1
|
Touati N, Rodríguez C, Moreault MP, Sicotte C, Lapointe L. Maintaining a medical institution in a context of materiality change: Lessons from a Canadian university hospital. Health (London) 2023; 27:1135-1154. [PMID: 35791458 PMCID: PMC10588263 DOI: 10.1177/13634593221109680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
This research aimed to better understand how institutions are maintained, and the role of materiality in this institutional work. More specifically, the present qualitative case study analyzed how different actors in a large academic hospital in Canada worked together (i.e. accomplished institutional work) to maintain the institution of medical record keeping as a new clinical information system (computerized physician order entry-the material entity) was enacted. The study reveals that, to maintain the institution at stake, the intertwinement of processes of creating and maintaining institutions took place. In fact, different forms of institutional work interact Results also strongly suggest that the design of computerized physician order entry and its implementation (i.e. the materiality involved in this institutional change) played an important role in the maintenance of the institution of medical record keeping: on the one hand, it was particularly present in three types of institutional work, namely enabling, policing, and deterring; on the other hand, it appeared to be an essential component of the routinization of work by allowing a better fit between the new technology and the organization of work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nassera Touati
- École nationale d’administration publique (ENAP), Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rajamani S, Hultman G, Bakker C, Melton GB. The role of organizational culture in health information technology implementations: A scoping review. Learn Health Syst 2021; 6:e10299. [PMID: 35860317 PMCID: PMC9284926 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sripriya Rajamani
- Informatics Program, School of NursingUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
- Institute for Health InformaticsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Gretchen Hultman
- Institute for Health InformaticsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Caitlin Bakker
- Health Sciences LibraryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Genevieve B. Melton
- Institute for Health InformaticsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
- Center for Learning Health System SciencesUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Almoaber B, Amyot D. Key factors of clinicians' acceptance of CPOE system and their link to change management. Inform Health Soc Care 2021; 47:326-345. [PMID: 34723747 DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1993858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The successful implementation of a Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) system is a challenging process for any healthcare organization. It requires a dramatic change not only to the way the care is provided but also to the way clinicians work. Because of the required change complexity, organizations must consider key factors of clinicians' acceptance to avoid resistance and maximize chances of success. This paper aims to identify the different factors that affect clinicians' acceptance of CPOE systems and their relation to existing change management models. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify barriers and recommendations to the clinicians' acceptance of CPOE systems. Then, a comparative analysis was used to explain the relationship between the discovered factors and change management, with a focus on Kotter's model. The review included 23 articles. A total of 28 barriers and 25 recommendations have been identified. In conclusion, factors of clinicians' acceptance fall into two categories: one related to the used implementation strategy and the other related to how the system was designed. Most of the factors are similar to change management principles. The systematic incorporation of change management principles during CPOE implementation would likely improve clinicians' acceptance of the system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basmah Almoaber
- Information Systems Department, Science and Arts College in Khamis Mushait, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.,School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Daniel Amyot
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arnautovic T, Sommese K, Mullan PC, Frazier SB, Vazifedan T, Ramirez DE. Evaluating the Implementation Barriers of an Intranasal Fentanyl Pain Pathway for Pediatric Long-Bone Fractures. Pediatr Emerg Care 2018; 34:473-478. [PMID: 29200140 DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000001375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess physician comfort, knowledge, and implementation barriers regarding the use of intranasal fentanyl (INF) for pain management in patients with long-bone fractures in a pediatric emergency department (ED) with an INF pain pathway. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients, 3 to 21 years old, in our ED with an International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision code for a long-bone fracture from September 1, 2013, to August 31, 2015. Patients were divided into 4 groups: (1) received INF on the pathway appropriately; (2) "missed opportunities" to receive INF, defined as either INF was ordered and then subsequently canceled (for pain ratings, ≥6/10), or INF was ordered, cancelled, and intravenous (IV) morphine given, or INF was not ordered and a peripheral IV line was placed to give IV morphine as first-line medication; (3) peripheral IV established upon ED arrival; (4) no pain medication required. Additionally, a survey regarding practice habits for pain management was completed to evaluate physician barriers to utilization of the pathway. RESULTS A total of 1374 patients met the inclusion criteria. Missed opportunities were identified 41% of the time. Neither younger patient age nor more years of physician experience in the ED were associated with increased rates of missed opportunities. The survey (95% response rate) revealed greater comfort with and preference for IV morphine over INF. CONCLUSIONS The high rate of missed opportunities, despite the implementation of an INF pain pathway, indicates the need for further exploration of the barriers to utilization of the INF pain pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paul C Mullan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA
| | - Steven Barron Frazier
- Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN
| | - Turaj Vazifedan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA
| | - Dana Erikson Ramirez
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McCall SJ, Souers RJ, Blond B, Massie L. Physician Satisfaction With Clinical Laboratory Services: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 81 Institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 140:1098-103. [PMID: 27684982 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0486-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT -Assessment of customer satisfaction is a vital component of the laboratory quality improvement program. OBJECTIVE -To survey the level of physician satisfaction with hospital clinical laboratory services. DESIGN -Participating institutions provided demographic information and survey results of physician satisfaction, with specific features of clinical laboratory services individually rated on a scale of 5 (excellent) to 1 (poor). RESULTS -Eighty-one institutions submitted 2425 surveys. The median overall satisfaction score was 4.2 (10th percentile, 3.6; 90th percentile, 4.6). Of the 16 surveyed areas receiving the highest percentage of excellent/good ratings (combined scores of 4 and 5), quality of results was highest along with test menu adequacy, staff courtesy, and overall satisfaction. Of the 4 categories receiving the lowest percentage values of excellent/good ratings, 3 were related to turnaround time for inpatient "STAT" (tests performed immediately), outpatient STAT, and esoteric tests. The fourth was a new category presented in this survey: ease of electronic order entry. Here, 11.4% (241 of 2121) of physicians assigned below-average (2) or poor (1) scores. The 5 categories deemed most important to physicians included quality of results, turnaround times for inpatient STAT, routine, and outpatient STAT tests, and clinical report format. Overall satisfaction as measured by physician willingness to recommend their laboratory to another physician remains high at 94.5% (2160 of 2286 respondents). CONCLUSIONS -There is a continued trend of high physician satisfaction and loyalty with clinical laboratory services. Physician dissatisfaction with ease of electronic order entry represents a new challenge. Test turnaround times are persistent areas of dissatisfaction, representing areas for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon J McCall
- From the Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (Dr McCall); the Department of Biostatistics (Ms Souers) and Surveys (Ms Blond), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service, New Mexico VA Health Care Systems and Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque (Dr Massie)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ratwani R, Fairbanks T, Savage E, Adams K, Wittie M, Boone E, Hayden A, Barnes J, Hettinger Z, Gettinger A. Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7:1069-1087. [PMID: 27847961 PMCID: PMC5228144 DOI: 10.4338/aci-2016-06-r-0105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Decisions made during electronic health record (EHR) implementations profoundly affect usability and safety. This study aims to identify gaps between the current literature and key stakeholders' perceptions of usability and safety practices and the challenges encountered during the implementation of EHRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two approaches were used: a literature review and interviews with key stakeholders. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify usability and safety challenges and best practices during implementation. A total of 55 articles were reviewed through searches of PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. We used a qualitative approach to identify key stakeholders' perceptions; semi-structured interviews were conducted with a diverse set of health IT stakeholders to understand their current practices and challenges related to usability during implementation. We used a grounded theory approach: data were coded, sorted, and emerging themes were identified. Conclusions from both sources of data were compared to identify areas of misalignment. RESULTS We identified six emerging themes from the literature and stakeholder interviews: cost and resources, risk assessment, governance and consensus building, customization, clinical workflow and usability testing, and training. Across these themes, there were misalignments between the literature and stakeholder perspectives, indicating major gaps. DISCUSSION Major gaps identified from each of six emerging themes are discussed as critical areas for future research, opportunities for new stakeholder initiatives, and opportunities to better disseminate resources to improve the implementation of EHRs. CONCLUSION Our analysis identified practices and challenges across six different emerging themes, illustrated important gaps, and results suggest critical areas for future research and dissemination to improve EHR implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj Ratwani
- Raj Ratwani, PhD, National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington D.C.,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Grood C, Raissi A, Kwon Y, Santana MJ. Adoption of e-health technology by physicians: a scoping review. J Multidiscip Healthc 2016; 9:335-44. [PMID: 27536128 PMCID: PMC4975159 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s103881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this scoping review was to summarize the current literature identifying barriers and opportunities that facilitate adoption of e-health technology by physicians. DESIGN Scoping review. SETTING MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases as provided by Ovid were searched from their inception to July 2015. Studies captured by the search strategy were screened by two reviewers and included if the focus was on barriers and facilitators of e-health technology adoption by physicians. RESULTS Full-text screening yielded 74 studies to be included in the scoping review. Within those studies, eleven themes were identified, including cost and liability issues, unwillingness to use e-health technology, and training and support. CONCLUSION Cost and liability issues, unwillingness to use e-health technology, and training and support were the most frequently mentioned barriers and facilitators to the adoption of e-health technology. Government-level payment incentives and privacy laws to protect health information may be the key to overcome cost and liability issues. The adoption of e-health technology may be facilitated by tailoring to the individual physician's knowledge of the e-health technology and the use of follow-up sessions for physicians and on-site experts to support their use of the e-health technology. To ensure the effective uptake of e-health technologies, physician perspectives need to be considered in creating an environment that enables the adoption of e-health strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe de Grood
- Department of Community Health Sciences, W21C Research and Innovation Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary
| | | | | | - Maria Jose Santana
- Department of Community Health Sciences, W21C Research and Innovation Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gellert GA, Hill V, Bruner K, Maciaz G, Saucedo L, Catzoela L, Ramirez R, Jacobs WJ, Nguyen P, Patel L, Webster SL. Successful Implementation of Clinical Information Technology: Seven Key Lessons from CPOE. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6:698-715. [PMID: 26767065 DOI: 10.4338/aci-2015-06-soa-0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2015] [Accepted: 10/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify and describe the most critical strategic and operational contributors to the successful implementation of clinical information technologies, as deployed within a moderate sized system of U.S. community hospitals. BACKGROUND AND SETTING CHRISTUS Health is a multi-state system comprised of more than 350 services and 60 hospitals with over 9 000 physicians. The Santa Rosa region of CHRISTUS Health, located in greater San Antonio, Texas is comprised of three adult community hospital facilities and one Children's hospital each with bed capacities of 142-180. Computerized Patient Order Entry (CPOE) was first implemented in 2012 within a complex market environment. The Santa Rosa region has 2 417 credentialed physicians and 263 mid-level allied health professionals. METHODS This report focuses on the seven most valuable strategies deployed by the Health Informatics team in a large four hospital CHRISTUS region to achieve strong CPOE adoption and critical success lessons learned. The findings are placed within the context of the literature describing best practices in health information technology implementation. RESULTS While the elements described involved discrete de novo process generation to support implementation and operations, collectively they represent the creation of a new customer-centric service culture in our Health Informatics team, which has served as a foundation for ensuring strong clinical information technology adoption beyond CPOE. CONCLUSION The seven success factors described are not limited in their value to and impact on CPOE adoption, but generalize to - and can advance success in - varied other clinical information technology implementations across diverse hospitals. A number of these factors are supported by reports in the literature of other institutions' successful implementations of CPOE and other clinical information technologies, and while not prescriptive to other settings, may be adapted to yield value elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Gellert
- CHRISTUS Health, Health Informatics , San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - V Hill
- Baylor College of Medicine, Pediatrics , San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - K Bruner
- CHRISTUS Health, Health Informatics , San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - G Maciaz
- CHRISTUS Health, Health Informatics , San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - L Saucedo
- CHRISTUS Health, Health Informatics , San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - L Catzoela
- CHRISTUS Health, Health Informatics , San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - R Ramirez
- CHRISTUS Health, Health Informatics , San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - W J Jacobs
- CHRISTUS Health, Health Informatics , San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - P Nguyen
- CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Westover Hills Hospital , San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - L Patel
- CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Medical Center , San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - S L Webster
- CHRISTUS Health, Health Informatics , San Antonio, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Communication is an essential element of good medical practice also in pathology. In contrast to technical or diagnostic skills, communication skills are not easy to define, teach, or assess. Rules almost do not exist. In this paper, which has a rather personal character and cannot be taken as a set of guidelines, important aspects of communication in pathology are explored. This includes what should be communicated to the pathologist on the pathology request form, communication between pathologists during internal (interpathologist) consultation, communication around frozen section diagnoses, modalities of communication of a final diagnosis, with whom and how critical and unexpected findings should be communicated, (in-)adequate routes of communication for pathology diagnoses, who will (or might) receive pathology reports, and what should be communicated and how in case of an error or a technical problem. An earlier more formal description of what the responsibilities are of a pathologist as communicator and as collaborator in a medical team is added in separate tables. The intention of the paper is to stimulate reflection and discussion rather than to formulate strict rules.
Collapse
|