The feasibility of Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography stress testing in low-risk chest pain protocol patients

Impact of rubidium imaging availability on management of patients with acute chest pain

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the impact of 82-Rubidium positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) availability on patient management presenting at the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP).

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study of clinical databases. Patients presenting with CP with a non-definitive suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at the ED between April 2016 and February 2020 were divided into 2 groups based on PET availability. The proportion of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) without significant coronary artery disease (CAD), length of stay (LoS), and additional downstream testing were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 21,242 ED visits for CP without definitive ACS: 5,492 when PET is not available and 15,750 when PET is available. When PET is available, proportion of patients undergoing a MPI study was greater (20.7% vs 17.6%, P<0.0001), proportion of ICA without significant CAD was similar (18.5% vs 21.4%, P=0.24), and median ED LoS was shorter (16.6 vs 18.1 hours, P=0.03). Patients undergoing SPECT MPI had significantly more downstream testing (8.9% vs 6.4%, P=0.003) and a higher rate of coronary angiogram without significant CAD (21.2% vs 14.2%, P=0.09) compared to those who underwent PET MPI.

CONCLUSION

Availability of PET MPI was associated with an increased number of MPI referral from the ED, similar rates of ICA without significant CAD, decreased LoS, and fewer downstream testing.

Combined stress myocardial CT perfusion and coronary CT angiography as a feasible strategy among patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department

BACKGROUND

A combined approach of myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) with coronary CT angiography (CTA) was shown to have better diagnostic accuracy than coronary CTA alone. However, data on cost benefits and length of stay when compared to other perfusion imaging modalities has not been evaluated. Therefore, we aim to perform a feasibility study to assess direct costs and length of stay of a combined stress CTP/CTA and use SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) as a benchmark, among chest pain patients at intermediate-risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presenting to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This is a prospective two-arm clinical trial (NCT02538861) with 43 patients enrolled in stress CTP/CTA arm (General Electric Revolution CT) and 102 in SPECT-MPI arm. Mean age of the study population was 65 ​± ​12 years; 56% were men. We used multivariable linear regression analysis to compare length of stay and direct costs between the two modalities.

RESULTS

Overall, 9 out of the 43 patients (21%) with CTP/CTA testing had an abnormal test. Of these 9 patients, 7 patients underwent invasive coronary angiography and 6 patients were found to have obstructive coronary artery disease. Normal CTP/CTA test was found in 34 patients (79%), who were discharged home and all patients were free of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days. The mean length of stay was significantly shorter by 28% (mean difference: 14.7 ​h; 95% CI: 0.7, 21) among stress CTP/CTA (20 ​h [IQR: 16, 37]) compared to SPECT-MPI (30 ​h [IQR: 19, 44.5]). Mean direct costs were significantly lower by 44% (mean difference: $1535; 95% CI: 987, 2082) among stress CTA/CTP ($1750 [IQR: 1474, 2114] compared to SPECT-MPI ($2837 [IQR: 2491, 3554]).

CONCLUSION

Combined stress CTP/CTA is a feasible strategy for evaluation of chest pain patients presenting to ED at intermediate-risk for ACS and has the potential to lead to shorter length of stay and lower direct costs.

Role of imaging for acute chest pain syndromes

Acute chest pain suggestive of ischemic cardiac origin, with a normal or nondiagnostic electrocardiogram and negative initial cardiac markers for myocardial necrosis represent a significant diagnostic dilemma for clinicians. Multiple imaging modalities play a pivotal role in early diagnosis and safe discharge of these patients. In this review, we compare the current imaging modalities available for these patients including their diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and cost effectiveness. Acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging significantly improves the clinical outcome in these patients and reduces the overall cost when incorporated into the decision making pathway. The choice of imaging modality recommended should be based on local institutional expertise and the overall clinical presentation. The imaging modality with high diagnostic accuracy and negative predictive value will provide for precise risk stratification which is important to clinical decision making, including patients who require admission to the hospital and those who can be safely discharged.

Nuclear perfusion imaging for functional evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: the future is now

Nuclear imaging, with both single-photon emission computed tomography and PET, has a well-established role in the assessment of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. There is a large body of evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of these modalities, however, they continue to evolve rapidly with advances in camera and tracer technology, as well as changes in imaging protocols to increase lab efficiency, improve image quality and to decrease radiation exposure to patients. Nuclear imaging also provides insights into atherogenesis at a molecular level and can be combined with other imaging modalities, providing both functional and structural data and complimentary information on the presence of coronary disease and its functional implications.