1
|
Harris RE, Yates AR, Nandi D, Krawczeski CD, Klamer B, Martinez GV, Andrade GM, Beckman BF, Bi J, Zepeda-Orozco D. Urinary biomarkers associated with acute kidney injury in pediatric mechanical circulatory support patients. Pediatr Nephrol 2024; 39:569-577. [PMID: 37552466 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-06089-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS), the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) is between 37 and 63%. In this study, we performed an exploratory analysis evaluating the relationship of multiple urine biomarkers with AKI development in pediatric MCS patients. METHODS This is a single center retrospective study in a pediatric cohort receiving MCS from August 2014 to November 2020. We measured 14 urine biomarkers of kidney injury on day 1 following MCS initiation and analyzed their association with development of AKI in the first 7 days of MCS initiation. RESULTS Sixty patients met inclusion criteria. Patients with AKI were more likely to be supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (65% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001), compared to the no AKI group and less likely to have ventricular assist devices (10% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in the median urine albumin and urine osteoactivin in the AKI group, compared to the no AKI group (p = 0.020 and p = 0.018, respectively). When normalized to urine creatinine (UCr), an increased log osteoactivin/UCr was associated with higher odds of AKI development (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.07, 4.44; p = 0.028), and higher log epidermal growth factor (EGF)/UCr (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.96) was associated with decreased odds of AKI. CONCLUSIONS Early increase in urine osteoactivin is associated with AKI development within 7 days of MCS initiation in pediatric patients. Contrary, an increased urine EGF is associated with kidney protection. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel E Harris
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Andrew R Yates
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Deipanjan Nandi
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Catherine D Krawczeski
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brett Klamer
- Biostatistics Resource at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Gabriela Vasquez Martinez
- Kidney and Urinary Tract Center, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Gabriel Mayoral Andrade
- Kidney and Urinary Tract Center, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brian F Beckman
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Cardiovascular Research, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jianli Bi
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Cardiovascular Research, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Diana Zepeda-Orozco
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Kidney and Urinary Tract Center, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's, Columbus, OH, USA
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bartfay SE, Kolsrud O, Wessman P, Dellgren G, Karason K. The trajectory of renal function following mechanical circulatory support and subsequent heart transplantation. ESC Heart Fail 2022; 9:2464-2473. [PMID: 35441491 PMCID: PMC9288773 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim Patients with advanced heart failure (HF) frequently suffer from renal insufficiency. The impact of durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and subsequent heart transplantation (HTx) on kidney function is not well described. Methods and results We studied patients with advanced HF who received durable MCS as bridge to transplantation (BTT) and underwent subsequent HTx at our centre between 1996 and 2018. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured by 51Cr‐EDTA or iohexol clearance during heart failure work‐up; 3–6 months after MCS; and 1 year after HTx. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was classified according to KDIGO criteria based on estimated GFR. A total of 88 patients (46 ± 15 years, 84% male) were included, 63% with non‐ischaemic heart disease. The median duration of MCS‐treatment was 172 (IQR 116–311) days, and 81 subjects were alive 1 year after HTx. Measured GFR increased from 54 ± 19 during HF work‐up to 60 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m2 after MCS (P < 0.001) and displayed a slight but nonsignificant decrease to 57 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m2 1 year after HTx (P = 0.38). The trajectory of measured GFR did not differ between pulsatile and continuous flow (CF) pumps. Among patients 35–49 years and those who were treated in the most recent era (2012–2018), measured GFR increased following MCS implantation and subsequent HTx. Estimated GFR displayed a similar course as did measured GFR. Conclusions In patients with advanced heart failure, measured GFR improved after MCS with no difference between pulsatile and CF‐pumps. The total study group showed no further increase in GFR following HTx, but in certain subgroups, including patients aged 35–54 years and those treated during the latest era (2012–2018), renal function appeared to improve after transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven-Erik Bartfay
- Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Oscar Kolsrud
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Peter Wessman
- Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Göran Dellgren
- Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kristjan Karason
- Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gustafsson F, Ben Avraham B, Chioncel O, Hasin T, Grupper A, Shaul A, Nalbantgil S, Hammer Y, Mullens W, Tops LF, Elliston J, Tsui S, Milicic D, Altenberger J, Abuhazira M, Winnik S, Lavee J, Piepoli MF, Hill L, Hamdan R, Ruhparwar A, Anker S, Crespo-Leiro MG, Coats AJS, Filippatos G, Metra M, Rosano G, Seferovic P, Ruschitzka F, Adamopoulos S, Barac Y, De Jonge N, Frigerio M, Goncalvesova E, Gotsman I, Itzhaki Ben Zadok O, Ponikowski P, Potena L, Ristic A, Jaarsma T, Ben Gal T. HFA of the ESC position paper on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider Part 3: at the hospital and discharge. ESC Heart Fail 2021; 8:4425-4443. [PMID: 34585525 PMCID: PMC8712918 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The growing population of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)‐supported patients increases the probability of an LVAD‐ supported patient hospitalized in the internal or surgical wards with certain expected device related, and patient‐device interaction complication as well as with any other comorbidities requiring hospitalization. In this third part of the trilogy on the management of LVAD‐supported patients for the non‐LVAD specialist healthcare provider, definitions and structured approach to the hospitalized LVAD‐supported patient are presented including blood pressure assessment, medical therapy of the LVAD supported patient, and challenges related to anaesthesia and non‐cardiac surgical interventions. Finally, important aspects to consider when discharging an LVAD patient home and palliative and end‐of‐life approaches are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finn Gustafsson
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Binyamin Ben Avraham
- Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ovidiu Chioncel
- Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases 'Prof. C.C., Iliescu', University of Medicine Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Tal Hasin
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Avishai Grupper
- Heart Failure Institute, Lev Leviev Heart Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Aviv Shaul
- Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Yoav Hammer
- Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Wilfried Mullens
- Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Laurens F Tops
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeremy Elliston
- Anesthesiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Steven Tsui
- Transplant Unit, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Davor Milicic
- Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Johann Altenberger
- SKA-Rehabilitationszentrum Großgmain, Salzburger, Straße 520, Großgmain, 5084, Austria
| | - Miriam Abuhazira
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Stephan Winnik
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jacob Lavee
- Heart Transplantation Unit, Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Lorrena Hill
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Righab Hamdan
- Department of Cardiology, Beirut Cardiac Institute, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Arjang Ruhparwar
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Anker
- Department of Cardiology (CVK), Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marisa Generosa Crespo-Leiro
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC), CIBERCV, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica A Coruña (INIBIC), Universidad de a Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain
| | | | - Gerasimos Filippatos
- Heart Failure Unit, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece. School of Medicine, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Marco Metra
- Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rosano
- Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, St George's Hospitals NHS Trust University of London, London, UK.,RCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - Petar Seferovic
- Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Heart Failure Center, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade University Medical Center, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Frank Ruschitzka
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, University Heart Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stamatis Adamopoulos
- Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation Unit, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Yaron Barac
- Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nicolaas De Jonge
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Frigerio
- Transplant Center and De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Israel Gotsman
- Heart Institute, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Osnat Itzhaki Ben Zadok
- Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Piotr Ponikowski
- Centre for Heart Diseases, University Hospital, Wroclaw, Department of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Luciano Potena
- Heart and Lung Transplant Program, Bologna University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Arsen Ristic
- Department of Cardiology of the Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade University School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Tiny Jaarsma
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Tuvia Ben Gal
- Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agarwal KA, Patel H, Agrawal N, Cardarelli F, Goyal N. Cardiac Outcomes in Isolated Heart and Simultaneous Kidney and Heart Transplants in the United States. Kidney Int Rep 2021; 6:2348-2357. [PMID: 34514196 PMCID: PMC8418976 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Kidney dysfunction is not uncommon in patients with advanced heart failure. Simultaneous kidney and heart transplants (SKHTs) have gained acceptance as a treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure and severe kidney dysfunction. United States saw a rise of 650% in SKHT from 2000 to 2019. Despite increasing number of SKHT, the selection criteria remain poorly defined and vary across transplant centers. Methods We evaluated patient and cardiac allograft survival for SKHT and heart transplant alone (HTA) using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. We then performed a subgroup analysis in recipients with post-transplant acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) and compared outcomes between SKHT and HTA recipients. Results Although patient survival was comparable between SKHT and HTA groups (12.4 vs. 11.3 years), patients dependent on dialysis pretransplant derived greater survival advantage from SKHT as compared with HTA (12.4 vs. 9.9 years). Cardiac graft survival was better in SKHT (12.5 vs. 11.2 years). Among patients who developed acute kidney injury requiring RRT postoperatively, SKHT recipients had a significantly better survival (11.9 vs. 2.7 years). Conclusion Our data support consideration of SKHT in dialysis-dependent heart transplant candidates and suggest that patients who are at increased risk of requiring RRT after heart transplant may benefit from SKHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishna Adit Agarwal
- Division of Nephrology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Het Patel
- Division of Nephrology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nikhil Agrawal
- Division of Nephrology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Francesca Cardarelli
- Division of Nephrology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nitender Goyal
- Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yalcin YC, Muslem R, Veen KM, Soliman OI, Hesselink DA, Constantinescu AA, Brugts JJ, Manintveld OC, Fudim M, Russell SD, Tomashitis B, Houston BA, Hsu S, Tedford RJ, Bogers AJJC, Caliskan K. Impact of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy on Chronic Kidney Disease: A Longitudinal Multicenter Study. J Card Fail 2020; 26:333-341. [PMID: 31981698 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients undergoing durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation suffer from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, we investigated the effect of LVAD support on CKD. METHODS A retrospective multicenter cohort study, including all patients undergoing LVAD (HeartMate II (n = 330), HeartMate 3 (n = 22) and HeartWare (n = 48) implantation. In total, 227 (56.8%) patients were implanted as bridge-to-transplantation; 154 (38.5%) as destination therapy; and 19 (4.7%) as bridge-to-decision. Serum creatinine measurements were collected over a 2-year follow-up period. Patients were stratified based on CKD stage. RESULTS Overall, 400 patients (mean age 53 ± 14 years, 75% male) were included: 186 (46.5%) patients had CKD stage 1 or 2; 93 (23.3%) had CKD stage 3a; 82 (20.5%) had CKD stage 3b; and 39 (9.8%) had CKD stage 4 or 5 prior to LVAD implantation. During a median follow-up of 179 days (IQR 28-627), 32,629 creatinine measurements were available. Improvement of kidney function was noticed in every preoperative CKD-stage group. Following this improvement, estimated glomerular filtration rates regressed to baseline values for all CKD stages. Patients showing early renal function improvement were younger and in worse preoperative condition. Moreover, survival rates were higher in patients showing early improvement (69% vs 56%, log-rank P = 0 .013). CONCLUSIONS Renal function following LVAD implantation is characterized by improvement, steady state and subsequent deterioration. Patients who showed early renal function improvement were in worse preoperative condition, however, and had higher survival rates at 2 years of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunus C Yalcin
- Thoraxcenter, Unit Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rahatullah Muslem
- Thoraxcenter, Unit Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kevin M Veen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Osama I Soliman
- Thoraxcenter, Unit Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Division of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alina A Constantinescu
- Thoraxcenter, Unit Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jasper J Brugts
- Thoraxcenter, Unit Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier C Manintveld
- Thoraxcenter, Unit Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marat Fudim
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stuart D Russell
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brett Tomashitis
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Brian A Houston
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Steven Hsu
- Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Heart and Vascular Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan J Tedford
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ad J J C Bogers
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kadir Caliskan
- Thoraxcenter, Unit Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pinsino A, Mondellini GM, Royzman EA, Hoffman KL, D'Angelo D, Mabasa M, Gaudig A, Zuver AM, Masoumi A, Garan AR, Mohan S, Husain SA, Toma K, Faillace RT, Giles JT, Takeda K, Takayama H, Naka Y, Topkara VK, Demmer RT, Radhakrishnan J, Colombo PC, Yuzefpolskaya M. Cystatin C- Versus Creatinine-Based Assessment of Renal Function and Prediction of Early Outcomes Among Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device. Circ Heart Fail 2020; 13:e006326. [PMID: 31959016 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.119.006326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine (sCr) improves early after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation but subsequently declines. Although sCr is a commonly accepted clinical standard, cystatin C (CysC) has shown superiority in assessment of renal function in disease states characterized by muscle wasting. Among patients with an LVAD, we aimed to (1) longitudinally compare CysC-eGFR and sCr-eGFR, (2) assess their predictive value for early postoperative outcomes, and (3) investigate mechanisms which might explain potential discrepancies. METHODS A prospective cohort (n=116) with CysC and sCr concurrently measured at serial time points, and a retrospective cohort (n=91) with chest computed tomography performed within 40 days post-LVAD were studied. In the prospective cohort, the primary end point was a composite of in-hospital mortality, renal replacement therapy, or severe right ventricular failure. In the retrospective cohort, muscle mass was estimated using pectoralis muscle area indexed to body surface area (pectoralis muscle index). RESULTS In the prospective cohort, sCr-eGFR significantly improved early post-LVAD and subsequently declined, whereas CysC-eGFR remained stable. CysC-eGFR but not sCr-eGFR predicted the primary end point: odds ratio per 5 mL/(min·1.73 m2) decrease 1.16 (1.02-1.31) versus 0.99 (0.94-1.05). In retrospective cohort, for every 5 days post-LVAD, a 6% decrease in pectoralis muscle index was observed (95% CI, 2%-9%, P=0.003). After adjusting for time on LVAD, for every 1 cm2/m2 decrease in pectoralis muscle index, there was a 4% decrease in 30-day post-LVAD sCr (95% CI, 1%-6%, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS Initial improvement in sCr-eGFR is likely due to muscle wasting following LVAD surgery. CysC may improve assessment of renal function and prediction of early postoperative outcomes in patients with an LVAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Pinsino
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.,Department of Medicine, NYC Health + Hospitals/Jacobi, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (A.P., R.T.F.)
| | - Giulio M Mondellini
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Eugene A Royzman
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Katherine L Hoffman
- Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (K.L.H., D.D.)
| | - Debra D'Angelo
- Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (K.L.H., D.D.)
| | - Melissa Mabasa
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Antonia Gaudig
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Amelia M Zuver
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Amirali Masoumi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - A Reshad Garan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (S.M., S.A.H., K.T., J.R.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health (S.M.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Syed A Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (S.M., S.A.H., K.T., J.R.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Katherine Toma
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (S.M., S.A.H., K.T., J.R.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert T Faillace
- Department of Medicine, NYC Health + Hospitals/Jacobi, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (A.P., R.T.F.)
| | - Jon T Giles
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (J.T.G.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Koji Takeda
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery (K.T., H.T., Y.N.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Hiroo Takayama
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery (K.T., H.T., Y.N.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Yoshifumi Naka
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery (K.T., H.T., Y.N.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Veli K Topkara
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Ryan T Demmer
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (R.T.D.)
| | - Jai Radhakrishnan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine (S.M., S.A.H., K.T., J.R.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Paolo C Colombo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Melana Yuzefpolskaya
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.P., G.M.M., E.A.R., M.M., A.G., A.M.Z., A.M., A.R.G., V.K.T., P.C.C., M.Y.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Cardiorenal syndromes have been categorized into 5 clinical subtypes based on which organ is perceived to be the primary precipitant of the vicious and interrelated cycle of declining function in both organs. This clinical classification has broadened interest in cardiorenal interactions, but it is merely descriptive, does not rely on or inform predominant pathophysiology, and has produced little change in either practice or the research agenda. In contrast, recent scientific work identifies common pathophysiological pathways for several categories of cardiorenal syndromes, suggesting a unifying pathogenesis. Fibrosis is a common consequence of inflammation- and oxidative stress-related endothelial dysfunction in aging, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, ischemia, and organ injury. It is a common feature in heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Therefore, we suggest that fibrosis may be not only a marker but also the primary driver of pathophysiology in several cardiorenal syndromes. Interstitial fibrosis in the heart, large arteries, and kidneys may play a key role in the pathophysiology of the cardiorenal syndrome continuum. Focusing on fibrosis as a disease mediator might enable the identification of fibrosis-related biotargets that could potentially be modulated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, or other novel antifibrotic agents in development. This conceptual approach may be an effective new strategy for the prevention and treatment of fibrosis within the cardiorenal syndrome continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiez Zannad
- Universite de Lorraine, Inserm, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques-1433 and Inserm U1116, CHRU Nancy, France (F.Z., P.R.).,F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France (F.Z., P.R.)
| | - Patrick Rossignol
- Universite de Lorraine, Inserm, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques-1433 and Inserm U1116, CHRU Nancy, France (F.Z., P.R.).,F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France (F.Z., P.R.).,Association Lorraine pour le Traitement de l'Insuffisance Rénale, Nancy, France (P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|