Adjunctive Volasertib in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia not Eligible for Standard Induction Therapy: A Randomized, Phase 3 Trial

AML treatment: conventional chemotherapy and emerging novel agents

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is driven by complex mutations and cytogenetic abnormalities with profound tumoral heterogeneity, making it challenging to treat. Ten years ago, the 5-year survival rate of patients with AML was only 29% with conventional chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. All attempts to improve conventional therapy over the previous 40 years had failed. Now, new genomic, immunological, and molecular insights have led to a renaissance in AML therapy. Improvements to standard chemotherapy and a wave of new targeted therapies have been developed. However, how best to incorporate these advances into frontline therapy and sequence them in relapse is not firmly established. In this review, we highlight current treatments of AML, targeted agents, and pioneering attempts to synthesize these developments into a rational standard of care (SoC).

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel molecules as potent inhibitors of PLK1

Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is an attractive therapeutic target for the treatment of tumors, as it is an essential cell-cycle regulator frequently overexpressed in tumor tissues. PLK1 can promote tumor invasion and metastasis, and is often associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients. However, no PLK1 inhibitor has been granted marketing approval until now. Therefore, more potentially promising PLK1 inhibitors need to be investigated. In this study, a series of novel inhibitors targeting PLK1 was designed and optimized derived from a new scaffold. After synthesis and characterization, we obtained the structure-activity relationship and led to the discovery of the most promising compound 30e for PLK1. The antiproliferative activity against HCT116 cells (IC50 = 5 nM versus 45 nM for onvansertib) and the cellular permeability and efflux ratio were significantly improved (PappA→B = 2.03 versus 0.345 and efflux ratio = 1.65 versus 94.7 for 30e and onvansertib, respectively). Further in vivo studies indicated that 30e had favorable antitumor activity with 116.2% tumor growth inhibition (TGI) in comparison with TGI of 43.0% for onvansertib. Furthermore, 30e improved volume of tumor tissue distribution in mice as compared to onvansertib. This initial study on 30e holds promise for further development of an antitumor agent.

Proposals for Clinical Trials in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

OPINION STATEMENT

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematologic malignancy of mostly older individuals that exhibits both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. CMML presentation and outcome are variable, reflecting genetic and clinical heterogeneity. Hypomethylating agents are the mainstay of therapy but induce complete remissions in less than 20% of patients and do not prolong survival compared to hydroxyurea. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is potentially curative, but few patients qualify due to advanced age and/or comorbidities. Work of the past several years has identified key molecular pathways that drive disease proliferation and transformation to acute leukemia, including JAK/STAT and MAPK signaling and epigenetic dysregulation. There is increasingly compelling evidence that inflammation is a major driver of CMML progression. Thus far however, this mechanistic knowledge has not yet been translated into improved outcomes, suggesting that fundamentally new approaches are required. In this review, we discuss the disease course, new classifications, and current treatment landscape of CMML. We review ongoing clinical studies and discuss options for rationally based future clinical trials.

Novel Investigational Agents and Pathways That May Influence the Future Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute Myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with a 5-year overall survival of 32% between 2012 to 2018. The above number severely dwindles with age and adverse risk of disease, presenting opportunities for new drug development and is an area of dire unmet need. Basic science and clinical investigators across the world have been working on many new and old molecule formulations and combination strategies to improve outcomes in this disease. In this review, we discuss select promising novel agents in various stages of clinical development for patients with AML.

Transferrin-guided intelligent nanovesicles augment the targetability and potency of clinical PLK1 inhibitor to acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a most lethal hematological malignancy, partly because of its slow development of targeted therapies compared with other cancers. PLK1 inhibitor, volasertib (Vol), is among the few molecular targeted drugs granted breakthrough therapy status for AML; however, its fast clearance and dose-limiting toxicity greatly restrain its clinical benefits. Here, we report that transferrin-guided polymersomes (TPs) markedly augment the targetability, potency and safety of Vol to AML. Vol-loaded TPs (TPVol) with 4% transferrin exhibited best cellular uptake, effective down-regulation of p-PLK1, p-PTEN and p-AKT and superior apoptotic activity to free Vol in MV-4-11 leukemic cells. Intravenous injection of TPVol gave 6-fold higher AUC than free Vol and notable accumulation in AML-residing bone marrow. The efficacy studies in orthotopic MV-4-11 leukemic model demonstrated that TPVol significantly reduced leukemic cell proportions in periphery blood, bone marrow, liver and spleen, effectively enhanced mouse survival rate, and impeded bone loss. This transferrin-guided nano-delivery of molecular targeted drugs appears to be an interesting strategy towards the development of novel treatments for AML.

MYC and therapy resistance in cancer: risks and opportunities

The MYC transcription factor, encoded by the c-MYC proto-oncogene, is activated by growth-promoting signals, and is a key regulator of biosynthetic and metabolic pathways driving cell growth and proliferation. These same processes are deregulated in MYC-driven tumors, where they become critical for cancer cell proliferation and survival. As other oncogenic insults, overexpressed MYC induces a series of cellular stresses (metabolic, oxidative, replicative, etc.) collectively known as oncogenic stress, which impact not only on tumor progression, but also on the response to therapy, with profound, multifaceted consequences on clinical outcome. On one hand, recent evidence uncovered a widespread role for MYC in therapy resistance in multiple cancer types, with either standard chemotherapeutic or targeted regimens. Reciprocally, oncogenic MYC imparts a series of molecular and metabolic dependencies to cells, thus giving rise to cancer-specific vulnerabilities that may be exploited to obtain synthetic-lethal interactions with novel anticancer drugs. Here we will review the current knowledge on the links between MYC and therapeutic responses, and will discuss possible strategies to overcome resistance through new, targeted interventions.

Therapeutic Targeting of DNA Damage Response in Cancer

DNA damage response (DDR) is critical to ensure genome stability, and defects in this signaling pathway are highly associated with carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Nevertheless, this also provides therapeutic opportunities, as cells with defective DDR signaling are directed to rely on compensatory survival pathways, and these vulnerabilities have been exploited for anticancer treatments. Following the impressive success of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of BRCA-mutated breast and ovarian cancers, extensive research has been conducted toward the development of pharmacologic inhibitors of the key components of the DDR signaling pathway. In this review, we discuss the key elements of the DDR pathway and how these molecular components may serve as anticancer treatment targets. We also summarize the recent promising developments in the field of DDR pathway inhibitors, focusing on novel agents beyond PARP inhibitors. Furthermore, we discuss biomarker studies to identify target patients expected to derive maximal clinical benefits as well as combination strategies with other classes of anticancer agents to synergize and optimize the clinical benefits.