Dosimetry Formalism and Implementation of a Homogenous Irradiation Protocol to Improve the Accuracy of Small Animal Whole-Body Irradiation Using a 137Cs Irradiator

Cisplatin and Albumin-Based Gold-Cisplatin Nanoparticles Enhance Ablative Radiation Therapy-Induced Antitumor Immunity in Local and Distant Tumor Microenvironment

PURPOSE

Ablative radiation therapy (RT) is an important strategy to eliminate primary tumor and can potentially induce the abscopal effect. Human serum albumin nanoparticle (NP) was used for controlled release of cisplatin to decrease cisplatin's systemic toxicity, and gold (Au) was added to increase RT-induced immunogenic cell death and potentiate the abscopal antitumor immunity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The designed albumin-based cisplatin-conjugated AuNPs were administered concurrently with ablative RT. C57BL/6 mice implanted with syngeneic murine Lewis lung carcinoma or murine MB49 tumor models were treated with ablative RT (12 Gy per fraction for 2 fractions, total 24 Gy), cisplatin, or Au-cisplatin NPs.

RESULTS

Combining ablative RT with cisplatin or Au-cisplatin NPs both destroyed the primary tumor effectively and elicited immunogenic cell death accompanied by release of danger-associated molecular patterns. This enhanced recruitment of effector tumor-infiltrating immune cells, including natural killer T cells and CD8+ T cells, and elicited an increased percentage of professional antigen-presenting CD11c+ dendritic cells. Transient weight loss, accompanying hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and hematopoietic suppression, was observed as a systemic adverse event in the cisplatin but not the Au-cisplatin NPs group. Cisplatin and Au-cisplatin NPs both showed equivalent ability to reduce metastatic potential when combined with ablative RT, confirmed by suppressed unirradiated flank tumor growth and decreased metastatic lung tumor burden, which translated to improved survival. Mobilization and abundance of effector tumor-infiltrating immune cells including CD8+ T cells and dendritic cells were observed in the distant lung tumor microenvironment after ablative RT with cisplatin or Au-cisplatin NPs, demonstrating increased antitumor immunotherapeutic activity as an abscopal effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with cisplatin, the albumin-based Au-cisplatin NPs exhibited equivalent but no superior antitumor immunotherapeutic activity while reducing systemic adverse events and can be safely administered concurrently with ablative RT. Alternative NP formulations may be designed to further improve anticancer outcomes.

Comparison and calibration of dose delivered by137Cs and x-ray irradiators in mice

Objective.The Office of Radiological Security, U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, is implementing a radiological risk reduction program which seeks to minimize or eliminate the use of high activity radiological sources, including¹³⁷Cs, by replacing them with non-radioisotopic technologies, such as x-ray irradiators. The main goal of this paper is to evaluate the equivalence of the dose delivered by gamma- and x-ray irradiators in mice using experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. We also propose a novel biophantom as anin situdose calibration method.Approach.We irradiated mouse carcasses and 3D-printed mouse biophantoms in a¹³⁷Cs irradiator (Mark I-68) and an x-ray irradiator (X-Rad320) at three voltages (160 kVp, 225 kVp and 320 kVp) and measured the delivered radiation dose. A Geant4-based Monte Carlo model was developed and validated to provide a comprehensive picture of gamma- and x-ray irradiation in mice.Main Results.Our Monte Carlo model predicts a uniform dose delivered in soft-tissue for all the explored irradiation programs and in agreement with the absolute dose measurements. Our Monte Carlo model shows an energy-dependent difference between dose in bone and in soft tissue that decreases as photon energy increases. Dose rate depends on irradiator and photon energy. We observed a deviation of the measured dose from the target value of up to -9% for the Mark I-68, and up to 35% for the X-Rad320. The dose measured in the 3D-printed phantoms are equivalent to that in the carcasses within 6% uncertainty.Significance.Our results suggest that 320 kVp irradiation is a good candidate to substitute¹³⁷Cs irradiation barring a few caveats. There is a significant difference between measured and targeted doses for x-ray irradiation that suggests a strong need forin situcalibration, which can be achieved with 3D-printed mouse biophantoms. A dose correction is necessary for bone doses, which can be provided by a Monte Carlo calculation. Finally, the biological implications of the differences in dose rates and dose per photon for the different irradiation methods should be carefully assessed for each small-animal irradiation experiment.

BAIRDA: a novel in vitro setup to quantify radiobiological parameters for cervical cancer brachytherapy dose estimations

Objective. Brachytherapy (BT) dose prescriptions for locally advanced cervical cancer are made with account for the radiobiological parameters, α/β ratio and halftime of repair (T 1/2 ). However, a wide range of parameter values has been reported which can challenge commonly held equivalencies between dose prescriptions. This is the first reported study that aims to develop an in vitro experimental technique using clinical high-dose-rate (HDR) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) Ir-192 brachytherapy afterloaders to quantify these parameters in vitro and to contextualize findings within contemporary practice. Approach. To efficiently quantify α/β and T 1/2 , in vitro experiments more reflective of clinical BT practice than traditional clonogenic survival assays were developed and applied to four squamous cell carcinoma cell lines (CaSki, C-33A, SiHa, and SW756). Radiation was delivered using single acute and fractionated dose treatments with a conventional irradiator and clinical HDR and PDR BT afterloaders. For the latter, a novel brachytherapy afterloader in vitro radiation delivery apparatus (BAIRDA) was developed. Main Results. The α/β and T 1/2 values determined using BAIRDA and the conventional irradiator showed close agreement, validating the novel apparatus and technique. For CaSki, C-33A, SiHa, and SW756, the BAIRDA-measured α/β ratios (5.2 [4.6–5.8], 5.6 [4.5–6.6], 6.3 [4.9–7.7], and 5.3 [4.7–6.0] Gy, respectively) were consistently smaller, while the T 1/2 (3.3 [2.7–3.9], 2.7 [2.0–3.3], 2.8 (2.4–3.1], and 4.8 [4.1–5.4] hours) larger, than the widely accepted values in clinical practice (α/β = 10 Gy; T 1/2  = 1.5 h). Significance. In vitro experiments using BAIRDA provided evidence for differences between the conventionally selected and experimentally determined α/β ratio and T 1/2 . Treatment regimens using HDR-BT and PDR-BT, designed to deliver equivalent radiobiological doses based on conventional values, were shown to differ by up to 27 Gy EQD2 – an effect that could impact treatment outcomes in cervical cancer. Furthermore, with BAIRDA, we have developed a novel method for radiobiological research in BT.

Development of Standard X-Ray Beams for Calibration of Radiobiology Cabinet and Conformal Irradiators

This work seeks to develop standard X-ray beams that are matched to radiobiology X-ray irradiators. The calibration of detectors used for dose determination of these irradiators is performed with a set of standard X rays that are more heavily filtered and/or lower energy, which leads to a higher uncertainty in the dose measurement. Models of the XRad320, SARRP, and the X-ray tube at the University of Wisconsin Medical Radiation Research Center (UWMRRC) were created using the BEAMnrc user code of the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code system. These models were validated against measurements, and the resultant modeled spectra were used to determine the amount of added filtration needed to match the X-ray beams at the UWMRRC to those of the XRad320 and SARRP. The depth profiles and half-value layer (HVL) simulations performed using BEAMnrc agreed to measurements within 3% and 3.6%, respectively. A primary measurement device, a free-air chamber, was developed to measure air kerma in the medium energy range of X rays. The resultant spectra of the matched beams had HVL's that matched the HVL's of the radiobiology irradiators well within the 3% criteria recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the average energies agreed within 2.4%. In conclusion, three standard X-ray beams were developed at the UWMRRC with spectra that more closely match the spectra of the XRad320 and SARRP radiobiology irradiators, which will aid in a more accurate dose determination during calibration of these irradiators.

Study logistics that can impact medical countermeasure efficacy testing in mouse models of radiation injury

PURPOSE

To address confounding issues that have been noted in planning and conducting studies to identify biomarkers of radiation injury, develop animal models to simulate these injuries, and test potential medical countermeasures to mitigate/treat damage caused by radiation exposure.

METHODS

The authors completed an intensive literature search to address several key areas that should be considered before embarking on studies to assess efficacy of medical countermeasure approaches in mouse models of radiation injury. These considerations include: (1) study variables; (2) animal selection criteria; (3) animal husbandry; (4) medical management; and (5) radiation attributes.

RESULTS

It is important to select mouse strains that are capable of responding to the selected radiation exposure (e.g. genetic predispositions might influence radiation sensitivity and proclivity to certain phenotypes of radiation injury), and that also react in a manner similar to humans. Gender, vendor, age, weight, and even seasonal variations are all important factors to consider. In addition, the housing and husbandry of the animals (i.e. feed, environment, handling, time of day of irradiation and animal restraint), as well as the medical management provided (e.g. use of acidified water, antibiotics, routes of administration of drugs, consideration of animal numbers, and euthanasia criteria) should all be addressed. Finally, the radiation exposure itself should be tightly controlled, by ensuring a full understanding and reporting of the radiation source, dose and dose rate, shielding and geometry of exposure, while also providing accurate dosimetry. It is important to understand how all the above factors contribute to the development of radiation dose response curves for a given animal facility with a well-defined murine model.

CONCLUSIONS

Many potential confounders that could impact the outcomes of studies to assess efficacy of a medical countermeasure for radiation-induced injuries are addressed, and recommendations are made to assist investigators in carrying out research that is robust, reproducible, and accurate.