Clinical Findings and Ocular Symptoms Over 1 Year in a Sample of Scleral Lens Wearers

Influence of midday removal and re-application of a scleral lens on fluid reservoir thickness, pre-lens tear film quality and visual acuity

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the midday removal and re-application of scleral lenses (SL) influences fluid reservoir (FR) thickness, pre-lens tear film quality and visual acuity.

METHODS

Two clinical experiments were conducted. A total of 49 keratoconic eyes were evaluated for Part1(tear film and visual acuity analysis) and 12 keratoconic eyes for Part2 (FR thickness analysis). All subjects were wearing 16.4 mm SL for more than 12-months. Tear Film Surface Quality (TFSQ) was evaluated with Medmont E300 at more than 120 min of SL wear, 10 min after SL removal (pre-corneal TFSQ) and 5 min after re-apply the same SL. High and Low Contrast Visual Acuity (HCVA and LCVA) were also assessed with the SL on eye (before and after re-application). For Part2, Anterior OCT (MOptim MOcean4000, China) measurements were taken with and without the SL (at the same time points of Part1) and three outcomes were evaluated: FR thickness, SL thickness (control measurement) and corneal thickness.

RESULTS

Removing and re-applying a SL had a statistically significant positive impact on TFSQ, with an improvement from 0.26 ± 011 to 0.16 ± 0.08 (p = 0.001). This was accompanied by a statistically significant improvement in LogMAR HCVA (from 0.10 ± 0.09 to 0.08 ± 0.08, p < 0.001) and LCVA (from 0.39 ± 0.13 to 0.36 ± 0.13, p < 0.001). Regarding Part2 of the study, a statistically significant increase in FR thickness was observed after SL re-application (from 223.64 ± 48.08 µm to 267.81 ± 80.03 µm, p = 0.007). No changes in corneal thickness were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Midday removal and re-application of a scleral lens positively impacted pre-lens tear film surface quality, although the observed improvement in visual acuity does not constitute a clinically significant change. Clinicians should consider that removing and reapplying a scleral lens may result in an overestimation of the fluid reservoir thickness, which could affect clinical assessments and treatment decisions.

Metrics of Anterior Sclera in Normal Chinese Adults: Anterior Segment Imaging Using the Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography

PURPOSE

To measure the corneoscleral limbus and anterior sclera parameters of normal Chinese adults by swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 56 Chinese subjects with ametropia were evaluated in the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from September 2020 to December 2020, including 26 (46.4%) men, with an average age of 24.7±1.8 years old. The OCT SS-1000 (CASIA, Tomey, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure the sagittal height, corneoscleral junction (CSJ) angle, and scleral angle.

RESULTS

The chord was across the corneal center and the line connecting the center of the cornea and the center of the chord was perpendicular to the chord. The mean sagittal height at chord lengths of 10.0, 12.3, and 15.0 mm were 1,756±72, 2,658±110, and 3,676±155 μm, respectively. The absolute values of the differences between horizontal and vertical meridians at three chord lengths were 54±40, 70±67, and 117±95 μm, respectively. One-way analysis of variance showed that the differences of CSJ angles at 12.3-mm chord and scleral angles at 15.0-mm chord in the four segments were statistically significant ( F values were 32.01 and 13.37, respectively, both P <0.001). The CSJ angles from low to high were 176.53±2.14° (nasal), 178.66±1.84° (inferior), 179.13±1.20° (temporal), and 179.31±1.68° (superior), and 87.5% of the nasal angles were less than 179°. The scleral angles from high to low were 38.35±2.47° (temporal), 38.26±3.37° (superior), 35.37±3.10° (nasal), and 35.30±4.71° (inferior).

CONCLUSIONS

The morphology of corneoscleral limbus and anterior sclera is asymmetrical in normal Chinese adults. The nasal side of the corneoscleral limbus has the largest angle, and the superior and temporal sides of the scleral angle are larger.

Prospective assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure after scleral lens wear: A 12-month follow-up study

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term influence of scleral lens (SL) wear on corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure (IOP) in irregular and regular corneas. Secondary goal comprised evaluate the fluid reservoir (FR) thickness overtime and correlate it with the changes in corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP.

METHODS

Seventy (70) eyes with irregular corneas (IC Group) and 21 eyes with regular corneas (RC Group) were fitted with 16.4 mm SL and wore the lenses for 12 months. Corrected IOP (IOPcc), Goldmann equivalent IOP (IOPg) and corneal biomechanical parameters (Corneal Hysteresis (CH) and Corneal Resistance Factor (CRF)) were measured with Ocular Response Analyzer. Slit lamp images were analyzed with ImageJ software to assess FR thickness overtime. Measurements were taken at lens dispensing visit prior lens wear (LDV1) and after 60 min of lens wear (LDV2) and at 1, 6 and 12-month follow-up visits. Measurements were done immediately after lens removal.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences on IOPcc, IOPg, CRF and CH over the follow-up visits in both groups. Mean IOPcc and IOPg fluctuations overtime were clinically insignificant and below 1 mmHg in both groups. IOPg, CH and CRF were significantly lower on IC Group (p < 0.001), although no statistically significant differences were found between groups for IOPcc. Regarding FR thickness, statistically significant differences were found over the follow-up on both groups, with a mean decrease of 186.29 µm on IC Group and 175.32 µm on RC Group (p < 0.001). Statistically significant moderate to high negative correlations between FR and IOPg, CRF and CH were found only in the RC Group.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term SL wear was not associated to changes in corneal biomechanical parameters neither on IOP as measured after lens removal. Besides IOP measurement without SL removal, more studies are needed to investigate the potential relationship with SL fitting characteristics (namely FR thickness).

Conjunctival microbiome changes in soft contact lens users and contact lens discomfort patients

INTRODUCTION

Contact lens discomfort (CLD) acts as a challenging problem, and the associated conjunctival microbiome changes were unclear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Conjunctival sac swab samples were collected from 12 eyes of nonwearers (NW), 12 eyes of asymptomatic contact lens (ACL) wearers, and 11 eyes of CLD. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to investigate differences among three groups.

RESULTS

No differences in alpha diversity were observed among the three groups. The beta diversity showed a distinct microbiome composition between ACL and CLD group (P = 0.018) with principal coordinate analysis. The relative abundance of Firmicutes was significantly higher in CLD (48.18%) than in ACL (13.21%) group (P = 0.018). The abundance of Bacillus in patients with ACL (0.05%) or with CLD (0.02%) were significantly lower than that in the NW (1.27%) group (P = 0.024, 0.028, respectively). Moreover, the abundance of Firmicutes was positively correlated with the OSDI scores in CLD patients (r = 0.817, P < 0. 01, Spearman).

DISCUSSIONS

Patients with CLD have various degrees of bacterial microbiota imbalance in the conjunctival sac, compared with NW and ACL groups.

CONCLUSION

Firmicutes may serve as a potential biomarker for the CLD patients.

Assessment of meibomian gland drop-out and visibility through a new quantitative method in scleral lens wearers: A one-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVES

To validate a previously developed algorithm based on the visibility of meibomian gland images obtained with Cobra fundus camera and to assess the changes in meibomian glands in scleral lens wearers over one year of lens wear.

METHODS

Infrared meibography was obtained from the upper eyelid using the Cobra fundus camera in forty-three volunteers (34.2 ± 10.1 years). Meibographies were classified into 3 groups: Group 1 = good subjective gland visibility and gland drop-out < 1/3 of the total area; Group 2 = low visibility and gland drop-out < 1/3; and Group 3 = low visibility and gland drop-out > 1/3. Meibomian gland visibility metrics were then calculated using the developed algorithm from the pixel intensity values of meibographies. Repeatability of new metrics and their correlations with gland drop-out were assessed. Meibographies and ocular symptoms were also assessed after 1 year of scleral lens wear in 29 subjects.

RESULTS

Gland drop-out percentage was not statistically different between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.464). Nevertheless, group 1 showed higher grey pixel intensity values than the other groups. Statistically significant correlations were found between gland visibility metrics and gland drop-out percentage. Repeatability was acceptable for all metrics, coefficient of variation achieving values between 0.52 and 3.18. While ocular symptoms decreased with scleral lens wear (p < 0.001), no statistically significant differences were found in gland drop-out percentage (p = 0.157) and gland visibility metrics (p > 0.217).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method can assess meibomian gland visibility in an objective and repeatable way. Scleral lens wear appears to not adversely affect meibomian gland drop-out and visibility while might improve dry eye symptoms after one year of lens wear. These preliminary results should be confirmed with a control group.

How Can We Best Measure the Performance of Scleral Lenses? Current Insights

Scleral lenses (SLs) present several unique advantageous characteristics for patients. As these lenses are mainly fitted in severely diseased eyes, a thorough evaluation of the ocular surface before and after SL fitting and the on-eye SL fitting evaluation are essential and help minimize potential physiological complications. This review will explore the current and emerging techniques and instrumentation to best measure SL performance ensuring optimal lens fitting, visual quality, comfort and physiological responses, highlighting some potential complications and follow-up recommendations. A single physician could perform the great majority of evaluations. Still, the authors consider that the assessment of SL fitting should be a collaborative and multidisciplinary job, involving contact lens practitioners, ophthalmologists and the industry. This publication has reviewed the most up-to-date work and listed the most used techniques; however, the authors encourage the development of more evidence-based recommendations for SL clinical practice.

Dry Eye Symptoms in Individuals With Keratoconus Wearing Contact Lenses

OBJECTIVES

To assess dry eye symptoms associated with different contact lens modalities in patients with keratoconus using a dry eye questionnaire.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed by the National Keratoconus Foundation. The survey asked participants to report demographic characteristics, current optical correction, age at the time of diagnosis of keratoconus, and contact lens history. The 12-item Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was also completed. Data from participants wearing the same contact lens modality bilaterally were analyzed.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 197 individuals wearing the same contact lens modality bilaterally. The average age of participants at the time of the survey was 47.2±14.8 years (range: 15-87 years), and the average age at which keratoconus was diagnosed was 26.1±9.9 years (range: 8-55 years). The mean overall OSDI score of all participants was 40.2±22.8 (range: 0-100). There was no difference in the mean OSDI scores based on current contact lens modality type (F=1.79; n=187; P=0.13). Based on an OSDI score of 33 or higher, 90% of participants reported symptoms indicative of dry eye disease. Scleral lens wearers reported less discomfort on the individual items related to windy and low-humidity conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with keratoconus, irrespective of contact lens modality, report a high incidence of dry eye symptoms.

Improvement of Vision and Ocular Surface Symptoms With a Scleral Lens After Microbial Keratitis

ABSTRACT

A 38-year-old woman, previous daily disposable soft contact lens wearer, reported an episode of microbial keratitis positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa 11 months before contacting the investigators. After acute treatment, she was left with a degree of opacity in the pupillary area, corneal scar, and an irregular corneal profile, with a best spectacle visual acuity of +0.48 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. A scleral lens was able to mask those corneal sequelae and, even considering the corneal opacity, the visual acuity recovered to +0.06 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. The patient was fitted with a 16.4-mm scleral lens and attended several appointments over a 12-month follow-up period. After 12 months of scleral lens wear, the improvement of both high-contrast and low-contrast visual acuities remained stable and a clearing of the corneal opacity was observed. The comfort was assessed with the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, which depicted a comfort enhancement from 75.0 to 47.9 over the short term. The Quality of Vision questionnaire was also administrated and showed an improvement on frequency, severity, and bothersome of the vision-related symptoms over time. Scleral lens may be a good option to improve vision, comfort, and restore the ocular surface function in patients with corneal scars and opacities secondary to microbial keratitis.

Irregular Astigmatism Management Using SPOT Scleral Lenses in the Treatment of Corneal Ectasia and Penetrating Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of SPOT scleral lenses in the management of irregular astigmatism in patients with corneal ectasia and penetrating keratoplasty. Second, we analyzed patients' characteristics and tolerance, comfort, and geometries of fitted lenses.

METHOD

Over a 5-year period, we included patients experiencing irregular astigmatism fitted with SPOT scleral contact lenses, from the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, France. Data collected included corneal diseases, refractive error, best-corrected visual acuity (VA) with SPOT lenses, geometry of the lens, number of adjustment consultations, and the duration of follow-up. Comfort, quality of vision, less handling, and satisfaction were evaluated using visual analog scales after a 6-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included, analyzing 107 eyes. Eighty percent of patients still daily wore lenses after a follow-up of 22.3±13.8 months. Visual acuity improved by 0.47±0.51 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (average increase of 5 lines) (P<0.001) after wearing scleral lenses. Comfort, quality of vision, less handling, and satisfaction of contact lenses were excellent (>75/100). Contact lenses were daily worn 10.0±4.1 hr/day. Most patients wore size M (17 mm) lenses (53.3% of patients), with an average sagittal height of 5.2±1.2 mm. Internal toricity was used in 30% of cases. Best geometry was found after 2.69±0.87 consultations.

CONCLUSION

SPOT scleral contact lenses are an effective and well tolerated method to improve the VA of patients with irregular astigmatism.

Multifocal Electroretinogram in Keratoconus Patients without and with Scleral Lenses

Purpose: To investigate changes in the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) response in eyes with keratoconus when corrected with scleral lenses (SL) compared with the best correction in glasses.Methods: The mfERG responses in 10 eyes with keratoconus were recorded with the best correction using both a trial frame (baseline) and a hexafocon A SL using an electrophysiological diagnostic system. Electrophysiologic measurements were performed with the pupils fully dilated with instillation of 1% phenylephrine. The implicit time (milliseconds), amplitude (nV), and response density (nV/deg²) of the peaks (N1, P1, and N2) were analyzed for the total mfERG response, six rings and four quadrants of the retina, and compared between the two conditions.Results: All eyes had a significant improvement in visual quality with the SL compared with baseline (mean differences, 0.26 ± 0.17 and 0.22 ± 0.13 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution for high- and low-contrast visual acuity, respectively). The peaks implicit times of the mfERG responses did not show significant differences (p > .05). The P1 amplitude decreased in all the retinal areas with the SL. Only the total retinal response and the nasal quadrants reached significance (p ≤ 0.044). The P1 response density in ring 1 was on average higher with the SL, but not significantly so. The decline in P1 response density from the center to the periphery was more abrupt with the SL, and was more similar to the response density distribution of a typical subject, without a corneal pathology.Conclusions: mfERG did not show any change associated with retinal disease in young patients with keratoconus. Although the improved visual performance was not associated with changes in the mfERG response, the correction of irregular astigmatism with the SL helps exclude the optical effect induced by keratoconus.

CLEAR - Scleral lenses

Scleral lenses were the first type of contact lens, developed in the late nineteenth century to restore vision and protect the ocular surface. With the advent of rigid corneal lenses in the middle of the twentieth century and soft lenses in the 1970's, the use of scleral lenses diminished; in recent times there has been a resurgence in their use driven by advances in manufacturing and ocular imaging technology. Scleral lenses are often the only viable form of contact lens wear across a range of clinical indications and can potentially delay the need for corneal surgery. This report provides a brief historical review of scleral lenses and a detailed account of contemporary scleral lens practice including common indications and recommended terminology. Recent research on ocular surface shape is presented, in addition to a comprehensive account of modern scleral lens fitting and on-eye evaluation. A range of optical and physiological challenges associated with scleral lenses are presented, including options for the clinical management of a range of ocular conditions. Future applications which take advantage of the stability of scleral lenses are also discussed. In summary, this report presents evidence-based recommendations to optimise patient outcomes in modern scleral lens practice.