TWELVE-MONTH OUTCOME AFTER ONE INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF BEVACIZUMAB TO TREAT MYOPIC CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION

Treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization: a network meta-analysis and review

PURPOSE

This is, to our knowledge, the first network meta-analysis aiming to compare all treatment modalities for myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

METHODS

After the electronic databases were searched, two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, full-texts, and extracted information. Primary endpoints were change in visual outcome and central retinal thickness. We used a network meta-analysis to compare treatment outcomes in the early (≤ 6 months) and late (> 6 months) phase.

RESULTS

We included 34 studies (2,098 eyes) in our network meta-analysis. In the early phase, the use of anti-VEGF led to a gain of 14.1 letters (95% CI, 10.8-17.4) compared to untreated patients (p < 0.0001), 12.1 letters (95% CI, 8.3-15.8) to photodynamic therapy (PDT) (p < 0.0001), 7.5 (95% CI, 1.2-13.8) letters to intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (TCA) (p = 0.019), and - 2.9 letters (95% CI, - 6.0-0.2) to the combination of anti-VEGF and PDT (p = 0.065). In the later phase, these results were largely maintained. There were no significant differences in visual outcomes between patients treated with 1 + PRN and 3 + PRN. However, the 1 + PRN group received 1.8 (SD 1.3), while the 3 + PRN group received 3.2 (SD 0.9) injections within 12 months (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis confirms that anti-VEGF is the most effective treatment for myopic CNV using the 1 + PRN treatment strategy.

Ten-Year Outcomes of Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Analysis of Prognostic Factors

The current standard treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularisation (mCNV) is intravitreal injection of VEGF antagonists. This study was proposed to assess efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for the treatment of mCNV across a 10-year follow-up. Thirty eyes of thirty patients with treatment-naïve mCNV who underwent IVB and were followed up with for a minimum of ten years were recruited for the present retrospective cohort study. All participants were treated with three monthly IVB at baseline and then evaluated and treated under pro re nata (PRN) schedule. Outcome measures were to determine BCVA changes over years and identify the predictive factors of both final visual outcome and need for retreatment. Analysis of the main involved prognostic factors with correlations among variables is reported. Visual acuity remained stable at 10-year follow-up (p = 0.001) with the greatest improvement at 2 years (p < 0.0001) in all CNV locations. Baseline BCVA correlated positively with final BCVA (β = 0.88, p < 0.0001, R²: 0.75). No predictive factors for the need of additional injections were identified. Retinal and choroidal thickness significantly reduced over time but without correlation with the number of injections. CNV max height and area significantly decreased at 10 years (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.003, respectively), with complete regression of mCNV lesion in 40% of subjects. Intravitreal bevacizumab resulted as long-term effective and safe therapy for mCNV with sustained results at 10 years.

Anti-VEGF Therapy in Myopic CNV

In this narrative-review, we report the most recent data from the literature of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV). Myopic CNV is the most frequent sight-threatening complication of pathologic myopia. The natural course of mCNV can result in expanding macular atrophy and /or fibrosis, leading to irreversible visual loss after 5 years. Retinal multimodal imaging is mandatory for early diagnosis and monitoring of the disease during treatment. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is recommended as the first-line treatment option for mCNV. Prompt treatment of active mCNV with intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy has been demonstrated to be effective in terms of visual outcome improvements reducing the occurrence of late-stage complications.

Comparison of structural and functional outcome of aflibercept versus ranibizumab in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization

PURPOSE

To compare visual functional improvement and retinal structural changes of aflibercept versus ranibizumab for the management of treatment-naïve choroidal neovascularization related to pathological myopia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective randomized study included patients suffering from myopic choroidal neovascularization. Patients received three intravitreal injections of aflibercept (2 mg) or ranibizumab (0.5 mg) in 1:1 ratio every 4 weeks. Ophthalmic evaluation and optical coherence tomography were performed at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months after last injection. Primary outcome measure was the visual acuity change from baseline to month 3 after injection. Secondary outcome measures included change in retinal thickness and the relation of morphological and functional changes to baseline assessment parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 48 myopic patients (48 eyes) suffering from myopic choroidal neovascularization were randomly assigned to receive either aflibercept (Group A) or ranibizumab (Group B). In Group A, best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved from 0.53 ± 0.10 logMAR to 0.38 ± 0.11 logMAR, at 3 months, and from 0.55 ± 0.11 logMAR to 0.39 ± 0.12 logMAR in Group B. Whereas, retinal thickness reduced from 317.7 ± 53.6 µm to 164.5 ± 81.9 µm in Group A, and from 321.1 ± 98.8 µm at baseline to 178.9 ± 64.5 µm in Group B at month 3. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were statistically insignificant between the two groups at final visit.

CONCLUSION

Both aflibercept and ranibizumab provided a significant improvement in visual acuity and retinal thickness in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization. Comparable functional and architectural results were achieved by both treatment modalities.

Myopic maculopathy: Current status and proposal for a new classification and grading system (ATN)

Myopia is a highly frequent ocular disorder worldwide and pathologic myopia is the 4th most common cause of irreversible blindness in developed countries. Pathologic myopia is especially common in East Asian countries. Ocular alterations associated with pathologic myopia, especially those involving the macular area-defined as myopic maculopathy-are the leading causes of vision loss in patients with pathologic myopia. High myopia is defined as the presence of a highly negative refractive error (>-6 to -8 diopters) in the context of eye elongation (26-26.5 mm). Although the terms high myopia and pathologic myopia are often used interchangeably, they do not refer to the same eye disease. The two key factors driving the development of pathologic myopia are: 1) elongation of the axial length and 2) posterior staphyloma. The presence of posterior staphyloma, which is the most common finding in patients with pathologic myopia, is the key differentiating factor between high and pathologic myopia. The occurrence of staphyloma will, in most cases, eventually lead to other conditions such as atrophic, traction, or neovascular maculopathy. Posterior staphyloma is for instance, responsible for the differences between a myopic macular hole (MH)-with and without retinal detachment-and idiopathic MH. Posterior staphyloma typically induces retinal layer splitting, leading to foveoschisis in myopic MH, an important differentiating factor between myopic and emmetropic MH. Myopic maculopathy is a highly complex disease and current classification systems do not fully account for the numerous changes that occur in the macula of these patients. Therefore, a more comprehensive classification system is needed, for several important reasons. First, to more precisely define the disease stage to improve follow-up by enabling clinicians to more accurately monitor changes over time, which is essential given the progressive nature of this condition. Second, unification of the currently-available classification systems would establish standardized classification criteria that could be used to compare the findings from international multicentric studies. Finally, a more comprehensive classification system could help to improve our understanding of the genetic origins of this disease, which is clearly relevant given the interchangeable-but erroneous-use of the terms high and pathologic myopia in genetic research.

Pharmacotherapy of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization

BACKGROUND

Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a common cause of central visual loss in patients with high myopia, and the most common form of CNV in younger individuals. Pharmacologic therapy is the current mainstay of treatment of these patients.

METHODS

Review of pharmacological treatment options for myopic CNV, which primarily involves intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents.

RESULTS

At this time, anti-VEGF therapy agents are the first-line therapy in these patients. Comparative trials have not identified any major differences in treatment outcomes between aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab. Only ranibizumab is approved for this indication in the US. Best visual outcomes are associated with younger age, smaller lesion size, and absence of chorioretinal atrophy.

CONCLUSION

Anti-VEGF therapy is generally very effective in the treatment of myopic CNV.

Intravitreal aflibercept versus bevacizumab for treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization

The authors performed a retrospective and comparative study to compare the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept and bevacizumab for patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV). The patients with treatment-naïve mCNV received 1 + PRN intravitreal bevacizumab from March 2008 to February 2013, while from March 2013 to July 2016 patients were treated by 1 + PRN intravitreal aflibercept, all with monthly follow-up for 12 months. Primary outcome measures included change in central foveal thickness (CFT) in 1 mm by spectral-domain optic coherence tomography, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 12. Complications after injections were recorded. The intra-group changes in CFT and BCVA were compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test, the between-group difference compared with Wilcoxon rank sum test. Fisher's exact test was used for categorical comparison between groups. Seventy-eight eyes of 78 patients were collected. There were 42 eyes in bevacizumab group, with mean age of 53.2 ± 5.4 years and 27 female patients of them. The mean BCVA significantly improved from baseline 0.56 ± 0.35 logMAR to 0.35 ± 0.35 logMAR at Month 12 after bevacizumab treatment (p < 0.001). The mean CFT significantly decreased from baseline 315.3 ± 25.6 μm to 253.7 ± 24.4 μm at Month 12 following intravitreal bevacizumab (p < 0.001). There were 36 eyes in aflibercept group, with mean age of 52.8 ± 6.8 years and 24 female patients of them. The mean BCVA significantly improved from baseline 0.61 ± 0.47 logMAR to 0.38 ± 0.41 logMAR at Month 12 after aflibercept treatment (p < 0.001). The mean CFT significantly decreased from baseline 328.2 ± 19.8 μm to 241.8 ± 27.2 μm at Month 12 following intravitreal aflibercept (p < 0.001). The baseline demographics, lens status, axial length, refractive errors, duration of symptoms, BCVA, and CFT did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between bevacizumab and aflibercept groups in BCVA and CFT from Month 1 to Month 12 (p > 0.05). Injection number of aflibercept was 2.11 ± 0.41, less than that of bevacizumab (3.23 ± 0.38) during 12-month period (p = 0.01). There were no systemic thromboembolic event, elevated intraocular pressure, retinal detachment, or infectious endophthalmitis following injections in both groups. We concluded that both aflibercept and bevacizumab can effectively treat choroidal neovascularization in high myopes. Intravitreal aflibercept had similar efficacy but less treatment number than bevacizumab for mCNV during 12-month period.

Intravitreal Injection of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents for Ocular Vascular Diseases: Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide the clinical recommendations for the administration of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs especially bavacizumab for ocular vascular diseases including diabetic macular edema, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, myopic choroidal neovascularization, retinal vein occlusion and central serous chorioretinopathy.

METHODS

Twenty clinical questions were developed by the guideline technical committee. Relevant websites and databases were searched to find out the pertinent clinical practice guidelines to answer the questions. The technical committee provided possible answers (scenarios) according to the available evidences for each question. All scenarios along with their levels of evidence and the supported articles were sent to the experts for external review. If the experts did not agree on any of the scenarios for one particular clinical question, the technical committee reviewed all scenarios and their pertinent evidences and made the necessary decision. After that, the experts were asked to score them again. All confirmed scenarios were gathered as the final recommendations.

RESULTS

All the experts agreed on at least one of the scenarios. The technical committee extracted the agreed scenario for each clinical question as the final recommendation. Finally, 56 recommendations were developed for the procedure of intravitreal anti-VEGF injection and their applications in the management of ocular vascular diseases.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of this guideline can standardize the management of the common ocular vascular diseases by intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents. It can lead to better policy-making and evidence-based clinical decision by ophthalmologists and optimal evidence based eye care for patients.

SUBRETINAL FIBROSIS AFTER ANTIVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY IN EYES WITH MYOPIC CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence and risk factors of subretinal fibrosis and their impact on visual outcome in eyes with myopic CNV.

METHODS

Medical records of 72 eyes treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in a pro re nata regimen for myopic CNV that followed up for more than 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of subretinal fibrosis after anti-VEGF therapy was determined using both fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography. The incidence and risk factors of subretinal fibrosis were evaluated, and best-corrected visual acuity was compared between the eyes with and without subretinal fibrosis.

RESULTS

The incidences of subretinal fibrosis during the 1-year and whole follow-up period were 31.9% and 36.1%, respectively. Occurrence of subretinal fibrosis was associated with frequent CNV recurrence (P = 0.005) and poor baseline best-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.044) in a Cox proportional hazard model. Anatomically, the eyes with subretinal fibrosis showed more frequent progression of chorioretinal atrophy (95.7% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.027) and less frequent photoreceptor recovery (17.4% vs. 65.3%, P < 0.001) after anti-VEGF therapy. Occurrence of subretinal fibrosis was associated with poor vision at baseline (P = 0.011) and the final visit (P = 0.008) when compared with the findings in the nonoccurrence group.

CONCLUSION

Development of subretinal fibrosis after anti-VEGF therapy was common in eyes with myopic CNV and was associated with CNV recurrence. Myopic eyes with subretinal fibrosis show progressive chorioretinal atrophy and poor visual outcome.

Epidemiology, treatment pattern and health care utilization of myopic choroidal neovascularization: a population based study

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence and incidence of myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in Taiwan, including the health care utilization and treatment-associated costs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using existing data from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance claims database to identify patients who had a diagnosis of myopic CNV recorded from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011. The prevalence of myopic CNV was monitored during this period, and the frequency and cost of both treatment visits and monitoring visits were analyzed for 2 years following diagnosis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of myopic CNV was 0.017%. In total, 9068 patients with myopic CNV were identified, 12.3% (n = 1111) of whom were treated. Of those treated, 72.0% (n = 800) received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (IVI); the remainder received either photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (vPDT), laser photocoagulation, or a combination of therapies. IVI was associated with the largest number of treatment visits as well as a higher administrative (non-drug) cost per treatment visit (a mean of USD 57.18). vPDT alone was associated with a higher overall cost per treatment visit and more monitoring visits than IVI or laser photocoagulation. Costs for monitoring visits were highest for IVI.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of myopic CNV was lower than that reported in previous studies, possibly because of differences in age distribution in the populations studied. The frequencies of treatment administered were similar to those reported in previous studies; however, a cost-effectiveness comparison could not be made owing to lack of data in previous studies.

Photoreceptor inner segment ellipsoid band integrity on spectral domain optical coherence tomography

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography cross-sectional imaging of the macula has conventionally been resolved into four bands. However, some doubts were raised regarding authentication of the existence of these bands. Recently, a number of studies have suggested that the second band appeared to originate from the inner segment ellipsoids of the foveal cone photoreceptors, and therefore the previously called inner segment-outer segment junction is now referred to as inner segment ellipsoidband. Photoreceptor dysfunction may be a significant predictor of visual acuity in a spectrum of surgical and medical retinal diseases. This review aims to provide an overview and summarizes the role of the photoreceptor inner segment ellipsoid band in the management and prognostication of various vitreoretinal diseases.

Forty-two-month outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab in myopic choroidal neovascularization

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of bevacizumab in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathological myopia.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center non-comparative study the medical records of 29 eyes from 29 patients with naïve CNV secondary to high myopia and at least 42 months of follow up were reviewed. All eyes received a loading dose of one intravitreal injection per month for two consecutive months and were retreated on an as-needed basis during the course of follow up. The main outcome measures were post-treatment ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and visual stabilization over time. Stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for visual acuity gain and final visual acuity outcome at 42 months.

RESULTS

At 42 months of follow-up bevacizumab was associated with the maintenance of significant benefits in visual acuity compared to baseline. No adverse ocular or systemic effects from treatment were encountered. No statistically significant correlations were found between BCVA change and any of the quantitative variables. However, when final BCVA was taken as a dependent variable and CNV size and pre-treatment VA were included as predictors, a bivariate model was identified by stepwise regression which gave a 75 % of explained variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab treatment was found to be efficacious in the treatment of myopic CNV, resulting in stable gains in visual acuity lasting at least 42 months, without any adverse ocular or general events. Myopic CNV size was identified as a significant prognostic factor.

Myopic choroidal neovascularisation: current concepts and update on clinical management

Choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) is a common vision-threatening complication of myopia and pathological myopia. Despite significant advances in understanding the epidemiology, pathogenesis and natural history of myopic CNV, there is no standard definition of myopic CNV and its relationship to axial length and other myopic degenerative changes. Several treatments are available to ophthalmologists, but with the advent of new therapies there is a need for further consensus and clinical management recommendations. Verteporfin photodynamic therapy has been an established treatment for subfoveal myopic CNV for many years, but this treatment does not restore visual acuity and is associated with long-term chorioretinal atrophy. More recently, clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in patients with myopic CNV have demonstrated substantial visual acuity gains and quality of life increases compared with photodynamic therapy. These enhanced outcomes provide updated evidence-based clinical management guidelines of myopic CNV, and increase the need for a generally accepted definition for myopic CNV. This review critically summarises the latest myopic CNV literature in the context of clinical experience and recommends a myopic CNV treatment algorithm.

Management of Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathological Myopia: The Era of Changes

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathological myopia is an important cause of significant visual impairment in young adults. High myopia is particularly prevalent in Asian population. New scientific contributions have been made to the understanding of high myopia and myopic CNV. Treatment for myopic CNV has previously relied on photodynamic therapy, laser photocoagulation, and submacular surgery. The treatment outcomes from these modalities are, however, controversial. The introduction of antiangiogenic agents including bevacizumab and ranibizumab has brought the treatment of myopic CNV into a new era. The purpose of this review was to provide an overview of the natural history of myopic CNV, the prognostic factors, and the various treatment options including laser photocoagulation and photodynamic therapy, with particular attention on antiangiogenic agents.

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSES

To update existing evidence and evaluate intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections for myopic choroidal neovascularization.

METHODS

The authors conducted comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Biosis Preview, and LILACS. Included studies were categorized by study design. Comparative studies were classified as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCT studies, and these two types of studies were presented and meta-analyzed separately for the following comparisons: 1) anti-VEGF versus photodynamic therapy, 2) anti-VEGF monotherapy versus combination therapy with photodynamic therapy, 3) single versus 3 monthly injections followed by pro re nata (PRN) treatment, and 4) ranibizumab versus bevacizumab. Noncomparative prospective series were pooled to estimate mean visual gain, mean retinal thickness change, and the average number of anti-VEGF injections required for myopic choroidal neovascularization. Ocular and systemic adverse events were also summarized.

RESULTS

Literature search yielded 18 comparative studies and 83 noncomparative studies. Superiority of anti-VEGF over photodynamic therapy in a 24-month period was confirmed by 2 RCTs and 6 non-RCT studies. The influence of combined photodynamic therapy was uncertain based on two non-RCT studies. Three non-RCT studies showed that the visual outcomes of 3+PRN injections might be slightly better than 1+PRN injections within 1 year. No difference was observed between ranibizumab and bevacizumab in two RCTs and one non-RCT study. The estimated visual improvement was two lines on average. Adverse events were uncommon as reported.

CONCLUSION

Accumulating evidence confirmed that anti-VEGF injections should be the first-line therapy for myopic choroidal neovascularization.

RADIANCE: a randomized controlled study of ranibizumab in patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg, guided by visual acuity (VA) stabilization or disease activity criteria, versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) in patients with visual impairment due to myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

DESIGN

Phase III, 12-month, randomized, double-masked, multicenter, active-controlled study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N = 277) with visual impairment due to myopic CNV.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive ranibizumab on day 1, month 1, and thereafter as needed guided by VA stabilization criteria (group I, n = 106); ranibizumab on day 1 and thereafter as needed guided by disease activity criteria (group II, n=116); or vPDT on day 1 and disease activity treated with ranibizumab or vPDT at investigators' discretion from month 3 (group III, n = 55).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean average best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to month 1 through months 3 (primary) and 6, mean BCVA change and safety over 12 months.

RESULTS

Ranibizumab treatment in groups I and II was superior to vPDT based on mean average BCVA change from baseline to month 1 through month 3 (group I: +10.5, group II: +10.6 vs. group III: +2.2 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters; both P<0.0001). Ranibizumab treatment guided by disease activity was noninferior to VA stabilization-guided retreatment based on mean average BCVA change from baseline to month 1 through month 6 (group II: +11.7 vs. group I: +11.9 ETDRS letters; P<0.00001). Mean BCVA change from baseline to month 12 was +13.8 (group I), +14.4 (group II), and +9.3 ETDRS letters (group III). At month 12, 63.8% to 65.7% of patients showed resolution of myopic CNV leakage. Patients received a median of 4.0 (group I) and 2.0 (groups II and III) ranibizumab injections over 12 months. No deaths or cases of endophthalmitis and myocardial infarction occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranibizumab treatment, irrespective of retreatment criteria, provided superior BCVA gains versus vPDT up to month 3. Ranibizumab treatment guided by disease activity criteria was noninferior to VA stabilization criteria up to month 6. Over 12 months, individualized ranibizumab treatment was effective in improving and sustaining BCVA and was generally well tolerated in patients with myopic CNV.

Prognostic factors of eyes with naïve subfoveal myopic choroidal neovascularization after intravitreal bevacizumab

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of 1 intravitreal bevacizumab injection followed by pro re nata (1 + PRN) injection in cases of subfoveal myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and to identify CNV-recurrence-related prognostic factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

In total, 103 eyes of 89 consecutive naive patients who had subfoveal myopic CNV and had been followed-up for at least 2 years were included. Of those eyes, 24 had recurrences. The remaining eyes were stable after the initial treatment.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 51.1 ± 15.2 years. The average follow-up duration was 44.1 ± 12.7 months. At baseline and at the 1-year, 2-year, and final visits, the average best corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) were 0.57 ± 0.45, 0.38 ± 0.51, 0.40 ± 0.52, and 0.41 ± 0.41 logMAR, respectively. The recurrence rate during follow-up was 23.3%. The BCVA improved by 0.2 logMAR after 2.7 injections in the eyes without recurrence but by only 0.08 logMAR after 6.9 injections in the eyes with recurrence. In univariate analysis, recurrence was associated with older age, more myopic refraction, thinner choroid, larger CNV lesions, and subfoveal hemorrhage at baseline. In multivariate analysis, only baseline CNV lesion size associated significantly with CNV recurrence (P = 0.002). Recurrence, baseline BCVA, choroidal thickness, and CNV size associated significantly with final BCVA (P = 0.026, <0.0001, 0.007, and 0.002, respectively). Baseline choroidal thickness, CNV size, age, and presence of lacquer cracks associated significantly with injection number (P < 0.0001, <0.0001, 0.026, and 0.035, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

1 + PRN intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy effectively stabilized subfoveal myopic CNV. The CNV size, the baseline BCVA, and the choroidal thickness were the main prognostic factors of subfoveal myopic CNV after 1 + PRN injection of bevacizumab.

[Treatment of high myopic choroidal neovascularisation with intravitreal bevacizumab]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in the treatment of high myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 16 eyes of 16 patients with high myopic choroidal neovascularization treated with first-line IVB (1.25mg/0.05mL) with a one-year follow-up. All patients underwent a complete baseline (M0) ophthalmologic examination, including the measurement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), biomicroscopic and fundus examination, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, and optical coherence tomography. Patients were followed monthly. Additional IVB was administered when persistent or additional retinal exudation was observed. The main study parameters were visual acuity at 1, 6 and 12 months and the progression of exudation on OCT and angiography.

RESULTS

Mean age was 63±14 years and spherical equivalent was -15.4±7.4 diopters. Baseline BCVA was 0.75±0.5 logMAR. Mean follow-up was 15±2 months. The average number of IVB was 2.4±1.2 injections. Metamorphopsia decreased in all patients and completely disappeared in fourteen eyes. Mean BCVA was 0.5±0.3 logMAR at M1 and 0.6±0.5 logMAR at M6 and M12. No adverse events related to the intravitreal injections were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that IVB (Avastin(®)) is effective in the treatment of high myopic CNV. Moreover, only a small number of intravitreal injections were required to treat this condition.

Comparison of foveal-sparing with foveal-involving photodynamic therapy for myopic choroidal neovascularization

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual outcomes of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathological myopia in eyes treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT), and to determine the effect of lesion location and foveal involvement on visual prognosis.

METHODS

Interventional case series of 24 consecutive patients with myopic CNV treated with PDT. The main outcome measure was final LogMAR visual acuity (VA).

RESULTS

Of 24 eyes, the CNV lesion was subfoveal in 11 and extrafoveal in 13. Overall, the mean LogMAR VA at 24 months was 0.72. Extrafoveal CNV lesions achieved significantly better final VA compared with subfoveal CNV (LogMAR 0.45 vs 1.05, P=0.012). Eyes with extrafoveal CNV lesions were subdivided into foveal-sparing PDT (where the PDT laser spot did not involve the foveal center) and foveal-involved PDT (where the PDT laser covered the fovea). At all time points, the group with foveal-sparing PDT had significantly better VA compared with the foveal-involved group. The final LogMAR VA for the foveal-sparing PDT group was 0.26 compared with 1.00 for the foveal-involved PDT group (P=0.003). At 24 months, 77.8% of foveal-sparing PDT cases achieved VA of ≥ 20/40, compared with 25% of foveal-involved PDT cases and 9.1% of subfoveal CNV lesions (P=0.006).

CONCLUSION

For patients with myopic CNV, foveal-sparing PDT results in significantly better long-term visual outcomes compared with those with foveal-involved PDT. Foveal-sparing PDT may be of value for treatment of myopic CNV patients who are not suitable for treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections.

Only first intravitreal bevacizumab injection achieves statistically significant visual improvement in naïve myopic choroidal neovascularization

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab when administered on an as-needed basis for the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV), and to assess visual changes upon treatment.

Methods

This study was designed as a retrospective, interventional case series, for which the inclusion criteria were pathologic myopia, and documentation of untreated active macular CNV on fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography. Monthly changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual gain after each treatment, and correlation with refraction, age, location, and dimension of CNV were considered. The data were analyzed using the one-tailed, paired Wilcoxon test.

Results

Nineteen naive eyes were found suitable for the study. The mean number of treatments was 3.32 ± 2.36 (confidence interval 2.25–4.37) during a mean follow-up period of 18.95 ± 8.3 months. At baseline, mean BCVA was 0.58 ± 0.37 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units. At 12 months, mean BCVA was 0.39 ± 0.35 logMAR and at 24 months was 0.39 ± 0.40. Mean improvement in BCVA from baseline was +0.17 ± 0.25 logMAR (P < 0.05) at month 12, +0.14 ± 0.25 logMAR (P = 0.1) at month 18, and +0.09 ± 0.32 logMAR (P = 0.5) at month 24. Improvement on pretreatment BCVA was significant (+0.16 logMAR, P < 0.01) after the first injection, but not after the second (−0.01 logMAR, P = 0.5) or third (+0.02 logMAR, P = 0.5) injections. There was a statistically significant correlation between age and number of treatments, and between improvement in BCVA of foveal versus extrafoveal location of CNV.

Conclusion

The use of intravitreal bevacizumab “as needed” is an effective treatment for myopic CNV, but visual gain is statistically significant only after the first injection and decreases in the second year.

Summary of prognostic factors for choroidal neovascularization due to pathological myopia treated by intravitreal bevacizumab injection

AIM

This systematic review assesses the prognostic factors for intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVB) in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to pathological myopia.

METHODS

The literature searches were performed in Ovid Medline, EMBASE and CENTRAL. Relevant studies with prognostic data on best corrected vision acuity (BCVA) after intravitreal bevacizumab injection were included for review. Two reviewers participated in the data retrieval and independently assessed each included study.

RESULTS

A total 252 articles were retrieved, including 16 studies containing the most updated and complete data on prognostic factors for neovascularization due to pathological myopia treated by intravitreal bevacizumab injection. A great number of quantitative, clinical, and treatment-related factors were determined to have a positive influence on vision outcome after intravitreal bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

A lower rate of development of chorioretinal atrophy, smaller pretreatment CNV size, and younger age were indentified as the most consistently significant prognostic factors affecting the efficacy of IVB in eyes of myopic CNV and were associated with improved BCVA. A worse BCVA after IVB in eyes with myopic CNV probably was associated with subfoveal CNV, lower baseline BCVA, longer duration of CNV, incomplete regression of CNV, subretinal hemorrhage, and previous PDT treatment. No apparent association were observed between the refraction error, axial length, lens status and change in BCVA after IVB. We indentified significant prognostic factors in this systematic review study that might allow for the selection of patients with myopic CNV which are most likely to benefit from IVB.

[Therapy of myopic choroidal neovascularization]

Recently published studies have shown that myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) is efficiently treated by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs. Within a prospective executive study, photodynamic therapy failed to prove a significant difference over the duration of 2 years. Although a systematic evaluation of different retreatment algorithms still has to be done the administration of single injections depending on specialist assessment of morphological changes, predominantly spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and fundus, has achieved a marked visual improvement. The experience of treating age-related macular degeneration should not be simply transferred to mCNV and an individual approach, not only for female patients of childbearing age, is necessary.

Long-term outcome of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy with bevacizumab or ranibizumab as primary treatment for subfoveal myopic choroidal neovascularization

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy as primary treatment for subfoveal myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

METHODS

In all, 37 treatment-naïve eyes of 37 patients with subfoveal myopic CNV who received intravitreal bevacizumab (n=22) or ranibizumab (n=15) injections with at least 2 years of follow-up were reviewed. All eyes received initial three loading doses of anti-VEGF at monthly intervals and retreatment was performed in persistent or recurrent CNV. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors for visual outcome.

RESULTS

The mean age was 57.3 years and the mean refractive error was -11.7 D. For all eyes, the mean logMAR best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.86 (20/145) at baseline to 0.48 (20/60) at 2 years (P<0.001). The mean visual improvement for the bevacizumab and ranibizumab groups at 2 years was 2.8 and 5.1 lines, respectively (P=0.073). There was no significant difference in the proportion of eyes having visual gain of three or more lines or visual loss of three or more lines between the two groups. The mean number of injections was 3.8 for both bevacizumab and ranibizumab groups. Multivariate analyses showed that eyes with higher myopic refractive error were less likely to have visual gain after treatment (P=0.043), while size of CNV was negatively correlated with mean change in vision (P=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy resulted in long-term visual improvement in myopic CNV. The treatment efficacy in terms of visual gain and number of retreatment appeared to be similar between bevacizumab and ranibizumab.

Choroidal neovascularization in pathological myopia

Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is one of the leading causes of visual impairment worldwide. The clinical and socioeconomic impact of myopic CNV in Asian countries is particularly significant due to rising trend in the prevalence and severity of pathological myopia. The exact pathogenesis of myopic CNV remains unclear and there is paucity of information with respect to incidence and risk factors for myopic CNV from prospective studies. Furthermore, there are no recognized measures that may prevent or delay the development of CNV in eyes with pathological myopia. Advances have been made in the diagnosis and characterization of myopic CNV over the years. Until recently, treatment modalities for myopic CNV were limited to thermal laser photocoagulation and photodynamic therapy with verteporfin, both these modalities primarily aim at prevention of further visual loss. In the last 5 years, inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been used successfully and may improve vision to some extent. Nevertheless, the long-term safety and efficacy of anti-VEGF agents remains unknown. Furthermore, the risk of developing chorioretinal atrophy remains the key factor in determining the final visual outcome. This review article summarizes the current literature on myopic CNV, highlighting new evolving diagnostic and treatment modalities, prognostic factors influencing visual outcome, and areas of future research.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for myopic choroidal neovascularization

Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a vision-threatening complication in the eyes with pathological myopia, which is particularly prevalent among young and middle-aged Asians globally. To date, the verteporfin in photodynamic therapy study is the only randomized-controlled study in treatment of subfoveal myopic CNV. However, its long-term benefit is controversial. Recently, intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors have shown promising results. In the absence of randomized-controlled trial comparing the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors with photodynamic therapy and placebo, the purpose of this article is to review the current studies on functional and anatomical outcomes in both subfoveal and juxtafoveal myopic CNV. Furthermore, the influences of various doses and frequencies, as well as age and previous photodynamic therapy treatment on its effect are described.