Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Pediatric Rehabilitation: Pathological Features and Scheduled Pharmacological Therapies

Rehabilitation Care of the Child with an Acute Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) represent a unique and evolving population. Recovery and long-term prognosis are variable given the heterogeneity of ages, developmental stages, and types of injuries. This article summarizes important information regarding severe TBI epidemiology, pathophysiology, classification, and acute management. Early and longitudinal involvement of rehabilitation experts, such as pediatric physiatrists, is critical in managing complications and optimizing outcomes.

Weathering the storm: a single-institution experience with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after brain tumor resection in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) is a complication of severe traumatic or hypoxic brain injury characterized by transient episodes of tachycardia, tachypnea, hypertension, hyperthermia, diaphoresis, and/or dystonic posturing. Posttraumatic "sympathetic storms" are associated with poor outcomes. PSH rarely occurs after brain tumor resection in pediatric patients; only 4 cases have been published since 1929. Thus, the authors sought to report their experience with postcraniotomy PSH in pediatric brain tumor patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients younger than 18 years of age who underwent craniotomy for brain tumor resection at a single center by a single surgeon over a 7-year period was performed. A clinical diagnosis of postoperative PSH was recorded. Recorded outcomes included the interval between surgery and initiation of cytotoxic therapy, need for long-term CSF diversion, length of hospital stay, and survival.

RESULTS

Of the 150 patients who were included for analysis, 4 patients were diagnosed with postoperative PSH for an overall occurrence of 2.7%. PSH patients were younger than non-PSH patients (1.8 ± 0.4 years vs 9.2 ± 5.3 years, p = 0.010) and tended to have intraventricular tumors close to the thalamus, basal ganglia, and/or brainstem. PSH patients experienced longer hospital admissions (44.3 ± 23.4 days vs 6.8 ± 9.4 days, p = 0.001), a shorter interval between surgery and initiation of cytotoxic cancer-directed therapy (14.3 ± 8.0 days vs 90.7 days ± 232.9 days, p = 0.011), and increased need for long-term CSF diversion compared with non-PSH patients (75% vs 25%, p = 0.005). At the last follow-up, 50% of PSH patients had died compared with 13% of non-PSH patients (p = 0.094).

CONCLUSIONS

PSH is a rare postoperative complication that may affect young children with periventricular tumors and is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Increasing awareness of this condition is vital to improving patient outcomes.

Pharmacological Treatment for Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity

BACKGROUND

Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity, which affects up to 10% of all acquired brain injury survivors, is characterized by elevated heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and temperature; diaphoresis; and increased posturing. Pharmacological agents that have been studied in the management of this disorder include opiates, γ-aminobutyric acid agents, dopaminergic agents, and β blockers. Although paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity is a relatively common complication after acquired brain injury, there is a paucity of recommendations or comparisons of agents for the management of this disorder.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate all relevant literature on pharmacological therapies used to manage patients with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity to help elucidate possible best practices.

METHODS

Of the 27 studies evaluated for inclusion, 10 studies received full review: 4 retrospective cohort studies, 5 single case studies, and 1 case series.

RESULTS

Monotherapy is usually not effective in the management of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity and multiple agents with different mechanisms of action should be considered. α2-Agonists such as dexmedetomidine may hold some slight clinical efficacy over agents like propofol, and with respect to oral medications, propranolol might convey some slight advantage compared to others. However, with the limited data available, these results must be interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

As the treatment of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity is reactive to symptomatic evolution over time, critical care nurses play a vital role in the monitoring and treatment of these patients. Limited data exist on the management of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity and larger robust data sets are needed to guide decision-making. (Critical Care Nurse. 2020;40[3]:e9-e16).

Drug Use in Pediatric Patients Admitted to Rehabilitation For Severe Acquired Brain Injury: Analysis of the Associations With Rehabilitation Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Patients with severe acquired brain injuries require drug therapies in intensive care for life support and injury treatment. Patients who then access rehabilitation usually maintain their drug treatments long term, with a potential influence on the rehabilitation course. Whereas drug effects have been reported for specific drugs and clinical issues in adults, comprehensive data on pediatric patients with traumatic and non-traumatic injuries are scant.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to describe the therapeutic classes and groups of drugs prescribed to pediatric inpatients recovering from severe acquired brain injury when they enter rehabilitation; to assess whether clinical variables may determine the use of drug classes; and to assess whether the use of drug classes may be associated with differences in rehabilitation outcomes.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective chart review, following a previous study on the clinical-epidemiological characteristics of our patients. We collected information on drug therapies present at admittance to rehabilitation and analyzed their distribution according to therapeutic classes and groups. We verified the associations of drug groups with clinical variables (putatively antecedents to drug use) and with rehabilitation outcomes (putatively resultant of drug use and of clinical variables) in regression models. The clinical variables considered were injury etiology, Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at admittance to rehabilitation, sex, age at injury, plus two aggregate factors resulting from the previous work, 'neurological dysfunction' regarding the use of devices and 'injury severity' regarding the neurological status. The rehabilitation outcomes used were death after rehabilitation, persistence of a vegetative/minimally conscious state, coma duration, duration of the rehabilitation stay, rehabilitation efficiency (GOS at discharge minus GOS at admittance, divided by the length of rehabilitation stay).

RESULTS

We described the distribution of drug classes and groups among pediatric patients with severe acquired brain injuries. Regarding the associations between drug classes and clinical variables, we found greater use of cardiovascular agents with higher patient age, 'neurological dysfunction' score, and with an etiology of hypoxic brain injury. The use of antithrombotic agents was greater with higher patient age and 'neurological dysfunction' score. Glucocorticoid use was greater with higher GOS at admittance and with several etiologies: brain tumor, infective encephalitis, and autoimmune encephalitis. Regarding drug classes and rehabilitation outcomes, we found that the use of cardiovascular drugs was associated with increased occurrence of death after rehabilitation. The use of antispastic drugs was associated with a more frequent permanence in vegetative/minimally conscious states. The use of antispastic drugs and melatonin was associated with longer coma duration. The use of glucocorticoid drugs was associated with decreased rehabilitation efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

We provided a description of drug use in pediatric rehabilitation after severe acquired brain injuries, which was lacking in the literature. Prospective studies should verify our associative observations regarding clinical variables, drugs use, and outcomes, to assess causality.

Organic features of autonomic dysregulation in paediatric brain injury - Clinical and research implications for the management of patients with Rett syndrome

Rett Syndrome (RTT) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder with autonomic nervous system dysfunction. The understanding of this autonomic dysregulation remains incomplete and treatment recommendations are lacking. By searching literature regarding childhood brain injury, we wanted to see whether understanding autonomic dysregulation following childhood brain injury as a prototype can help us better understand the autonomic dysregulation in RTT. Thirty-one (31) articles were identified and following thematic analysis the three main themes that emerged were (A) Recognition of Autonomic Dysregulation, (B) Possible Mechanisms & Assessment of Autonomic Dysregulation and (C) Treatment of Autonomic Dysregulation. We conclude that in patients with RTT (I) anatomically, thalamic and hypothalamic function should be explored, (II) sensory issues and medication induced side effects that can worsen autonomic function should be considered, and (III) diaphoresis and dystonia ought to be better managed. Our synthesis of data from autonomic dysregulation in paediatric brain injury has led to increased knowledge and a better understanding of its underpinnings, leading to the development of application protocols in children with RTT.

Identification and Management of Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity After Traumatic Brain Injury

Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) has predominantly been described after traumatic brain injury (TBI), which is associated with hyperthermia, hypertension, tachycardia, tachypnea, diaphoresis, dystonia (hypertonia or spasticity), and even motor features such as extensor/flexion posturing. Despite the pathophysiology of PSH not being completely understood, most researchers gradually agree that PSH is driven by the loss of the inhibition of excitation in the sympathetic nervous system without parasympathetic involvement. Recently, advances in the clinical and diagnostic features of PSH in TBI patients have reached a broad clinical consensus in many neurology departments. These advances should provide a more unanimous foundation for the systematic research on this clinical syndrome and its clear management. Clinically, a great deal of attention has been paid to the definition and diagnostic criteria, epidemiology and pathophysiology, symptomatic treatment, and prevention and control of secondary brain injury of PSH in TBI patients. Potential benefits of treatment for PSH may result from the three main goals: eliminating predisposing causes, mitigating excessive sympathetic outflow, and supportive therapy. However, individual pathophysiological differences, therapeutic responses and outcomes, and precision medicine approaches to PSH management are varied and inconsistent between studies. Further, many potential therapeutic drugs might suppress manifestations of PSH in the process of TBI treatment. The purpose of this review is to present current and comprehensive studies of the identification of PSH after TBI in the early stage and provide a framework for symptomatic management of TBI patients with PSH.

Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcome

OBJECTIVE

To describe paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury using the new consensus definition, the risk factors associated with developing paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity, and the outcomes associated with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic children's hospital PICU.

PATIENTS

All pediatric patients more than 1 month and less than 18 years old with severe traumatic brain injury between 2000 and 2016. We excluded patients if they had a history of five possible confounders for paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity diagnosis or if they died within 24 hours of admission for traumatic brain injury.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Our primary outcome was PICU mortality. One hundred seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty-six patients (20%) had at least eight criteria and therefore met classification of "likelihood of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity." Older age was the only factor independently associated with developing paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.16). PICU mortality was significantly lower for those with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity compared with those without paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (odds ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.52), but PICU length of stay was greater in those with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (odds ratio, 4.36; 95% CI, 2.94-5.78), and discharge to an acute care or rehabilitation setting versus home was higher in those with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (odds ratio, 5.59; 95% CI, 1.26-24.84; odds ratio, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.87-15.57, respectively). When paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity was diagnosed in the first week of admission, it was not associated with discharge disposition.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the rate of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity in patients with severe traumatic brain injury is higher than previously reported. Older age was associated with an increased risk for developing paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity, but severity of the trauma and the brain injury were not. For survivors of severe traumatic brain injury beyond 24 hours who developed paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity, there was a lower PICU mortality but also greater PICU length of stay and a lower likelihood of discharge home from the admitting hospital, suggesting that functional outcome in survivors with paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity is worse than survivors without paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity.

Calming the Storm: Dysautonomia for the Pediatrician

Dysautonomia is a potentially life-threatening syndrome seen in many different types of brain injuries. It involves paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity and typically includes a constellation of symptoms, including: tachycardia, tachypnea, hyperthermia, hypertension, diaphoresis, hypertonia, and/or decerebrate or decorticate posturing. It is a clinical diagnosis of exclusion. A multimodal treatment approach is necessary including environmental modifications along with pharmacotherapy. Early management can help prevent comorbidities including secondary brain injury while also improving patient outcomes. This discussion serves as an overview of dysautonomia with a focus on management in the pediatric population including an example of a clinical algorithm and a review of the commonly used medications.