Impact of chronic kidney disease on long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting or bare-metal stents

Medical Therapy Versus Revascularization in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the evidence on optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus coronary revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).

RECENT FINDINGS

A post hoc analysis of the COURAGE trial in patients with SIHD and CKD showed no difference in freedom from angina, death, and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) between OMT and percutaneous intervention plus OMT compared with patients without CKD. The ISCHEMIA-CKD trial of 777 patients with advanced CKD revealed no difference in cumulative incidence of death or nonfatal MI at 3 years between OMT and revascularization but the composite of death or new dialysis was higher in the invasive arm. Additionally, there were no significant or sustained benefits in related to angina-related health status in invasive versus conservative strategy. An initial revascularization strategy does not reduce mortality or MI or relieve angina symptoms in patients with SIHD and advanced CKD.

Two-year outcome and risk factors for mortality in patients with coronary artery disease and renal failure: The prospective, observational CAD-REF Registry

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are strongly associated. CAD is the most frequent cause of cardiovascular death in patients with CKD.

METHODS

The prospective observational nationwide multicenter Coronary Artery Disease and REnal Failure (CAD-REF) Registry enrolled 3352 patients with angiographically documented CAD classified according to their baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) into 5 groups according to the K/DOQI-guidelines. Patients were followed for two years. The aim of this study was the analysis of outcome and the identification of risk factors for two-year mortality in patients with both CKD and CAD.

RESULTS

With decreasing renal function, patients had more often diabetes mellitus, hypertension, peripheral artery disease, and previous cardiovascular events and interventions. The amount of diseased vessels increased with decreasing renal function. For the whole cohort, two-year mortality was 6.5%. Kaplan-Meier-curves showed highest mortality in patients with CKD stages 4 and 5 (22.4%). In multivariate Cox-regression analyses, significant risk factors for two-year all-cause mortality were lower eGFR, current smoking, left ventricular ejection fraction, diabetes mellitus treated with oral medication or insulin, age, and peripheral artery disease. Coronary status missed the level of statistical significance as a risk factor for mortality in multivariable regression analysis. An eGFR reduction of 10ml/min/1.73m² increased the risk of mortality by 19% regardless of other risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-year morbidity and mortality increased with the degree of renal impairment. To improve survival of patients with CAD and CKD, nephroprotection is urgently needed especially for patients with atherosclerotic burden.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00679419, http://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Comparison of Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal Stents in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stents (DESs) and bare metal stents (BMSs) are both recommended to improve coronary revascularization and to treat coronary artery disease in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the potential superiority of DESs over BMSs for reducing the incidence of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in CKD patients has not been established, and the results remain controversial. We aimed to systematically assess and quantify the total weight of evidence regarding the use of DESs versus BMSs in CKD patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this systematic review and conventional meta-analysis, electronic studies published in any language until May 20, 2016, were systematically searched through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing outcomes in CKD patients with DESs versus BMSs and extracted data in a standard form. Pooled odd ratios and 95% CIs were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models. Finally, 38 studies involving 123 396 patients were included. The use of DESs versus BMSs was associated with significant reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events (pooled odds ratio 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64-0.88; P<0.001), all-cause mortality (odds ratio 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.90; P<0.001), myocardial infarction, target-lesion revascularization, and target-vessel revascularization. The superiority of DESs over BMSs for improving clinical outcomes was attenuated in randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DESs significantly improves the above outcomes in CKD patients. Nevertheless, large-sized randomized controlled trials are necessary to determine the real effect on CKD patients and whether efficacy differs by type of DES.