EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A TREAT-AND-EXTEND REGIMEN WITH AFLIBERCEPT IN TREATMENT-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TYPE 3 NEOVASCULARIZATION: A 52-Week, Single-Arm, Multicenter Trial

INCIDENCE AND TIMING OF PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENT AND SUBRETINAL FLUID DEVELOPMENT IN TYPE 3 MACULAR NEOVASCULARIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and timing of pigment epithelial detachment (PED) and subretinal fluid (SRF) development in type 3 macular neovascularization.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 84 patients who were diagnosed with treatment-naïve type 3 macular neovascularization who did not show SRF at diagnosis. All patients were initially treated with three loading injections of ranibizumab or aflibercept. After the initial loading injections, as-needed regimen was performed for retreatment. The development of either PED or SRF was identified. The incidence and timing of PED development in patients without PED at diagnosis and that of SRF development in patients with PED at diagnosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 41.3 ± 20.7 months after diagnosis. Among the 32 patients without serous PED at diagnosis, PED developed in 20 (62.5%) at a mean of 10.9 ± 5.1 months after diagnosis. PED development was noted within 12 months in 15 patients (46.8%; 75.0% among the PED development cases). In 52 patients with serous PED and without SRF at diagnosis, 15 developed SRF (28.8%) at a mean of 11.2 ± 6.4 months after diagnosis. SRF development was noted within 12 months in nine patients (17.3%; 66.6% among the SRF development cases).

CONCLUSION

PED and SRF developed in a substantial proportion of patients with type 3 macular neovascularization. The average period of development of these pathologic findings was within 12 months of diagnosis, suggesting the need for active treatment during the early treatment period to improve treatment outcomes.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monotherapy or combined with verteporfin photodynamic therapy for retinal angiomatous proliferation: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Purpose: To assess functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy versus combined with verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) for Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation (RAP). Methods: Studies reporting outcomes of intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy and/or in combination with verteporfin PDT in RAP eyes with a follow-up ≥ 12 months were searched. The primary outcome was the mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months. Mean change in central macular thickness (CMT) and mean number of injections were considered as secondary outcomes. The mean difference (MD) between pre- and post-treatment values was calculated along with 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI). Meta-regressions were performed to assess the influence of anti-VEGF number of injections on BCVA and CMT outcomes. Results: Thirty-four studies were included. A mean gain of 5.16 letters (95% CI = 3.30-7.01) and 10.38 letters (95% CI = 8.02-12.75) was shown in the anti-VEGF group and combined group, respectively (anti-VEGF group vs. combined group, p < 0.01). A mean CMT reduction of 132.45 µm (95% CI = from -154.99 to -109.90) and 213.93 µm (95% CI = from -280.04 to -147.83) was shown in the anti-VEGF group and combined group, respectively (anti-VEGF group vs. combined group, p < 0.02). A mean of 4.9 injections (95% CI = 4.2-5.6) and 2.8 injections (95% CI = 1.3-4.4) were administered over a 12-month period in the anti-VEGF group and combined group, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed no influence of injection number on visual and CMT outcomes. High heterogeneity was found across studies for both functional and anatomical outcomes. Conclusion: A combined approach with anti-VEGF and PDT could provide better functional and anatomical outcomes in RAP eyes compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy.

Difference in characteristics and lesion reactivation between type 3 macular neovascularization with and without subretinal fluid at baseline

PURPOSE

To compare the characteristics and incidence rates of lesion reactivation after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV) with and without subretinal fluid (SRF) at baseline.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 95 patients diagnosed with type 3 MNV. After the initial loading injections, re-treatment was performed when lesion reactivation occurred defined as the re-accumulation of subretinal or intraretinal fluid or the new development of a retinal/subretinal hemorrhage. The differences in the baseline characteristics and the incidence rates of lesion reactivation were compared between patients with SRF (SRF group, n = 42) and those without SRF (non-SRF group, n = 53).

RESULTS

At diagnosis, the mean visual acuity was worse (0.68 ± 0.41 vs 0.50 ± 0.36; P = 0.032), mean central retinal thickness was greater (515.4 ± 145.9 μm vs 383.8 ± 105.5 μm; P < 0.001), and the incidence of focal retinal hemorrhages was higher (90.5% vs 66.0%; P = 0.005) in the SRF group than in the non-SRF group. In the SRF group, the first lesion reactivation was noted in 89.7% at a mean of 5.8 ± 4.4 months after the third injection. In the non-SRF group, the first lesion reactivation was noted in 70.6% at a mean of 6.1 ± 3.8 months. There was a significant difference in lesion reactivation between the two groups (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in the baseline characteristics and incidence of lesion reactivation between type 3 MNV with and without SRF suggests that the presence of SRF may be indicative of more advanced disease with a high risk of visual deterioration. This result also suggests the need for more active treatment to preserve vision in patients with SRF.

Comparison of 24-month treatment outcomes between as-needed treatment and switching to treat-and-extend in type 3 macular neovascularization

This study aimed to compare 24-month treatment outcomes between patients with type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV) treated using an as-needed regimen and those who switched to treat-and-extend (TAE). This retrospective study included 32 patients who were initially treated with an as-needed regimen but switched to TAE (TAE group) and 74 patients who were treated with an as-needed regimen throughout the follow-up period (as-needed group). The number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and degree of change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over 24 months were compared between the two groups. The incidence of fibrotic scarring, tears of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and subretinal hemorrhage was also evaluated. The number of anti-VEGF injections was higher in the TAE group (mean: 11.7) than in the as-needed group (mean: 6.9; P < 0.001). The BCVA outcome (measured using the mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) was significantly better in the TAE group (mean improvement of logMAR 0.15) than in the as-needed group (mean deterioration of logMAR 0.15). The incidence of fibrotic scarring (6.3% vs. 18.9%), RPE tears (3.1% vs. 6.8%), and subretinal hemorrhage (0% vs. 9.5%) was relatively lower in the TAE group. Treatment outcomes of the TAE group were better than those of the as-needed group, suggesting that switching to the TAE regimen would be a useful approach for patients with type 3 MNV requiring efficient treatment.

LONG-TERM CHANGES IN CHOROIDAL THICKNESS IN EYES WITH TYPE 3 MACULAR NEOVASCULARIZATION

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) in eyes with Type 3 macular neovascularization that underwent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed with 47 patients diagnosed with Type 3 macular neovascularization and treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. All the patients initially received three loading injections. The SCT was compared at diagnosis, 3 months, 12 months, and at the final follow-up visit. The velocity of changes in SCT was also compared between each period.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 52.1 ± 11.0 months. The mean SCT was 143.3 ± 51.2 µm at diagnosis, and it had significantly decreased to 128.6 ± 47.4 µm at 3 months (P < 0.001), 123.2 ± 45.7 µm at 12 months (P < 0.001), and 110.0 ± 43.0 µm at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). The mean velocity of the decrease in SCT was 4.9 ± 3.9 µm per month during the first 3 months, 0.6 ± 1.2 µm per month between the 3rd and the 12th months, and 0.3 ± 0.3 µm per month between the 12th month and the final follow-up. The velocity of the decrease was significantly greater during the first 3 months than during the 3rd to 12th month (P < 0.001) and 12th month to final follow-up (P < 0.001) periods. The difference was not significant between the 3rd to 12th month and 12th months to final follow-up (P = 0.836) periods.

CONCLUSION

Subfoveal choroidal thickness continuously decreased over time, with a significant decrease of 23% noted in eyes with Type 3 macular neovascularization. The thickness rapidly decreased during the initial loading phase. Subsequently, a continuous but gradual decrease in the thickness was noted.

Intravitreal aflibercept partially reverses severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy in treatment-naïve patients

Objective

To evaluate whether diabetic retinopathy can be reversed after aflibercept, based on improvements in diabetic macular edema, hard exudates (HEs) of the posterior pole, and retinal microaneurysms (MAs).

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective study of 30 patients (34 eyes) with severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) who were treated between August and October 2018. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), area of HEs, and number of MAs were compared before and after treatment.

Results

The mean patient age was 61.4 ± 7.1 years; 14 patients (46.7%) were men. The mean number of injections per patient was 3.5 ± 0.5. The time between the last injection and the last follow-up was 82 days (range, 78–110 days). Six months after the first intravitreal injection, significant improvement was observed in BCVA (from 0.70 ± 0.18 to 0.42 ± 0.19 logMAR), CFT (from 377.17 ± 60.41 to 261.21 ± 31.50 µm), and number of MAs (from 182.2 ± 77.4 to 101.5 ± 59.6). Observations over 6 months after the first intravitreal injection showed a statistically significant reduction in the area of HEs (P = 0.007). No adverse events occurred during the treatment period.

Conclusion

Diabetic retinopathy might be partially reversed by aflibercept treatment, as indicated by BCVA, CFT, number of MAs, and area of HEs.

Difference in treatment burden of neovascular age-related macular degeneration among different types of neovascularization

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in the treatment burden among different types of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 431 patients who were diagnosed with neovascular AMD. Patients were divided into three groups: type 1 or 2 neovascularization group (n = 167), type 3 neovascularization group (n = 50), and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) group (n = 214). The number of hospital visits per year and the number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections per year were compared among these groups. Furthermore, the incidence of bilateral involvement during the follow-up period was compared among the groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 50.6 ± 11.3 months. The number of hospital visits per year was significantly higher in the type 1 or 2 neovascularization group (mean: 6.1 ± 1.5) and type 3 neovascularization (6.6 ± 1.6) than in the PCV group (6.0 ± 1.5) (P < 0.001). The number of anti-VEGF injections per year was significantly higher in type 3 neovascularization group (3.1 ± 1.7) than in the type 1 or 2 neovascularization group (2.3 ± 1.5) or the PCV group (2.3 ± 1.2) (P = 0.042). There was a significant difference in the incidence of bilateral involvement among patients in type 1 or 2 neovascularization group (20.4%), type 3 neovascularization group (46.0%), and the PCV group (15.4%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The high frequency of hospital visits and that of anti-VEGF injections in patients with type 3 neovascularization suggests high treatment burden in these patients. The high incidence of bilateral involvement could be one of the primary reasons for high treatment burden in patients with type 3 neovascularization.