LINCOFF RULES ARE NOT FOLLOWED IN RETINAL DETACHMENT WITH POSTERIOR BREAKS AND ATTACHED CORTICAL VITREOUS

Lincoff's Rule Is Not Followed in Pediatric Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachments

PURPOSE

To validate Lincoff's rules (LRs) in cases of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in the pediatric age group and to identify factors in cases LR was not followed.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study where 98 pediatric patients with RRD were identified through surgery records. Forty case sheets with complete record of ocular examination and surgical findings were analyzed. Visible or suspected preoperative retinal break identified using the LR and actual intraoperative retinal break noted was recorded. Validity of LR was tested and analysed.

RESULT

The median age of the study participants was 11 years ranging from 5 to 18 years. There were 35 (88%) boys and 5 (12%) girls in the study. Myopia was noted in 13 (33%) eyes and in 21 (53%) eyes, there was a history of preexisting ocular trauma. Moderate degree of agreement with a Cohen's kappa 0.41 was noted with regards to LR validity in pediatric RRD. LR was validated in non-myopic eyes (p = 0.022), inferior RD (p < 0.001), and those with anteriorly located retinal breaks (p < 0.001). Other attributes such as history of trauma (p = 0.08), lens status (p = 0.489), macula sparing RRD (p = 0.882), and chronicity of RRD (p = 0.612) did not have a statistically significant association with validity of LR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the presence of anterior retinal break (p = 0.011) and presence of inferior RD (p = 0.022) as the two most important attributes in a RD for agreement of LR.

CONCLUSION

LRs fail to accurately identify the exact location of the retinal break due to its posterior location and absence of posterior vitreous detachment in most cases with pediatric RRDs.

The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treatment patterns

Backgrounds

To describe changes in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgical procedures in Beijing during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of RRD patients was analyzed. Patients were divided into the COVID-19 pandemic group and pre-COVID-19 group according to their presentation. The presurgery characteristics, surgical procedures, and surgery outcomes were collected. The potential factors related to the choice of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or scleral buckling (SB) were analyzed using logistic regression. The differences in the procedure choice under specific conditions were compared. Surgery outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

In the COVID-19 pandemic group, less patients received SB (27.8, 41.3%, p = 0.02) while more patients received PPV (72.2, 58.6%, p = 0.02); in patients who received SB, fewer patients received subretinal fluid drainage (45.4,75.7%, p = 0.01); in patients who received PPV, fewer patients received phacovitrectomy (7.0, 21.0%, p = 0.02). The choice of PPV was related to older age (1.03, p = 0.005), the presence of RRD with choroidal detachment (RRD-CD) (2.92, p = 0.03), pseudophakia (5.0, p = 0.002), retinal breaks located posterior to the equator (4.87, p < 0.001), macular holes (9.76, p = 0.005), and a presurgery visual acuity (VA) less than 0.02 (0.44, p = 0.03). Fewer phakia patients with retinal breaks located posterior to the equator (1/28, 11/30, p = 0.01) and fewer patients with chronic RRD and subretinal strand (1/9, 9/16, p = 0.03) received SB in the COVID-19 pandemic group. There were more patients with improved VA (55.7, 40.2%, p = 0.03) in the COVID-19 pandemic group. The overall single-surgery retinal attachment rate was similar in the two groups (94.9, 94.5%, p = 0.99).

Conclusions

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, the main reason for the increased number of PPV in RRD treatment was that more complicated cases were presented. However, the surgeons were conservative in procedure choice in specific cases. The adjustments on RRD treatments lead to comparable surgery outcomes.