RATES AND RISK FACTORS FOR RECURRENCE OF RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY AFTER LASER OR INTRAVITREAL ANTI–VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR MONOTHERAPY

Safety and efficacy of ripasudil eye drops in preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity: phase 1/2, open label, single-arm trial

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of ripasudil for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

STUDY DESIGN

Phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, 12-week clinical trial.

METHODS

Infants born with gestational age (GA) of ≤ 32 weeks or weight of ≤ 1500 g with zone I or II, ≥ stage 1, ROP in both eyes were enrolled. Ripasudil eye drops were administered to patients in both eyes. Phase 1 was a dose-escalation study (once daily for 1 week, then twice daily for 2 weeks); an additional dosing up to 9 weeks was allowed if no safety issues occurred. In phase 2, ripasudil was administered twice daily for up to 12 weeks. Adverse events were assessed. The proportion of patients with type 1 ROP progression, number of days for type 1 ROP progression, and progression to the most advanced ROP stage were estimated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four infants were enrolled (phase 1, n = 3; phase 2, n = 21). Nineteen and four patients experienced systemic and ocular adverse events, respectively. Efficacy endpoints were not different between the ripasudil and historical control groups. However, in the GA ≤ 27 weeks subgroup, fewer patients progressed to type 1 ROP in the ripasudil than in the historical control group (P = 0.09). In the GA ≤ 27 weeks subgroups, the 25th percentile for the number of days for type 1 ROP progression was 22 days in the historical control group and 44 days in the ripasudil group.

CONCLUSION

Ripasudil was safe and inhibited/delayed type 1 ROP progression, especially in infants with short GA.

Vascular development analysis: a study for tertiary anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy after second reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity

Purpose

To observe the vascular development results of tertiary anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy following spontaneous second reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

Methods

This retrospective study included 22 infants (42 eyes) with Type 1 or aggressive ROP (A-ROP) who received three anti-VEGF drug treatments for ROP from January 2018 to December 2022. The vascular growth, possible associated risk factors, and the retinal vascularization (DB/DF ratio) were assessed.

Results

The mean follow-up was 17.6 months. After the 3rd intravitreal injection, seven eyes showed complete vascularization (Group 1), while the remaining 35 eyes demonstrated persistent avascular retina (PAR) (Group 2). In Group 2, 17 eyes maintained a stable state and were classified in the regression subgroup. The other 18 eyes developed a 3rd reactivation (reactivation subgroup) and were treated with laser photocoagulation (LPC).Birth weight (BW) was significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 (p < 0.001). The decision tree analysis shows that only infants weighing more than 1,250 g (17.50%) had a chance to achieve complete retinal vascularization. The possibility of PAR was higher in patients with BW <1,250 g than ≥1,250 g (70.00% vs. 12.50%). In addition, most infants with BW ≥ 1,290 g and initial ROP disease in Zone I or posterior Zone II developed PAR.

Conclusion

Tertiary IVR can successfully treat a second ROP reactivation and improve peripheral retinal vascularization. BW is the most significant factor related to complete retinal vascularization. Our decision tree model may be helpful in predicting the prognosis of anti-VEGF drugs in the event of a second ROP reactivation.

Readmission After Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Discharge: The Importance of Social Drivers of Health

OBJECTIVE

To determine associations between sociodemographic and medical factors and odds of readmission after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit for infants with very low birth weight (<1500g).

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study using linked data from the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, California Vital Statistics, and the Child Opportunity Index (COI) 2.0. Infants with very low birth weight born from 2009 through 2018 in California were considered. Odds ratios of readmission within 30 days of discharge adjusting for infant medical factors, maternal sociodemographic factors, and birth hospital were calculated via multivariable logistic regression and fixed-effect logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 42 411 infants met inclusion criteria. Also, 8.5% of all infants were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. In addition to traditional medical risk factors, two sociodemographic factors were significantly associated with increased odds of readmission in adjusted models: payor other than private insurance for delivery [aOR = 1.25 (95% CI 1.14-1.36)] and maternal education of less than high school degree [aOR = 1.19 (95% CI 1.06-1.33)]. Neighborhood Child Opportunity Index was not associated with odds of readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Sociodemographic factors, including lack of private insurance and lower maternal educational attainment, are significantly and independently associated with increased odds of readmission after neonatal intensive care unit discharge, in addition to traditional medical risk factors. Socioeconomic deprivation and health literacy may contribute to risk of readmission. Targeted discharge interventions focused on addressing social drivers of health warrant exploration.

Comparison of different agents and doses of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (aflibercept, bevacizumab, conbercept, ranibizumab) versus laser for retinopathy of prematurity: A network meta-analysis

Laser photocoagulation (LPC) and/or intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections constitute the current standard treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). This network meta-analysis focus on whether a ranking of interventions may be established for different dose levels of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents (aflibercept, bevacizumab, conbercept, ranibizumab) as primary treatments for ROP versus laser in terms of retreatment rate as primary outcome, and time to retreatment and refractive error as secondary endpoints, since best anti-VEGF dosage remains under debate. Sixty-eight studies (15 randomized control trials and 53 nonrandomized studies) of 12,356 eyes of 6445 infants were retrieved from databases (2005 Jan. - 2023 June). Studies were evaluated for model fit, risk of bias and confidence of evidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). Bayesian NMA showed that anti-VEGF drugs were not inferior to laser in terms of retreatment rate. For intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), doses half of the conventional infant dose showed a low risk of retreatment rate (risk ratio (RR) of 1.43; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.508, 4.03). On probability ranking as surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) plot, half dose of bevacizumab had a better position than conventional and augmented (1.2-2 times the regular dose) doses. A similar probability trend was observed for half vs. conventional doses of aflibercept and ranibizumab. Conventional infant dose of conbercept showed the lowest risk for retreatment (RR 0.846; 95% CrI: 0.245, 2.91). For secondary endpoints, lower doses of anti-VEGF agents were associated with shorter times to retreatment. The largest changes were noted for the augmented doses of bevacizumab and ranibizumab (0.3 mg) with means of 14.1 weeks (95% CrI: 6.65, 21.6) and 12.8 weeks (95% CrI: 3.19, 20.9), respectively. Finally, NMA demonstrated better refractive profile for anti-VEGF than laser therapy, especially for the conventional infant doses of bevacizumab and ranibizumab which exhibited a significantly better refractive profile than LPC, with mean differences of 1.67 (spherical equivalent - diopters) (95% CrI: 0.705, 2.67) and 2.19 (95% CrI: 0.782, 3.59), respectively. In the SUCRA plots, LPC had a markedly different position with a higher probability for myopia. Further clinical trials comparing different intravitreal doses of anti-VEGF agents are needed, but our findings suggest that low doses of these drugs retain efficacy and may reduce ocular and systemic undesired events.

Evaluating the causes of retinopathy of prematurity relapse following intravitreal bevacizumab injection

BACKGROUND

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a proliferative disorder of the developing retina. Intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVB) is an emerging treatment for severe forms of ROP, which does not restrict the visual field in comparison to laser therapy. The present study aimed to determine and evaluate the risk factors for ROP recurrence following IVB injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 98 eyes of 49 infants with ROP who had received IVB injections as the primary treatment for type 1 ROP are included.

RESULTS

Fifty-four eyes (55.1%) had aggressive retinopathy of prematurity (A-ROP), and forty-four (44.9%) had Stage III Plus ROP in Zone II. ROP recurred in 13 eyes (13.26%) of 8 infants. The mean period between IVB and the ROP recurrence was 8.08 (95% CI:5.32-10.83) weeks. The infants who had ROP recurrence had lower birth weight (P value = 0.002), lower postmenstrual age at IVB injection (P value = 0.001), lower IVB injection gap period from birth (P value = 0.044), higher oxygen therapy requirement rate after IVB injection (P value < 0.001, OR:19.0) and higher oxygen therapy duration (P value = 0.006). The ROP severity, gestational age at birth, and diet were not statistically different between the recurrence and complete regression groups. Out of 13 eyes treated with laser photocoagulation because of ROP relapse, macula dragging occurred in one eye, and all the cases met the complete regression.

CONCLUSION

Low birth weight and oxygen therapy are the most important risk factors for ROP relapse, which requires meticulous oxygen treatment guidelines for premature infants.

Treated Cases of Retinopathy of Prematurity in Germany: 10-Year Data from the Retina.net Retinopathy of Prematurity Registry

PURPOSE

To analyze changes in demographic parameters and retreatment patterns over a 10-year period in a clinical routine setting of infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment documented in the German Retina.net ROP registry.

DESIGN

Multicenter, noninterventional, observational registry study recruiting patients treated for ROP.

SUBJECTS

A total of 692 eyes of 353 infants treated for ROP were documented in the Retina.net ROP registry over a 10-year period between 2011 and 2020. These cases cover about 15% of all infants treated for ROP in Germany.

METHODS

The Retina.net ROP registry was established in 2012 to jointly collect information on infants treated for ROP. The database collects information on demographic parameters (gestational age [GA], birth weight, neonatal comorbidities) as well as treatment parameters (type of treatment, weight and age at treatment, and stage of ROP). A total of 19 centers contributed to the analysis. This is the 10-year analysis of data from 2011 to 2020, in which we focus on changes over time regarding the respective parameters.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes over time in demographic parameters and treatment patterns for ROP in Germany.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of treatment requiring ROP was 3.5% of all infants screened for ROP at participating centers. Gestational age, weight at birth, and weight at treatment remained stable over the 10-year period, whereas postmenstrual and postnatal age at treatment increased moderately but statistically significantly over the years. The most prevalent ROP severity stage at treatment was stage 3+ in zone II (76.6% of all treated eyes). Treatment patterns changed considerably from predominantly laser treatments in 2011 (75% of all treated eyes) to predominantly ranibizumab treatments in 2020 (60.9% of all treated eyes). The overall retreatment rate was 15.6%. Retreatment rates differed between initial treatment modalities (14.1% after laser coagulation, 12% after bevacizumab and 24.5% after ranibizumab). Treatment-associated systemic or ophthalmic complications were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

This data analysis represents one of the largest documented cohorts of infants treated for ROP. The data on demographic parameters and treatment patterns provide useful information for further improvement of ROP management.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Clinical Risk Factors for Retinopathy of Prematurity Reactivation after Intravitreal Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rate and risk factors for reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after intravitreal injection (IVI) of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents.

STUDY DESIGN

Infants who received IVI therapy between 2017 and 2022 were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: those with and without ROP reactivation. Information on ROP variables and patient variables were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 114 infants with 223 eyes were enrolled in the study. The ROP reactivation rate was 11.4% of infants (9.9% of eyes). The mean duration of reactivation was 84 ± 45 days. Among the 223 eyes treated with IVI, reactivation rates were 6% for bevacizumab, 13.9% for aflibercept, and 22.2% for ranibizumab. A multivariable regression model showed that ranibizumab was an independent risk factor (OR 11.4, P = .008) for reactivation. Other risk factors included infants with periventricular leukomalacia (OR 13.8, P = .003), patent ductus arteriosus ligation (OR 10.7, P = .032), and infants who still required invasive mechanical ventilation on the day of IVI therapy (OR 7.0, P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

All anti-VEGF agents carry a risk of ROP reactivation, with the risk being greater with ranibizumab 0.25 mg than with bevacizumab 0.625 mg. Reactivation of ROP should be assessed vigilantly, especially in those infants with increased risks. Future research to determine the optimal anti-VEGF selection and dosage in high-risk infants is warranted.

The efficacy and ocular safety following aflibercept, conbercept, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and laser for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is typically treated with laser photocoagulation and/or intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). To the best of our knowledge, most systematic reviews have focused on comparing anti-VEGF against laser treatment while comparisons between different anti-VEGF agents are lacking. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different anti-VEGF agents or laser after primary ROP therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases up to November 2022. We included studies that used anti-VEGF or laser for ROP with comparable cohorts.

RESULTS

Overall, 44 studies were included in this meta-analysis. When comparing anti-VGEF with laser, we found that the anti-VEGF group had a significantly higher retreatment rate (RR = 1.56, 95%CI = [1.06, 2.31], p = 0.03), a longer time from treatment to retreatment (WMD = 5.99 weeks, 95%CI = [4.03, 7.95], p < 0.001), a lower retinal detachment rate (RR = 0.55, 95%CI = [0.30, 0.91], p = 0.02), higher spherical equivalent (WMD = 1.69D, 95%CI = [0.61, 2.77], p = 0.002), lower myopia rate (RR = 0.69, 95%CI = [0.50, 0.97], p = 0.03) and lower anisometropia rate (RR = 0.44, 95%CI = [0.29, 0.67], p = 0.0001). In comparisons between ranibizumab and bevacizumab, the intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) group was associated with higher recurrence rate (RR = 2.02, 95%CI = [1.49, 2.73], p < 0.0001), higher retreatment rate (RR = 1.70, 95%CI = [1.17, 2.47], p = 0.0006), and lower high myopia rate (RR = 0.31, 95%CI = [0.12, 0.77], p = 0.01). Similarly, when compared to aflibercept and conbercept, the IVR cohort also demonstrated higher recurrence and retreatment rates. While no significant differences were observed in any of the variables included in the statistical analysis in the comparison between bevacizumab and aflibercept.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-VEGF was associated with higher retreatment and lesser incidence of myopia as compared to laser. Laser therapy was linked to more complications like retinal detachment and myopia. Ranibizumab exhibited higher recurrence and retreatment rates compared to bevacizumab, aflibercept, and conbercept.

Comparison of post-treatment recurrence between ranibizumab injection and laser photocoagulation for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity

OBJECTIVE

To compare post-treatment recurrence between ranibizumab injection and laser photocoagulation (LP) for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and explore the associated risk factors.

METHODS

The clinical data of ROP infants treated with LP or ranibizumab in a NICU of China from October 2007 to November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and compared, such as general condition, degree of ROP, therapeutic effectiveness and post-treatment recurrence. The dependent variable was recurrence after ROP treatment. Univariate and regression analysis of risk factors was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 298 ROP infants (556 eyes), 58% of the eyes were treated with LP and the other 42% with ranibizumab. There was no significant difference in gestational age at birth, birth weight, sex, delivery mode, prenatal corticosteroids, ROP diagnosed before admission or after admission, and the duration of oxygen therapy between the two groups. However, the ratio of type 1 ROP and aggressive retinopathy of prematurity (A-ROP) in ranibizumab group was higher than that in LP group. The number of treatments, recurrence rate and recurrence interval in ranibizumab group were higher than those in LP group. However, there was no difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups after stratified analysis by the lesion area and the presence or absence of A-ROP. There was no significant difference in the final lesion regression between the two groups. Regression analysis showed that plus disease and ROP located in zone I were independent risk factors for post-treatment recurrence.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in the recurrence rate of ROP between ranibizumab injection and LP, and recurrence is mainly related to the severity of ROP. In half of our patients treated with A-ROP recurrences occur.

Comparison in Retreatments between Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To compare the types and dosages of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) to ascertain whether specific dosages or types of injection were associated with retreatment in clinical practice in the United States.

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective, consecutive series.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated with anti-VEGF injections from 2007 to 2021.

METHODS

Sixteen sites from the United States participated. Data collected included demographics, birth characteristics, examination findings, type and dose of anti-VEGF treatment, retreatment rates, and time to retreatment. Comparisons of retreatment rates between bevacizumab and ranibizumab intravitreal injections were made.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relative rate of retreatment between varying types of anti-VEGF therapy, including bevacizumab and ranibizumab, and the various dosages used for each.

RESULTS

Data from 873 eyes of 661 patients (61% male and 39% female) were collected. After exclusion of 40 eyes treated with laser before anti-VEGF injection and 266 eyes re-treated with laser at or beyond 8 weeks after the initial anti-VEGF treatment, 567 eyes of 307 patients (63% male and 37% female) remained and were included in the primary analysis. There was no difference between the no retreatment and retreatment groups in terms of birthweight, gestational age, age at first injection, ROP stages, or number of involved clock hours. The retreatment group had a larger percentage of aggressive ROP (34% vs. 18%, P < 0.001) and greater percentage of zone 1 ROP (49 vs. 34%, P = 0.001) than the no retreatment group. Ranibizumab use was associated with a higher rate of retreatment than bevacizumab use (58% vs. 37%, P < 0.001), whereas the rate of retreatment was not associated with a specific dose of ranibizumab (R2 = 0.67, P = 0.32). Meanwhile, lower doses of bevacizumab were associated with higher rates of retreatment compared with the higher doses (R2 = 0.84, P = 0.01). There was a dose-specific trend with higher doses trending toward lower retreatments for bevacizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

In a multicenter study of ROP patients initially treated with anti-VEGF therapy, ranibizumab and lower-dose bevacizumab use were associated with an increased rate of retreatment when compared with higher-dose bevacizumab.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Comparison of adverse events between intravitreal anti-VEGF and laser photocoagulation for treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To synthesize existing evidence on adverse events, complications, and unfavorable outcomes of current treatment modalities for treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity (TR-ROP).

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, EMBASE, Trip Database, and the gray literature available were searched. Randomized Clinical Trials and observational studies comparing the adverse events of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, pegaptanib, conbercept) and laser photocoagulation (LPC) as treatment modalities for infants with TR-ROP were included. The main outcomes compared between the two treatment modalities were: 1. Refractive Errors and Biometry Parameters, 2. Adverse events, complications, and unfavorable outcomes, 3. Disease Recurrence/Disease Regression/Need for retreatment, 4. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes.

RESULTS

Higher quality studies concluded that LPC leads to greater rates of myopia than intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment while the rate of adverse events and of unfavorable neurodevelopmental outcomes is similar. However, there was controversy among the included studies concerning the rate of ROP recurrence between intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and LPC.

CONCLUSION

There is need for future primary studies assessing the adverse events of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections compared with LPC as treatment modalities for infants with TR-ROP.

Structural and refractive outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab followed by laser photocoagulation for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity

PURPOSE

To evaluate refractive and structural outcomes for patients treated for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent ranibizumab and "delayed laser," defined as any laser photocoagulation treatment administered at least 2 weeks and <1 year after the initial anti-VEGF injection.

METHODS

The medical records of infants with type 1 ROP treated between 2015 and 2020 with intravitreal 0.25 mg ranibizumab followed by delayed laser photocoagulation, with a minimum of 6 months' follow-up, were reviewed retrospectively. Refractive and structural outcomes were extracted from the record.

RESULTS

A total of 68 eyes of 34 neonates were included, with median gestational age of 24 weeks and birthweight of 657 g. Patients were aged 0.9 to 4.4 years at last follow-up; mean follow-up interval was 2.7 ± 1.02 years. There was no progression to stage 4 or 5 following treatment during the study period. At 2 years' follow-up (mean age, 2.41 ± 0.23 years), median spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.13 D (IQR, 4.20 D). At most recent examination (mean age, 2.70 ± 1.02 years), the most common ocular findings included strabismus (32%), optic atrophy (24%), amblyopia (21%), high myopia (7%), and nystagmus (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our small cohort, neonates with type 1 ROP treated with intravitreal ranibizumab and delayed laser demonstrated good structural outcomes, with no progression to retinal detachment. We found lower rates of high myopia compared with previous reports of laser photocoagulation monotherapy.

Comparison of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab versus bevacizumab for treatment of type 1 and aggressive retinopathy of prematurity in rural Egypt. A randomized clinical trial

Objective

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) monotherapy compared with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) monotherapy for treatment of type 1 and aggressive retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in rural Egypt.

Methods

36 eyes of 18 infants with bilateral aggressive or type 1 ROP were recruited between September 2020 and September 2022. Mean follow-up duration was 16.53 months. IVB was injected in the right eye and IVR in the left eye, rescue injection of the same initial anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in case of ROP reactivation. Outcome measures included regression achieved either by single injection or multiple injections or additional laser therapy at 55 weeks’ postmenstrual age (PMA), recurrence of ROP, total retinal vascularisation time and complications.

Results

Initial regression of ROP within 1 week occurred in 11/18 eyes (61.1%) in bevacizumab group and 15/18 eyes (83.3%) in ranibizumab group (p=0.137). Primary outcome measure was achieved in 14/18 eyes (77.8%) and 16/18 eyes (88.9%) in bevacizumab and ranibizumab groups, respectively (p=0.658). Late reactivation requiring retreatment with anti-VEGF was encountered in 4/18 eyes (22.2%) and 1/18 eyes (5.6%) in bevacizumab and ranibizumab groups, respectively (p=0.338). Peripheral laser therapy on the avascular retina was done in 3/18 eyes (16.7%) in each group at mean of 55.67 weeks' PMA.

Conclusion

Bevacizumab and ranibizumab proved to be effective regarding regression of acute ROP and continuing peripheral retinal vascularisation. Higher proportion of reactivation with bevacizumab, however, clinically non-significant. Laser therapy can be postponed to reduce its complications.

Trial registration number

NCT05033106.

A Network Meta-Analysis of Retreatment Rates following Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, and Laser for Retinopathy of Prematurity

TOPIC

To compare bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, and laser treatment as primary therapies for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in terms of retreatment rate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Anti-VEGF agents are increasingly used as primary treatment for ROP and may provide superior outcomes compared with laser in posterior disease. Head-to-head comparisons between different anti-VEGFs are lacking.

METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized comparative studies that had been reported as of March 2022. We included studies that used bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept or laser for ROP with comparable cohorts and treatment criteria. Studies were evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, and those with biased case selection, nonrandomized case-control, or lack of control group were excluded. Frequentist meta-analyses of proportions determined the absolute primary retreatment rate of each modality and Bayesian network meta-analyses compared pairs of treatments in type 1 and Zone I ROP.

RESULTS

In all, 30 studies (4686 eyes) were included in the network meta-analyses. For type 1 ROP, single-treatment success rates (i.e., likelihood of needing no further treatment) were 89.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.8%-93.8%; n = 1552) for laser, 87.0% (95% CI: 78.6%-93.8%; n = 2081) for bevacizumab, 80.7% (95% CI: 62.0%-94.4%; n = 326) for aflibercept, and 74.0% (95% CI: 62.7%-84.1%; n = 727) for ranibizumab. Bayesian network meta-analysis indicates that laser treatment is associated with a significant 62% (95% credible interval [CrI]: 16%-83%) reduction in retreatment risk compared with ranibizumab, while no significant difference was found among other pairwise comparisons. The mean ± standard error of the mean times to secondary treatment following primary aflibercept (12.96 ± 0.47 weeks) and bevacizumab (11.36 ± 0.54 weeks) therapy were significantly longer than that for primary ranibizumab (9.29 ± 0.43weeks) therapy (P = 7 × 10^-7 and P = 9 × 10^-3, respectively). For Zone I ROP, single-treatment success rates were 91.2% (95% CI: 83.6-96.9; n = 231) for bevacizumab, 78.3% (95% CI: 61.4-91.9; n = 100) for ranibizumab, and 65.9% (95% CI: 41.4-87.2; n = 158) for laser treatment. In this case, Bayesian network meta-analysis suggests that primary bevacizumab is associated with a significant 67% (95% CrI:10%-90%) reduction in retreatment risk compared with laser treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser was associated with a lower rate of retreatment than ranibizumab in type 1 ROP (Zones I and II combined), while bevacizumab was associated with a lower rate of retreatment than laser in Zone I ROP. Aflibercept and bevacizumab demonstrate longer duration of action than ranibizumab for ROP.

[Risk factors for recurrence after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection for retinopathy of prematurity]

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection in the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and the risk factors for recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 159 infants with ROP who were born in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and underwent anti-VEGF treatment from January 2016 to December 2021. According to the presence or absence of recurrence within the follow-up period after initial anti-VEGF treatment, they were divided into a recurrence group with 24 infants and a non-recurrence group with 135 infants. The medical data were compared between the two groups, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the risk factors for the recurrence of ROP after anti-VEGF treatment.

RESULTS

After one-time anti-VEGF treatment, all 159 infants showed regression of plus disease. Recurrence was observed in 24 infants (15.1%) after anti-VEGF treatment, with a mean interval of (8.4±2.6) weeks from treatment to recurrence. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative fundus hemorrhage and prolonged total oxygen supply time were risk factors for the recurrence of ROP (P<0.05), while gestational hypertension was a protective factor (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection is effective for ROP. Preoperative fundus hemorrhage and long duration of oxygen therapy may increase the risk of ROP recurrence, and further studies are needed to investigate the influence of gestational hypertension on the recurrence of ROP.

Clinical outcome following reinjection of Ranibizumab for reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity

BACKGROUND

To assess reactivation after initial intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) or worse and the outcome following reinjection of ranibizumab for this reactivation.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed on infants screened for ROP between March 2013 and February 2020 in Mansoura University Children Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt. Infants treated with ranibizumab 0.25 mg/0.025 mL were identified for review of their clinical outcomes. Data of infants with reactivation and IVR re-injection were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 2318 infants were screened for ROP, 115 (5%) infants (216 eyes) with a mean gestational age of 30 ± 2.5 weeks and mean birth weight of 1290 ± 355.2 g received IVR at mean postmenstrual age (PMA) of 38 ± 3.1 weeks. All treated eyes demonstrated initial regression of ROP. However, ROP reactivation occurred in 5 (2.3%) eyes of 3 patients, at an average of 9.6 ± 2.9 weeks after treatment. None of these eyes had retinal detachment. A second dose IVR was administered and all five eyes showed regression with complete retinal vascularisation, at a mean PMA of 60 ± 5.1 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

IVR is beneficial as an initial and subsequent treatment for type 1 ROP or APROP. A long-term follow-up until complete retinal vascularisation is recommended to avoid disease reactivation.

ROP-like retinopathy in full/near-term newborns: A etiology, risk factors, clinical and genetic characteristics, prognosis and management

Purpose

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) like retinopathy (ROPLR) could occur in full/near-term newborns. The causes and clinical features are still largely elusive. This study focused on the risk factors, clinical and genetic characteristics, treatment and outcome, and prognosis of ROPLR.

Methods

A total of 47 consecutive full/near-term newborns during 2016–2017 with ROPLR were included. The clinical and genetic characteristics, treatment and outcome, prognosis, and potential underlying etiology of ROPLR were were analyzed.

Results

91 eyes of 47 infants were found to have ROPLR. The ROPLR regressed completely in 65.9% and partially in 20.9% of eyes without any interventions. Retinal changes of family exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) were allocated in 12 neonates (group A), perinatal hypoxia-ischemia were categorized in 17 neonates (group B), and the other 18 neonates were categorized in group C. Compared to those in group B/C, infants in group A had significantly more severe retinopathy (stage 4/5, p &lt; 0.001) and more treatments (p &lt; 0.00 risk factor 1).

Conclusions

Perinatal hypoxia-ischemia might be a major risk factor for ROPLR, in which spontaneous regression was common. FEVR, confirmed by positive family findings and genetic testing, might be the second risk factor of ROPLR, in which retinopathy is more severe and treatment is needed.

Time Course of Retinopathy of Prematurity Regression and Reactivation After Treatment with Ranibizumab or Laser in the RAINBOW Trial

PURPOSE

To study the time course of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) regression and reactivation after treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab or laser in the ranibizumab compared with laser therapy for the treatment of infants born prematurely with ROP trial.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of a randomized, clinical trial.

SUBJECTS

A total of 225 infants (448 eyes) were randomized to ranibizumab 0.2 mg (n = 74, 148 eyes), ranibizumab 0.1 mg (n = 77, 152 eyes), and laser (n = 74, 148 eyes).

METHODS

Features of disease regression were measured using time-to-event analysis per eye, corrected for within-subject association. Analyses of disease reactivation and additional treatments were descriptive.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Median time to regression of plus disease, stage 3 ROP, aggressive posterior (AP)-ROP to 24-week follow-up and disease reactivation and first additional treatment to 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The median times to regression after ranibizumab 0.2 mg vs. laser were as follows: plus disease, 4 vs. 16 days (P < 0.001); stage 3 ROP, 8 vs. 16 days (P = 0.004); and AP-ROP, 7.3 vs. 22 days (P = 0.03). Results for ranibizumab 0.1 mg were similar to those for 0.2 mg, with a median of 4, 9, and 8 days, respectively. Additional treatments were given in 34 (25%) of 138 eyes after laser and 40 (27%) of 146 and 42 (28%) of 152 eyes after 0.2 mg and 0.1 mg ranibizumab, respectively. Incomplete disease regression requiring additional treatment occurred in 30 (22%) of 138 eyes after laser after a median interval of 15 days compared with 11 (8%) of 146 and 9 (6%) of 152 after 0.2 mg and 0.1 mg ranibizumab after a median interval of 21 and 13 days, respectively. Retinopathy of prematurity reactivation requiring additional treatment occurred in 3 (2%) of 138 eyes after laser after a median interval of 43 days compared with 22 (15%) of 146 and 26 (17%) of 152 after 0.2 and 0.1 mg ranibizumab after a median interval of 53.5 (maximum, 105) and 54.5 days (maximum, 128), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal 0.2 or 0.1 mg ranibizumab induced a faster regression of plus disease, stage 3 ROP, and AP-ROP than laser did. Ranibizumab was associated with fewer additional treatments for incomplete disease regression but more for disease reactivation.

Repeated intravitreal ranibizumab for reactivated retinopathy of prematurity after intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy: vascular development analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the retinal vascularization of repeated intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for reactivated retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated with IVR monotherapy.

METHODS

The retrospective study reviewed ROP infants who accepted IVR injection as the first treatment in our department from January 2017 to December 2018. The ratio of the distance from the center of the optic disc to the border of the vascularized zone (DB) to the distance from the center of the disc to the fovea (DF) was used for the vascular outgrowth analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight infants were included in the study. A total of 54.3% of the reactivated ROP patients could achieve complete vascularization after repeated IVR injections. Gestational age (GA) > 29 weeks and a temporal DB/DF ratio ≥ 3 in the first IVR were potential predictors for complete retinal vascularization after IVR monotherapy. The temporal DB/DF ratio ≥ 3.6 in the second IVR injection was a potential predictor for complete retinal vascularization after repeated IVR for ROP reactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

Reactivated ROP after IVR monotherapy can be treated successfully with repeated IVR injections. GA and temporal DB/DF ratio are potential predictors of complete retinal vascularization in ROP infants treated with IVR.

Progression of retinal vascularization after intravitreal anti-vascular-endothelial growth factor therapy in retinopathy of prematurity

Background

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) therapy is now considered as one of standard therapies in approaching infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). The purpose of this study was to assess the time to full retinal vascularization in infants with ROP who were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study evaluated premature infants with ROP who were treated with IVB between 2012 and 2019. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the medical records and analyzed. Main outcomes were defined as time to complete vascularization and time of zone shift.

Results

Eight hundred sixty-five eyes from 441 patients were included. Average gestational age and birth weight were 28 ± 4 weeks and 1121 ± 624 g, respectively. Primary treatment failure and reactivation occurred in 35 eyes (4.0%) and 33 eyes (3.8%), respectively. Recurrent ROP occurred significantly more frequently in infants with pre-treatment zone 1 ROP compared to those with zone 2 ROP (7.6% versus 3%, p < 0.01). Patients with pre-treatment zone 2 reached zone 3 faster than those with pre-treatment zone 1 (142 ± 152 days versus 181 ± 174 days, p < 0.01); however, the time until full retinal vascularization did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.10).

Conclusion

This study revealed that pre-treatment ROP zone was associated with ROP reactivation rate but not with time to full vascularization in those treated with IVB.

Trial registration Retrospectively registered; IR.TUMS.FARABI.REC.1399.040

Ranibizumab in retinopathy of prematurity - one-year follow-up of ophthalmic outcomes and two-year follow-up of neurodevelopmental outcomes from the CARE-ROP study

Purpose:

The primary endpoint results from the comparing alternative ranibizumab dosages for safety and effcacy in retinopathy of prematurity (CARE-ROP) core study identified ranibizumab as an effective treatment to control acute retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). This study reports the 1- and 2-year follow-up data focusing on long-term functional outcomes and safety.

Methods:

The CARE-ROP trial compared 0.12 mg versus 0.20 mg ranibizumab in 20 infants with ROP in a multicentric, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study design. Sixteen patients entered the follow-up period. An ophthalmologic assessment at one year postbaseline was acquired from all 16 patients and a neurodevelopmental assessment at two years postbaseline was acquired from 15 patients.

Results:

Fifteen of 16 infants were able to fixate and follow moving objects at one year postbaseline treatment. One child progressed to stage 5 ROP bilaterally between the end of the core study and the 1-year follow-up (first seen at PMA 75 weeks). Mean spherical equivalents were −1.9 diopters (D) and −0.75 D in the 0.12 mg and the 0.20 mg treatment arms. Strabismus was present in seven and nystagmus in five out of 16 infants. Mental development scores were within normal limits in six out of ten patients with available data. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment arms.

Conclusion:

Neurodevelopmental and functional ocular outcomes 1 and 2 years after treatment with ranibizumab are reassuring regarding long-term safety. Late reactivation of ROP, however, represents a challenge during the follow-up phase and it is of utmost importance that regular follow-ups are maintained.

Cognitive Outcomes Following Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Retinopathy of Prematurity: 4- to 6-Year Outcomes in a Prospective Cohort

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term cognitive outcomes in children who underwent intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

This single-center study enrolled 186 children between 3 and 6 years of age and included 101 children in the final analysis: premature without ROP (group 1), ROP not needing treatment (group 2), IVB monotherapy (group 3), IVB plus laser therapy (group 4), and laser monotherapy (group 5). The Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) was evaluated by the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence Test at baseline and then annually for 1-2 years and compared among groups.

RESULTS

The age at cognitive evaluation was 4.5-4.9 years at baseline and 6.1-7.0 years at the last follow-up. The FSIQ was comparable among the groups at both time points (P = .08 and .50, respectively). Severe cognitive impairment (FSIQ < 70) was more common in group 4 at baseline (4%, 22%, 13%, 33%, and 0% in groups 1-5, respectively; P = .03) but did not differ among the groups at the last follow-up (6%, 0%, 4%, 22%, and 0%; P = .22). After adjusting for sex, Apgar score, neonatal adverse events, and days on mechanical ventilation, IVB was not associated with FSIQ either at baseline or at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

At 4.5 to beyond 6 years of age, children who underwent IVB monotherapy had comparable cognitive outcomes compared to the other premature children without prior IVB. Children who underwent IVB plus laser showed higher severe cognitive impairment at 4.5 years of age.

Characteristics of Eyes Developing Retinal Detachment After Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity

BACKGROUND

We investigated the incidence and clinical characteristics of eyes showing retinal detachment (RD) after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 76 consecutive eyes of 45 patients (18 girls and 27 boys) with stage 3 ROP who received anti-VEGF therapy between January 2012 and August 2020 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months was conducted. Eyes were divided into two groups: the vitrectomy (V) group that required vitrectomy for RD after anti-VEGF therapy and the non-vitrectomy (non-V) group that did not require vitrectomy. Data were collected from patient charts, including sex, postmenstrual age (PMA) at birth, birth weight, PMA at anti-VEGF therapy, comorbidities, reactivation, examination interval, and subsequent vitrectomies.

RESULTS

The median PMA at birth was 24.7 (range, 22.1-29.3) weeks. Twenty-seven eyes (35.1%) exhibited ROP reactivation at 6.4 ± 3.1 weeks after anti-VEGF therapy. The V group included six eyes of five patients, all of whom exhibited reactivation and developed RD 10.1 ± 6.5 weeks after anti-VEGF therapy. The types of RD were conventional (classic) in two eyes and circumferential (unique to RD after anti-VEGF) in four eyes. Three eyes required repeated vitrectomy. All eyes, except one eye in the V group, achieved retinal attachment at the last examination. The non-V group included 70 eyes of 40 patients, of which 21 exhibited reactivation and were treated successfully with laser (17 eyes) or second anti-VEGF (4 eyes). The proportion of eyes with plus disease was significantly higher in the V group (50.0%) than in the non-V group (10.0%) (P = 0.035). V group included 3 of 22 eyes (13.6%) in which the interval between the last examination and the diagnosis of reactivation was <1 week and 3 of 5 eyes (60.0%) in which the interval was more than 1 week (P = 0.024). The two groups showed no significant differences in the other factors.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 8% of eyes developed RD about 10 weeks after anti-VEGF therapy for ROP. Eyes with history of plus disease should be carefully monitored at appropriate intervals after anti-VEGF therapy for ROP.

Assessment and management of retinopathy of prematurity in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)

The incidence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) continues to rise due to the improved survival of very low birth weight infants in developed countries. This epidemic is also fueled by increased survival of preterm babies with variable use of oxygen and a lack of ROP awareness and screening services in resource-limited regions. Improvements in technology and a basic understanding of the disease pathophysiology have changed the way we screen and manage ROP, educate providers and patients, and improve ROP awareness. Advancements in imaging techniques, expansion of telemedicine services, and the potential for artificial intelligence-assisted ROP screening programs have created opportunities to improve ROP care in areas with a shortage of ophthalmologists trained in ROP. To address the gap in provider knowledge regarding ROP, the Global Education Network for Retinopathy of Prematurity (GEN-ROP) created a web-based tele-education training module that can be used to educate all providers involved in ROP, including non-physician ROP screeners. Over the past 50 years, the treatment of severe ROP has evolved from limited treatment modalities to cryotherapy and laser photocoagulation. More recently, there has been growing evidence to support the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents for the treatment of severe ROP. However, VEGF is known to be important in organogenesis and microvascular maintenance, and given that intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment can result in systemic VEGF suppression over a period of at least 1-12 weeks, there are concerns regarding adverse effects and long-term ocular and systemic developmental consequences of anti-VEGF therapy. Future research in ophthalmology to address the growing burden of ROP should focus on cost-effective fundus imaging devices, implementation of artificial intelligence platforms, updated treatment algorithms with optimal use of anti-VEGF and careful investigation of its long-term effects, and surgical options in advanced ROP. Addressing these unmet needs will aid the global effort against the ROP epidemic and optimize our understanding and treatment of this blinding disease.

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH REACTIVATION AFTER INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB OR RANIBIZUMAB THERAPY IN INFANTS WITH RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and risk factors of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injection (anti-VEGF therapy) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 80 consecutive eyes of 43 patients with Type 1 ROP or worse who received anti-VEGF therapy during January 2012-February 2018. Patients were divided into those who were injected with 0.25 mg of bevacizumab (IVB group, 37 eyes) and 0.25 mg of ranibizumab (IVR group, 43 eyes). Serum VEGF concentrations of 18 patients were measured before and after IVR.

RESULTS

Antivascular endothelial growth factor injection therapy reduced ROP activity in all eyes; however, 14 eyes (17.5%) exhibited reactivation. The reactivation rates of the IVB and IVR groups were 13.5% and 20.9%, respectively (P = 0.556). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that postmenstrual age ≤35 weeks at anti-VEGF therapy (P = 0.014) and aggressive posterior ROP (P = 0.044) was significantly associated with reactivation. Serum VEGF was significantly suppressed at Days 1 (P < 0.001) and 7 (P = 0.012) after IVR and returned to the preinjection level by Day 14 (P = 0.210).

CONCLUSION

Both IVR and IVB seemed effective in reducing ROP activity. Reactivation after anti-VEGF therapy may be associated with younger postmenstrual age at anti-VEGF therapy and aggressive posterior ROP.

Description and management of retinopathy of prematurity reactivation after intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the literature regarding reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after treatment with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Reactivation can occur after anti-VEGF or laser. Risk factors for reactivation include patient and disease-related factors. Various studies are evaluating the use of different anti-VEGF agents and reactivation rates. However, the definition of reactivation varies between studies.

SUMMARY

The literature has varied definitions of reactivation, which is often used interchangeably with recurrence. It is important to recognize features of reactivation of ROP to appropriately manage patients and conduct clinical trials. The International Classification of ROP 3rd edition has established a consensus guideline regarding terminology describing reactivation.

The results of intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy for treating aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity and Type 1 retinopathy of prematurity

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) monotherapy for aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (APROP) and Type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), along with recurrence rates and treatment outcomes for recurrences.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study reviewed the records of infants with ROP (Type 1 and APROP), who received IVB treatment between March 2013 and February 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 257 eyes from 130 cases (unilateral eyes in three cases) were included. Cases were followed for 121.7 ± 45.7 weeks (range: 70-260 weeks). Recurrence requiring treatment was determined in 14.8% of all eyes at a mean of 9.6 ± 2.7 weeks (range: 6-15 weeks) after initial treatment and a mean of 42.3 ± 2.2 weeks (range: 38-48 weeks) postmenstrual age. Recurrence requiring treatment was observed in 20.8% of APROP and 5.8% of Type 1 ROP eyes at a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). Persistent avascular areas were found in 54 eyes (25.8%) at the corrected age of 1 year, and prophylactic laser treatment was applied. This was statistically significantly higher in APROP (38.6%) than in Type 1 ROP (10.5%) (p < 0.001). An unfavourable structural outcome (progression to retinal detachment) occurred in one eye (0.4%), which developed insufficient regression and progression.

CONCLUSIONS

IVB monotherapy is effective for APROP and Type 1 ROP with Zone 1 and posterior Zone 2 localisation. However, because of recurrences requiring treatment and persistent peripheral avascular areas, severe, late complications must be considered, and follow-up examinations must be made. Prophylactic laser treatment for persistent avascular areas seems effective for minimising long-term complications.

Incidence and Factors of Postoperative Lens Opacity after Lens-Sparing Vitrectomy for Retinopathy of Prematurity

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence and factors associated with lens opacity after lens-sparing vitrectomy (LSV) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Among the 141 eyes of 94 patients who underwent LSV for ROP between 2006 and 2019, 108 eyes of 71 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months after LSV were investigated.

METHODS

Data were collected from patients' charts, including gender, gestational age at birth, birth weight, stage of ROP, postmenstrual age (PMA) at LSV, surgical procedure, preoperative injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, subsequent retinal surgeries, and lensectomy during follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Lens status at last visit, incidence and timing of lensectomy, and risk factors for lens opacity requiring lensectomy.

RESULTS

Stages of ROP at LSV were 4A, 4B, and 5 in 92 eyes, 13 eyes, and 3 eyes, respectively. The median PMA at LSV was 40.6 weeks. Thirty-two eyes received anti-VEGF therapy before LSV. Lens opacity was found in 17 eyes (15.7%), of which 10 eyes (9.3%) underwent lensectomy. The period between LSV and lensectomy ranged from 21 days to 131.9 months (median, 21.1 months). Eleven other eyes (10.2%) underwent lensectomy as part of a reoperation for worsening of ROP. A total of 80 eyes (74.1%) preserved clear lenses at the latest follow-up examination after surgery (median, 6.8 years; range, 1-14 years). The Kaplan-Meier estimate showed that the proportion of patients with phakia at 5 and 10 years was 92.4% and 89.0%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that eyes with the use of tamponade at LSV (P = 0.005; odds ratio [OR], 25.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.187-157.5) and young PMA at LSV (P = 0.033; OR, 1.047; 95% CI, 1.012-1.099) were associated significantly with lens opacity requiring lensectomy. However, anti-VEGF therapy was not associated with lens opacity requiring lensectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 10% of eyes required lensectomy because of lens opacity after LSV for ROP. The development of lens opacity requiring lensectomy seems to be associated with the use of tamponade and young PMA at LSV.