LONG-TERM CHANGES IN CHOROIDAL THICKNESS IN EYES WITH TYPE 3 MACULAR NEOVASCULARIZATION

CHARACTERISTICS PREDICTIVE OF FELLOW-EYE GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY WITHOUT NEOVASCULARIZATION IN UNILATERAL TYPE 3 MACULAR NEOVASCULARIZATION

PURPOSE

To evaluate the predictive characteristics of fellow-eye geographic atrophy (GA) without neovascularization in patients with unilateral Type 3 macular neovascularization.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 84 patients who were diagnosed with unilateral Type 3 macular neovascularization. Patients who developed fellow-eye neovascularization and those exhibiting GA without neovascularization at the final follow-up were included in the neovascularization and GA groups, respectively. The patient demographics and baseline fellow-eye characteristics were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 40.5 ± 11.5 months after diagnosis. Patients included in the GA group (n = 28) were significantly older (mean 77.4 ± 5.2 years vs. 74.2 ± 5.8 years, P = 0.016), had significantly thinner subfoveal choroidal thickness (mean 109.4 ± 36.8 µ m vs. 173.1 ± 77.6 µ m, P < 0.001), and had a significantly higher incidence of baseline GA (39.3% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.019) than those included in the neovascularization group (n = 56). In the multivariate analysis, subfoveal choroidal thickness showed a close negative association with the risk of GA rather than neovascularization ( P = 0.004, β = 0.982, 95% confidence interval = 0.970-0.994).

CONCLUSION

In patients with unilateral Type 3 macular neovascularization, older age, the presence of GA, and a thin choroid in the fellow eye were found to be indicative of a higher probability of progression toward fellow-eye GA instead of neovascularization may be potential candidates for future complement inhibitor treatments targeting fellow-eye GA.

Difference in Lesion Reactivation between Pure Type 2 and Mixed Type 1 and 2 Macular Neovascularization and its Influence on Long-Term Treatment Outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare lesion reactivation and treatment outcomes between pure type 2 and mixed type 1 and 2 macular neovascularization (MNV) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 155 patients diagnosed with type 2 MNV. After the initial loading injections, as-needed retreatment was provided. The difference in first lesion reactivation after the initial treatment was evaluated between pure type 2 MNV (pure type 2 group, n = 37) and mixed type 1 and 2 MNV (mixed group, n = 118). The degree of change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 32.7 ± 13.7 months. Lesion reactivation differed significantly between the type 2 (60.0%) and mixed (84.5%) (P = .004) groups. The degree of visual change during the follow-up period also differed significantly between the pure type 2 (mean 2.8 lines of improvement) and mixed (mean 0.2 lines of deterioration) (P = .008) groups. In multivariate analysis, lesion type (P = .012) and baseline visual acuity (P = .002) were significantly associated with ≥2 lines of visual improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesion reactivation and treatment outcomes differed between pure type 2 and mixed type 1 and 2 MNV. These results suggested the need for different treatment strategies for these two MNV subtypes.

Investigation of the Trend of Selecting Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents for the Initial Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the trend of selecting ranibizumab and aflibercept for the initial treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included 460 patients who were diagnosed with treatment-naïve neovascular AMD and PCV and were initially treated with either ranibizumab or aflibercept. The patients were divided into two groups: the ranibizumab group (n = 96) and the aflibercept group (n = 324). The patients’ characteristics and the proportion of the subtypes of macular neovascularization (MNV) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients in the ranibizumab group were significantly older (mean 74.3 ± 8.4 years) than those in the aflibercept group (mean 70.4 ± 8.8 years; p < 0.001). In the ranibizumab group, the proportions of type 1 or 2 MNV, type 3 MNV, and PCV were 50.0%, 27.1%, and 22.9%, respectively. In the aflibercept group, the proportions were 35.2%, 6.8%, and 58.0%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the proportion of MNV subtypes between the ranibizumab and aflibercept groups (p < 0.001). Ranibizumab was used in 54.2% of patients with type 3 MNVs. However, in patients with PCV, aflibercept was used in 89.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab was preferred as an initial treatment agent in older patients and those with type 3 MNV, whereas aflibercept was highly preferred in patients with PCV. The different characteristics and efficacy of the two agents may have partially contributed to this trend.