The Effects of Latanoprost With Benzalkonium Chloride Versus Travoprost With SofZia on the Ocular Surface

Association between the use of prostaglandin analogues and ocular surface disease: a systematic review

Patients with glaucoma often experience chronic ocular surface diseases, potentially underestimated in frequency and severity. To provide updated estimates of ocular surface diseases linked to prostaglandin analogue antiglaucoma eye medication, a systematic review was conducted. Twenty-seven publications were selected from databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, following a search strategy targeting glaucoma and prostaglandins while excluding certain medications '(Glaucoma AND prostaglandins OR 'prostaglandin analogues')('eye drops' OR 'artificial tears' OR 'ocular surface' OR 'dry eye' OR 'dry eye syndrome' OR 'ocular surface disease' OR 'tear film') NOT ('beta blockers' OR 'alpha adrenergic agonists' OR 'carbonic anhydrase inhibitors' OR 'rho-quinase')'. The review revealed a correlation between prostaglandin analogue use and ocular surface damage, assessing parameters such as tear break-up time, Schirmer test value, ocular surface staining, hyperaemia score, and meibomian gland characteristics. Some studies explored switching patients to alternative glaucoma medications, noting varied effects on ocular surface parameters. Comparisons suggested better tolerance and outcomes with preservative-free options over prostaglandins. Additionally, the impact of treatment duration and diquafosol on ocular health, including meibomian gland loss, was examined across different formulations. Although a link between prostaglandin analogues (with or without preservatives) and ocular surface damage was established, inconsistencies in methodologies and assessment across studies were noted. This comprehensive review, spanning a decade of glaucoma research, underscores the need for re-evaluation of treatment strategies in ophthalmology. It stresses the significance of informed decision-making for enhanced glaucoma care, taking into account the observed effects of various medications on eye health.

Efficacy and Safety of a Preservative-Free Latanoprost Cationic Emulsion in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Concurrent Ocular Surface Disease: A Randomized Phase 2 Study

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP), ocular surface disease (OSD) parameters, and safety in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG)/ocular hypertension (OH) and concurrent OSD treated with preservative-free latanoprost 0.005% cationic emulsion (PF-latanoprost-E) or travoprost-Z 0.004% ophthalmical solution containing a soft preservative system. Methods: Patients with OAG/OH and OSD were randomized to treatment with PF-latanoprost-E or travoprost-Z nightly for 3 months. Outcomes included mean diurnal IOP reduction; OSD endpoints, including symptom improvement, tear break-up time (TBUT), and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score; and safety after 1 and 3 months. Results: A total of 105 patients were randomized, 51 to PF-latanoprost-E and 54 to travoprost-Z. IOP reductions (LS mean differences) at 3 months were numerically greater in the PF-latanoprost-E than in the travoprost-Z group at 8AM (7.2 versus 6.0 mmHg), 10AM (6.7 versus 5.9 mmHg), and 4PM (6.0 versus 5.4 mmHg). LS mean changes in IOP from baseline in both groups at 1 and 3 months, however, were comparable. Mean ± SD CFS scores on the Ora scale at month 3 showed significantly greater reductions in the PF-latanoprost-E than in the travoprost-Z group (-1.07 ± 1.863 versus -0.16 ± 2.553 P = 0.0461). The mean TBUT at month 3 showed similar improvements in both groups (1.1 versus 1.0 s, P > 0.05). OSD symptoms improved but did not differ significantly in the two groups. Overall safety was comparable in both groups. Conclusion: PF-latanoprost-E effectively and safely lowered IOP and improved OSD parameters in patients with OAG/OH. These findings provide evidence for the beneficial effects of this new formulation of latanoprost in glaucoma patients with OSD.

Glaucoma and Ocular Surface Disease: More than Meets the Eye

Understanding the association between ocular surface disease and glaucoma is important for improving adherence to treatment and introducing practical solutions. While topical antihypertensive medications for glaucoma are well tolerated according to short-term studies, there is little evidence on their long-term effects. Since they are often required for many years, the effects of these drops on the ocular surface become important in regard to quality of life and adherence. In this nonsystematic review performed in April 2022, we summarize what is known about the relationship between glaucoma and ocular surface disease. Specifically, we examine how each class of topical glaucoma drops affects the ocular surface. We then review the treatment of ocular surface disease for patients on topical glaucoma therapy. Finally, we discuss treatments that may reduce or eliminate the burden of topical medications.

A new look at the safety and tolerability of prostaglandin analogue eyedrops in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

INTRODUCTION

In the last 25 years, topical prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) have emerged to become first line and first choice therapeutic options in the management of glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OHT). Although the short-term efficacy and safety of PGAs has been extensively investigated, less is known about their long term safety and tolerability. This gap in current knowledge is clinically relevant, because treatment-related adverse events and long-term tolerability issues are key determinants of the overall success of long-term therapy and the final outcome of a lifelong, symptomless disease like glaucoma.

AREAS COVERED

We include selected evidence pertaining to the safety and tolerability of available and emerging PGA formulations. We also outline PGA formulations with different concentrations of the active ingredient, different preservatives, and preservative-free (PF) options.

EXPERT OPINION

Undoubtedly PGAs will continue to play a major role in the medical therapy of glaucoma and OHT. Despite extensive literature and prolonged clinical experience with these agents worldwide, a number of areas that warrant further research have been identified in the present review. Recently launched novel PGAs, or those still in development offer new opportunities and future challenges.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of travoprost and latanoprost for the management of open-angle glaucoma given as an evening dose

As intraocular pressure (IOP) is primarily higher in the morning, an evening dose of prostaglandin analogs is typically used as monotherapy to decrease IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Travoprost (TV) has reported efficacy in treating open-angle glaucoma; however, the safety and efficacy may be different compared with that for latanoprost (LT). The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of an evening dose of TV compared with that of LT in treating open-angle glaucoma. Data including IOP, results of lid and slit-lamp examination and ophthalmoscopy, as well as adverse effects in 250 affected eyes from patients with open-angle glaucoma who received either TV (n=89) or LT (n=161) once in the evening for 3-months were included in the analyses. At the end of treatment, TV (23.45±1.52 vs. 19.15±1.01 mmHg; P<0.0001) and LT (23.93±2.11 vs. 19.45±1.11 mmHg; P<0.0001) successfully lowered the IOP. In addition, there was no significant difference in the reduction of IOP values at the end of treatment between the two groups (P=0.120). Furthermore, there were no adverse effects on visual acuity (P>0.05), except for non-visual acuity, for example hyperemia (P<0.0001 for both groups), while there was a significant increase in the number of patients with dry eyes receiving TV (P=0.020) and a significant increase with eyelid swelling (P=0.036) and headache (P=0.037) in patients receiving LT. In conclusion, evening doses of TV and LT had the same efficacy and manageable adverse effects in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma (level of evidence, 3).