Reduction of blood pressure variability by combination therapy in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Change in Blood Pressure Variability Among Treated Elderly Hypertensive Patients and Its Association With Mortality

Background

Information is scarce regarding effects of antihypertensive medication on blood pressure variability (BPV) and associated clinical outcomes. We examined whether antihypertensive treatment changes BPV over time and whether such change (decline or increase) has any association with long‐term mortality in an elderly hypertensive population.

Methods and Results

We used data from a subset of participants in the Second Australian National Blood Pressure study (n=496) aged ≥65 years who had 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure recordings at study entry (baseline) and then after a median of 2 years while on treatment (follow‐up). Weighted day‐night systolic BPV was calculated for both baseline and follow‐up as a weighted mean of daytime and nighttime blood pressure standard deviations. The annual rate of change in BPV over time was calculated from these BPV estimates. Furthermore, we classified both BPV estimates as high and low based on the baseline median BPV value and then classified BPV changes into stable: low BPV, stable: high BPV, decline: high to low, and increase: low to high. We observed an annual decline (mean±SD: −0.37±1.95; 95% CI, −0.54 to −0.19; P<0.001) in weighted day‐night systolic BPV between baseline and follow‐up. Having constant stable: high BPV was associated with an increase in all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio: 3.03; 95% CI, 1.67–5.52) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio: 3.70; 95% CI, 1.62–8.47) in relation to the stable: low BPV group over a median 8.6 years after the follow‐up ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Similarly, higher risk was observed in the decline: high to low group.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that in elderly hypertensive patients, average BPV declined over 2 years of follow‐up after initiation of antihypertensive therapy, and having higher BPV (regardless of any change) was associated with increased long‐term mortality.

Effect of antihypertensive treatment on 24-h blood pressure variability: pooled individual data analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring studies based on olmesartan mono or combination treatment

Objective:

To evaluate the impact of olmesartan alone or combined with one to three antihypertensive drugs on 24-h blood pressure variability (BPV) and on distribution of BP reduction in a pooled individual data analysis of 10 double-blind, randomized, ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) studies.

Methods:

ABPMs were performed before and after 6–12 weeks of treatment with placebo (n = 119), active control monotherapy [n = 1195, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DCCBs)] olmesartan monotherapy (n = 1410), active control dual combination [n = 79, DCCB + thiazide diuretic (TD)], olmesartan dual combination (n = 637, DCCB or TD), and triple combination therapy (n = 102, DCCB+TD). 24-h BPV was calculated as unweighted or weighted SD of the mean BP, and average real variability. BP control was assessed by smoothness index and treatment-on-variability index.

Results:

The greatest effect on 24-h systolic BPV/diastolic BPV was observed under olmesartan triple [−2.6/−1.9; −1.9/−1.3; −1.4/−1.3 mmHg] and active control dual combination [−1.8/−1.4; −1.9/−1.5; −1.2/−1.1 mmHg]. Smoothness indexes and treatment-on-variability indexes were significantly (P = 0.0001) higher under olmesartan dual (1.53/1.22, 1.67/1.29, 2.05/1.59), olmesartan triple (2.47/1.85, 2.80/2.06, 3.64/2.67), or active control dual combination (1.70/1.26, 1.85/1.33, 2.29/1.65) than under monotherapies (control: 0.86/0.73, 0.80/0.65, 1.01/0.82; olmesartan: 1.02/0.86, 0.95/0.78, 1.23/1.00). They were also greater in patients receiving high-dose olmesartan monotherapy or high-dose olmesartan dual combination than in the corresponding low-dose group.

Conclusion:

Olmesartan plus a DCCB and/or a TD produces a larger, more sustained, and smoother BP reduction than placebo and monotherapies, a desirable feature for a more effective prevention of the cardiovascular consequences of uncontrolled hypertension.

Blood pressure variability: assessment, predictive value, and potential as a therapeutic target

A large body of evidence has consistently supported the relationship between blood pressure (BP) levels and the risk of cardiovascular complications. In recent years, several independent studies have also indicated that this risk may not only depend on the magnitude of the blood pressure elevation per se but also on the presence of other associated conditions such as increased blood pressure variability. This concept has been supported by a series of reports, most of which post hoc analyses of clinical trials in hypertension, showing that increasing values of BP variability (BPV) (either in the short term, in the midterm, or in the long term) may predict development, progression, and severity of cardiac, vascular, and renal organ damage, as well as cardiovascular events and mortality. Remarkably, studies conducted in populations at high cardiovascular risk have shown increasing values of BPV in the individual subjects (so-called intra- or within-individual BPV) to be strong predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, even to a larger extent than average BP values. However, in subjects at low to moderate cardiovascular risk, the contribution of BPV to cardiovascular risk prediction over and beyond average BP values has been shown to be only moderate. The aim of this paper is to critically review the evidence addressing the prognostic relevance of different components of BPV addressing a yet open question, i.e., whether routine assessment of BPV in clinical practice should be regarded as an additional target of antihypertensive treatment to improve cardiovascular protection.

Chinese Herbal Medicine Combined with Conventional Therapy for Blood Pressure Variability in Hypertension Patients: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate effect of Chinese medicine combined with conventional therapy on blood pressure variability (BPV) in hypertension patients. Methods. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing Chinese medicine with no intervention or placebo on the basis of conventional therapy were included. Data extraction, analyses, and quality assessment were performed according to the Cochrane standards. Results. We included 13 RCTs and assessed risk of bias for all the trials. Chinese medicine has a significant effect in lowering blood pressure (BP), reducing BPV in the form of standard deviation (SD) or coefficient of variability (CV), improving nighttime BP decreased rate, and reversing abnormal rhythm of BP. Conclusions. Chinese medicine was safe and showed beneficial effects on BPV in hypertension patients. However, more rigorous trials with high quality are warranted to give high level of evidence before recommending Chinese medicine as an alternative or complementary medicine to improve BPV in hypertension patients.

Long-term treatment of clonidine, atenolol, amlodipine and dihydrochlorothiazide, but not enalapril, impairs the sexual function in male spontaneously hypertensive rats

This study was designed to investigate the impact of representative antihypertensive drugs of 5 classes on the sexual function in male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) at doses that achieved similar blood pressure (BP) reduction. The experiment was performed in 6 groups of male SHR. The dose are 20 μg/kg/day for clonidine, 3 mg/kg/day for enalapril, 20 mg/kg/day for atenolol, 2 mg/kg/day for amlodipine, and 10 mg/kg/day for dihydrochlorothiazide. SHR were treated for 3 months, and then the penile erection and sexual behavior were detected. After BP recording, SHR were killed to evaluate the organ-damage, weight of accessory sex organs and levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone in serum. Five drugs had the similar efficacy on BP reduction. All drugs except of enalapril, significantly prolonged the mount latency, and decreased the mount frequency (P<0.05). Clonidine also reduced the conception rate (45% vs. 80% in control group, P<0.05). Amlodipine and dihydrochlorothiazide significantly increased the testosterone level (0.79±0.30, 0.80±0.34 vs. 0.49±0.20 in control group, unit: ng/dl, P<0.05). Enalapril, atenolol and amlodipine also significantly decreased the BP variability (systolic, 8.2±2.5, 7.6±1.8, 8.9±2.0 vs. 12.2±3.8 in control group, unit: mm Hg). All these drugs significantly decreased the organ-damage (P<0.05). In conclusion, long-term treatment with 5 common antihypertensive drugs possessed obvious organ protection in SHR. Clonidine, atenolol, amlodipine and dihydrochlorothiazide, but not enalapril, impair sexual function.

Assessment and interpretation of blood pressure variability in a clinical setting

Blood pressure (BP) is characterized by marked fluctuations occurring within the 24 h as a result of complex interactions between behavioral, environmental, humoral, and neural central or reflex influences. Significant BP variations also occur over more prolonged periods of time (i.e. between days, weeks, months, seasons and even years), not as a random phenomenon but as a result of several interacting factors yet not completely identified. Depending on the method and time interval considered for measurement, the clinical significance and prognostic implications of different types of BP variability (BPV) may substantially differ. Either in the short or in the long term, BPV has been associated with development, progression and severity of cardiac, vascular and renal organ damage and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, independently adding to cardiovascular risk, over and above the contribution of elevated mean BP levels. The present paper provides a review on the main methods currently employed for assessment of BPV as well as on the mechanisms, clinical interpretation and prognostic significance of different types of BPV, addressing the question on whether BPV should be a target for antihypertensive treatment for the current prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability

Blood pressure (BP) is characterized by marked short-term fluctuations occurring within a 24 h period (beat-to-beat, minute-to-minute, hour-to-hour, and day-to-night changes) and also by long-term fluctuations occurring over more-prolonged periods of time (days, weeks, months, seasons, and even years). Rather than representing 'background noise' or a randomly occurring phenomenon, these variations have been shown to be the result of complex interactions between extrinsic environmental and behavioural factors and intrinsic cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms. Although the adverse cardiovascular consequences of hypertension largely depend on absolute BP values, evidence from observational studies and post-hoc analyses of data from clinical trials have indicated that these outcomes might also depend on increased BP variability (BPV). Increased short-term and long-term BPV are associated with the development, progression, and severity of cardiac, vascular, and renal damage and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Of particular interest are the findings from post-hoc analyses of large intervention trials in hypertension, showing that within-patient visit-to-visit BPV is strongly prognostic for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This result has prompted discussion on whether antihypertensive treatment should be targeted not only towards reducing mean BP levels but also to stabilizing BPV with the aim of achieving consistent BP control over time, which might favour cardiovascular protection.

Blood pressure variability, cardiovascular risk, and risk for renal disease progression

The adverse cardiovascular consequences of high blood pressure (BP) not only depend on absolute BP values, but also on BP variability (BPV). Evidence has been provided that independently of mean BP levels, BP variations in the short- and long-term are associated with the development, progression and severity of cardiac, vascular and renal organ damage, and with an increased risk of CV events and mortality. Alterations in BPV have also been shown to be predictive of the development and progression of renal damage, which is of relevance if considering that impaired renal function in a hypertensive patient constitutes a very potent predictor of future CV events and mortality even in treated subjects. This review will address whether antihypertensive treatment should target alterations in BPV, in addition to reducing absolute BP levels, in order to achieve the highest CV and renal protection in hypertensive and renal patients.

Autonomic nervous system adjustment (ANSA) in patients with hypertension treated with enalapril

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Reduced baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), decreased heart rate variability (HRV) and increased blood pressure (BP) variability have serious consequences for target organ damage in patients with hypertension, beside the BP level. The study was aimed to evaluate acute and long-term effects of enalapril, on BRS and HRV in individuals with prehypertension and mild essential hypertension.

METHODOLOGY

We enrolled in the study 85 patients (male 53%, age 42-67) with prehypertension and mild hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥120 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg). All patients were tested before, 30 minutes after first oral enalapril dose and three weeks after monotherapy with enalapril. The methodology included: beat to beat HRV analysis, BRS measurements with sequence technique, ECG with short term and 24-hour HRV analysis, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with systolic and diastolic BP variability analysis. Patients were divided into groups with sympathetic or vagal predominance based on Autonomic Nervous System Adjustment (ANSA) method.

RESULTS

1) 30 min after initial dose enalapril significantly and effectively reduced systolic BP with shift towards the parasympathetic predominance as reflected in decreased heart rate and low frequency (LF) to high frequency (HF) ratio (LF/HF ratio); 2) chronic enalapril therapy effectively reduced BP, including both systolic BP, diastolic BP and pulls pressure, had positively influence on dipping status, but did not significantly change BP variability; 3) in the whole patient group chronic enalapril therapy did not significantly change HRV, but it significantly decreased LF(nu) in the patient with high basal sympathetic activity, and significantly increased LF(nu) in patients with high basal vagal activity; enalapril also significantly decreased HF (nu) in patients with high basal parasympathetic activity; 4) despite initial, transit changes in maximal and minimal slope of BRS enalapril did not significantly affect sensitivity of spontaneous baroreflex activation.

CONCLUSION

Initial enalapril dose significantly reduced systolic BP and had beneficial effects on autonomic tone and baroreflex sensitivity. Chronic enalapril therapy effectively reduced BP without significant influence on BRS, but had significant autonomic effects on HRV when initial autonomic profile in each patient was analyzed by ANSA. Analyzed by ANSA method chronic enalapril therapy managed to retrieve disturbed sympathovagal balance and established autonomic equilibrium.

AT₁ angiotensin II receptor and novel non-AT₁, non-AT₂ angiotensin II/III binding site in brainstem cardiovascular regulatory centers of the spontaneously hypertensive rat

Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) have an activated brain angiotensin system that contributes to the elevation of blood pressure in this animal model. Physiological and pharmacological studies suggest that hyperactivation of brain AT₁ angiotensin receptors is a major pathophysiological factor. Consistent with these observations, radioligand binding studies indicate widespread up-regulation of brain angiotensin receptors in SHR. One key brainstem site in which AT₁ receptor stimulation appears to contribute to the elevated blood pressure in SHR is the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM). However, no quantitative comparison of AT₁ receptor binding in the RVLM has been made in SHR versus normotensive rats. A novel, non-AT₁, non-AT₂ binding site, specific for angiotensins II and III, has recently been discovered in the brain. To determine if radioligand binding to either AT₁ receptors or this novel angiotensin binding site is altered in the RVLM and other caudal brainstem regions of SHR, a quantitative densitometric autoradiographic comparison of radioligand binding in SHR versus normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats was made. In both the RVLM and caudal ventrolateral medulla (CVLM) as well as dorsomedial medulla (DMM), there was increased expression of AT₁ receptor binding in SHR (13%, 9%, and 23%, respectively). Conversely, expression of the novel, non-AT₁, non-AT₂, angiotensin II and III binding site was decreased in the RVLM and DMM of SHR (37% and 13%, respectively). This increased AT₁ receptor binding in the RVLM may contribute to the hypertension of SHR. Reduced radioligand binding to the novel, non-AT₁, non-AT₂, angiotensin binding site in the RVLM of SHR may indicate a role for this binding site to reduce blood pressure via its interactions with angiotensins II and III.

A new method for assessing variability of 24 h blood pressure and its first application in 1526 elderly men

1. Blood pressure variability (BPV) includes physiological and random variations in blood pressure (BP). Commonly used approaches, such as standard deviation (SD) and weighted standard deviation (wSD) methods, do not efficiently assess random variation in BP. In the present study, we propose a novel method to assess individual BP variations, extracting random variation in BP by eliminating physiological variation mathematically. This novel assessment method furthers our understanding of the relationship between BP variation and lacunar infarction (LACI). 2. In the present study, we analysed ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recordings taken from 1526 men aged 60-98 years of age. Individual curves were created using a mathematical method and the related BP variation calculated, namely the SD for individual BP variations. In addition, correlations between LACI and BP variations as determined by the classical SD method, wSD and our novel assessment method (SD') were evaluated. 3. The results demonstrated that 24 h variations in systolic BP (SBP) were closely associated with LACI when the SD and wSD methods were used (P < 0.05), but the most significant correlations were observed when the SD' method was used (P < 0.01). Furthermore, using SD' yielded the lowest value of the parameter P among the three different methods used to analyse BPV. Using the SD' method, a significant correlation was found between variations in SBP and the incidence of LACI (P < 0.05). It was found that the incidence of LACI increased by 2% with each 1 mmHg increase in SBP variation. 4. In conclusion, our novel assessment method enables mathematical removal of interference from physiological BP variation and the results show a better correlation with LACI. Thus, our novel method may be considered a simple index of 24 h BP variation that is superior to conventional SD and wSD methods.

Effect of carvedilol on pulse pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats with adriamycin nephropathy

Recent studies indicated pulse pressure as a risk factor for left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and stroke as well as chronic renal failure progression. The present study examined the effects of carvedilol and its combination with captopril on blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, kidney vascular changes and kidney function in spontaneously hypertensive rats with adriamycin nephropathy. Four groups of 20 SHR each were involved: (1) control group: SHR; (2) ADR group: SHR treated with ADR (2mg/kg i.v. twice in 20 days); (3) ADR-C group: SHR treated with ADR and carvedilol (30 mg/kg/day) and (4) ADR-CC group: SHR treated with ADR and carvedilol (30 mg/kg/day) and captopril (60 mg/kg/day). Systolic-, diastolic- and mean-pressures and pulse pressure were determined at weeks 6 and 12 after the second ADR injection; and body weight, creatinine clearance and proteinuria at weeks -3, 6 and 12. The rats were sacrificed at week 6 or 12, the weights of the left and right ventricles and kidneys measured and the kidney vascular index was calculated as described by Bader and Mayer. Both carvedilol alone and combined with captopril significantly reduced systemic blood pressure but the effect of the latter was more pronounced and registered from week 4 till the end of the study. Carvedilol and its combination with captopril significantly decreased SBP, DBP and MAP. They also decreased PP, prevented the development of LVH, and renal vascular changes and slowed the progression of chronic renal failure and these effects were stronger in the ADR-CC group than in the ADR-C group. The antihypertensive drugs failed to prevent proteinuria in ADR SHR. Significant positive correlations were found between PP (but not SBP, DBP and MAP) and both proteinuria and Ccr in all groups of rats. In conclusion, carvedilol alone, but more strongly in combination with captopril, significantly reduced blood pressure, PP, LVH, renal blood vessel changes and chronic renal failure progression.