Mechanisms of cancer-associated thrombosis

The pulmonary-vascular-stump filling defect on CT post lung tumor resection: a predictor of cancer progression

BACKGROUND

To explore the pulmonary-vascular-stump filling-defect on CT and investigate its association with cancer progression.

METHODS

Records in our institutional database from 2018 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed to identify filling-defects in the pulmonary-vascular-stump after lung cancer resection and collect imaging and clinical data of patients.

RESULTS

Among the 1714 patients analyzed, 95 cases of filling-defects in the vascular stump after lung cancer resection were identified. After excluding lost-to-follow-up cases, a total of 77 cases were included in the final study. Morphologically, the filling-defects were dichotomized as 46 convex-shape and 31 concave-shape cases. Concave defects exhibited a higher incidence of increase compared to convex defects (51.7% v. 9.4%, P = 0.001). Among 61 filling defects in the pulmonary arterial stump, four (6.5%) increasing concave defects showed the nuclide concentration on PET and extravascular extension. The progression-free survival (PFS) time differed significantly among the concave, convex, and non-filling-defect groups (log-rank P < 0.0001), with concave defects having the shortest survival time. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that the shape of filling-defects independently predicted PFS in early onset on CT (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.39-1.99; P = 0.04). In follow-ups, the growth of filling-effects was an independent predictor of PFS (HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.11-0.65; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Certain filling-defects in the pulmonary-arterial-stump post lung tumor resection exhibit malignant growth. In the early onset of filling-defects on CT, the concave-shape independently predicted cancer-progression, while during the subsequent follow-up, the growth of filling-defects could be used independently to forecast cancer-progression.

Underlying Mechanisms of Thrombosis Associated with Cancer and Anticancer Therapies

OPINION STATEMENT

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) has been identified as the second most prevalent cause of death after cancer itself. Moreover, the risk of thrombotic events in cancer patients increases due to anticancer drugs, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) as well as arterial thromboembolic (ATE) events are present in CAT. Although VTE occurs more frequently, ATE events are very significant and in some cases are more dangerous than VTE. Guidelines for preventing thrombosis refer mainly VTE as well as the contribution of ATE events. Several factors are involved in thrombosis related to cancer, but the whole pathomechanism of thrombosis is not clear and may differ between patients. The activation of the coagulation system and the interaction of cancer cells with other cells including platelets, endothelial cells, monocytes, and neutrophils are promoted by a hypercoagulable state caused by cancer. We present an update on the pathomechanisms of CAT and the effect of anticancer drugs, mainly targeted therapies with a focus on TKIs. Considering the risk of bleeding associated with anticoagulation in each cancer patient, the anticoagulation strategy may involve the use of FXIa inhibitors, direct oral anticoagulants, and low-molecular-weight heparin. Further research would be valuable in developing strategies for reducing CAT.

Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A New Light on an Old Story

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a rising and significant phenomenon, becoming the second leading cause of death in cancer patients. Pathophysiology of CAT differs from thrombosis in the non-cancer population. There are additional risk factors for thrombosis specific to cancer including cancer type, histology, and treatment, such as chemotherapy. Recently developed scoring systems use these risk factors to stratify the degree of risk and encourage thromboprophylaxis in intermediate- to high-risk patients. Anticoagulation is safely used for prophylaxis and treatment of CAT. Both of these have largely been with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), rather than the vitamin K antagonist (VKA); however, there has been increasing evidence for direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use. Consequently, international guidelines have also adapted to recommend the role of DOACs in CAT. Using DOACs is a turning point for CAT, but further research is warranted for their long-term risk profile. This review will discuss mechanisms, risk factors, prophylaxis and management of CAT, including both LMWH and DOACs. There will also be a comparison of current international guidelines and how they reflect the growing evidence base.