Surgical Observations From the First 120 Cases of Subretinal Gene Therapy for Inherited Retinal Diseases

Safety and Efficacy of Adeno-Associated Viral Gene Therapy in Patients With Retinal Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of ocular gene therapy using adeno-associated virus (AAV).

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for controlled or non-controlled interventional gene therapy studies using key words related to retinal diseases, gene therapy, and AAV vectors. The primary outcome measure was safety, based on ocular severe adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcome measures evaluated efficacy of the therapy based on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and improvements in visual sensitivity and systemic involvement following ocular delivery. Pooling was done using a DerSimonian Laird random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, version 1.

Results

Our search identified 3548 records. Of these, 80 publications met eligibility criteria, representing 28 registered clinical trials and 5 postmarket surveillance studies involving AAV gene therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), choroideremia, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinitis pigmentosa (RP), X-linked retinoschisis, and achromatopsia. Overall, AAV therapy vectors were associated with a cumulative incidence of at least one SAE of 8% (95% confidence intervals [CIs] of 5% to 12%). SAEs were often associated with the surgical procedure rather than the therapeutic vector itself. Poor or inconsistent reporting of adverse events (AEs) were a limitation for the meta-analysis. The proportion of patients with any improvement in BCVA and visual sensitivity was 41% (95% CIs of 31% to 51%) and 51% (95% CIs of 31% to 70%), respectively. Systemic immune involvement was associated with a cumulative incidence of 31% (95% CI = 21% to 42%).

Conclusions

AAV gene therapy vectors appear to be safe but the surgical procedure required to deliver them is associated with some risk. The large variability in efficacy can be attributed to the small number of patients treated, the heterogeneity of the population and the variability in dosage, volume, and follow-up.

Translational Relevance

This systematic review will help to inform and guide future clinical trials.

Visual Acuity, Retinal Morphology, and Patients' Perceptions after Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl for RPE65-Associated Retinal Disease

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of patient's age, baseline visual acuity, and intraoperative foveal detachment on outcomes of subretinal voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (VN, Luxturna®) therapy and to assess patients' perceptions of the treatment effect.

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective, consecutive case series and cross-sectional prospective survey.

SUBJECTS

All 41 consecutive patients treated with VN after FDA approval at three institutions between January 2018 and May 2020.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of operative reports, clinical notes, ancillary testing and complications, comparing data at baseline and 1, 2-3, 6-9, and 10-15 months after subretinal surgery. A survey was administered to adult patients and parents of pediatric patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in BCVA and retinal morphology, and patients' perceptions.

RESULTS

77 eyes of 41 patients (16 adults and 25 children, range 2-44 years, mean follow-up 10 months, range 1 week to 18.5 months) were analyzed. There was no statistically significant vision change for the adults, whereas there was a trend of improvement for children that reached statistical significance for some time points but not all. At the last follow-up, 14/48 (29%) pediatric and 3/26 (12%) adult eyes improved ≥2 lines (p=0.15). Baseline VA did not have an effect on post-therapy VA (p=0.23). Central foveal thickness decreased mildly in both children and adults, without significant difference between the populations. The fovea was detached by VN in 62 eyes (81%). Inner segment-outer segment junction remained unchanged in 91% of 54 eyes with gradable OCTs, with or without foveal detachment. Thirty-two patients (78%) were reached for the survey an average of 1.15±0.50 years (range 0.31 to 2.31) after surgery in the first eye. Improvement in night, day, and/or color vision was reported by 23 (72%), 22 (69%), and 18 (56%) patients respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is limited by large variability in follow-up time. There were no persistent statistical significant vision changes. A decrease in foveal thickness was noted in most eyes. The long-term significance of this remains to be determined.

The safety and efficacy of gene therapy treatment for monogenic retinal and optic nerve diseases: A systematic review

PURPOSE

This study aimed to systematically review and summarize gene therapy treatment for monogenic retinal and optic nerve diseases.

METHODS

This review was prospectively registered (CRD42021229812). A comprehensive literature search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central, and clinical trial registries (February 2021). Clinical studies describing DNA-based gene therapy treatments for monogenic posterior ocular diseases were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias evaluation was performed. Data synthesis was undertaken applying Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines.

RESULTS

This study identified 47 full-text publications, 50 conference abstracts, and 54 clinical trial registry entries describing DNA-based ocular gene therapy treatments for 16 different genetic variants. Study summaries and visual representations of safety and efficacy outcomes are presented for 20 unique full-text publications in RPE65-mediated retinal dystrophies, choroideremia, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, rod-cone dystrophy, achromatopsia, and X-linked retinoschisis. The most common adverse events were related to lid/ocular surface/cornea abnormalities in subretinal gene therapy trials and anterior uveitis in intravitreal gene therapy trials.

CONCLUSION

There is a high degree of variability in ocular monogenic gene therapy trials with respect to study design, statistical methodology, and reporting of safety and efficacy outcomes. This review improves the accessibility and transparency in interpreting gene therapy trials to date.