Targeting persistent normal left ventricular geometry in the general population: a 25-year follow-up study

Echocardiographic Phenotypes of Subclinical Organ Damage: Clinical and Prognostic Value in the General Population. Findings from the Pamela Study

Subclinical alterations in cardiac structure and function include a variety of abnormal phenotypes of established adverse prognostic significance such as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), alterations of LV geometry, left atrial (LA) enlargement, and aortic root (AR) dilatation. The excess cardiovascular (CV) risk associated with these phenotypes has been consistently demonstrated in different clinical settings such in patients with systemic hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, heart failure and in geneal population samples. The Pressioni Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA), a longitudinal population-based study originally designed to assess the normality values, prognostic significance of office, home and 24-hour blood pressure, including among the many clinical and laboratory variables the collection of echocardiographic data, allowed to gather important information on the clinical prognostic significance of subclinical cardiac damage during a long follow-up period. This article summarizes the original findings provided by the PAMELA study on the clinical correlates and prognostic significance of echocardiographic markers of subclinical organa damage namely LVH, left atrial enlargement (LA) and AR dilatation at the community level.

The pressioni arteriose monitorate e loro associazioni (PAMELA) research project: a 25-year long journey

INTRODUCTION

Among the observational studies performed in the area of blood pressure measurements in the population the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) investigation represents an unique research for a number of reasons.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION AND SYNTHESIS

The PAMELA study combines clinic, home and 24-hour blood pressure measurements in all partiicipants, which were representative of the general population. Examination included metabolic variables, allowing us to determine the interrelationships between bood pressure and metabolic profile. The protocol also included evaluation of organ damage, such as left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, left atrial dimensions and aortic root diameters. Finally, PAMELA represents one of the few studies with a prolonged follow-up, the last survey being completed three years ago and data collected are actually under analysis. This will allow to update the information related to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the study cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The present paper will provide an overview of the various scientific contributions of the PAMELA study to the epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical aspects of hypertension and hypertension related cardiovascular risk.