1
|
Winters TA, Marzella L, Molinar-Inglis O, Price PW, Han NC, Cohen JE, Wang SJ, Fotenos AF, Sullivan JM, Esker JI, Lapinskas PJ, DiCarlo AL. Gastrointestinal Acute Radiation Syndrome: Mechanisms, Models, Markers, and Medical Countermeasures. Radiat Res 2024; 201:628-646. [PMID: 38616048 DOI: 10.1667/rade-23-00196.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
There have been a number of reported human exposures to high dose radiation, resulting from accidents at nuclear power plants (e.g., Chernobyl), atomic bombings (Hiroshima and Nagasaki), and mishaps in industrial and medical settings. If absorbed radiation doses are high enough, evolution of acute radiation syndromes (ARS) will likely impact both the bone marrow as well as the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Damage incurred in the latter can lead to nutrient malabsorption, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, altered microbiome and metabolites, and impaired barrier function, which can lead to septicemia and death. To prepare for a medical response should such an incident arise, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) funds basic and translational research to address radiation-induced GI-ARS, which remains a critical and prioritized unmet need. Areas of interest include identification of targets for damage and mitigation, animal model development, and testing of medical countermeasures (MCMs) to address GI complications resulting from radiation exposure. To appropriately model expected human responses, it is helpful to study analogous disease states in the clinic that resemble GI-ARS, to inform on best practices for diagnosis and treatment, and translate them back to inform nonclinical drug efficacy models. For these reasons, the NIAID partnered with two other U.S. government agencies (the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, and the Food and Drug Administration), to explore models, biomarkers, and diagnostics to improve understanding of the complexities of GI-ARS and investigate promising treatment approaches. A two-day workshop was convened in August 2022 that comprised presentations from academia, industry, healthcare, and government, and highlighted talks from 26 subject matter experts across five scientific sessions. This report provides an overview of information that was presented during the conference, and important discussions surrounding a broad range of topics that are critical for the research, development, licensure, and use of MCMs for GI-ARS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Winters
- Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP), Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, Maryland
| | - Libero Marzella
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Olivia Molinar-Inglis
- Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP), Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, Maryland
| | - Paul W Price
- Office of Regulatory Affairs, DAIT, NIAID, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Nyun Calvin Han
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Jonathan E Cohen
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Sue-Jane Wang
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Anthony F Fotenos
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Julie M Sullivan
- Center for Devices for Radiological Health (CDRH), FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - John I Esker
- Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Washington, DC
| | - Paula J Lapinskas
- Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Washington, DC
| | - Andrea L DiCarlo
- Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP), Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
MacVittie TJ. Where are the medical countermeasures against the ARS and DEARE? A current topic relative to an animal model research platform, radiation exposure context, the acute and delayed effects of acute exposure, and the FDA animal rule. Int J Radiat Biol 2023:1-15. [PMID: 36811500 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2023.2181999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A question echoed by the National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB) in 2010, remains a reasonable question in 2023; 'Where are the Countermeasures?'. A critical path for development of medical countermeasures (MCM) against acute, radiation-induced organ-specific injury within the acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and the delayed effects of acute radiation exposure (DEARE) requires the recognition of problems and solutions inherent in the path to FDA approval under the Animal Rule. Keep Rule number one in mind, It's not easy. CONSIDERATIONS The current topic herein is focused on defining the nonhuman primate model(s) for efficient MCM development relative to consideration of prompt and delayed exposure in the context of the nuclear scenario. The rhesus macaque is a predictive model for human exposure of partial-body irradiation with marginal bone marrow sparing that allows definition of the multiple organ injury in the acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and the delayed effects of acute radiation exposure (DEARE). The continued definition of natural history is required to delineate an associative or causal interaction within the concurrent multi-organ injury characteristic of the ARS and DEARE. A more efficient development of organ specific MCM for both pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis to include acute radiation-induced combined injury requires closing critical gaps in knowledge and urgent support to rectify the national shortage of nonhuman primates. The rhesus macaque is a validated, predictive model of the human response to prompt and delayed radiation exposure, medical management and MCM treatment. A rational approach to further development of the cynomolgus macaque as a comparable model is urgently required for continued development of MCM for FDA approval. CONCLUSION It is imperative to examine the key variables relative to animal model development and validation, The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and exposure profiles, of candidate MCM relative to route, administration schedule and optimal efficacy define the fully effective dose. The conduct of adequate and well-controlled pivotal efficacy studies as well as safety and toxicity studies support approval under the FDA Animal Rule and label definition for human use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J MacVittie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Total Skin Treatment with Helical Arc Radiotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24054492. [PMID: 36901922 PMCID: PMC10002962 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
For widespread cutaneous lymphoma, such as mycosis fungoides or leukemia cutis, in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and for chronic myeloproliferative diseases, total skin irradiation is an efficient treatment modality for disease control. Total skin irradiation aims to homogeneously irradiate the skin of the entire body. However, the natural geometric shape and skin folding of the human body pose challenges to treatment. This article introduces treatment techniques and the evolution of total skin irradiation. Articles on total skin irradiation by helical tomotherapy and the advantages of total skin irradiation by helical tomotherapy are reviewed. Differences among each treatment technique and treatment advantages are compared. Adverse treatment effects and clinical care during irradiation and possible dose regimens are mentioned for future prospects of total skin irradiation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang Z, Wu H, Lin Q, Wang X, Kang S. Lymphopenic condition enhanced the antitumor immunity of PD-1-knockout T cells mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 system in malignant melanoma. Immunol Lett 2022; 250:15-22. [PMID: 36174769 DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adoptive transfer of PD-1 knockout T cells mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been used in various cancers and got satisfactory treatment effectiveness. However, the effectiveness was limited due to the low proliferation ability, antigen recognition ability and short lifetime of T cells in vivo. METHOD In this study, PD-1 knockout T cells mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 system were transferred into lymphopenic mice after sub-lethal dose of total body irradiation. The antitumor effects of PD-1 knockout T cells were comprehensively analyzed by flow cytometry. Moreover, PD-L1 knockout B16 cells were inoculated subcutaneously in lymphopenic mice receiving infusion of naïve T cells to value the role of PD-1/PD-L1 axis on lymphopenia-induced antitumor immunity RESULT: In this study, we found that the PD-1-knockout T cells underwent several rounds of homeostatic proliferation in vivo when they were transferred into lymphopenic mice. The number of IFN-γ-releasing CTL was significantly increased and the tumor growth was remarkably inhibited in lymphopenic mice receiving infusion of PD-1 knockout T cells. The expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells rose smartly in lymphopenic mice undergoing homeostatic proliferation. PD-L1 gene knockout on B16 melanoma cells could effectively enhance the antitumor immunity mediated by the homeostatic proliferation of T cells and significantly inhibited the growth of tumor CONCLUSION: These findings suggested that lymphopenic condition after total body irradiation might be able to create an environment to promote the PD-1 knockout T cells to recognize tumor antigen and undergo homeostatic proliferation, thus induced a more powerful antitumor immunity than adoptively transferring into immunocompetent hosts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zike Yang
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361001, Fujian, China
| | - Huita Wu
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361001, Fujian, China
| | - Qing Lin
- Department of Rehabilitation, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361001, Fujian, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361001, Fujian, China
| | - Shijun Kang
- Department of Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
MacVittie TJ, Farese AM. Recent advances in medical countermeasure development against acute radiation exposure based on the US FDA animal rule. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2021; 41:S438-S453. [PMID: 34433144 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac20e0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in medical countermeasures (MCMs) has been dependent on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) animal rule (AR) and the final guidance document provided for industry on product development. The criteria outlined therein establish the path for approval under the AR. The guidance document, along with the funding and requirements from the federal agencies provided the basic considerations for animal model development in assessing radiation effects and efficacy against the potential lethal effects of acute radiation injury and the delayed effects of acute exposure. Animal models, essential for determining MCM efficacy, were developed and validated to assess organ-specific, potentially lethal, radiation effects against the gastrointestinal (GI) and hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS), and radiation-induced delayed effects to lung and associated comorbidities of prolonged immune suppression, GI, kidney and heart injury. Partial-body irradiation models where marginal bone marrow was spared resulted in the ability to evaluate the concomitant evolution of multiple organ injury in the acute and delayed effects in survivors of acute radiation exposure. There are no MCMs for prophylaxis against the major sequelae of the ARS or the delayed effects of acute exposure. Also lacking are MCMs that will mitigate the GI ARS consequent to potentially lethal exposure from a terrorist event or major radiation accident. Additionally, the gap in countermeasures for prophylaxis may extend to mixed neutron/gamma radiation if current modelling predicts prompt exposure from an improvised nuclear device. However, progress in the field of MCM development has been made due to federal and corporate funding, clarification of the critical criteria for efficacy within the FDA AR and the concomitant development and validation of additional animal models. These models provided for a strategic and tactical approach to determine radiation effects and MCM efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J MacVittie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, United States of America
| | - Ann M Farese
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|