Twenty-four-hour central blood pressure is not better associated with hypertensive target organ damage than 24-h peripheral blood pressure

Associations of 24-Hour Central Systolic Blood Pressure With Multiorgan Damage in Nondialysis Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Multiple target-organ damages (TODs) in the same patient are common and further increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between ambulatory central systolic blood pressure (SBP) and multiple TODs has yet to be explored.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MobilO-Graph PWA was used to monitor the participants' ambulatory blood pressure, and the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, carotid hypertrophy, and kidney injury were used to define TOD. Logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to explore the correlation between SBP and TOD. Overall, 2018 nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease were included and 580 (28.74%) had multiple TODs. Twenty-four-hour central SBP with c2 calibration exhibited a stronger correlation with the increasing number of TOD compared with 24-hour brachial SBP in ordinal logistic regression analyses. In the multivariable analyses with the presence of multiple TODs, the odds ratios were 1.786 (95% CI, 1.474-2.165; P<0.001) for 24-hour brachial SBP and 1.949 (95% CI, 1.605-2.366; P<0.001) for 24-hour central SBP with c2 calibration. The receiver operating characteristic analyses also showed that 24-hour central SBP with c2 calibration had higher discrimination than 24-hour brachial SBP regarding multiple TODs (P<0.001). In addition, using 130/135 mm Hg as the threshold for 24-hour brachial SBP/central SBP with c2 calibration to cross-classify, the prevalence of multiple TODs was greater in cases of concordant hypertension compared with cases of isolated brachial hypertension and concordant normotension, with no difference between the latter 2 conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-four-hour central SBP with c2 calibration was more associated with the presence of multiple TODs compared with 24-hour brachial SBP and was helpful in risk classification of multiple TODs among nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease.

Correlation among Waist Circumference and Central Measures of Blood Pressure

BACKGROUND

Arterial stiffness is a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Body fat measures such as waist circumference (WC) have been associated with CVD in adulthood.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of arterial stiffness, measured by applanation tonometry-Sphygmocor, with WC.

METHODS

Observational study with 240 participants who make routine consultations at the outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Participants were interviewed and had central blood pressure measurements (CBPM), anthropometric parameters, abdominal fat and visceral fat measured. Paired and unpaired t and chi-square tests were used. A significance level of 5% was adopted.

RESULTS

Of the 240 participants, 51.82% were male with a mean age of 59.71(±14.81) years and a mean WC of 99.87 (11.54) cm. Mean CBPM values were: Central arterial pressure (CAP) = 130.23 (91-223) mmHg, pulse wave velocity (PWV) = 9.8 (5.28-19.6)m/s and Augmentation Index [Amplification Index (AI)] = 29.45 (-14-60). PWV and CAP were highly correlated with WC with p<0.001 and p=0.02, respectively; however, the same positive correlation was not found between WC and AI (p=0.06).

CONCLUSION

The present study showed a positive association between WC and arterial stiffness, through the femoral carotid pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) and AI, being stronger with cf-PWV, suggesting the evaluation of the effect of WC in vascular health as a method of aid in the early treatment of CVD and in the prevention of clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Influence of Blood Pressure and Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity on Target Organ Damage in Hypertension

Objectives

Assessment of target organ damage (TOD) is an important part of the diagnosis and evaluation of hypertension. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) is considered to be the gold-standard for noninvasive arterial stiffness assessment. This study aims to analyze the risk of TOD in people with different phenotypes of peripheral blood pressure and cf-PWV.

Methods

The study cohort was recruited from December 2017 to September 2021 at Ruijin Hospital in Shanghai. It was divided into 4 groups according to peripheral blood pressure (pBP) and cf-PWV. TOD was assessed as carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), chronic kidney disease (CKD), urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI).

Results

A total of 1,257 subjects (mean age 53.13 ± 12.65 years, 64.2% males) was recruited. Age, body mass index (BMI) and fasting blood glucose (FBG), as well as peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP), peripheral diastolic blood pressure (pDBP), peripheral pulse pressure (pPP) were significantly different in the four groups (P < 0.01). eGFR, ACR, LVMI and CIMT were significantly different among different groups (P < 0.01). The risk of ACR abnormality was significantly higher in the group with elevated pBP (P = 0.005, OR 2.264, 95%CI 1.277–4.016; and in the group with elevated pBP and cf-PWV (P = 0.003, OR 1.482, 95%CI 1.144–1.920), while left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was significantly higher in the group with elevated cf-PWV (P = 0.002, OR 1.868, 95%CI 1.249–2.793).

Conclusion

Different profiles based on the status of PBP and cf-PWV associated with different TOD. Individuals with higher pBP have an increased risk of ACR abnormality, while individuals with only cf-PWV elevated have a higher risk of LVH.

Disparate Associations of 24-h Central Aortic and Brachial Cuff Blood Pressure With Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage and Cardiovascular Risk

Objective

Aim of this study was to evaluate the associations of non-invasive central aortic and peripheral (brachial) blood pressure (BP) for Hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk.

Methods

We evaluated associations of HMOD with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) of central aortic and peripheral BP indices in patients with primary hypertension and presence of several cardiovascular risk factors. BP measurements were performed by means of a non-invasive automated oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph). HMOD was defined as the presence of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) above normal values and/or carotid plaque, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and/or renal abnormalities as assessed by urine albumin/creatinine ratio above normal values and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min per 1.73 m².

Results

In the study cohort of 273 (age 55.2 ± 13.4 years, 71.8% male) patients with primary hypertension, documented HMOD was present in 180 (65.9%), LVH in 70 (25.6%), increased IMT in 129 (47.3%). Fifty-six patients (20.5%) had kidney organ damage (20.5% albuminuria and 2.6% impaired eGFR). When accounting for confounding factors (age, sex, body-mass-index, antihypertensive treatment, smoking, triacylglycerol, statin treatment, glucose, hypoglycemic therapy, or heart rate) only peripheral 24-h pulse pressure (PP) maintained statistical significance with HMOD indices (OR: 1.126, 95% CI: 1.012~1.253; p = 0.029). Using ASCVD risk score as the independent continuous variable in multiple linear regression, 24-h central systolic pressure (SBP) (β = 0.179; 95% CI:0.019~0.387; p = 0.031), daytime central PP (β = 0.114; 95% CI:0.070~0.375; p = 0.005, night-time central SBP (β = 0.411; 95% CI:0.112~0.691; p = 0.007) and night-time PP (β = 0.257; 95% CI:0.165~0.780; p = 0.003) were all positively associated with ASCVD risk.

Conclusions

Blood pressure obtained by 24-h ABPM was better correlated with HMOD than office BP. Whilst 24-h peripheral BP showed a stronger association with HMOD than 24-h central BP, the prognostic value of 24-h central BP for the 10-year ASCVD risk was superior to 24-h peripheral BP.

Ambulatory monitoring of central arterial pressure, wave reflections, and arterial stiffness in patients at cardiovascular risk

This paper reviews current 24 h ambulatory noninvasive technologies for pulse wave analysis (PWA) providing central arterial pressure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index and the scientific evidence supporting their use in the clinical management of patients with arterial hypertension or at risk for cardiovascular complications.The most outstanding value of these techniques lies in the fact that they are user-friendly, mostly operator independent, and enable the evaluation of vascular function during daily-life conditions, allowing to obtain repeated measurements in different out-of-office circumstances, less artificial than those of the laboratory or doctor's office.Studies performed so far suggest that 24 h PWA may represent a potentially promising tool for evaluating vascular function, structure, and damage in daily-life conditions and promoting early screening in subjects at risk. The current evidence in favor of such an approach in the clinical practice is still limited and does not recommend its routine use. In particular, at the moment, there is a shortage of long-term prognostic studies able to support the predictive value of 24 h PWA. Finally, the accuracy of the measures is strongly dependent on the type of technology and device employed with lack of interoperability among the devices that deeply affects comparability of results among studies using different technologies. It is thus mandatory in the near future to promote proper validation studies, for instance using the ARTERY protocol, and to plan well-designed long-term longitudinal studies that may prove the accuracy and high predictive value of PWA in ambulatory conditions.

The Impact of Various Blood Pressure Measurements on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Hypertension is a potent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. High blood pressure (BP) correlates closely with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Although the gold standard remains office BP (auscultatory or automated), other methods (central or out-of-office) are gaining popularity as better predictors of CV events. In this review, we investigated the prognostic value of each method of BP measurement and explored their advantages and pitfalls. Unattended automated office BP is a novel technique of BP measurement with promising data. Ambulatory BP monitoring, and to a lesser extent, home BP measurements, seem to predict cardiovascular events and mortality outcomes better, while at the same time, they can help distinguish hypertensive phenotypes. Data on the association of central BP levels with cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, are conflicting. Future extensive cross-sectional and longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate head-to-head the corresponding levels and results of each method of BP measurement, as well as to highlight disparities in their prognostic utility.

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory central blood pressure in adolescents and young adults: association with peripheral blood pressure and preclinical organ damage

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship of 24-h ambulatory central blood pressure (ABP) with preclinical organ damage in youth.

METHODS

Individuals aged 10-25 years referred for suspected hypertension and healthy volunteers had simultaneous 24-h peripheral and central ABP monitoring (Mobil-O-Graph 24 h PWA). Central BP was calculated using two different calibration methods (c1 using oscillometric systolic/diastolic ABP; c2 using mean arterial/diastolic ABP). Their association with preclinical organ damage [left ventricular mass index (LVMI), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), 24-h pulse wave velocity (PWV)] was investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 136 participants were analyzed (age 17.9 ± 4.7 years, 54% adolescents, 77% males, 34% with elevated ABP). Twenty-four-hour peripheral systolic ABP (pSBP) was higher than c1 systolic ABP (c1SBP) by 14.1 ± 3.7 mmHg, but lower than c2SBP by 6.5 ± 7.6 mmHg (all P < 0.01). c2SBP quartiles provided better stratification of preclinical organ damage than pSBP. Both c1SBP/c2SBP were significantly associated with LVMI (r = 0.35/0.33) and IMT (r = 0.23/0.42; all P < 0.01; primary endpoint). These associations were stronger for c2SBP compared with those of pSBP in adolescents but not in adults. PWV was more closely associated with pSBP than c2SBP (r = 0.94/0.83, P < 0.01). LVMI variation was best determined by c2SBP in adolescents and pSBP in adults; IMT by c2SBP and PWV by pSBP in both subgroups.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that in young individuals, the calibration method for 24-h central ABP plays a major role in determining its association with preclinical organ damage. In adolescents, 24-h central ABP appears to be more strongly associated with early cardiac and carotid damage than peripheral BP.

Association Between Circadian Hemodynamic Characteristics and Target Organ Damage in Patients With Essential Hypertension

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the association between circadian hemodynamic characteristics and asymptomatic hypertensive organ damage.

METHODS

Circadian hemodynamics, including 24-hour brachial and aortic systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AIx@75), cardiac index, and total vascular resistance (TVR), were evaluated using an oscillometric device, Mobil-O-Graph, in 284 essential hypertensive patients (67.8 ± 16.0 years, 54% female). Hypertensive target organ damage (TOD), namely carotid wall thickening, left ventricular hypertrophy, and albuminuria, was assessed in all patients.

RESULTS

Office SBP and 24-hour brachial and aortic SBP all increased with increasing number of organs involved (all P < 0.01 for trend). After multivariate logistic regression analysis, 24-hour brachial SBP (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04 for 1 mm Hg increase, P < 0.001) as well as aortic SBP (OR = 1.03 for 1 mm Hg increase, P < 0.05) maintained significance. Percent decrease during nighttime in brachial SBP, PWV, and TVR, but not cardiac index, showed a significant graded relationship with the number of organs involved. In a multivariate stepwise regression model, the nighttime values of brachial SBP, PWV, and TVR emerged as independent predictors of the presence of TOD.

CONCLUSION

In essential hypertension, 24-hour aortic SBP could be a marker of subclinical TOD, and further, the blunted nocturnal BP reduction in TOD patients might be mediated by disturbed circadian hemodynamic variations in aortic SBP, vascular resistance, and arterial stiffness.

Relation of blood pressure and organ damage: comparison between feasible, noninvasive central hemodynamic measures and conventional brachial measures

OBJECTIVE

The present cross-sectional study investigated whether central SBP and pulse pressure (PP) measured noninvasively with a novel cuff-based stand-alone monitor are more strongly associated with hypertensive end-organ damage than corresponding brachial measures.

METHODS

We investigated the cross-sectional association of central versus brachial SBP and PP with echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI), LV hypertrophy (LVH), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), and increased IMT (IMT ≥ 75th percentile) among 246 participants drawn from the general population (mean age 57.2 years, 55.3% women).

RESULTS

All blood pressure (BP) measures were positively correlated with LVMI and IMT (P < 0.001 for all). Brachial and central SBP correlated equally strongly with LVMI (r = 0.42 versus 0.40, P for difference 0.19) and IMT (r = 0.32 versus 0.33, P = 0.60). However, brachial PP correlated more strongly than central PP with LVMI (r = 0.34 versus 0.27, P = 0.03) and IMT (r = 0.40 versus 0.35, P = 0.04). In multivariable-adjusted logistic models, all four BP measures were significantly associated with LVH and increased IMT (P ≤ 0.03 for all). However, the diagnostic accuracy of logistic regression models that included brachial or central hemodynamic parameters was similar for LVH [area under curve (AUC) for SBP: 0.74 versus 0.76, P = 0.16; AUC for PP: 0.75 versus 0.73, P = 0.35] and IMT (AUC for SBP: 0.61 versus 0.61, P = 0.67; AUC for PP: 0.63 versus 0.61, P = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that central SBP and PP measured with a stand-alone noninvasive BP monitor do not improve diagnostic accuracy for end-organ damage over corresponding brachial measures.

Comparing Office, Central, Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Predicting Left Ventricular Mass

The blood pressure measurement method that more accurately predicts a left ventricular mass is controversial, and the evidence suggesting superiority of central over brachial measurements is contradictory. The aim of this study was to compare the relationship between the different clinic and out-of-clinic blood pressure measurements methods with left ventricular mass in patients who attended a specialised hypertension centre for a central blood pressure measurement. An analysis was performed on the correlations between left ventricular mass and central and brachial blood pressure measurements made in the clinic, and home, as well as 24-h systolic blood pressure measurements. A linear regression analysis was then performed to assess the independent relationship of each blood pressure measurement with left ventricular mass. The results on 824 treated and 123 untreated patients showed no significant differences between correlations, although home readings tended to have the best correlations. In regression adjusted models, for each 10 mmHg increase in systolic home blood pressure the left ventricular mass increased 10 g/m² (95% CI; 3.7-27, p=.01, _adjR² 0.38), and for 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure it increased 2.3 g/m² (95% CI 0.76-3.9, p<.01, _adjR² 0.15) in treated and untreated patients, respectively. The association of systolic blood pressure with left ventricular mass was better explained by home and 24-h ambulatory monitoring than to clinic-based measurements in treated and untreated patients, respectively. In the clinic, however, the central measurement was not superior to brachial blood pressure.

Association of Haemodynamic Indices of Central and Peripheral Pressure with Subclinical Target Organ Damage

Background

Central aortic pressure has often been shown to be more closely associated with markers of vascular function and incidence of cardiovascular events compared to peripheral pressure. However, the potential clinical use of central aortic or peripheral haemodynamic indices as markers of target organ damage (TOD) has not been fully established.

Methods

We evaluated associations of TOD with central aortic and peripheral haemodynamic indices (central aortic [cPP] and peripheral pulse pressure [pPP], central aortic augmentation index, and central and peripheral waveform factor) in 770 hospital inpatients (age 60 ± 10 years, 473 males) with primary hypertension. TOD was quantified in terms of arterial stiffness as measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR). Subclinical TOD was defined as carotid IMT >0.9 mm, urine ACR >3.5 mg/mmol in females and >2.5 mg/mmol in males and/or cfPWV >12 m/s.

Results

Both cPP and pPP showed significant correlation with cfPWV (r = 0.41 vs. 0.40; p < 0.01), ACR (r = 0.24 vs. 0.27; p < 0.01) and carotid IMT (r = 0.14 vs. 0.15; p < 0.01). Each SD increase in pPP and cPP was associated with increased risk of cfPWV >12 m/s (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7 and 2.9 for pPP and cPP, respectively), ACR >2.5 mg/mmol (OR = 1.2 and 1.4, respectively), and carotid IMT >0.9 mm (OR = 1.46 and 1.53, respectively). Compared to pPP, cPP had higher predictive power for TOD for age ≥60 years (OR = 3.07, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although both pPP and cPP show an association with TOD in a hypertensive population, cPP provides additional information beyond pPP associated with TOD in a hypertensive cohort. Central aortic haemodynamic indices as potential biomarkers of subclinical TOD need to be validated by further prospective studies.

ECG Voltage in Relation to Peripheral and Central Ambulatory Blood Pressure

BACKGROUND

The heart ejects in the central elastic arteries. No previous study in workers described the diurnal profile of central blood pressure (BP) or addressed the question whether electrocardiogram (ECG) indexes are more closely associated with central than peripheral BP.

METHODS

In 177 men (mean age, 29.1 years), we compared the associations of ECG indexes with brachial and central ambulatory BP, measured over 24 hours by the validated oscillometric Mobil-O-Graph 24h PWA monitor.

RESULTS

From wakefulness to sleep, as documented by diaries, systolic/diastolic BP decreased by 11.7/13.1 mm Hg peripherally and 9.3/13.6 mm Hg centrally, whereas central pulse pressure (PP) increased by 4.3 mm Hg (P < 0.0001). Over 24 hours and the awake and asleep periods, the peripheral-minus-central differences in systolic/diastolic BPs averaged 11.8/–1.6, 12.7/–1.8, and 10.3/–1.2 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.0001). Cornell voltage and index averaged 1.18 mV and 114.8 mV·ms. Per 1-SD increment in systolic/diastolic BP, the Cornell voltages were 0.104/0.086 mV and 0.082/0.105 mV higher in relation to brachial 24-hour and asleep BP and 0.088/0.90 mV and 0.087/0.107 mV higher in relation to central BP. The corresponding estimates for the Cornell indexes were 9.6/8.6 and 8.2/10.5 mV·ms peripherally and 8.6/8.9 and 8.8/10.7 mV·ms centrally. The regression slopes (P ≥ 0.067) and correlation coefficients (P ≥ 0.088) were similar for brachial and central BP. Associations of ECG measurements with awake BP and PP were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral and central BPs run in parallel throughout the day and are similarly associated with the Cornell voltage and index.