Isodose curve mappings measured while undergoing rotation for quality assurance testing of a 137Cs irradiator

Commissioning and Assessment of Radiation Field and Dose Inhomogeneity for a Dual X-ray Tube Cabinet Irradiator: To Ensure Accurate Dosimetry in Radiation Biology Experiments

Purpose

Standardization of x-ray cabinet irradiator dose, geometry, and calibration reporting is an ongoing process. Multi-tube designs have been introduced into the preclinical market and give a theoretical benefit but have not been widely assessed for use in preclinical irradiation conditions. The aim of this study was to report our experience commissioning a dual x-ray source cabinet irradiator (CIXD, Xstrahl Limited, United Kingdom) and assess the dose distribution for various experimental conditions.

Methods and Materials

Half-value layer (HVL) measurement, profile measurements, and output calibration were performed using a calibrated ion chamber. Constancy measurements were performed twice daily over 2 weeks to assess output fluctuations. Film measurements were completed using solid water to assess percent depth dose and homogeneity within the field and within variable thicknesses of solid water and phosphate-buffered saline solution. Film measurements were repeated for various arrangements of petri dishes filled with phosphate-buffered saline or water and in a 3D-printed mouse phantom.

Results

The x-ray tubes had a measured in-air output of 1.27 Gy/min. The HVL was 1.7 mm Cu. The upper and lower tubes both exhibited the heel effect, but when operated simultaneously, the effect was reduced. Ion chamber measurements revealed a 15% dose inhomogeneity within the tray area (18 × 18 cm2). Film measurements in the petri dishes indicated minor nonuniformities in the arrangements of the experimental apparatus. Measurements from the mouse phantom with film agreed with ion chamber measurements for various phantom placements and orientations.

Conclusions

X-ray cell culture and animal irradiation with dual tube cabinet irradiation is efficient and robust when using established dosimetric tools to confirm output and homogeneity. The conditions assumed for calibrations are often not maintained during experiments. We have confirmed that inhomogeneities are present for single-tube use; however, they are reduced with simultaneous tube use. Additional dosimetric monitoring should be performed for each unique irradiation setup.

Study logistics that can impact medical countermeasure efficacy testing in mouse models of radiation injury

PURPOSE

To address confounding issues that have been noted in planning and conducting studies to identify biomarkers of radiation injury, develop animal models to simulate these injuries, and test potential medical countermeasures to mitigate/treat damage caused by radiation exposure.

METHODS

The authors completed an intensive literature search to address several key areas that should be considered before embarking on studies to assess efficacy of medical countermeasure approaches in mouse models of radiation injury. These considerations include: (1) study variables; (2) animal selection criteria; (3) animal husbandry; (4) medical management; and (5) radiation attributes.

RESULTS

It is important to select mouse strains that are capable of responding to the selected radiation exposure (e.g. genetic predispositions might influence radiation sensitivity and proclivity to certain phenotypes of radiation injury), and that also react in a manner similar to humans. Gender, vendor, age, weight, and even seasonal variations are all important factors to consider. In addition, the housing and husbandry of the animals (i.e. feed, environment, handling, time of day of irradiation and animal restraint), as well as the medical management provided (e.g. use of acidified water, antibiotics, routes of administration of drugs, consideration of animal numbers, and euthanasia criteria) should all be addressed. Finally, the radiation exposure itself should be tightly controlled, by ensuring a full understanding and reporting of the radiation source, dose and dose rate, shielding and geometry of exposure, while also providing accurate dosimetry. It is important to understand how all the above factors contribute to the development of radiation dose response curves for a given animal facility with a well-defined murine model.

CONCLUSIONS

Many potential confounders that could impact the outcomes of studies to assess efficacy of a medical countermeasure for radiation-induced injuries are addressed, and recommendations are made to assist investigators in carrying out research that is robust, reproducible, and accurate.

Dosimetry Formalism and Implementation of a Homogenous Irradiation Protocol to Improve the Accuracy of Small Animal Whole-Body Irradiation Using a 137Cs Irradiator

Shielded Cs irradiators are routinely used in pre-clinical radiation research to perform in vitro or in vivo investigations. Without appropriate dosimetry and irradiation protocols in place, there can be large uncertainty in the delivered dose of radiation between irradiated subjects that could lead to inaccurate and possibly misleading results. Here, a dosimetric evaluation of the JL Shepard Mark I-68A Cs irradiator and an irradiation technique for whole-body irradiation of small animals that allows one to limit the between subject variation in delivered dose to ±3% are provided. Mathematical simulation techniques and Gafchromic EBT film were used to describe the region within the irradiation cavity with homogeneous dose distribution (100% ± 5%), the dosimetric impact of varying source-to-subject distance, and the variation in attenuation thickness due to turntable rotation. Furthermore, an irradiation protocol and dosimetry formalism that allows calculation of irradiation time for whole-body irradiation of small animals is proposed that is designed to ensure a more consistent dose delivery between irradiated subjects. To compare this protocol with the conventional irradiation protocol suggested by the vendor, high-resolution film dosimetry measurements evaluating the dose difference between irradiation subjects and the dose distribution throughout subjects was performed using phantoms resembling small animals. Based on these results, there can be considerable variation in the delivered dose of > ± 5% using the conventional irradiation protocol for whole-body irradiation doses below 5 Gy. Using the proposed irradiation protocol this variability can be reduced to within ±3% and the dosimetry formalism allows for more accurate calculation of the irradiation time in relation to the intended prescription dose.