

Current TIPS practice in Australia varies significantly across institutions. There is a need for a national consensus clinical practice guidelines to improve access and minimise unwarranted variation. A national registry for TIPS could measure, monitor, and report on quality of clinical care and patient outcomes.

Post-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Hepatic Encephalopathy-A Review of the Past Decade's Literature Focusing on Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established treatment for portal hypertension and its' complications in liver cirrhosis, yet the development of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains a significant concern. This review covers the reported incidence, risk factors, and management strategies for post-TIPS HE over the past decade. Incidence varies widely (7-61%), with factors like age, liver function, hyponatremia, and spontaneous portosystemic shunts influencing risk. Procedural aspects, including TIPS timing, indication, and stent characteristics, also contribute. Pharmacological prophylaxis with lactulose and rifaximin shows promise, but current evidence is inconclusive. Procedural preventive measures, such as shunt embolization and monitoring portal pressure gradients, are explored. Treatment involves pharmacological options like lactulose and rifaximin, and procedural interventions like stent diameter reduction. Ongoing studies on novel predictive markers and emerging treatments, such as faecal microbiota transplant, reflect the evolving landscape in post-TIPS HE management. This concise review provides clinicians with insights into the multifaceted nature of post-TIPS HE, aiding in improved risk assessment, prophylaxis, and management for patients undergoing TIPS procedures.