Prevalence of Anxiety, Depression, and Distress in SCAD and Non-SCAD AMI Patients: A Comparative Study

The comprehensive care of the post-SCAD patient

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is the nonatherosclerotic, nontraumatic dissection of an epicardial coronary artery which is predominantly caused by intramural hematoma formation or intimal disruption. SCAD is an increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in young women and its true prevalence may be underestimated due to its underdiagnosis. The pathogenesis of SCAD is multifaceted and influenced by gender-specific factors, hormonal fluctuations, genetics, arteriopathies, and physical and emotional stressors. Although the pathogenesis of SCAD is multifaceted, current guidance on the care of the post-SCAD patient is limited. Moreover, it is necessary to address each of the different components contributing to the pathogenesis of SCAD in order to improve outcomes and quality of life in this patient population. This literature review aims to consolidate the current knowledge on the medical management, rehabilitation, reproductive and mental health care, and comorbidities that affect SCAD survivors.

Patients' perspective of quality-of-care and its correlation to quality-of-life following spontaneous coronary artery dissection

AIMS

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an under-recognized cause of myocardial infarction. We aimed to investigate SCAD survivors' perceptions of their quality-of-care and its relationship to quality-of-life.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An anonymous survey was distributed online to SCAD survivors involved in Australian SCAD support groups, with 172 (95.3% female, mean age 52.6 ± 9.2 years) participants in the study. The survey involved assessment of quality-of-life using a standardized questionnaire (EQ-5DTM-3L). Respondents rated the quality-of-care received during their hospital admission for SCAD with a median of 8/10 [interquartile range (IQR) 7-10]. Respondents ≤ 50 years vs. >50 years were more likely to perceive that their symptoms were not treated seriously as a myocardial infarction (χ2 = 4.127, df = 1, P < 0.05). Participants rated clinician's knowledge of SCAD with a median of 4/10 (IQR 2-8) and 7/10 (IQR 3-9) for Emergency and Cardiology clinicians, respectively (P < 0.05). The internet was the most selected source (45.4%) of useful SCAD information. The mean EQ-5DTM summary index was 0.79 (population norm 0.87). A total of 47.2% of respondents reported a mental health condition diagnosis, with 36% of these diagnosed after their admission with SCAD. Quality-of-life was significantly associated with perceived quality-of-care: EQ-5DTM index/(1-EQ-5DTM index) increased by 13% for each unit increase in quality-of-care after adjusting for age and comorbidities (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

While SCAD survivors rated their overall hospital care highly, healthcare providers' knowledge of SCAD was perceived to be poor, and the most common source of SCAD information was the internet. Mental health conditions were common, and a significant association was observed between perceived quality-of-care and SCAD survivors' quality-of-life.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in women in the generative period: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcome-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a non-traumatic and non-iatrogenic separation of the coronary arterial wall.

Materials and methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis is reported following the PRISMA guidelines and is registered in the PROSPERO database. A literature search was focused on female patients in generative period (16-55 of age) with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) caused by SCAD, and comparison from that database NP-SCAD (spontaneous coronary artery dissection in non pregnant women) and P-SCAD (spontaneous coronary artery dissection in pregnant women).

Results

14 studies with 2,145 females in the generative period with ACS caused by SCAD were analyzed. The median age was 41 years (33.4-52.3 years). The most common risk factor was previous smoking history in 24.9% cases. The most common clinical presentation of ACS was STEMI in 47.4%. Conservative treatment was reported in 41.1%. PCI was performed in 32.7%, and 3.8% of patients had CABG surgery. LAD was the most frequently affected (50.5%). The prevalence of composite clinical outcomes including mortality, non-fatal MI and recurrent SCAD was 3.3% (95% CI: 1.4-5.1), 37.7% (95% CI: 1.9-73.4) and 15.2% (95% CI: 9.1-21.3) of patients. P-SCAD compared to NP-SCAD patients more frequently had STEMI (OR = 3.16; 95% CI: 2.30-4.34; I2 = 64%); with the left main and LAD more frequently affected [(OR = 14.34; 95% CI: 7.71-26.67; I2 = 54%) and (OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.06-2.32; I2 = 23%)]; P-SCAD patients more frequently underwent CABG surgery (OR = 6.29; 95% CI: 4.08-9.70; I2 = 0%). NP-SCAD compared to P-SCAD patients were more frequently treated conservatevly (OR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.37-0.98; I2 = 0%). In P-SCAD compared to NP-SCAD mortality rates (OR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.06-21.16; I2 = not applicable) and reccurence of coronary artery dissection (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: 0.97-6.61; I2 = 0%) were not more prevalent.

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis indicated that patients with P-SCAD more frequently had STEMI, and events more frequently involved left main and LAD compared to NP-SCAD patients. Women with NP-SCAD were significantly more often treated conservatively compared to P-SCAD patients. P-SCAD compared to NP-SCAD patients did not have significantly higher mortality rates or recurrent coronary dissection.

Psychosocial and lifestyle impacts of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A quantitative study

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies suggest that acute myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) carries significant psychosocial burden. This survey-based quantitative study builds on our earlier qualitative investigation of the psychosocial impacts of SCAD in Australian SCAD survivors. The study aimed to document the prevalence and predictors of a broad range of psychosocial and lifestyle impacts of SCAD.

METHOD

Australian SCAD survivors currently enrolled in the Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute genetics study were invited to participate in an online survey to assess the psychosocial impacts of SCAD. Participants completed a questionnaire, developed using findings from our earlier qualitative research, which assessed 48 psychosocial and five lifestyle impacts of SCAD. Participants also provided demographic and medical data and completed validated measures of anxiety and depression.

RESULTS

Of 433 SCAD survivors invited to participate, 310 (72%) completed the questionnaire. The most common psychosocial impacts were 'shock about having a heart attack' (experienced by 87% respondents), 'worry about having another SCAD' (81%), 'concern about triggering another SCAD' (77%), 'uncertainty about exercise and physical activity' (73%) and 'confusion about safe levels of activity and exertion' (73.0%) and 'being overly aware of bodily sensations' (73%). In terms of lifestyle impacts, the SCAD had impacted on work capacity for almost two thirds of participants, while one in ten had sought financial assistance. The key predictors of psychosocial impacts were being under 50, current financial strain, and trade-level education. The key predictors of lifestyle impacts were being over 50, SCAD recurrence, trade-level education, and current financial strain. All psychosocial impacts and some lifestyle impacts were associated with increased risk of anxiety and/or depression.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

This quantitative study extends our previous qualitative investigation by documenting the prevalence of each of 48 psychosocial and five lifestyle impacts identified in our earlier focus group research, and by providing risk factors for greater SCAD impacts. The findings suggest the need for supports to address initial experiences of shock, as well as fears and uncertainties regarding the future, including SCAD recurrence and exercise resumption. Support could be targeted to those with identified risk factors. Strategies to enable SCAD survivors to remain in or return to the paid workforce are also indicated.

A review of the risk and precipitating factors for spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Introduction

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) accounts for 1%-4% of cases of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). SCAD is caused by separation occurring within or between any of the three tunics of the coronary artery wall. This leads to intramural hematoma and/or formation of false lumen in the artery, which leads to ischemic changes or infarction of the myocardium. The incidence of SCAD is higher in women than in men, with a ratio of approximately 9:1. It is estimated that SCAD is responsible for 35% of ACS cases in women under the age of 60. The high frequency is particularly observed during pregnancy and in the peripartum period (first week). Traditional risk factors are rare in patients with SCAD, except for hypertension. Patients diagnosed with SCAD have different combinations of risk factors compared with patients who have atherosclerotic changes in their coronary arteries. We presented the most common so-called "non-traditional" risk factors associated with SCAD patients.

Risk factors and precipitating disorders which are associated with SCAD

In the literature, there are few diseases frequently associated with SCAD, and they are identified as predisposing factors. The predominant cause is fibromuscular dysplasia, followed by inherited connective tissue disorders, systemic inflammatory diseases, pregnancy, use of sex hormones or steroids, use of cocaine or amphetamines, thyroid disorders, migraine, and tinnitus. In recent years, the genetic predisposition for SCAD is also recognized as a predisposing factor. The precipitating factors are also different in women (emotional stress) compared with those in men (physical stress). Women experiencing SCAD frequently describe symptoms of anxiety and depression. These conditions could increase shear stress on the arterial wall and dissection of the coronary artery wall. Despite the advancement of SCAD, we can find significant differences in the clinical presentation between women and men.

Conclusion

When evaluating patients with chest pain or other ACS symptoms who have a low cardiovascular risk, particularly female patients, it is important to consider the possibility of ACS due to SCAD, particularly in conditions often associated with SCAD. This will increase the recognition of SCAD and the timely treatment of affected patients.