Cardiocerebral resuscitation: a better approach to cardiac arrest

The Efficacy of Alternative Cardiopulmomonary Resuscitation Methods When Compared to Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Simulation Study

Objective

There are limited data comparing the alternative cardiopulmomary resuscitation (CPR) methods (over the head CPR, straddle CPR and one hand CPR) to standard CPR performed by emergency medical technicians (EMTs). Therefore we investigated the efficacy of the alternative CPRs compared to that of standard CPR performed by EMTs in simulated cardiac arrest scenarios.

Methods

Thirty EMTs of intermediate level participated in this study. The performance of CPR was defined as the average depth, the total number of chest compressions, and the rate of compressions. EMTs performed three minutes of standard CPR and of alternative CPR on standard simulation mannequins with recording devices. Recorded performance was measured and compared between subgroups by the type of CPR, gender of EMTs and gender with various methods of CPR using ANOVA and t test statistics.

Results

The average depth of compressions was 42.3±5.8, 42.6±4.7, 43.5±3.7, 33.8±6.6 mm (mean±standard deviation) respectively in standard CPR, over the head CPR, straddle CPR and one hand CPR. The total number of chest compression was 330.4±38.1, 334.8±70.2, 334.0±34.9, 312.1±53.5 in 3 minutes. The rate of compressions was found to be 111.5±10.3, 113.8±11.6, 110.5±11.2, 110.7±11.8 times per minute. The comparison of the performance qualities for the four types of CPR showed that the compression depth was significantly lower in one-hand CPR (p<0.000). No EMT gender difference in the quality of performance of total CPR was noted.

Conclusions

The efficacy of alternative CPRs are shown to be similar to that of standard CPR in a compression-only simulation cardiac arrest model.

Continuous chest compression pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation after witnessed electrocution

Electrical injury is a relatively infrequent but potentially devastating multisystem injury with high morbidity and mortality. We describe the case of an 11-year-old boy who suffered loss of his consciousness after touching an electrical cable.

One-hand chest compression and hands-off time in single-lay rescuer CPR-a manikin study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of one-hand chest compression while continuously maintaining an open airway (OCOA) on rescue breath-associated hands-off time (RAHO) during single-lay rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

METHODS

In this study, 193 CPR/automated external defibrillator certified lay rescuers were randomly allocated into 2 groups and were tested in a standard scenario using a mannequin. In control group (group A), the participants provided standard CPR. In group B, OCOA was performed by placing the heel of the strong hand in the center of the mannequin's chest while maintaining an open airway using the other hand.

RESULTS

Mean RAHO was statistically significantly different between the two groups (group A: 8.38 ± 1.97 vs group B: 7.71 ± 2.43, P = .008). Only 13 (13.5%) group A and 25 (25.8%) group B providers ventilated the manikin with tidal volumes of 500 to 600 mL, while most participants caused hyperventilation. Although there were no significant differences in mean tidal volume between the groups, stomach inflation was greater in group A (< .001). Chest compressions were deeper in group A (P < .001), while chest recoil was significantly better in group B. In group B, there was a positive correlation between body mass index and compression depth (group A, P = .423; group B, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, OCOA resulted in shorter RAHO and less stomach inflation. Our results indicate that the airway should be maintained open during chest compressions, regardless of the technique. Larger studies are needed for the full clarification of OCOA.