Hereditary arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies: decision-making about genetic testing

Diagnostic yield of genetic testing in heart transplant recipients with prior cardiomyopathy

Background

The importance of genetic testing for cardiomyopathies has increased in the last decade. However, in heart transplant patients with former cardiomyopathy, genetic testing in retrospect is not routinely performed. We hypothesize that the yield of genetic testing in this population is considerable, and will have a major impact for both patients and relatives.

Methods

Patients that underwent heart transplantation (HTx) between 1995 and 2020 and were still in follow-up, were offered genetic testing if the primary etiology was non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Next generation sequencing (NGS) of known cardiomyopathy genes was performed and variants were classified as variant of unknown significance (class 3), likely pathogenic (class 4) or pathogenic (class 5) variant.

Results

Of the 99 HTx patients in active follow-up, only 6 patients had a genetic diagnosis at the time of HTx. In this study, 31 selected patients with prior non-ischemic cardiomyopathy underwent genetic testing post HTx. 23/31 patients (74.2%) carried a variant that was classified as class 3 or higher. In 12/31 patients a class 4/5 variant (38.7%) was identified, and in 11/31 patients (35.5%) a class 3 variant. Class 5 Variants in TTN were the most prevalent (7/31), followed by class 5 variants in MYBPC3 (2/31). A positive family history was present in 21/31 (67.7%) and a second precipitating factor (e.g., alcohol abuse, pregnancy) was present in 17/31 patients (54.8%). Diagnostic yield of genetic testing was similar between patients with or without familial history and/or second hit. Through cascade screening 48 family members were screened for presence of a class 4/5 variant, of whom 19 (39.6%) were genotype positive, of whom 10 (52.6%) showed a cardiac phenotype. Appropriate follow-up was offered.

Conclusions

Genetic testing for cardiomyopathy genes established a molecular diagnosis in 38.7% of patients post HTx. These results highlight the importance of genetic testing in this population as it is still often overlooked in patients that already underwent HTx in the past. Genetic testing is highly recommended, independent of family history or second precipitating factors, as it might identify relatives at risk.

Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Pathogenic Variants in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy Referred for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the frequency of (likely) pathogenic variants (LP/Pv) among dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) ventricular tachycardia (VT) patients referred for CA and their impact on procedural outcome and long-term prognosis.

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of genetic variants associated with monomorphic VT among DCM is unknown.

METHODS

Ninety-eight consecutive patients (age 56 ± 15 years; 84% men, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 39 ± 12%) referred for DCM-VT ablation were included. Patients underwent electroanatomical mapping and testing of ≥55 cardiomyopathy-related genes. Mapping data were analyzed for low-voltage areas and abnormal potentials. LP/Pv-positive (LP/Pv+) patients were compared with LP/Pv-negative (LP/Pv-) patients and followed for VT recurrence and mortality.

RESULTS

In 37 (38%) patients, LP/Pv were identified, most frequently LMNA (n = 11 of 37, [30%]), TTN (n = 6 of 37, [16%]), PLN (n = 6 of 37, [16%]), SCN5A (n = 3 of 37, [8%]), RBM20 (n = 2 of 37, [5%]) and DSP (n = 2 of 37, [5%]). LP/Pv+ carriers had lower LVEF (35 ± 13% vs. LP/Pv-: 42 ± 11%; p = 0.005) and were less often men (n = 27 [73%] vs. n = 55 [90%]; p = 0.03). After a median follow-up of 2.4 years (interquartile range: 0.9 to 4.4 years), 63 (64%) patients had VT recurrence (LP/Pv+: 30 of 37 [81%] vs. LP/Pv-: 33 of 61 [54%]; p = 0.007). Twenty-eight patients (29%) died (LP/Pv+: 19 of 37 [51%] vs. LP/Pv-: 9 of 61 [15%]; p < 0.001). The cumulative 2-year VT-free survival was 41% in the total cohort (LP/Pv+: 16% vs. LP/Pv-: 54%; p = 0.001). The presence of LP/Pv (hazard ratio: 1.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 3.4; p = 0.02) and unipolar low-voltage area size/cm² increase (hazard ratio: 2.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.6 to 4.0; p < 0.001) were associated with a decreased 2-year VT-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DCM-VT, a genetic cause is frequently identified. LP/Pv+ patients have a lower LVEF and more extensive VT substrates, which, in combination with disease progression, may contribute to the poor prognosis. Genetic testing in patients with DCM-VT should therefore be recommended.