Effect of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy in Dry Eye Disease Caused by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Managing Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Treatment: A Systematic Review

Ocular surface disease (OSD) is a frequent disabling challenge among patients with glaucoma who use benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-containing topical glaucoma medications for prolonged periods. In this comprehensive review, we evaluated the prevalence of OSD and its management, focusing on both current and future alternatives. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria were used to assess a) the impact of active ingredients and preservatives on the ocular surface and b) the efficacy of preservative-free (PF) alternatives and adjunctive therapies. BAK-containing glaucoma medications were found to significantly contribute to OSD by increasing corneal staining, reducing tear film stability, and elevating ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores. Transitioning to PF formulations or those with less cytotoxic preservatives, such as Polyquad® and SofZia®, demonstrated a marked improvement in OSD symptoms. In particular, the use of adjunct cyclosporine A, through its anti-inflammatory and enhanced tear film stability actions, was shown to be very beneficial to the ocular surface. Therefore, the most effective management of OSD is multi-factorial, consisting of switching to PF or less cytotoxic medications, adjunct use of cyclosporine A, and early incorporation of glaucoma surgical treatments such as laser trabeculoplasty, trabeculectomy, glaucoma drainage devices, or minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS).

Long-Term Impacts of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy on Ocular Surface Health and Tear Film Dynamics in Patients with Dry Eye Disease: Detailed Analysis and Observations Over a 1-Year Follow-Up Period

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the long-term effects of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy on patients with dry eye disease (DED) associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

METHODS

A retrospective case series was performed with 110 participants undergoing IPL therapy. Assessments included the eye fitness test (EFT) to gauge subjective symptoms, along with objective measures using the Tearcheck® device (ESW Vision, Houdan, France) noninvasive first breakup time (NIFBUT), noninvasive average breakup time (NIABUT), central tear meniscus height (CTMH), thinnest tear meniscus height (TTMH), and ocular surface inflammatory risk evaluation (OSIE) assessed using the SCHWIND SIRIUS device (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany).

RESULTS

This study documented significant improvements in subjective and objective symptoms associated with DED and MGD. Subjective symptoms measured by the EFT showed an average increase of 9.74 points (range -10 to 28, standard deviation [SD] ± 7.54), indicating reduced symptoms. Objective measures of tear film stability, represented by NIABUT, increased by an average of 4.04 s (range -15.00 to 14.40, SD ± 4.91). Tear film stability evaluation (TFSE) scores decreased by 229.12 points on average (range -1775 to 528, SD ± 384.94), suggesting enhanced tear film stability. OSIE type 1 showed a reduction in inflammation, with a percentage decrease of 4.98% (range -45 to 5, SD ± 7.33). Additionally, OSIE capture time decreased by 3.25 s on average (range -27 to 22, SD ± 10.35), further indicating an improvement in ocular surface health.

CONCLUSION

IPL therapy was shown to be a promising, noninvasive approach for improving quality of life in patients with DED by effectively managing symptoms and stabilizing tear film. The findings support the use of IPL as a sustainable treatment modality for DED associated with MGD.

The photothermal effect of intense pulsed light and LipiFlow in eyelid related ocular surface diseases: Meibomian gland dysfunction, Demodex and blepharitis

The treatment and management of ocular surface diseases have shifted towards a co-treatment approach focusing on overall ocular surface homeostasis. When treating issues related to the eye, it is essential to not only focus on the damaged or disabled areas but also consider the larger picture. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), Demodex infection, and blepharitis all interact at the eyelid site and can cause damage to the ocular surface to varying degrees. Palpebral lesions disrupt the balance of ocular surface homeostasis, leading to dry eye and keratitis. Traditional treatments, such as manual physical hot compress massage, have limited effectiveness due to the structure of the eyelid. However, intense pulsed light (IPL) technology uses penetrating light energy to generate heat energy, which can eliminate inflammation of capillaries or kill Demodex. Additionally, the LipiFlow thermal effect and physical compression provide a more vital and longer-lasting therapeutic effect on MGD by excluding other primary causes of ocular surface inflammation. Therefore, personalized treatment techniques based on photothermal effects may be effective. In the future, IPL and LipiFlow may potentially dismiss immune-inflammation factors causing ocular surface disease or block the delivery of systemic immune-related diseases.

Diamond Bur Microblepharoexfoliation Combined with Intense Pulse Light and Meibomian Gland Expression for Evaporative Dry Eye: A Short-term Controlled Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

To assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of microblepharoexfoliation (MBE), intense pulse light (IPL) and meibomian gland expression (MGX) for treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

METHODS

This was a prospective, parallel-control trial conducted from April 2022 to January 2023. Participants were assigned to receive either three sessions of MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy (treatment group) or home-based therapy alone (control group). Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and after 2-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy eyes of 70 patients were enrolled. MBE-IPL-MGX treatment achieved better improvements than home-based therapy in ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and symptom assessment in dry eye (SANDE) scores, noninvasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT), lipid layer grade (LLG), loss area meibomian gland (LAMG) and meibomian gland yielding secretion score (MGYSS). The mean differences between the two groups were as follows: OSDI (- 11.23 ± 4.68 points, P < 0.001), SANDE (- 24.63 ± 13.41 points, P < 0.001), NIBUT (1.3 ± 1.57 s, P = 0.033), LLG (0.4 ± 0.04 points, P = 0.003), LAMG (- 2.85 ± 1.69%, P = 0.023) and MGYSS (7.5 ± 2.32 points, P < 0.001). In addition, the increment (Δ) of MGYSS after MBE-IPL-MGX treatment was significantly higher in MGD grades 2 and 3 (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MBE-IPL-MGX treatment is an effective and well-tolerated procedure that improves dry eye symptoms and signs as well as meibomian gland secretions in patients with MGD. In addition, this treatment is recommended for MGD grades 2 and 3.

Efficacy of meibomian gland expression combined with Home-Based therapy in the management of dry eye Disease: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of meibomian gland expression (MGX) combined with home-based therapy versus home-based therapy alone for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED) caused by meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled studies (RCTs), reporting the effects of MGX combined with home-based therapy in 2 databases, PubMed and Web of Science, was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The search period was until August 20, 2023. According to the heterogeneity, a random or fixed effects model was performed in the meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated to analyze dry eye symptoms (DES) score, tear film break-up time (TBUT), total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS) and meibomian glands expressibility (MGE). All analyses were performed by RevMan Web, version 5.7. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to analyze the quality of the studies selected.

RESULTS

Two RCTs with a total of 99 patients were included. The studies reported that MGX combined with home-based therapy improves DES score, TBUT, tCFS and MGE compared to the home-based therapy. However, the meta-analysis indicated that MGX combined with home-based therapy only seems to be beneficial in reducing DES score (SMD -0.49; 95 % CI: -0.89 to -0.08; P = 0.02; I2 = 0 %). In addition, although TBUT, tCFS and MGE reported a slight trend in favor of MGX combined with home-based therapy, it was non-significant.

CONCLUSIONS

While MGX combined with home-based therapy seem to show some evidence of alleviating dry eye symptoms, there is insufficient evidence to conclude the effects of this treatment definitively particularly in improving dry eye signs caused by MGD, such as TBUT, tCFS and MGE. Therefore, further RCTs are needed to elucidate these results.

Current application of intense pulsed light for the management of dry eye disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This review explored intense pulsed light (IPL) as an alternative treatment for dry eye disease (DED) symptom relief by correcting tear-film homeostasis. A systematic search was performed in March 2022 on five databases (Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, ProQuest, and EBSCO). Studies were extracted for the following outcomes of interest: standard patient evaluation of eye dryness questionnaire (SPEED), ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear break-up time (TBUT), and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS). All studies published up to March 2022 were reviewed. Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) was used to screen studies for risk of bias where appropriate. A meta-analysis was done to quantify any reported quantitative data. Thirteen studies were included in this study. A total of 931 individuals and 1454 numbers of eyes were reviewed in this meta-analysis. Among studies that explored and reported the effect of IPL in individuals with DED, TBUT and OSDI improved significantly post intervention, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 1.02 [95% CI 0.41-1.64] and 0.28 [95% CI 0.04-0.52], respectively. CFS and SPEED scores, however, showed no statistically significant difference, with an SMD of 0.22 [95% CI -0.19 to 0.64] and 0.28 [95% CI -0.11 to 0.66], respectively. In conclusion, current evidence indicates IPL as a possible adjunctive treatment in individuals with DED in an otherwise limited treatment option. Further studies through more extensive trials are needed to validate this finding and elucidate its mechanism.