The role of conventional and novel mechanisms in explaining increased risk of cardiovascular events in offspring with positive parental history

Parental cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular disease risk factors in the offspring: The Diet, Cancer and Health cohorts

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) aggregates in families and offspring with parental CVD may have adverse risk factor levels long time before the potential onset of CVD. We compared risk factor levels in offspring of parents with atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) and parents with no ASCVD at different parental ages at onset.

METHODS

The study included 5751 participants (median age: 50 years) of the Diet, Cancer and Health - Next Generations study. Measurements included blood pressure, body composition and lipid fractions. Information on parental ASCVD and age at disease onset was obtained through register linkage. Parental ASCVD was defined as myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or peripheral artery disease occurring <70 years, prematurely (mothers: <65 years fathers: <55 years), divided into age categories or using a broader classification of CVD. Linear regression models using Generalized Estimating Equations were used for analysis. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity and some additionally for BMI.

RESULTS

Offspring with parental ASCVD had a higher blood pressure, waist circumference, BMI, visceral adipose tissue, percentage of body fat and non-HDL cholesterol levels, but not other lipid levels, compared to offspring with no parental ASCVD (all p < 0.01). Overall, the same patterns were observed for parental ASCVD occurring prematurely and using a broader CVD classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Offspring with parental ASCVD had a higher blood pressure, higher body composition measures and higher non-HDL cholesterol levels compared to offspring with no parental ASCVD. Findings were overall consistent across different classifications of parental ASCVD.

Familial history of heart disease and increased risk for elevated troponin in apparently healthy individuals

BACKGROUND

Family history of heart disease (FH-HD) is associated with an increase drisk of subsequent HD. High sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) is arecognized biomarker of myocyte injury even in HD free patients. We examined the association between FH-HD and hs-cTnT in apparently healthy individuals.

HYPOTHESIS

FH-HD is associated with elevated hs-cTnT in apparently healthy individuals.

METHODS

In a cross sectional study we analyzed data of apparently healthy individuals (n=3,821) recruited for the Tel-Aviv Medical Center Inflammation Survey (TAMCIS). Blood samples were obtained for hs-cTnT and high sensitive CRP (hs-CRP) among other tests. FH-HD was defined as first degree family member with HD diagnosis and classified as premature if the diagnosis was done before the age of 55 for men or 65 for women.

RESULTS

Elevated hs-cTnT (>14 ng/L) was more common in FH-HD of any age, and in premature FH-HD (FH-P-HD) participants than in participants without FH-HD (4.4% vs 2.0%, p<0.001 and 4.3% vs 2.0%, p=0.001, respectively). Adjustmentfor potential risk factors with association to elevated hs-cTnT (age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, hs-CRP, smoking and physical activity), showed that FH-HD and FH-P-HD remained significantly associated with elevated hs-cTnT (OR=1.62, p=0.025 and OR=1.70, p=0.039, respectively). Furthermore, we found that a significant interaction between FH-HD or FH-P-HD and high levels ofhs-CRP (>3 mg/L) increased the risk for elevated hs-cTnT (OR=3.07, p=0.036 for FH-HD and OR=3.25, p=0.053 for FH-P-HD).

CONCLUSIONS

FH-HD and its interaction with elevated hs-CRP levels were significantly associated with elevated hs-cTnT in apparently healthy individuals suggesting that an inflammatory process may be involved in this association.

Crossing family histories of diabetes and cardiovascular disease leads to unexpected outcomes in diabetic offspring

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the isolated and crossed effects of familial histories (FH) of early onset coronary heart disease (EOCHD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on diabetic offspring.

METHODS

The cardiometabolic phenotype of 1098 T2DM patients was analyzed according to an FH of T2DM and/or EOCHD, including body composition, fasting insulinemia, insulin sensitivity, β-cell function (BCF), lipids, lipoprotein(a), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) number and functionality, and micro- and macrovascular complications.

RESULTS

Mean age and T2DM duration were 69 and 18 years, respectively; 64% of patients were male, 50% (n = 550) had an FH of T2DM (DM[+]), and 13% (n = 145) had an FH of EOCHD (EOCHD[+]). Four subgroups were generated by crossing FHs: DM[-]EOCHD[-] (44%; n = 487); DM[+]EOCHD[-] (42%; n = 466); DM[-]EOCHD[+] (6%; n = 61); and DM[+]EOCHD[+] (8%; n = 84). Microangiopathies were highest among DM[+] patients, whose BCF was deteriorating the fastest. More numerous/dysfunctional HDLs characterized EOCHD[+] patients. The greatest frequency of cardiovascular disease (CVD; 69%) was observed in DM[-]EOCHD[+] patients, whose lipoprotein(a) and insulinemia were also highest (81 nmol/L and 140 pmol/L, respectively). The lowest frequency of CVD (30%) was observed in DM[+]EOCHD[-] patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Familial histories of DM and EOCHD predispose to increased microvascular and macrovascular risk, respectively, with hyperinsulinemia, lipoprotein(a), and dysfunctional HDLs standing out as mediators of the inherited macrovascular risk. Yet, crossing these FHs did not randomly redistribute vascular risk, because patients with parental T2DM had fewer macrovascular diseases regardless of familial EOCHD. The odds of being left-handed were unexpectedly greater in patients with crossed parental histories.

Association of Family History With Cardiovascular Disease in Hypertensive Individuals in a Multiethnic Population

BACKGROUND

Hypertension alone is a poor predictor of the individual risk of cardiovascular disease. Hereditary factors of which hypertension is merely a marker may explain why some hypertensive individuals appear more susceptible to cardiovascular disease, and why some ethnicities have more often seemingly hypertension-related cardiovascular disease than others. We hypothesize that, in hypertensive individuals, a positive family history of cardiovascular disease identifies a high-risk subpopulation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Healthy Life in Urban Settings (HELIUS) is a cohort study among participants of Dutch, South-Asian Surinamese, African Surinamese, Ghanaian, Turkish, and Moroccan origin aged 70 years and younger. In participants with hypertension (n=6467), we used logistic regression to assess the association of family history of cardiovascular disease with prevalent stroke and nonstroke cardiovascular disease, adjusting for sex, age, education, and smoking. To detect ethnic differences, we tested for interaction between family history and ethnicity and stratified the analysis by ethnicity. A positive family history was associated with a higher prevalence of nonstroke cardiovascular disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.05; 95% CI, 1.65-2.54) and stroke (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.19-2.20). The strongest association of family history with nonstroke cardiovascular disease was found among the Dutch (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.37-4.44) and with stroke among the African Surinamese (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.32-3.57). The interaction between family history and African Surinamese origin for stroke was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In multiethnic populations of hypertensive patients, a positive family history of cardiovascular disease may be used clinically to identify individuals at high risk for nonstroke cardiovascular disease regardless of ethnic origin and African Surinamese individuals at high risk for stroke.

Family history of atherosclerotic vascular disease is associated with the presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm

We investigated whether family history (FHx) of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) was associated with presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The study cohort comprised of 696 patients with AAA (70±8 years, 84% men) and 2686 controls (68±10 years, 61% men) recruited from noninvasive vascular and stress electrocardiogram (ECG) laboratories at Mayo Clinic. AAA was defined as a transverse diameter of abdominal aorta ⩾ 3 cm or history of AAA repair. Controls were not known to have AAA. FHx was defined as having at least one first-degree relative with aortic aneurysm or with onset of ASCVD (coronary, cerebral or peripheral artery disease) before age 65 years. FHx of aortic aneurysm or ASCVD were each associated with presence of AAA after adjustment for age, sex, conventional risk factors and ASCVD: adjusted odds ratios (OR; 95% confidence interval): 2.17 (1.66-2.83, p < 0.01) and 1.31 (1.08-1.59, p < 0.01), respectively. FHx of ASCVD remained associated with AAA after additional adjustment for FHx of aortic aneurysm: adjusted OR: 1.27 (1.05-1.55, p = 0.01). FHx of ASCVD in multiple arterial locations was associated with higher odds of having AAA: the adjusted odds were 1.23 times higher for each additionally affected arterial location reported in the FHx (1.08-1.40, p = 0.01). Our results suggest both unique and shared environmental and genetic factors mediating susceptibility to AAA and ASCVD.

Should your family history of coronary heart disease scare you?

Traditional risk factors explain most of the risk associated with coronary heart disease, and after adjustment for risk factors family history was believed to contribute very little to population-attributable risk of coronary heart disease. However, the INTERHEART study demonstrated an independent association of family history of coronary heart disease with acute myocardial infarction. To assess this relationship more comprehensively in multiple datasets in different populations, we carried out a detailed review of the available evidence. Case-control studies involving 17,202 cases and 30,088 controls yielded a pooled unadjusted odds ratio (random-effects model, overall I(2) = 64.6%, P = 0.000) of 2.03 (95% confidence interval: 1.79-2.30), whereas cohort studies that included 313,837 individuals yielded an unadjusted relative risk for future coronary heart disease (random-effects model, overall I(2) = 88.7%, P = 0.000) of 1.60 (95% confidence interval: 1.44-1.77). Although the presence of family history of coronary heart disease indicates a cumulative exposure of shared genes and environment, the risk estimates for family history did not attenuate significantly after adjustment for conventional coronary heart disease risk factors in several studies. It is probably an oversimplification to dichotomize the family history variable into a simple "yes" or "no" risk factor, as the significance of family history is influenced by several variables, such as age, sex, number of relatives, and age at onset of disease in the relatives. Moreover, a quantitative risk-assessment model for the family history variable, such as the "family risk score," has a positive linear relationship with coronary heart disease. More studies are warranted to assess the benefits and risks of intensive interventions, both targeted individually and at the family level, among individuals with a valid family history and borderline elevated risk factors.

Addition of a novel, protective family history category allows better profiling of cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. The Asklepios Study

Objectives

Whereas the importance of family history (FH) is widely recognized in cardiovascular risk assessment, its full potential could be underutilized, when applied with its current simple guidelines-based definition (cFH): presence of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a first-degree relative. We tested the added value of a new, extended family history definition (eFH), also taking into account later onset of disease, second-degree relatives and number of affected relatives, on profiling cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population.

Design

longitudinal population study.

Setting

random, representative population sample from Erpe-Mere and Nieuwerkerken (Belgium, primary care).

Subjects

2524 male/female volunteers, aged 35–55 years, free from overt CVD.

Main outcome measures

Subjects were extensively phenotyped including presence of atherosclerosis (ultrasound) and a newly developed FH questionnaire (4 generations).

Results

Compared to cFH, eFH was superior in predicting an adverse risk profile (glycemic state, elevated blood pressure, lipid abnormalities, presence of metabolic syndrome components) and presence of atherosclerosis (all age & sex-adjusted p<0.05). Unlike cFH, eFH remained a significant predictor of subclinical atherosclerosis after adjusting for confounders. Most relations with eFH were not graded but showed clear informational breakpoints, with absence of CVD (including late onset) in any first-degree relative being a negative predictor of atherosclerosis, and a particularly interesting phenotype for further study.

Conclusions

A novel, extended FH definition is superior to the conventional definition in profiling cardiovascular risk and atherosclerotic burden in the general population. There remain clear opportunities to refine and increase the performance and informational content of this simple, readily-available inexpensive tool.

Effects of parental hypertension on longitudinal trends in blood pressure and plasma metabolic profile: mixed-effects model analysis

The mechanism underlying the association of parental hypertension with cardiovascular events in offspring remains unclear. In this study, the effects of parental hypertension on longitudinal trends of blood pressure and metabolic parameters were examined by mixed-effects model analysis. From 1977 to 2006, 5198 subjects participated in the Tanno-Sobetsu Study, and we selected 2607 subjects (1095 men and 1512 women) for whom data on parental history of hypertension were available. In both men and women with and without parental hypertension, systolic blood pressure and fasting blood glucose levels consistently increased from the third to eighth decades of life, whereas diastolic blood pressure and serum triglyceride levels followed biphasic (inverted U shape) time courses during that period. However, the relationships between the parameters and age were significantly shifted upward (by ≈5.3 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure, 2.8 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure, 0.30 mmol/L in blood glucose, and 0.09 mmol/L in triglyceride) in the group with parental hypertension compared with those in the group without parental hypertension. Both paternal and maternal histories of hypertension were determinants of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, and there was no significant interaction between the sides of parental history. There were no significant effects of parental hypertension on age-dependent or body mass index-dependent changes in serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. The present results indicate that parental hypertension has an age-independent impact on elevation of blood pressure, plasma glucose, and triglyceride levels, which may underlie the reported increase in cardiovascular events by family history of hypertension.